Search results matching tag 'US Government'

Ending Wars Adds To Deflation Pressures & Ends Bull Runs

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:52:00 GMT

GLOBAL VIEW. OK, HERE’S THE REAL BIG NEWS! All the above is well and good but the key news was shown on the public broadcasting channel last night, on World Focus which runs at 6 pm my time (the old BBC news, now Americanized as World Focus). I purposely watched it last night to see how they covered President Obama’s big speech to the United Nations. You know with delegates from Iran, Russia, the Middle East and everyone there. He did ok, said the expected, set forth America’s agenda. No surprises. But the surprise was the word the Obama, after getting a general’s recommendation that we need more troops in Afghanistan, is considering some change of strategy. To me that could only mean, if he’s considering NOT sending more troops, he considering cutting back on the troops we have there now.

IN OTHER WORDS, GETTING OUT, ENDING THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN!

Now if that is the case, markets and investors will have to adjust, and the sooner the better. Regular readers will remember that during the later part of the five year bull market run up from 2002 to 2007, I used to write that when we pulled our troops out of Iraq, that would likely spell big trouble for the economy. Slowing it down maybe into recession as the troops came back home and looked for jobs, and thus in turn very likely could be the end point to that bull market. (Of course things do change and while we never did pull troops out of Iraq, we instead got hit by that unexpected ‘Black Swan’ event, the subprime implosion.) Anyway, back then I cited the historical fact that when a cease fire in Viet Nam was announced, in January 1973, the bull run of the previous 2 ½ years (coincidentally?) ended. Basically I’d say because ended the war was deflationary. This is generally the case. After WWII ended there was big fear of a recession as well. Well, in today’s case I imagine the outcome after pulling out of Afghanistan would be similar. When we stop spending money on ammunition and equipment, on troop salaries, on military logistics, etc., etc., etc., that will also lead to a big deflationary economic slowdown, just what we don’t need right now.

Of course, President Obama has to think about more than just the economy, he has to think about the safety of the American people, the safety of our troops and overall for what’s best for the country. Plus, in switching his attention to the war against terror, he might just be buying into the growing feeling that the credit crisis and recession are winding down, buying into the Fed’s SPIN (or the truth) about the economy, so he can look elsewhere and feel that another deflationary force won’t hurt us now. Remember VP Biden said the incoming administration didn’t realize how bad the economic situation was when they first came in office so that might again be the case. Schwartz View: No announcements have been made on what decisions President Obama will make concerning Afghanistan. Right now it’s all Schwartz speculation (and many times I’m early in spotting something new, I think because I read so much.) The administration may just be testing the waters about how a change of strategy would be received. President Obama might indeed follow the military’s recommendation and just send more troops there. But I doubt it, logic says Afghanistan is unconquerable. And with a new US president we could have a new US strategy.

Good Time To Sell. Following this train of thought, I have to say today or soon is another logically good time to take more money off the table. Ending wars generally lead to deflationary results and the first market participants that pick up on this trend will benefit the most. Again, a ‘first mover’s’ advantage. Plus please remember the many years in development SCHWARTZ RULE: "MOVE EARLY!" That applies to buying or selling.

NET, NET, I’D REVIEW PORTFOLIOS & FIND AREAS TO DO SOME MORE SELLING!!!

To Stimulate Or Not To Stimulate The US Economy

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:29:00 GMT

ANTI-Stimulus Protest Demonstrations; Say What?

That’s a big global fear surrounding this global economic slump. History shows economic debacles like this breed unrest, anger, frustration among those losing their jobs, etc. and thus protest demonstrations. If one watches www.worldfocus.com or any other news global news show, you’ll see violent protests happening globally. In Eastern Europe as one example. In China too and especially. China’s government’s big fear, knowing it’s own history, is protests which bring down the government there. Making the upturn in global protests there and elsewhere important for all investors to track.

Yesterday’s Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) newspaper had a front page article reporting that anti-stimulus demonstrations have occurred in 35 American cities. Yes, these are small demonstrations so far, 100 or 200 people and organized by interest groups, but maybe they will grow in size after IBD gave them face time, i.e. publicity -- I hadn’t even heard about these protests at all until yesterday -- and also gave them such a nationalistic and catchy name: “Nationwide Tea Parties.” I read where these events are being organized by those groups who sarcastically say we should: “Legalize Capitalism!” Or who believe: “The best government, governs least.” And those who sardonically and exaggeratedly say: “No to socialism!” And are epitomized by one protestor’s sign which read: “Your mortgage is not my problem!”

Obviously US government stimulus spending to try to keep this weakened economy from getting worse is anathema to those who believe in the strict Austrian school of economics. That economic school says things just get screwed up terribly whenever the government gets involved. And who knows, maybe doing nothing, to try to shorten this downturn, was indeed the right move. But as I see it it’s too late now; we’re already committed. I’ve given up opining on what were the right and wrong roads to follow but let me also report there are a lot of other angry people in America today, those that say they are tired of lavish retreats and concerts, tired of private jets, tried of companies paying out huge bonuses with or without government money. Regular readers know I’ve been angry and pounding the table for many years about these excesses. So maybe we do or will have class warfare, that is if these anti-stimulus demonstrations get larger and cause more of a divide among all kinds of angry Americans.

Schwartz View: But as I see it, we’re now committed to this “bail out” path, we got committed a year ago when we bailed out the first company, Bear Stearns or whoever came first. This far along this path I can’t foresee us stopping now. Plus it only makes common sense for any government to try to stimulate the economy when the two other major sources of normal demand, consumer spending and business investment, are in total hunker down mode. The even bigger picture, as I see things from up on the mountaintop looking down at the valley and what’s happening, is that these demonstrations by those who say your problem is not my problem, are the last desperate efforts by those who still believe in the “me first” path America has been on for roughly three decades now. As I see it, the results of the recent US presidential election announced that the majority of Americans want big change in America, a change which returns the America Dream to the average working person once again and returns us to a more level playing field. And that means, even though there is some opposition, that America has now crossed the Rubicon, so to speak. Meaning we’ve just begun a 10-year or so cycle which puts public interest over private interest. History shows we do swing back and forth from longer periods, or about 20 years, of letting capitalism run unchecked and America showing strong economic growth as a result to shorter periods of about 10 years or so where we put the unfortunate and forgotten Americans first, which yes, also means slower economic growth as a result. (Please read Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s THE CYCLES OF AMERICAN HISTORY if you’d like more on this repetitive cycle.) All signs that I can detect today tell me that America is going to level the playing field, get rid of the excesses, the corruption and scamming of the system, in general just the overall greed which always naturally arises from allowing capitalism unchecked to run for too darn long. Again, I’m just observing what I see happening not opining whether it’s right or not. As for investment implications, for now stay hunkered down, practice extreme patience and proper money management while out waiting this Papa Bear market.

To subscribe to my daily letter PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET or to receive a week’s worth of FREE letters, please email me at RichardStk@oaol.com.

Good trading, speculating and investing!

What Obama Rally?

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:04:00 GMT

WHAT OBAMA RALLY? The Obama Rally hasn’t proven to be have much substance, at least not yet. If we track stock prices back to Election Day, November 4^th, the stock market hasn’t done much, in fact the S&P 500, the pro’s benchmark, is down -13.43%. Then, since Inauguration Day, January 20^th, again the stock market hasn’t gone anywhere either, the S&P is down -1.59%. But I still have hope. At look at my wall charts, or anywhere access charts, shows the stock market in general is down near the bottom end of its last three month trading range. But not broken below! So for aggressive traders the odds say now or soon is a good time to buy, to go long, for a bounce at least to the top end. Of course, only for those traders who can pull the trigger on losses if the bottom end of this range suddenly falls out. (Many say they are traders but can’t get themselves to sell when they are supposed to, can’t stand taking losses.)

A Target Date For Traders. We also now have a target date to shoot at which is always helpful. Remember the original target date to unload after the year end Santa Claus rally was the first couple of days of 2009, which looking back proved a perfect strategy with the Dow topping out on the first trading day of the year, Friday, January 2^nd and giving us a second chance to sell above Dow 9000 on the following Tuesday, January 6^th. Since then, nada. Stocks have fallen sharply the rest of January, closing below 8000 last Tuesday & kicking off trading today at Dow 8116.03. Past history, not to be forgotten, let’s move on.

Stimulus Plan Passing. Now we have passing the very important, about $800 billion dollar, economic stimulus plan to shoot at as a “selling on the fact” date. In other words, an opportunity to buy stocks here, the stocks which should benefit from the government money going towards specific industry niches and sectors. So I’ve been compiling a list of potential beneficiaries which I want to unveil this morning. My suggestion is to buy a couple of even a package of the below stocks with the plan to sell them when a bill passes Congress. Right now I hear the target date to get a plan passed is mid-February. The backup plan, in the stock market we always need an exit plan and a backup plan when we get involved, is to sell half on bill passage and keep half if the stock market has convinced us that the last three months was indeed base building and we’ve started off on a new short term or cyclical, mini bull market, encompassed in our larger secular bear market.

SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES. This is the area where we need to modernize America’s electricity/power transmission system. As Michael Morris, CEO of American Electric Power detailed recently our power grid was originally built piecemeal by local utilities and designed to serve only local regions. Thus it’s “far from being an efficient national-delivery system” and “hasn’t seen significant investment for more than 30 years.” The concept is we need a more powerful nationwide transmission system to get power from one part of the country to another, where needed. Especially now that we’re also going to bring online new renewable energy sources like wind and solar. If we could shoot the solar power generated in the desert to population centers with the flick of a switch, consider the efficiencies.

So first off, here’s some choices by Seeking Alpha, a boutique research firm:

Price Mkt Cap Wall Street Ranking Business Line

COMV Comverge $4.16 91m 7 buys, 6 holds Demand response provider

ENOC EnerNOC 9.11 184m 8 buys, 6 holds, 1 sell Demand response provider

ITRI Itron 60.01 2068m 9 buys, 8 sells Smart meter reader

Schwartz View: The concept is for grants to utilities for projects which allow utilities and their customers “… to track and manage the flow of energy more effectively, curb peak demand, reduce blackouts and integrate renewable energy and storage (including electric and plug-in hybrid vehicle batteries) into the grid.” I’m big on this as it makes good sense to me. We need a modern, cutting edge transmission system. Disclaimer! I own small pieces of all three companies above, either in my own IRA or in my trading accounts. And can and do change positions quickly and without notice.

RENEWABLE ENERGY. This is the part of the plan which provides money and tax credits for renewable energy providers and research and development in energy conservation and energy efficiency. Two companies poised to benefit from clean, green renewable energy companies, according to a Bloomberg article authored by Thomas Black on December 17^th are:

AKNS Akeena Solar 2.00 58m 1 buy, 6 holds Solar energy

CREE Cree, Inc 19.80 1752m 7 buys, 5 holds, 4 holds Energy efficient lighting

Schwartz View: I don’t know why the only solar stock on Mr. Black’s list was a penny stock. So beware! But there are lots and lots of solar stocks which could benefit led by market leader First Solar (FSLR), so let me expand this list.

FSLR First Solar, Inc. 139.05 11,275m 27 buys, 8 holds, 2 sells Thin-film tech solar modules

ENER Energy Conversion 24.79 1133m 7 buys, 10 holds, 3 sells Thin-film solar laminates

SPWRA SunPower Corp 28.80 2153m 21 buys, 11 holds, 3 sells Integrated solar products

INFRASTRUCTURE. Besides our electric power transmission grid another part of America’s infrastructure which needs rebuilding and modernizing is our transportation system originally built by President Eisenhower in the 1950s. It’s in dire need now and President Obama plans to spend the largest sum of money since it was built on updating it. Again, this is pointed not only to creating jobs now and in forthcoming years but will put us where we want to end up, with a modern system capable of helping America stay globally competitive in shipping our goods around the country and overseas. Some companies I’ve read about, and common sense tells us will benefit, are:

CAT Caterpillar 32.67 19,707m 7 buys, 13 holds, 3 sells Earth moving equipment

CX Cemex SAB 8.33 6768m 3 buys, 9 holds, 3 sells Big cement provider

CRH CRH plc 24.08 12,818m 1 buy, 1 hold Irish cement co covers US

MTW Manitowoc Co 6.21 809m 3 buys, 8 holds, 2 sells Maker of assorted cranes

QUIX Quixote 4.03 37m 1 buy, 2 holds Highway safety products

TEX Terex Corp 13.94 1322m 8 buys, 8 holds Heavy duty trucks/cranes

ENGINEERING. There are numerous other sectors which should benefit in rebuilding our roads, bridges, national parks. Some engineering firms are:

JEC Jacobs Engineering 40.56 4986m 9 buys, 5 holds, 2 sells Construction management

FLR Fluor Corp 41.04 7449m 11 buys, 4 holds, 3 sells Construction services

ABB ABB Limited 12.20 28,338m 9 buys, 0 holds, 1 sell Power technologies.

Disclaimer! I don’t own any of the remaining 14 stocks above. But I’m watching them and may buy some and/or change positions quickly and without notice at any time.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. There are lots more companies which should benefit. So I plan on providing more names all this week in this space, stay tuned. But generally, this trading and possible investment idea is based on “Trader Vic” Sperandeo’s view (read his two books) that government intervention changes the ground rules of the game and thus provides eagle-eyed traders with money making opportunities. Opportunities for those investors who understand the underlying economic principle involved and then time their moves properly. I agree. Money should flow to some companies for years, buttressing their businesses while other parts of our economy suffer. By the way, big China advocate is basically doing the same for himself, but over in China. China has a major stimulus plan in place also and in fact is implementing it much faster than here in the US because of their command style of capitalism. Rogers sees agricultural, water and infrastructure in China as not even knowing a global recession is on. The play here is similar.

Good trading, speculating and investing!

Monday Weekly Strategy

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Patience: Outlast This Bear Market

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 1^st, 2008: Since Lucy’s birthday was a Round Number & fell on Thanksgiving, everyone surprised her & came back Friday for tea. At the Tea House in the village, a reconverted barn on a hill with a great view of the mountain, a view I hadn’t seen before. Almost everywhere in town has a mountain view which makes me feel like I live in Lake Placid, another charming mountain town. Love it!

PS. I caught a bug which I’m working through today but possibly no letter tomorrow if I feel worse.

THE BIG PICTURE

I spent Thanksgiving evening discussing the past, present and future with my son Brian. In essence he asked me for a simple explanation of what caused the stock market to drop so much, what terms like deregulation, re-regulation, privatization, etc. mean & what the big picture looks like. Here’s my answer:

Let’s start with the two classical economic theories of thought. One, let free markets operate on their own, the old Austrian school of economics as promulgated in the early and mid 1900s by Friedrich Hayek versus two, getting government involved in the economy as advocated during the same time period by John Maynard Keynes. Both gentlemen lived through both world wars, the Great Depression and for decades beyond and their influence ebbed and flowed. Both economic theories had their time to shine, alternating roughly 30 year periods. The last totally free market cycle began its ascendancy when President Ronald Regan was elected to office in 1980. Since then union’s power has declined dramatically, corporate statesmen who shared equitably corporate wealth have became obsolete and bottom line profit became the only goal which caused stock price to rule business actions. During this long run in a totally free market direction whereby prosperity grew larger and larger spreading out to millions worldwide, normal prudence, probity and recognition of investment risk ultimately got lost. Greed took over completely when Wall Street came up with its latest round of newfangled, supposedly sophisticated investments, especially those incorporating securitization. Securitization just meaning turning all types of debt into securities which could be sold while spinning off huge commission style profits to everyone involved in the process or food chain. This, along with the 30-year trend to more and more deregulation, allowed commercial banks into previously banned investment areas, using heretofore unheard of leverage which caused capitalism to finally go off the deep end. By this I mean a 20% correction in our overheated, overdone, overblown US residential housing boom led to a bust after one bank woke up one day last summer to huge paper losses which soon showed everyone else was stuck with similar losses. This blow off following by an implosion and meltdown are the types of culminating events which cause these 30-year cycles to start swinging in the other direction. I now believe we’re just started a new long term swing away from free market economics as advocated by Mr. Hayek and towards a government role in economics as advocated by Mr. Keynes.

Summing up, we’ve just gone through that part of the long cycle which allows capitalism to run unfettered and thus grows the pie for everyone. The downside is that the gap between the rich and poor grows ever larger when we practice laissez-faire capitalism, essentially letting the marketplace alone which leads to the strongest doing best. But cycles are cycles and all eventually go to extremes and then swing the other way. Again, as I see it, we’ve just gone to one extreme and are now just beginning to cycle the other way, down the path whereby government steps in and applies regulations to the latest, most egregious ways of gaming the system. Which interferes with the magic of letting the free marketplace find its own proper price levels between consumers and producer providers and thus drags down the overall efficiency of the market. The rationale is that something has to be done to avoid another rare but normal breakdown by capitalism. Net, net our free market capitalistic system normally goes from one extreme to another, that deregulation goes so far it causes problems, then re-regulation sets in. With privatization or the selling off of previously government run businesses or business sectors being one form or aspect of deregulation. Thus, the last year’s breakdown and implosion in our financial system didn’t really show free market capitalism doesn’t work anymore, it just shows we’ve come to the end of the normal continuing pendulum swing out to one extreme and are now starting the long journey back to a middle ground and then out to the other extreme.

THE ECONOMY

Not much to comment about on the economy today.. We’re in that middle time period of this bear market and at the start of an economic downturn. Thus I expect the economic data, corporate earning reports and most other news to be pretty consistently bad for some time to come yet. One rule we do know about how the stock market operates and how it relates to the economy is that stocks turn up a few months before the economy does (with exceptions). So finding a bear market bottom will incorporate more than just watching the data. Waiting for the economic data to turn positive will make most investors months late in reentering the stock market. Schwartz View: Thus, myself, I watch the charts and believe in what I’ve espoused for many years, that charts tell you when to buy and then the fundamentals confirm down the road.

THE STOCK MARKET

Mr. Stock Market keeps trying its best to rally now. Last week the economic data was just plain awful and stocks rallied anyway. I wrote previously that stocks refusing to go down on bad news would be a good clue that the market has gone down enough, at least for the moment. Still, some remaining problems are: (1) I don’t see a proper base to support a big rally, unless I’m getting tricked by the undercutting of that possible base built from October 10^th through November 19^th, (2) I don’t see any improved fundamentals and still expect lots more bad news to become known next year and (3) history shows after financial glitches and consumer confidence losses of this magnitude bear markets and recessions following lead to once-in-a-generation market declines which don’t get over in just one year, roughly the time period we’ve seen this bear market last for so far. Yes, big bad bear markets generally last at least a year and a half to two years to even three years. Also this bounce reminds me very much of numerous temporary previous V-bottoms and short lasting rallies we’ve seen over the last few months. But a rally is a rally is a rally. And we have to play them. Eventually one rally will morph into the next bull market. Thus the key is to always keep sight of the Big Picture. Today the big picture perspective shows we’re firmly entrenched in a big bad bear market. So, in general strategy should be to sell and sell short rallies instead of buying dips. But when rallies periodically begin, we should modestly go along with them,, go with the flow, one toe in the water. That way if any rally proves to have legs we’ll start profiting immediately and know about it right away. But not to jump in with both feet because primary bear markets, just like primary bull markets, do reassert themselves, and until proven differently, it’s a whole lot easier to profit swimming with any tide or trend than swimming into it. Schwartz View: I’m trying to find a technical reason, say a good looking chart pattern at least, to buy a particular sector, but so far no luck. The one bullish trend which I see today is in the US dollar. Strength began back in mid-July and thus when strength continued past the three month normal max time frame identifying a bear market rally, or past mid-October in this case, and kept on going, I termed the strength as a new bull market. Otherwise everything else looks like iffy trends.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Strategy remains one of outlasting this bear market. Of proving you have more patience than Mr. Bear Market does. This is a difficult job which will test your discipline again and again if the past is any guide (which I believe it is). Over time you’ll be tempted to buy back in again and again whether you see a believable bear market bottom or not. Especially if you’re one who really watch stocks, the whole Wall Street show, daily. So continue to do any irresistible buying and or investing in a much smaller, subdued manner. Keep just enough money in the stock market to keep you interested and not so much that future declines can put you out of the game and out of business. And stay tuned here to find the real bottom.

Have a good week!

Where Now Inflation?

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:39:00 GMT

THE FIRST INFLATION SURGE IN 25 YEARS IS OVER. So, what now?

First, let me give credit when credit is due. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed finally got one right. They’ve been promising us moderating inflation for a year or more and now with -30% lower crude oil prices and a big general commodity collapse we’re finally we’re seeing it happen. Or, at least, starting to (most things economic happen with a lag). And with the US dollar now surging, that’s going to reverse/diminish rising, problematic imported inflation as well. So now the deflationists out there, those who say deflation is our real problem facing us for some time – Gary Shilling, Robert Prechter, Ron Insana to name just three -- can really have their time in the sun.

Still, there remains some debate whether problematic rising inflation is going quiescent. Mac Courtenay of Seeking Alpha, I guess a boutique research firm, offers up seven reasons why inflation isn’t going away:

1. Inflation is already firmly entrenched. Schwartz View: I agree. I’ve been observing the Fed’s incessant jawboning that inflation expectations remain low is wrong and we all know that the government’s inflation data is terrible skewed to the downside from what inflation really is.

2. Inflation is already here. Schwartz View: The Producer Price Index (PPI) is up +9.8% over last year, and that’s only what the government grudgingly admits to.

3. Inflation is now moving its way through the “food chain” showing up in consumer prices as well. After some hope that because of global competition (globalization) producers would eat the higher inflation. Schwartz View: This rippling through is evidenced by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising too, again up the fastest in 17 years.

4. Average weekly earnings fell in July the largest since 1990. Schwartz View: I’d guess Mr. Courtenay’s point is that when earnings drop, we can’t buy as much. ???

5. More and more Federal Reserve governors are talking about raising interest rates next, not lowering them. Especially if we see energy prices stabilize above $100 and bounce. Schwartz View: Of course, these Fed officials, meeting again next Tuesday, can change their views.

6. Global (food?) consumption patterns are heading higher. Schwartz View: I don’t know if author Courtenay is talking about food, metals or just what. But I agree with him on food. As people get a little money, one of the first things they spend it on is more and better food. Thus global food consumption patterns should keep heading higher even if the global economy recesses.

7. The markets will take charge. If the Fed doesn’t raise rates, the marketplace will raise them. Schwartz View: Not sure about this reason he positing for inflation staying problematic. Right now the markets, the long US Treasury market, is still forecasting a slowdown by yields going lower and lower, which to me means more disinflation ahead, not rising inflation.

Schwartz View: He goes on to say part of oil’s recent comeuppance, coming down, is forced hedge fund liquidation because of Congressional pressure (I agree). And that it’s a great time to buy TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and the easiest way is to buy the symbol TIP. And to buy commodities on this correction, recommending also symbols DBC (a basket of commodities) and GDX (gold). Myself, while I believe this commodity pullback is indeed a correction, I think it’s too early to buy them back.

Schwartz BIG PICTURE Inflation View. My belief, garnered from studying stock market history and looking at thousands of charts over the last 20+ years, is that when any new trend begins, many times it begin with a surge in the new direction, then a pullback or at least a pause, sort of to regroup, consolidate gains, make believers out of disbelievers, open the eyes of others who are slow to see and just basically kill enough time to see if the new trend has legs. Then after this pullback correction, which more often than not can be large and long lasting, runs its course, the new trend reasserts itself.

Basically that’s where I see us today with rising inflation, in a pause to refresh. I’ve theorized over the last year than oil and other commodities would stay stronger, longer than most thought this year. I’d say that proved correct with oil going up all the way to about $147 and related sectors like natural gas, energy services, solar, wind and other alternative clean green leading the stock market for the whole first half of 2008. Similar to what happened during the first year of the last severe Papa Bear stock market back in 1973-1874 (oil stayed high the first year). But now, with commodities reversing downward and in major correction, it’s obvious change has occurred, that a pause to refresh is underway. And we can expect this new trend to last longer and correct deeper than many would think I’d venture. Sure, first because commodities are inherently extremely volatile, much more so than stocks and bonds. But also because of the emerging new, macroeconomic backdrop. We seem to be in line for a major, global economic slowdown which will throw a big detour on the road to a new long term trend to rising global inflation. If the global economy really goes blah for the next few years, commodities will take a longer than expected breather. Schwartz View: Still I’m in agreement with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan who predicted in his 2007 book The Age of Turbulence that we live in an inflationary world and that the disinflation trend dominating all during his tenure as Fed chief is coming to an end. And I’m in agreement also with famed, global investor Jim Rogers who says commodities normally correct 50% or more and that’s what we’re seeing now, a correction not the end, to this so far about 9-year commodity bull market.

Reasons For a Summer Rally

RichardSchwartz — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:22:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Written Wednesday, July 30th, 2008: 6:30 am EST.

Another ‘flashy-splashy’ rally yesterday So typical of bear markets, especially those with much further in time and points to go. Grizzly bear markets thrive on investors’ hope and adamant investor reluctance to believe things can get worse. Bear markets end when that hope is gone. Anyway, everyone jumped on board the stock market yesterday, figuring that, once again, the credit crunch is over or at least winding down. I doubt that and really doubt that the nine month bear market is over but one never knows the future for sure so we always have to keep an open mind.

A SCHWARTZ RECAP. Bulls, still fighting this bear market, did a great job of spinning (it’s always easier to spin when there is a germ of truth) that Merrill Lynch’s capital raising move yesterday and more billions in write offs showed we’re in the “end game” of this crisis. That Merrill selling some distressed assets, doing what no one has wanted to do, selling out and thus setting a low market price, about 20 cents on the dollar, for some of their CDO’s, means that everyone else may be forced to follow suit and thus that will call an end to the prevailing uncertainty. But this game doesn’t end with Merrill alone, this may just be the beginning of the end, which, as we all know, can go on seemingly interminably. And subprime write downs are now just one piece of the now larger and still spreading problem, although a big part I admit. And subprime sell offs at whatever price would have been better if done many months ago, following the old Wall Street rule which Wall Street, when pressed, totally disregarded: “The first loss is the best loss.” Not many are noting the awful details either, that Merrill is paying Temasek Holdings, a Singapore-owned SWF (no, not meaning Single White Female!), a sovereign wealth fund to buy more stock. Previously Temasek bought Merrill stock and lost a bundle. Thus in this deal Merrill is now paying Temasek a cool $2.5 billion to offset some of Temasek’s losses on that first buy. Plus Merrill is financing the deal for Temasek and this deal will increase and dilute Merrill’s outstanding shares by 36%. And, ironically, the sale of these CDO’s are at a price lower than Merrill’s just announced mark-to-market quarterly earnings report and stated value. Finally, this whole new deal flies in the face of what John Thain, Merrill’s relatively new boss, has said previously, that Mother Merrill wouldn’t need or be raising any new capital. Schwartz View: Net, net, some say Merrill is a goner, that it will have to be taken over down the road some. I don’t know any details but agree with the concept, that brokers will have to merge.

TECHNICAL VIEW. IBD PUTS THE BULL BACK IN THE BOX!

Yep, yesterday was a bullish “follow-through” day according to Investor’s Business Daily (IBD). On the 11^th day, pretty late, after the recent July 14^th bottom, a number of key market indices followed through yesterday, that is rallied more than +1.7% and on heavier trading volume than the day before. Obviously lower oil has been the underlying linchpin to this rally; oil down stocks up and vice versa. Schwartz View: My stated view is that this drop in oil will help stocks for a time, for the time it takes investors to realize that lower oil isn’t going to be the panacea for this bearish stock market. That at some point lower oil will scare the pants off investors (so to speak) because they will see lower oil as confirmation that a recession is here and spreading globally. But we’ll have to wait on this theory of mine as for now lower oil does means higher stock prices.

IBD goes on to remind us that: “Every bull market in Wall street history started with a follow-through. But not every follow-through launches a new bull market.” I believe their stats but also know IBD has put the bull back in the box and then had to take it out a few days or a week or so later a couple times during the last few months. So, remember, nothing, no particular indicator, is perfect, by any means.

More Reasons For a Rally. But I’ve also been writing that the market is oversold, that the US government has come up with a boat load of temporary fixes and props to support the stock market including the stimulus plan, unprecedented lending to non-banks and barring short selling or at least making it extremely difficult to short the financials (the SEC extended this one week ban to August 12^th yesterday). And that a historical study of the pace of declines during extended bear markets show the market is now ahead of itself on the downside. Plus I must say I am impressed by many European stock markets posting a sequence of five straight up days after an extended, inexorable, grinding-lower decline, i.e. a bullish Trader Vic 4-Day Rule and change of intermediate trend. So we could certainly have a summer rally now.

Schwartz View: Myself I’d like to see and have written that a Dow Industrials and S&P 500 close above last Wednesday’s highs would give us a series of higher highs and higher lows, the definition of an uptrend. Well, we didn’t get quite that high a close yesterday another good day or two could do it. As for “Trader Vic’s” as easy as 1-2-3 change of trend, we have condition #1, a broken downtrend line and condition #2, a market which has stopped going down in place. We don’t have, as of yet, condition #3, that’s the higher high I’m watching for. Still, Trader Vic Sperandeo in his two excellent books from the early 1990s, get them, writes we don’t need all three, we can turn bullish with just one or two conditions met. Just be more cautious in proceeding and realize there’s always the chance for a whipsaw and have a backup plan for what you’ll do if that happens, how fast you’ll backtrack. With those caveats in mind, I put on some longs yesterday, not a lot and not terribly risky ones. Basically my theme is that as crude and other commodities correct, pressure should come off the food companies, off their raw material and input and power costs. And that at the same time these pressures diminish, food companies are successfully pushing through price increases such as mentioned by Kraft yesterday. If this summer rally holds together, say we get a new higher high by the Dow and S&P, I’ll push the envelope for short term trading purposes further.