Search results matching tag 'GDP'

We Won't Get Fooled Again!

ChuckButler — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:26:36 GMT

..But First, A Word From Our Sponsor..
Gain exposure to currencies of emerging BRIC countries-and don't lose a dime on market risk

Don't let market risk get in the way of potentially rewarding exposure to the BRIC currencies. Our 3-year MarketSafe® BRIC CD shields you from any market risk and provides 100% principal protection on deposits held until maturity.

* 4 BRIC currencies: Brazilian real, Russian ruble, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi
* High upside potential
* No market risk to deposited principal
* Low $1,500 minimum deposit

Some experts believe these 4 countries may become economic powerhouses in coming years. Now could be the right time to add these currencies to your portfolio. And you can do so-safely-with the U.S. denominated MarketSafe BRIC CD.

Don't miss this unique opportunity. Deadline to buy the BRIC MarketSafe CD is Dec. 3rd, 2009. Apply today or learn more at http://www.everbank.com/001CertificatesMSBRIC.aspx?referId=11808
.

In This Issue..

* Bernanke digs out some old words...
* Risk on, Risk off...
* Brazil to have a different meeting outcome?
* Winter Olympics are in Canada...

And Now... Today's Pfennig!

We Won't Get Fooled Again!

Good day... And a Terrific Tuesday to you! What a ride on Mr. Toad (Bernanke's) Wild Ride yesterday for the currencies! Gold? Well, at one point in the day, Gold had shot up $24 on the day! It topped out at $1,142... The shiny metal then gave some back on profit taking, but Whew! Gold holders have got to love it! Those that keep waiting for a pull-back... Well, they might be still waiting when the cows come home...

Yesterday, we had a couple of Fed Heads talking, but the Big Kahuna, stood out, and moved the markets with his statements... Here's the skinny...

Big Ben was giving a speech, and said that "The Fed will monitor closely the currencies, and that the Fed's policies will ensure that the dollar is strong." Now, when he first uttered those words, the dollar got bought and the non-dollar currencies were sold... But then, a few of us had this feeling... It was a feeling that we had heard all this before... And there... In the archives, circa June 2008... Bernanke said, "In collaboration with our colleagues at the Treasury, we continue to carefully monitor developments in foreign exchange markets." Wait! We won't get fooled again!

In June 2008, his statements spooked the markets into believing the Fed was really going to do something to bolster the dollar... But when nothing came along, the dollar REALLY got sold until the financial meltdown of August 2008... I mean... What has the Fed done in the past 1 1/2 years to "bolster the dollar"? Near zero interest rates that will remain in place for longer than they should... Quantitative easing... A Bloated balance sheet of toxic bonds...

You could see the V-8 moments on traders' faces when they realized, yesterday, that all this had been said before, and nothing came of it, so... Meet the new boss... Same as the old boss... We Won't Get Fooled Again! No No!

So, then traders reversed their buying of the dollar and sent the dollar to the woodshed... You should have seen the reversal... It was amazing... The Big Dog, euro, went from 1.4970 to 1.4860, and then turned around to rise to 1.50! ... Now, overnight, there has been some renewed selling of the non-dollar currencies, and the euro is back to 1.4910... Crazy... But not as crazy as Big Ben spouting off about "monitoring the currencies"... Yeah, right... And what are you going to do about them when they get out of line, Big Ben? Get the ruler out? I'll tell you what he'll do... Nothing... Absolutely nothing!

Memo to Big Ben... Ahem... Am I on? Ok, long time listener, first time caller... Big Ben... Just what policies are you talking about that will keep the dollar strong? In the future, you might want to list them, so that people like that Chuck Butler, doesn't rip your comments to shreds for their lack of truth, and facts...

Non-voting Fed Head, Fisher, had this to say yesterday... "Our job is to maintain the purchasing power of the dollar, while fostering the conditions that enable the economy to grow without fanning inflation." Hmmm I would say that he's got that right... But, apparently, somewhere along the way, the part about "maintaining the purchasing power of the dollar" got lost, eh? I mean, since the Fed / cartel was formed in 1913, the dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power... YIKES! Most people that did their jobs that badly would be fired/ let go... These guys have had almost 100 years to figure this out, and have failed miserably... And hey! Before I get accused of something (I'm always accused of something, with everything I say), Fed Head Fisher was the one that described the Fed Heads' job, not me!

OK... While I'm on this subject of being accused... I have been beating on the U.S. administration for 9 years, folks... I know I've really stepped it up with the step up of deficit spending by this administration, but, I chastised the previous administration beginning with their protectionism measures in 2000, and never let up, with their deficit spending... Someone even said I never talked about Cheney and his "Deficits Don't Matter"... WHAT? I've even repeated the same joke several times about the Deficits don't Matter crowd, and that they remind me of a guy standing on the Empire State Building, he decides to jump off, and as he passes the 56th floor, he says... "So far, so good!"

Yes, so far, so good, because he hadn't hit the concrete to go splat yet... And neither had the deficits crowd... But they will, and in fact, they are getting awfully close to the concrete right now!

Well... Enough of that... I just get so ticked off sometimes... I write, and write, and people say I didn't say this or that... Don't know what else to say... So, I'll go on...

The U.S. economy got a boost yesterday when Retail Sales grew at a faster rate than forecast, growing 1.4% in October, above the 0.9% rise projected by Wall Street. The jump came on rebounding demand for cars, a sign the economy kept recovering despite climbing unemployment. Aside from automobiles in October, other sales rose just 0.2%.

But... Are these numbers suspicious? Well, when you look at the previous month's revision, you have to question these numbers as well... September Retail Sales, which were reported as -1.5%, actually fell -2.3%... I wonder what this number's revision next month has in store...

Today, the data cupboard is stocked to the brim with data prints... Producer Price Index (PPI) prints along with two of my faves, Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization... And then the Big Kahuna of the day... The TIC's data... For those of you new to class, The TIC's data stands for Treasury International Capital... Or... Easier to understand... It's the fancy, schmancy name for Net Security Purchases by Foreigners... This is how we track, how well we're doing as a county at financing our ever expanding deficit...

I made a mistake yesterday when talking about the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and saying that if they didn't hike rates in December, that they would most likely come back in January at hike them... A reader pointed out to me that the RBA doesn't meet in January... OK... So, I guess I should have said that the RBA would hike at their next scheduled meeting!

Speaking of the RBA... They issued their latest meeting minutes, in which they sounded less hawkish than one would expect, since they raised rates at the same meeting... But this less hawkish tone, set off a round of Risk Aversion once again in the currency markets overnight... Risk on, Risk off, is reminding me of a Wayne and Garth street hockey game...

For, it's Risk on, one day, and Risk off the next day... So, while I find that the RBA minutes did set off this round of Risk off for the currencies, I don't see it having lasting power... Look for this all to fade, especially if we get a rogue data print in the U.S. today...

Late last week, I came across a story on the dollar that I totally forgot to talk about yesterday... So, here you go... Oh, by the way, strap yourself in for this one, and keep your arms and legs inside during the ride...

The German government's 5-person council of economic advisers issued a report that said, "After the massive global increase in U.S. dollar reserves in the past years, an "uncontrolled exit", especially in emerging economies from the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency is a possible trigger of instability in currency markets." The went on to say...

"Countries holding "high" dollar reserves should consider committing to selling their dollar holdings in a coordinated way over a longer period of time."

The folks over at the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) think that Bernanke's speech yesterday, basically gave the green light for a further, slow, gradual decline of the dollar... And, quite frankly, that's what traders would prefer to see too, given that they don't like getting whipsawed day in and day out by the Risk on, Risk off game... When assets go to fast one way or the other, it just causes strong corrections, and people get hurt by the movements... But a slow, gradual decline I would think would be the preference of the U.S. Gov't... That way, no one notices... It's not like a bubble that grows and everyone notices it...

Speaking of bubbles... And if you're like me, when I type, or say bubbles, I immediately think of Big Al Greenspan... Well, you'll love this Fed Head statement about bubbles... Here's Fed Head Kohn... "Asset price bubbles can be spotted when they become extreme, efforts to spot bubbles may result in seeing more than there is."

Now that statement plays well with Big Al Greenspan, who always claimed that bubbles could not be spotted before they got out of hand... Basically, what these two are saying in different ways is that the Fed could spot them, but probably wouldn't like it, and wouldn't have much at their disposal to do about it, so they just turn away...

And speaking of such... Fed Head Yellen said last night that the "U.S. stock market is not overvalued"... That's all I'll say about that!

OK... Hopefully, you are still with me here, and reading... And you will recall me going on and on about China and their FX currency swap agreements and how that was a baby step toward gaining a wider use of the renminbi... Well... Yesterday, there was a story, that I think Ty told me about, that talks about China preparing to float the renminbi, testing it in Hong Kong... The Chinese government has been moving to allow banks in Hong Kong to issue bonds, hold deposits, and settle trade with the mainland -- all in renminbi.

However, don't look for this conversion to a floating currency to happen soon... Financial analysts believe it will not happen before 2020... It may come sooner... But I wouldn't get all lathered up that it happens in the next year!

One of the best performing currencies VS the dollar this year, has been the Brazilian real, with a greater than 30% gain, so far... There's been a shakeup at the Brazilian Central Bank, and there will be a few new members, with voting power at the next meeting on December 9th... I still don't think the Brazilian real interest rate will be moved at this meeting, but with the new members, they might want to make a "statement" about how hawkish they are... And on December 10th, Brazil will print their 3rd QTR GDP, which I would think would be quite strong... You would have to think that the Central Bank will have privy to this report before they meet on the 9th... And with the new members possibly wanting to make a statement, there's a whole new outlook for the Central Bank meeting...

You know... As we draw closer to the end of the year, the closer we get to the winter Olympics which will be held in Vancouver, B.C. (and Whistler!) Going back to the early days of the World Markets Division at the old Mark Twain Bank, here in St. Louis, we tracked currencies from countries that were holding the Olympics, noticing that there was always a rise in the host country's currency... If that were to hold it would benefit the Canadian dollar / loonie... Will it hold true for the Vancouver Olympics? We'll have to wait-n-see, eh? But really... Wouldn't it be worth a flyer, a shekel or two to see if it did hold true?

And then there was this... Were you confused by the GM announcements yesterday? I was... First there was an announcement that GM would be paying back some of the bailout money to the Government... But then later it was announced that GM posted a $1.5 Billion loss... Kind of difficult to pay someone back, when you're booking losses, eh? Strange announcements for sure...

OK, to recap, which I forgot to do yesterday! UGH! The currencies were whipsawed yesterday by comments by Big Ben Bernanke, that we've heard before! The RBA issued a not-so-hawkish minutes report that spooked the markets and it's Risk off today... Brazil might have a different outlook for their next meeting in December, and the winter Olympics are ready for Vancouver, will that mean a boost for the loonie?

Currencies today 11/17/09: American style: A$ .9270, kiwi .7440, C$ .9450, euro 1.49, sterling 1.6775, Swiss .9840, European style: rand 7.4660, krone 5.62, SEK 6.8775, forint 179, zloty 2.76, koruna 17.1450, RUB 28.77, yen 89.30, sing 1.3870, HKD 7.75, INR 46.30, China 6.8266, pesos 13.01, BRL 1.7160, dollar index 75.38, Oil $78.24, 10-year 3.35%, Silver $18.16, and Gold... $1,030

That's it for today... Well, the college basketball season began last night... My beloved Missouri Tigers start tonight. The Tigers basketball team surprised quite a few people with their run last spring, hopefully they can repeat that! Our little Christine's husband is a high school basketball coach. Christine says that once the season starts, she rarely sees husband, Matt... She loves basketball season! HA! My little, adorable granddaughter, Delaney Grace, was at the house when I came home yesterday, and she ran out of the house to jump in my arms to hug me! WOW! Sure is great to have a little one around! OK... Late again today, UGH! Better get going... I hope your Tuesday is Terrific!

Chuck Butler
President
EverBank World Markets
1-800-926-4922
1-314-647-3837

Eclectica November Fund Commentary

JohnMauldin — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:55:00 GMT

Today's Outside the Box comes to us from England. My European partner Niels Jensen from time to time sends me some of the best letters he reads from the hedge fund world. He is an excellent filter for me, and this week's Outside the Box offering is no exception. Below is the November commentary from Eclectica fund manager Hugh Hendry. He challenges the current preoccupation with the falling dollar and China, and posits what would happen if that thinking is wrong? It offers some very thought-provoking ideas. You can contact them for more information at info@eclectica-am.com or visit their website: http://www.eclectica-am.com

Your wondering if we are all turning Japanese analyst,

John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box

Eclectica November Fund Commentary

by Hugh Hendry
Eclectica Fund Manager

"The power to become habituated to his surroundings is a marked characteristic of mankind."

John Maynard Keynes
The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1921

This month I will attempt to answer the entrance examination for the Chinese civil service. That is to say, I will attempt to tell you everything that I know. In doing so, I will argue that this year's rally in inflationary assets, from emerging stock markets to industrial commodities to the fall in the US dollar, could be a FAKE. Let me explain why.

But first, I am indebted to Scott Sumner, professor of economics at the University of Bentley, and his essay on the economic lessons that can be drawn from timelessness in art (see http://blogsandwikis.bentley.edu/themoneyillusion/?p=2542). It is a theme that I will constantly revisit in my arguments below.

Sumner is able to take us from the Flemish forger, Van Meegeren, and his horrendous reproductions of the Dutch painter, Vermeer, to the notion that every recession seems unique and special to its protagonists. So just how did Van Meegeren fool the Nazis with paintings that today look so awful, so un-Vermeer? Jonathan Lopez, the noted art historian, argues that a FAKE succeeds owing to its power to sway the contemporary mind. Or in other words, the best forgeries tend to pay homage to the tastes and prejudices of their time. The present is so seductive.

However, forget the art world. Controlling the psyche of this generation of investor is the indelible mark of the falling dollar and the associated fear of inflation. Monetary inflation has been the distinguishing feature of the last ten years, and it is now firmly embedded in the contemporary mind. I am sure I need not remind you that gold, along with just about every other commodity, has at least quadrupled in price since 1999. You already know my explanation for why this has happened.

The spectacular rise in the Chinese trade surplus, predominantly with America, to $320bn per annum at its peak in 2007, and the mercantilist desire to prevent currency appreciation drove the Asians and the sheiks to buy Treasuries and print their own currencies. The ability of fractional reserve banking to leverage this liquidity many times over provided the monetary mo-jo to instigate ever higher commodity prices. In other words, quantitative easing, masquerading as a cheap but fixed currency regime, has succeeded where Japan's orthodox version has failed. The QE succeeded because, amongst other features, it raised the velocity of monetary circulation.

However, it was not always like this. As an example, ten years ago it was unthinkable that the dollar would prove so fragile. Recall that back then, when the euro was first launched in 1999, it promptly lost 31% of its value against the greenback. The subsequent reconstruction of modern China, though, intervened. In order to finance the emergence of a new economic superpower, an abundance of dollars was needed. Have no doubt that had we not had the dollar as a reserve currency, the rise of China would not have been as swift nor as decisive.

The Yellow Brick Road

Consider another economy needing to be rebuilt: that of the United States in 1865, the post Civil War era. The rebirth of the American economy was funded from the monetary rectitude of the gold standard, not from the generosity of a foreign and infinitely expandable paper currency. However, all of this occurred before the discovery of cyanide for heap-leaching and the opening up of the huge South African gold fields. In other words, hard money was in tight supply and the recovery was neither swift nor decisive. Indeed, 30 years later, during the presidential election campaign of 1896, Williams Jennings Bryan was still hotly contesting its merits. He railed against the persistent price deflation and argued that the economy was burdened by a "cross of gold" (see The Eclectica Fund Report, December 2005).

Perhaps I Should Stick to the Twenty-First Century?

My previous investment letter attempted to explain the subtleties of the Triffen dilemma and the dollar's pre-eminent role in regenerating modern day economies. Let me repeat once more: lots of dollars were required, and duly delivered, to build modern China. They did not have to wait on the vagaries of a gold discovery to promote and sustain their economic engine. Instead, they required the willingness of their trade partners to run trade deficits. The US delivered and, partly as a consequence, the Fed's broader trade weighted dollar index has now fallen 20% since its peak in 2002 (the narrower DXY index compiled by the Intercontinental Exchange has fallen more, but excludes the renminbi and overstates the role of the euro). In return, the world has a new $4trn trading partner: China.

Heady stuff, but not without precedent: recall the Marshall Plan, a watershed American aid program that assisted the reconstruction of the Western European economy during the 1950s and 60s. This was further augmented by America's willingness to run trade deficits, the modern day equivalent to a gold discovery, which became necessary to sustain the emergence of the new economic trading bloc. This resulted in the dollar's huge devaluation versus gold in the 1970s. However, back then, the broad trade weighted index kept rising. This time it has fallen sharply.

What an Ungrateful Lot We Are?

The dollar's role as the world's sole reserve currency has both assisted and accelerated the development of world trade. America's trading partners have come to rely upon the bounty of dollars necessary to recycle their trade surpluses and thus finance their growing prosperity. This was done even at the expense of domestic American job losses. Replace the dollar with IMF special drawing rights; I hear your retort. Sure, but have you ever bought a cup of coffee with an accounting identity? And, fundamentally that argument still suffers from the dearth of any other major economy showing any willingness to sacrifice its short term economic standing for the longer-term mutual benefit of having enriched trading partners.

Do not forget that the Chinese could replicate equivalent currency baskets to SDRs at any moment. Instead, they continue to recycle almost three quarters of their trade surplus back into dollars. This is not coercion but simple commercial pragmatism. They know full well that neither Europe nor Japan nor Britain nor Switzerland nor the rest of Asia are willing to sacrifice the implicit loss of manufacturing jobs. They understand that it is only the US that is willing to embrace the benefits of comparative advantage that arise from international trade. Have you ever asked yourself why car prices in America are so low compared with those in Europe? This is my point.

I keep hearing that a dollar devaluation would help matters. I agree; it has. Let me say it again; we have already had the devaluation. That is what the last five years were all about. Now with China rebuilt, and the trade deficit in full retreat (note the -47% contribution from net exports to China's GDP growth in the first 9 months of this year), there are less dollar bills being exported overseas to ungrateful recipients. Is it not time we drop our fascination with the present and consider the future? Is it really inconceivable that the dollar could now strengthen?

Women in Love, Investors in Love. What's the Difference?

Of course this is a minority view. Investors have reacted to last year's deflationary traumas by insisting that it is business as usual. They behave like D.H. Lawrence's coal miner Gerald from the novel Women in Love, who, just days after his father's funeral, steals into his former lover's bedroom and, "...into her he poured all his pent-up darkness and corrosive heat, and he was whole again." Or was he? The trouble is that we are so anchored to the recent past. Investors are fearful of what now seems so familiar and recognisable; at what they perceive as the reckless behaviour of our monetary authorities. "Inflation is a monetary phenomenon" is their Friedmanite dogma. Their salvation can only be found in the safe sanctuary of gold and the embrace of risky assets, but are they truly safe?

This is my home. Don't be so sure about anything, Big Horace. Not about anything in this world.

The Orphan's Home Cycle
Horton Foote

And so, just as the Church of England commissioners became convinced by the cult of equity way back in the whimsical days of 1999 and went 100% long the stock market, investors today recant a new mantra of, "anything but the dollar (A-B-D)". Inflation bets are all the rage. Some would insist that it is their fiduciary duty to protect their clients' capital; I say tell that to the Church of England pension fund, whose assets today are just £461m against liabilities of £813m. Austerity beckons for the clergymen; heaven will have to pay their stipend.

But the spell cast by a contemporary cult is hard to resist. Take another august body, the Harvard Endowment Fund. Not typically renowned as a hotbed of reactionary fervour, the fund is nevertheless radical in its construction and has come to typify the A-B-D stance.

Harvard's position could well be construed as a one-way bet. Almost half of the fund is invested in emerging market equities, commodities, real-estate, private equity and junk bonds. It is as though the rap artist 50 Cent has taken over the advisory board. The fund is going to, "get rich or die tryin'".

We, on the other hand, approach risk by considering the worst possible outcome. For a current pension scheme the greatest torment would be a repeat of last year's final quarter when 30 year Treasuries yielded just 2.5%. This would require a CAGR of 20% or more from the fund's riskier assets at precisely the time that their future returns would seem most questionable; insolvency would beckon. And yet, they blithely run the risk of ruination.

Of course, they are not alone. Another popular argument is that the emerging economies have to urgently diversify their immense dollar reserves. And so the Chinese are colonising the African continent in the pursuit of commodities and the Indian government has just agreed to buy 200 tons of the IMF's gold hoard.

Is this not a reincarnation of the 1980 trade of the brothers Hunt? It is hardly an exaggeration to suggest that China, for all intents and purposes, is already the commodity market. For despite providing less than 8% of global GDP, China accounts for more than half of the world's steel production and more than half of global seaborne iron ore freight. Indeed, this peculiarity is circular in nature. Consider that a modern aluminium plant requires 25% of the project's cost to be spent on buying aluminium in the first place. And remember that investments in fixed capital formation (think new aluminium plants et al.) have made up 95% of Chinese GDP growth this year. China Inc. is Commodities Inc.

Accordingly, China shares the same risk as the world's largest pension schemes. An over- leveraged American consumer does not return to his/her manic buying of old. As William White, former chief economist of the BIS, has argued:

Many countries that relied heavily on exports as a growth strategy are now geared up to provide goods and services to heavily indebted countries that no longer have the will or the means to buy them.

Surely, the Chinese stash of Treasuries is a prudent elimination of the fat tail risk that private sector deleveraging in the west ends up killing the golden goose of the trade surplus. But instead, in exercising good ol' Texan tradition, they have opted, like the Hunt brothers did, to double up. It is the old dice game, Mort Subite, played by the employees of the National Bank of Belgium in the busy lunch time cafes of Brussels in 1910. If the players didn't have time to complete their business, they played a final round with a sudden ending where the loser would be pronounced dead.

Much is made of the comparison between today's balance sheet recession and Japan's demise back in 1989. Despite their bubble never coming close to matching China's prominence in industrial commodities, the loss of Japanese economic growth in the 1990s was nevertheless a major factor in the waterfall crash in commodities. This plunge ultimately saw oil trade for as little as $10 per barrel in the next decade. Just consider how much more devastating the experience would have been had they gone very long the commodity market in 1989 rather than golf courses and Rockefeller Centre. At least the Harvard endowment scheme did not share their enthusiasm for golf. But, this time around, I fear a Mort Subite beckons for the losers in Asia and the pension market.

Last Orders: Inflation or Deflation?

If a poet knows more about a horse than he does about heaven,
he might better stick to the horse... the horse might carry him to heaven.

Charles Ives

I am now going to return to the torturous and binary debate concerning inflation. As you know, I am in the deflation camp for now, and we own a modest amount of government bonds and a series of asymmetric bets which would receive a boost from a return to some form of risk aversion. You could say that I am sticking to my horse.

My intellectual foes, on the other hand, are adamant that long duration government bonds are a short. I even hear that some Wall Street legends are so convinced of the argument made by the likes of Niall Ferguson that they personally own Treasury put options and are actively counselling others to do the same. The argument can be condensed into just two fears.

First, they will suggest that 4.5% is not an adequate return for lending your money to the profligate United States for 30 years. I agree wholeheartedly. Again, I fear it is my accent, but let me stress once more that I do not propose that anyone adopt a buy-and-hold policy for the next thirty years in bonds. However, a nominal rate of 4.5% might prove very profitable over the coming year should breakeven inflation expectations head south again.

Second, the bears contend, a lower Chinese trade surplus will eliminate a very large source of Treasury buyers at a time of burgeoning supply. Again, we find ourselves agreeing vigorously. However, it is our contention that US savings are heading north over the months and years to come. And an America that saves is an America that does not run a current account deficit. It is an American that can finance its own spending domestically. The US produced a small surplus back in the 1990-91 recession, so why not again?

As a consequence the Chinese surplus is set to fall further and, with fewer dollars needing to be recycled to maintain the currency peg, their demand for Treasuries will continue to shrink. Now this is potentially a huge headache owing to the massive projected American budget deficits for this year and next, and the Treasury's desire to extend the maturity of the existing stock of government bonds which is becoming perilously short dated. Some estimate new issuance of around $2.5trn for the upcoming year. Perhaps, it is better that we buy those Treasury put options after all?

American Gothic

Or is it? I have quoted Don Coxe's definition of a bull market before and I intend to do so again. "The most exciting returns are to be had from an asset class where those who know it best, love it least." On this point, America has fallen out of love with its own currency and bond market. Foreigners own over half of the outstanding Treasury stock. But, like I said, I think events could reignite some of the natives' old amour.

It is almost like declaring an enthusiasm for Say's Law. Think of it this way, a greater supply of Treasuries would be a very obvious by-product of weaker than anticipated economic growth. And in this environment risk aversion stimulates the investment desire for risk free assets. So, in a round about way, there are circumstances when supply and demand can match in the bond market. But weaker economic growth? Surely the governments' interventions this year have remedied the economy?

The surprise might concern the role that rising leverage has played in boosting GDP and in anchoring investors' expectations to an unrealistic level of nominal GDP. Over the last decade, each marginal dollar of debt has generated less and less marginal income. We knew that there would be a "zero-hour" for the economy when the creation of new debt would not contribute to GDP growth. The government's reaction to last year's demand shock has been to increase its own leverage. But, with the economy operating at its zero-hour, we believe this incremental leverage will actually have a negative impact. That is to say, the public sector will fail in its attempt to bring the economy back to its previous level of nominal GDP. In this scenario, the outcome will disappoint the market's expectations, which are rampantly bullish as evidenced by this year's dramatic re-pricing of risk assets.

This zero-hour for America has perhaps arrived sooner than many had anticipated. It was heralded by the Japanese experience. Japan is the bogeyman that confronts all academic thinkers, regardless of creed, from Krugman to Ferguson, as well as all who would choose to intervene in the workings of the economy. In a debate I had with Mr. Ferguson in London last month, he claimed that Japan was an extreme outlier and could be ignored. Really?

No sex, no drugs, no wine, no woman, no fun, no sin, no wonder it's dark
Everyone around me is a total stranger.
Everyone avoids me like a psyched loan-ranger
That's why I'm turning Japanese,
I think I'm turning Japanese,
I really think so

The Vapors, 1980

Japan has championed both Friedman and Keynes. They have built bridges to nowhere and dropped Yen notes from helicopters for twenty years and still they have nothing to show for it. Clearly the additional return from Yen debt in Japan is close to zero and it exposes the nightmare of interventionists everywhere: it may just be that there are no policy remedies for a debt deflation. So to elaborate further, our chances of financial success are greatest under conditions where investors believe government spending will succeed but in reality it fails.

However, where will the demand for all of this additional government debt come from? Let us review the Fed's Z1 numbers. The US has household wealth of some $67trn. Of that, $20trn is accounted for by real estate and is perhaps out of bounds for our purposes. But $8trn is held in the form of private pensions and insurance funds. And yet, remarkably, these institutions presently allocate just $630bn to Treasuries et al. Households have a further $22trn in time deposits and other financial assets. But again they own just $500bn of Treasuries, and commercial banks own a tiny $130bn or, 1% of their total asset base of $12trn.

Consider that in 1952, at the very end of the supernova bond bull market formed from the ashes of the Great Depression and the Liberty Bonds that financed the Second World War, US banks held 40% of their gross assets in Treasuries. That is a potential $5trn of demand from this one source alone, albeit spread out over a number of years. And again, the Japan experience lends support. Japanese financial institutions have quadrupled the percentage of their assets held in JGBs. Furthermore, their households have lifted their government bond weightings five-fold over the last ten years. Should the same pattern repeat itself stateside, American households would need to buy another $2.5trn, but again, over ten years.

And let us not forget that a trend of rising prices allied to the most basic human emotion of avarice encouraged commercial banks and other financial institutions to buy $3.2trn of questionable mortgage backed securities in 2004, $1.9trn in 2005, $2.2trn in 2006 and $2.1trn in 2007. So it is not inconceivable, at least in my mind, that financial institutions, and notable amongst them the nation's pension and endowment schemes, could be motivated by another basic human emotion, namely fear for their own survival, to snap up all these new government bonds. Perhaps in the end supply will create its own demand.

Again, it all really comes down to your take on the ratio of total debt-to-GDP. If you believe, like I do, that it peaked in 2007 then the repercussions are enormous. The leverage does not necessarily have to come down (after peaking in 1932 at 300% it troughed 20 years later at 150%). Rather, it may well be that low interest rates allow the mountain of debt to continue to be serviced. This has been the Japanese experience to date. However, everything in our economic life exists at the margin, and the consequences of just maintaining the leverage constant would be a very low delta in nominal GDP growth. Consider that the Japanese, under these very circumstances, have managed to grow nominal GDP at just 1% compound since 1990.

In Bernie We Trust?

This is why China's mad dash for commodities and its investment splurge this year is so worrying. In my marketing presentations I show a picture of Madoff superimposed on a dollar bill and ask, "...in Bernie we trust?" My point is that if the hedge fund fraudster had been given the responsibility for US GDP accounting, he would surely have overstated the figure. And in a similar way, the rise in leverage has probably misrepresented the truly recurring nature of nominal GDP. Now, if we repeat the Japanese experience then it is possible that nominal US GDP will rise from $14trn today to perhaps just $16trn in ten years time. Along similar lines, the German government does not anticipate its economy exceeding its previous GDP high until 2014. And yet it is as though the other surplus countries are behaving like Bernie's former investors who, believing in the stated NAV and its promise of more of the same (i.e., predictable and attractive compound growth rates), were happy to spend lavishly. The Chinese are building capacity to meet a world where US nominal GDP is $25trn in ten years time. I fear they could be in for a nasty shock.

What Do I Mean?

Consider the steel market. The homogeneous nature of steel, as well as other factors such as its price-to-density, allows for the export of the finished good across trade boundaries. Now with China having been on such an expansionary tear, it may not surprise you to hear that finished Chinese steel prices today trade below their production cost. Furthermore, import license applications to sell steel in the US, the world's largest export market, rose 24% last month. Now, mostly this comes from Mexican and Korean producers, but clearly there is the implicit threat that their Chinese competitors might also be tempted.

But the Economy is Growing?

Clearly it would be inappropriate to annualise the production of the US steel industry in the fourth quarter of last year when capacity utilisation plummeted to just 32%. So consider, instead, the annual run rate this year from January to August. This was a period of stabilisation in tandem with the cash-for-clunkers program, which boosted the industry's largest customer, the car sector. It is quite chilling to note that steel production in America is on a par with output back in 1938, when GDP was a mere 7% of its current size. The industry's run rate dropped to a paltry 13% during the Great Depression. However, output only troughed at its 1908 level; a twenty year retracement that is a far cry from our 70 year retracement. So the physical developments in the western steel markets should raise some concern. However, with an active steel futures market in China turning over $15bn a day (consult the Bloomberg page <RBTA CMDY CT>), speculative fears concerning the dollar have overcome the paucity of industrial demand in the west.

Of course, it is not just steel. Consider the aluminium market. We recently had a very bearish meeting with the Norwegian company Norsk Hydro. Admittedly, their strong petro-currency does not help and you have to discount the solace I seek in finding people even more miserable than myself. Even so, the aluminium situation mimics that of steel, but with an even mightier inventory overhang. Four and a half million tons reside at the London Metal Exchange, perhaps 20% of world ex-China annual capacity. It is probable that 75% of this surplus stock is accounted for by financial players exploiting a contango.

Does Life Imitate Art?

The advocates of Prechter's socio-economics would not be surprised to hear that the Romanian writer Herta Mueller has been awarded this year's Nobel Prize for literature for her work depicting "the landscape of the dispossessed". In a Los Angeles Times review of her book, The Appointment, they noted,

"...it is sometimes difficult to tell whether we are reading about people driven mad by a mad regime or people who may not have had all their marbles in the first place."

My partner, Mr. Lee, reflected on this as he sat in the chilly offices of Norsk Hydro last week watching the snow fall outside. The Norwegians continued with their tale of woe: a couple of million tonnes of inventory remains unaccounted for on the world stage and are believed to be hidden in cheaper warehouses in Russia. The rationale behind this is the same as the rationale used by LME speculators. Furthermore, the big Russian players like Rusal are under intense pressure from Putin not to cut capacity (check out 'Putin bitch slaps Deripaska' on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PprlM5R3Hbg), and are rumoured to be surviving only by not paying their electricity bills.

To make matters even worse, the Chinese have stopped importing and are eager to ramp up domestic aluminium production. They havethe capacity to produce another 13mt annually, which is equivalent to 52% of global production. Lastly, there is the fact that Rio Tinto bought Alcan right at the very top of the cycle, though they dare not admit it is a terrible business.

Poor Old Norsk Hydro?

Who would want to share a stage with so many mad villains? The Norwegians noted that construction demand had just taken another leg down as buildings started pre-crisis are now finished whilst no further pipeline exists outside of China. Even Ryanair are talking about suspending their aggressive growth plans and may delay the purchase of more planes.

The Norwegians suffer the most pain at present, but if the dollar were to strengthen Alcoa could conceivably go bust. Their dollar cost is the company's only competitive advantage. Let us not forget Alcoa has the most exposure to aircraft construction and still has $10bn of gross debt lording over an almost equivalent market cap. Imagine that we have not even considered their pension liabilities. Yet the Alcoa CDS trades at 200 basis points, down from its high of 1200 earlier this year. Why?!

"May sorrow break these chains of my sufferings, for pity's sake"

Lascia ch'io pianga
Handel

Now remember I have been describing a positive macro scenario: a world in which low interest rates make the debt load manageable and that we muddle through with lower growth rates in nominal GDP. But clearly the consequences for corporate profitability are very poor. The alarming thing is that my opponents (see Ferguson et al.) believe that government bond yields are going much higher. Effectively, the world's bond vigilantes are going to punish the Fed and tighten monetary policy. It is almost as if the world's greatest speculators are agitating for their own demise. It is my contention that the leverage of the economy is only tenable if interest rates stay low and yet, whilst I believe some of them agree, they still fervently expect a rise.

Je consens, ou plutôt j'aspire à ma ruine.

Pierre Corneille
Polyeucte, 1642

Do not forget that the US does not share the distinction of the British or Australian housing markets. According to FSA data, 55% of UK mortgages are fixed rate and 45% are floating. The latter have, of course, collapsed and have proven a boon for disposable income. We must remember, however, that British fixed rates are determined by two and three year swap rates; so effectively the entire stock of UK mortgages are determined by the central bank and could be thought of as floating. In the US, however, things are very different. Total single-family mortgages outstanding are $11trn but $9trn is fixed to the prevailing 30 year Treasury yield. Banks just do not offer variable rate or teaser mortgages anymore. You might say that the American housing market hangs by the tender threads of the bond market's generosity. Lose it, and let us say that the markets demand 6% yields on 30 year durations and mortgage rates would then shoot back up to 7%. And, I would argue, the economy would come to a crashing halt. Do speculators really want this to happen?

Perhaps I am describing a pressure cooker. The private sector's debt may be sustained by maintaining low nominal interest rates.But the pressure from so much issuance at a time of great reluctance from financial institutions to purchase bonds could break the stalemate. And with it the ominous precedent of 1931, outlined in our February report, when a back up in ten year Treasury yields from 3.1% to 4.4% undoubtedly accelerated the rate of deflation in the US economy.

Japan Posts a 4.8% GDP!

ChuckButler — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:19:00 GMT

..But First, A Word From Our Sponsor..
Gain exposure to currencies of emerging BRIC countries-and don't lose a dime on market risk

* 4 BRIC currencies: Brazilian real, Russian ruble, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi
* High upside potential
* No market risk to deposited principal
* Low $1,500 minimum deposit

Don't miss this unique opportunity. Deadline to buy the BRIC MarketSafe CD is Dec. 3rd, 2009. Apply today or learn more at http://www.everbank.com/001CertificatesMSBRIC.aspx?referId=11808
.

In This Issue..

* Risk Aversion goes away mad...
* China just says "no" to currency flexibility...
* Maybe a return to fundamentals?
* Gold continues to soar!

And Now... Today's Pfennig!

Japan Posts a 4.8% GDP!

Good day... And a Marvelous Monday to you! It's raining here, so it's one of those Rainy Days and Mondays... But I won't let it get me down, as opposed to the song! I got a chance to check out our new digs in the building next door to us here... Very nice! And... A long way from that small office I sat in on Olive St. a decade ago, when we started EverBank... To think back 10 years ago, and where we are today... Simply amazing!

OK... As I told you Friday, the President was in China this past weekend, trying his best to get the Chinese to agree to a greater flexibility for the renminbi... Well... There were a few stories this past weekend that hinted about the Chinese agreeing to do such... But I prefer to go with this story that appeared on Reuters last night... "The Chinese government has sought to distance itself from speculation surrounding a central bank statement earlier this week that was interpreted as a shift in currency policy towards a stronger yuan. However, a report on Saturday by Xinhua, the state-controlled Chinese news agency said that the government would not allow the currency to gain against the dollar in the short term."

Wang Qing, chief Asia economist for Morgan Stanley in Hong Kong, said in a report to clients: "I consider this article an official effort by Chinese authorities to dismiss the renewed speculation of yuan appreciation in the near term."

So much for that visit to China, eh? Put that one down next to the visit to Copenhagen earlier this year... Ahem... 3 strikes and you're out in baseball... But, getting back to the trip to China... The Asia-Pacific members were pretty tough with their questions for the U.S. President, questioning his commitment to free trade... And then let him know that China is going to fight protectionism, and keep the renminbi on a leash...

On Friday, we had the currencies add a bit to their rally on Thursday, as the Risk Aversion campers were sent home without a ball... No need to go away mad... Just go away! There was a bit of interesting data reaction that happened on Friday, which only gave me some hope of returning to fundamentals... The U. of Michigan Consumer Confidence Index fell in October, which wasn't expected one iota... And... The dollar sold off! That's exactly what should happen when a country's economic data prints badly! So Hur-ray! YAHOO! But... Just like I always say... On swallow doesn't make a summer, and one reaction to a data print doesn't make for a shift in fundamentals... But could it be a start? Yes, it could... But we'll need to see more of this type of trading after data prints to indicate that the old "trading theme" has been put in our rear view mirrors, and that fundamentals have returned... But wouldn't that be a happy day? Oh happy day... Oh happy day...

I'm going to tell you this next bit, and you're not going to believe it at first... But stay with it... There was good news in Asia overnight, as the Japanese printed a 3rd QTR GDP report that showed an annualized rate of +4.8%! That was 2.9% higher than the "experts" forecast for Japan! So... Even Japan is joining the other Asian and pan-Asian countries (Australia) in posting strong economic growth!

The Asia-Pacific leaders pledged to keep stimulus measures in place until there's a "durable growth"... Hmmm... Here's hoping that the Asia-Pacific leaders let us know when that happens, for 4.8% annualized growth for Japan, sure seems like "durable growth" to me!

And... In keeping with our hopes that fundamentals return to currencies and commodities... The strong economic data for Japan, did not quash the yen! In fact, the yen has traded stronger VS the dollar overnight!

Speaking of trading stronger VS the dollar overnight... Have you seen the price of Gold? WOW! Gold has set, yet another, all-time record high overnight of $1,133! It has since given back some of that to trade at $1,127... But still... WOW!

You know... Just about 10 days ago, the dollar was looking as if it was going to make a comeback / correction... I even saw a cute little poem a trader wrote about it being the end of euro strength... But here we are 10 days later, and the dollar is looking quite weak again... The euro is back to pushing the envelope to 1.50 VS the dollar, and I just told you about Gold's run VS the dollar...

Of course this doesn't mean that a correction couldn't take place today, tomorrow, or the next day... I'm just pointing out something that I've told you all about for years now... And that is: short term forecasting for currencies is usually wrong! So, then, people ask me... Why then do you write a daily letter about currencies, Chuck? Ahhh, grasshopper, because, someone has to make sense of this daily noise, and... You never know when a "turn" might happen in the currencies...

The Aussie dollar (A$) spent the overnight sessions trying to get past .9350, but failed to do so, especially on the back of a note from a local bank analyst who went out on a limb and said the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) would be on hold at their next meeting on Dec. 1st... Well, that may be... But I still believe the RBA will hike rates in December! But if they don't, then we could look for an even larger hike when they come back in January! So, this keeping the A$ below .9350 won't last long, in my humble opinion!

We could get some traction from the euro and other Euro-type currencies this week, as the Euro Finance Week in Frankfurt will take place with top leaders speaking on the financial crisis and lessons to be learned from it... German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who's always good for some interesting quotes, will speak, as will European Central Bank (ECB) President, Jean-Claude Trichet...

Speaking of Euro-type currencies... The Norwegian krone, continues to follow the Big Dog, euro... But when the Big Dog, euro gets going, the krone normally out performs the euro... So... The Big Dog, euro is the key here...

OK... For some time now, I've been trying to point out to you that monetary inflation is going to sneak up on us and rip apart our investments... My good friend, David Galland, had this to say in his Friday letter... Here's David!

"Just because it's not readily apparent doesn't mean it's not there. Of course, I'm referring to the government's monetary inflation, which, thanks to a combination of factors, still hasn't jumped out of the closet to scare bond markets into cardiac arrest."

David then goes on to show his readers a table that had useful details on the progression from normal to very much not normal, leading up to the German Hyperinflation of the early 1900's... David then says, "As you can see, the situation in Germany was not so bad - until it was."

If you would like to see the "table" David refers to... Or read his excellent letter... Click here... http://www.caseyresearch.com/quick-guide/free-publications/

OK... You know, the soaring Gold price has been mostly tied to the weak dollar... But, you would have to think that "smart investors" with an eye on this monetary inflation is having some push to the price of Gold too... I know that's why I own Gold... The weak dollar thing is just icing on Gold's value in my opinion... The inflation hedge... The Deflation hedge... Or... As I call it... The "uncertainty hedge"...

And then there was this... The other night I was discussing the Health Care stuff, and told the person I was talking to that the stimulus bill, you know the one that was pushed through so fast last winter because we as a country were "near total collapse"? Well, the stimulus bill had hidden in it, part one of the Obama Health Care Plan... Hmmm didn't know that? Well, yes, grasshopper... It's the "death panels" that Sarah Palin coined them... They are called the rationing and enforcement board. And... The President has already funded them with $20.6 Billion of our taxpayer dollars!

Now... I'm not going to get into a discussion of the Health Care here... My point was simply to show that when bills are passed, it is important that they are read aloud to the people, to keep from "hiding" things in the bills... $20.6 Billion of money that the Gov't did not have!

Ok... Enough of that... My good friend, Dr. Dave Janda, was the first to expose this "hidden gem" And he's been on the speaking circuit trying to get anyone that will listen to him, and they should, to understand what's going on...

Currencies today 11/16/09: American Style: A$ .9340, kiwi .7445, C$ .9555, euro 1.4970, Sterling 1.6720, Swiss .9920, European Style: rand 7.3910, krone 5.5730, SEK 6.8060, forint 178.90, zloty 2.7375, koruna 17.0530, RUB 28.68, yen 89.50, sing 1.3850, HKD 7.75, INR 46.22, China 6.8269, pesos 13.01, BRL 1.7125, dollar index 75.03, Oil $77.19, 10-year 3.40%, Silver $17.85, and Gold... $1,130.30

That's it for today... Our resident TV personality, Ty Keough, was announcing the Missouri Valley Conference Soccer match yesterday on Fox Sports Midwest... Ty had a great line during the match, referring to one shot by a player as being a "venomous shot!" I made a drive to the country yesterday to visit my graves of my parents and oldest sister... It had been a couple of years since I made that drive, my bad... The little country town that our family farm sat outside of, hasn't changed... It's still the same quiet little country town in mid-Missouri... Went to dinner with good friends, Lisa and Kevin on Saturday night, they used to be our neighbors, and now we rarely see them... UGH! OK... Mike's here, so that means it's time to hit "send"! I hope you have a Marvelous Monday!

Chuck Butler
President
EverBank World Markets
1-800-926-4922
1-314-647-3837

If This Is Recovery…

JohnMauldin — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:31:00 GMT

If This is Recovery, Where Are the Taxes?
Last Business Standing
Stimulus, What Stimulus?
The Reality of Unemployment
Let the Good Times Roll
The Quick Double-Dip Scenario
Phoenix, New York, and Thoughts on the Internet

No one goes into Wal-Mart and asks to pay extra sales tax. Thus sales taxes are reasonable barometers for retail sales. This week we look at how taxes are doing in a period of economic recovery. Then we turn our eyes to a very interesting (and sobering) analysis of possible future unemployment rates. This is an anecdote to the happy-face analysis of employment numbers you get from establishment economists. There will be a lot of charts and tables, so this letter may print a little longer, but I think you will find it very interesting.

If This is Recovery, Where Are the Taxes?

I keep reading about surveys that show that retail sales are up. But as noted above, no one pays extra sales taxes, or decides they need to pay more income taxes. The surest way to measure retail sales is sales taxes. Want to know how incomes are doing? Look at income tax receipts. Let's look at sales taxes first.

First off, I can find no single source of recent sales tax information. It is all one-off, but it is consistent. Sales taxes in my home state of Texas are down 12.8% year-over-year, and we're in the fifth straight month of decreases of 11% or more. Projections are for sales taxes to continue to decline into 2010.

There is a very revealing study by the Pew Center on state taxes, called "Beyond California" (http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/). Everyone knows how bad California is. The Pew Center looks at how the rest of the states are doing, and focuses on 10 states that also have severe problems. Sales tax receipts are down 14% in Arizona, and state income taxes are down 32%.

On average, revenues are down almost 12%. Oregon has seen their revenues collapse a stunning 19%. New York is down 17%, with a deficit of 32%. Illinois has a projected deficit of 47% of its budget, second only to California with 49%. You can see how your state fares at http://downloads.pewcenteronthestates.org/Beyond_California_Appendix.pdf.

The Liscio Report notes that all states had negative year-over-year sales tax collections in October, and the weighted average decrease was 10.2%, down from a negative 7.2% in September. (www.theliscioreport.com)

Sales at Wal-Mart stores slipped by 0.4% in the third quarter. Actual government figures show that retail sales were down 1.5% in September from the previous month and 5.8% year-over-year. So how do we keep seeing headlines about retail sales being up, as unemployment keeps rising?

Remember that such reports are usually based on surveys, and generally cover mid-sized and up retailers, leaving out smaller businesses. Further, if you are a retail chain that has closed 10% of its stores, the remaining stores should in theory benefit from getting your loyal customers into them.

Last Business Standing

Yesterday I was with an associate, and I hesitated in asking them how their business was doing, because I knew things had been tough at the beginning of the year. But I did ask, and they said sales were up over the last months and business was looking better. Surprised, I asked them what made the difference. "Ah," they said, "less competition. Our competitors have gone out of business."

Best Buy and other electronic retailers had to benefit from Circuit City disappearing. That is Schumpeter's creative destruction at work. Not very good for total employment, but it does help the profitability of the survivors.

So, if things are so bad, how did we have 3.5% growth in the third quarter? First off, things are not as bad as they were in the past year. We are in fact getting close to an economic bottom, at least for now. Second, the 3.5% number is a preliminary estimate. A study by Goldman Sachs suggests that the number will be revised down by at least 0.5% and maybe as much as 1%.

Why? The estimate does not really take into account how poorly small businesses are performing. If you look at small-business indexes and compare them to historical GDP numbers, you get the smaller number mentioned above. And since at least 2% of the GDP was from the stimulus package (Cash for Clunkers, houses, tax cuts), the economy on its own was flat. That begs the question, what happens when the stimulus runs out?

And the answer is that we won't know for some time, as the stimulus is just getting ramped up. "According to CBO estimates, only 21% of [the stimulus] spending will occur in 2009; another 38% will come in 2010, and 22% in 2011. After that, its effect will dissipate quickly." (The Liscio Report)

But David Rosenberg notes that what the federal government is giving, the states are taking away. The Pew Study shows that at least nine other states are in appalling shape, so it is no wonder that David writes:

Stimulus, What Stimulus?

"Fully nine states are in fiscal distress and only two have balanced budgets. States like Michigan are planning 20% budget cuts for the coming year. Indiana is planning a 10% spending cut in light of a 7.4% YoY revenue decline. How can the economy really be out of recession if government revenues are still deflating?

"The states are filling around 40% of their fiscal gaps with the federal stimulus (so much for spending on "shovel ready" infrastructure projects). Even after the fiscal help from Washington, the state governments will still face a projected deficit of $142 billion for 2011 (versus $113 billion in 2010). All in, the restraint in the state and local government sector is estimated to drain a full percentage point from U.S. GDP growth in 2010 and more than fully offset the stimulative efforts from Washington. The U.S. economy is more likely to post growth of little more than 2% next year, rather than the 5% currently being discounted by the equity market."

The Reality of Unemployment

All this is, of course, going to put continued pressure on employment. As I noted last week, the number of unemployed actually soared by 558,000, to 15.7 million, as measured by the household survey, not the 190,000 you read about in the mainstream media. Unemployment is sadly continuing to rise by significant amounts.

In August, I did an interview with CNBC from Leen's Fishing Lodge in Maine. The unemployment numbers had just come out. I did a back-of-the-napkin estimate that we would need about 15 million new jobs over the next five years just to get back to where we were when the recession started.

That works out to a need for about 125,000 new jobs each month to handle new workers coming into the market (which comes to a total of 7.5 million over five years), plus the 8 million and rising jobs we've lost. That is a daunting number. It amounts to 250,000 new jobs a month every month for five years. And we are still losing more than that number a month, let alone adding the needed 250,000.

Look at the chart below. It shows the establishment survey employment figures for the last ten years. Only once, in 1999, did we actually add over 250,000 jobs a month for a whole year. And that was during the internet boom.

Sadly, the private sector has shed over 300,000 jobs since 1999. Think about that. We have had a decade where there have been no new jobs added by the private sector. Real incomes are roughly where they were, and the stock market is down. Talk about a lost decade.

I love it when someone does the really heavy lifting for me, and my friend Mike Shedlock of Sitka Pacific Capital Management has done a wonderful job of taking that speculation of mine and putting it into a spreadsheet that helps us get a real handle on what unemployment is likely to look like for the next ten years. I am going to make use of his basic analysis and then modify some of his assumptions in the spreadsheet he provided me, in order to think about different scenarios.

All three scenarios are based on assumptions, so let's see what Mish started with. There is a wealth of data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Census Bureau. According to the Census Bureau Population Estimates we are going to add about 2.5 million working-age (16 years old and up) citizens a year, from now until 2020. The numbers varies slightly year to year. Mish used an estimate of the average, summing up the buckets from 16 to 100+ for the years in question and rounding the result.

You can go to the BLS site and look at Table A-1, which shows the civilian noninstitutional population (those over 16 not in prisons), the participation rate (those who are working and/or want to work), the unemployment rate, the number employed, those not in the labor force, and those who want a job. Those are starting numbers for the charts below.

For those interested, you can read Mish's very full (and quite detailed) analysis at his blog site http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/mish-unemployment-projections-through.html). But let's look at his assumptions:

Job losses are likely to continue for a minimum of another year.
When job gains start, they will be very slow at first, then pick up.
An extremely generous monthly job gain stat over the course of the year would be 150,000 jobs.
A falling participation rate (boomers retiring) will continue to mask reported unemployment.
Starting in 2013 the labor pool will start decreasing because of Boomer demographics.
The noninstitutional population will rise by 2.5 million workers a year.

The spreadsheet below needs a little explanation. Let's start with the assumptions. Mike starts with current working-age population and adds 2.5 million people a year. He assumes that Boomers will retire at 65 (something which all the surveys say is not going to happen). And his last estimate is what the unemployment numbers will be. Everything else is based on those assumptions, which leads to the first column, or the expected unemployment number.

By the way, we know that everyone will want to make different assumptions. I am going to create three scenarios, but you can go to Mike's blog and at the bottom of the post is a link to the actual spreadsheet. Have fun. Let's look at scenario 1.

This assumes there is no double-dip recession, and jobs roughly rise along the same lines as the last recovery. Actually, Mish is far more optimistic, as in the very first chart you will notice that job losses were negative in the first year after the end of the recession and flat the second year. Mish has jobs rising by 120,000 next year and 600,000 the second year (2011), and then a fairly robust recovery. Below is the graph of the unemployment numbers under such a scenario.

Notice that unemployment stays at or above 11% for three years. Pessimistic? Mainstream and usually very optimistic Mark Zandi of www.economy.com predicted this week that unemployment would rise to 11% by the middle of next year, right in line with this scenario. Also note that total jobs rise by 14 million over ten years. Hardly doom and gloom. Again, Boomers all retire on time and there is no double-dip recession.

Let the Good Times Roll

What would it take to get back to 5% unemployment? I played with the spreadsheet and came up with the following numbers, which get us below 5% by 2020. I assume no recessions for the next ten years, and 2 million new jobs a year after 2011, which I start off with almost 1.5 million jobs. Of course, we have never done that, but let's be optimistic.

And the graph below shows the unemployment numbers for the Good Times Scenario.

Want to get to 5% within five years? Add 3 million jobs a year starting now. With no housing recovery, a smaller auto industry, and financial firms getting leaner.

The Quick Double-Dip Scenario

When I called the last two recessions about a year before they happened, it was not all that hard. We had inverted yield curves, falling leading indicators, and a lot of other data that pretty much pointed to a recession. Believing that we had a housing bubble and a looming credit crisis also helped my conviction in calling the last recession.

I think we are in for a double-dip recession in 2011, yet I readily admit there will be little if any statistical evidence in advance this time. This is more of an instinct call. I have serious doubts that we can have what amounts to the largest tax increase of all time in what will be a very weak (albeit growing) economy, without putting us back into recession. And Speaker Pelosi thinks it is a smart thing to add another 5.4% surtax on what will already be a rising capital gains and dividend tax.

Taxing small businesses, and that is what the tax increase amounts to, is a very bad idea in a weak economy. Small businesses are where the job growth comes from. Taking money from productive businesses and giving it to government is a fundamentally flawed concept.

Now, if they decide to postpone the tax increase, or phase it in slowly, then maybe we avoid the double dip. But right now it doesn't look like that will be the case. So, let's quickly see what a double-dip scenario might look like. Let's be optimistic and assume we only lose another 1.2 million jobs in the next recession, since we have already lost so many in this one (8 million and counting). And then the economy comes roaring back in 2012 with 1.5 million jobs and continues to grow rather smartly for the rest of the decade. No further recession. We absorb the tax increases and move on with our economic lives.

Unemployment under such a scenario would rise to just under 13% and stay above 10% for 8 years. Take a look at the chart and graph.

Think 13% is too dire? This week David Rosenberg said unemployment would rise to between 12-13%. The former Merrill Lynch economist was one of the few mainstream economists who called the recession and the credit crisis. The so-called "Blue Chip" economists told us at the beginning of 2008 that unemployment would peak out at 6%. While Rosie is not optimistic of late, he has a rather solid record of being right.

We are at 10.2% unemployment today. The economy lost jobs for 21 months after the end of the last recession. That would easily take us into 2011. Another million lost jobs will take us well over 11% and close to 12% (remember, you have to add in the increasing population), even without my double-dip scenario.

The letter is getting long and it's getting late, so let me close with a few thoughts.

First, 12% unemployment is horrendous by American standards. But Spain is now at 20%, and much of Europe has been in the 10% range for years.

Second, Americans are not used to the concept of 12% unemployment or 10% rates for extended periods. That is going to cause a serious backlash across the political spectrum. Couple that with the discomfort over $1.5-trillion deficits and there could be some serious political changes in the coming years. I think the message will be more anti-incumbent than one party or the other.

Third, the only way out of this morass is to create an environment where small business can thrive. As I've noted for the last several weeks in this letter, government spending does not increase GDP over time. It is a temporary nonproductive stimulus. It takes private investment to create jobs and increase productivity. Over the next few months, I will write more about how to do that.

Phoenix, New York, and Thoughts on the Internet

Next week I take a quick one-day trip to Phoenix, then back to do a satellite-remote speech to a South African hedge fund conference. I will be in New York the first weekend of December (the 4th) for Festivus, a great fundraiser for kids sponsored by Todd Harrison and the team at Minyanville (http://www.rpfoundation.org). Interestingly, they hold it every year at a "Texas" barbecue joint. Look me up if you are there.

The 7 kids, spouses, and grandkids are starting to gather. We will all have brunch Sunday and then a shower for Tiffani. She has another 6 weeks before she is due, and she is really uncomfortable. Walking is literally a pain.

Permit me to reminisce. A little over 9 years ago I started this letter on the internet with about 2,000 email addresses. It was a new version of what had been a print letter, as that was the business I knew. The internet was still a new thing to me, but it seemed like a good idea at the time. Little did I know.

I am still amazed at the growth and the direction my business and life have taken. My letters are sent out by various publishers and affiliates to over 1.5 million readers and posted on dozens of web sites, and the numbers have been growing rapidly of late. I am grateful. But I wonder what would happen if I started it today. Ten years ago there was little in the way of free economic letters. Not a lot of competition.

Today, there is so much free information that it's staggering. There have to be thousands of blogs and hundreds of free letters, some with very large circulations. It seems a new star is born every few months. While much of it does not add to the level of conversation, some of it is quite excellent. I think I am lucky to have started when I did.

And I am grateful for the kind attention you give me. As I turn 60, I note that this has been a rather overwhelming last ten years. A lot of changes for me, and almost all of them very good. But there are more to come. The last two flights I was on I was connected to the internet at 35,000 feet. I sense a lot more changes coming. I am thinking a lot about how to keep up and not get left behind, how to make sure that you, gentle reader, continue to get my best. That is what, at the end of the day, drives me.

Have a great week. I know I shall. Dad loves it when his kids (from 15 to 32) and spouses and grandkids are all under one roof.

Your amazed at it all analyst,

John Mauldin

Germany & France Post 3rd QTR Growth...

ChuckButler — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:31:01 GMT

..But First, A Word From Our Sponsor..
Gain exposure to currencies of emerging BRIC countries-and don't lose a dime on market risk

* 4 BRIC currencies: Brazilian real, Russian ruble, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi
* High upside potential
* No market risk to deposited principal
* Low $1,500 minimum deposit

Don't miss this unique opportunity. Deadline to buy the BRIC MarketSafe CD is Dec. 3rd, 2009. Apply today or learn more at http://www.everbank.com/001CertificatesMSBRIC.aspx?referId=11808
.

In This Issue..

* Risk Aversion fuels dollar rally yesterday...
* Eurozone growth may stop the Risk Aversion...
* Budget Deficit is a record $176.4 Billion!
* Euro, Swiss, Aussie, Norway, all cheaper today!

And Now... Today's Pfennig!

Germany & France Post 3rd QTR Growth...

Good day... And a Happy Friday to one and all! Let's try to make this a Fantastico Friday as well! The Risk Aversion that was creeping into the currency markets yesterday really took hold in the U.S. trading session, which meant the dollar was being bought once more, along with Japanese yen...

It just makes me laugh out loud, when I write that the "safe haven currencies" during Risk Aversion trading are the dollar and yen... These two countries have debt up to their eyeballs, pay no interest on their deposits, and have a leadership deficiency... (ok, before every begins to think that I'm ripping the president again, I'm not... I'm talking about the Central Bank, and lawmakers of each country)

There was good news out of the Eurozone this morning... Both Germany and France followed their previous quarter's growth, with stronger growth in the 3rd QTR... The Eurozone's two largest economies continued to recover from recession in the 3rd QTR, as exports boosted both German and French gross domestic products. I say that, and I want to spit out a raspberry to all those that claim the European Union will collapse because of the strong euro! Neener, neener, neener... The largest economies of the Eurozone can grow, with strong exports even with a strong euro!

OK Chuck, no need to be childish here, let's get back to the growth... Germany's GDP rose 0.7% in the three months to Sept. 30. In France, GDP also grew for the second consecutive quarter, rising 0.3%.

So... Of course this data from the Eurozone put a floor under the euro's decline from yesterday... It will be interesting to see how the U.S. guys look at these growth numbers... The European guys liked them... The U.S. traders though can be very fickle...

And more than that though, I think this might be the thing to put the Risk Aversion to bed... Recent history tells me that whenever Risk Aversion has crept into the markets, any sign that Global growth is back on track, and will lead investors to higher yielding assets, the Risk Aversion ends abruptly... Let's hope that's the case today with these two growth reports from the Eurozone!

Yesterday's data in the U.S. showed that the Weekly Initial Jobless Claims remain above 500,000 per week, and that the Budget Deficit was even worse than the forecast $160 Billion! The Budget Deficit for October totaled $176.4 Billion, which annualized puts us over $2.1 TRILLION! OMG! That awful folks! And you should be writing, calling, or making your way to your representative's next meeting and demanding that they STOP SPENDING MONEY THEY DON'T HAVE!

You know that letter that I said I was going to write to my darling granddaughter, Delaney Grace, apologizing for the lack of freedom and tax burdens that were left to her generation to deal with? Well, I started writing it the other night... What this and the previous administration is doing has no morals, when it comes to leaving the debt to be dealt with by future generations...

OK, it's a Friday, I need to try to remain calm here, and be upbeat! Hmmm... Usually, that means that I pull out a story on Gold... But yesterday was not a good day for the shiny metal, after reaching a new all-time record level of $1,118, it fell more than $10 in the aftermath of the Risk Aversion... See how stupid the Risk Aversion people are? I mean, if you wanted to avert risk, wouldn't you buy Gold?

Any way, colleague, Don Ries, sent me a story that he came across regarding Gold that I thought was quite interesting... The Telegraph in the U.K. printed a story about how Barrick Gold believes we may have reached "peak" Gold already... And by that "peak" I'm talking about the mining of the shiny metal!

"Aaron Regent, president of the Canadian gold giant, said that global output has been falling by roughly 1m ounces a year since the start of the decade. Total mine supply has dropped by 10% as ore quality erodes, implying that the roaring bull market of the last eight years may have further to run. There is a strong case to be made that we are already at 'peak gold'," he told The Daily Telegraph at the RBC's annual gold conference in London."

WOW! Did you get the one line that was in there about how this lack of mining implies that the roaring bull market of the last eight years may have further to run? I think that's putting it conservatively for sure! "may have further to run?" I would say it stronger... But I can't... Or I'm not supposed to! ( our legal beagles read the Pfennig each day!)

OK... That put me back on track to be more upbeat for this Fantastico Friday! Today's data cupboard will yield the Monthly Trade Deficit data, and the U. of Michigan Consumer Confidence index... The Trade Deficit overhang continues to be a problem for the U.S., obviously not as bad as a problem as it was during the go-go days for the consumer...

Traders have become "comfortably numb" with the deficit figures in the U.S. which is a bad thing folks... Traders need to make a stand, and not allow this stuff to just slip under the door, thus allowing larger and larger deficits in the future!

I see the President is in China... I bet he thinks his presence will be the thing that will move the Chinese to allow greater currency flexibility... I just don't see the Chinese getting caught up in the "show" to give in and allow flexibility in their currency, just because the President of the U.S. showed up...

The currencies are rallying this morning VS the dollar. Since I came in and began writing, the euro has climbed higher, albeit a small move higher, it's still moving higher, and thus has stopped the bleeding, that began yesterday morning...

I'm surprised the Aussie dollar isn't really hitting on all 8 this morning, considering the growth numbers in the Eurozone... But I think we might have to wait for the U.S. traders to come in to see the rally in the A$ this morning... It is Saturday in Australia!

The Swiss franc got caught up in the Risk Aversion trading yesterday, and has backed off its ascent to parity... The franc is trading around .9855 this morning, which is more than 1-cent lower than yesterday morning... Wink, wink...

And a country / currency that I drop the ball on all the time, when it comes to talking about it in the Pfennig, is the Norwegian krone... Long time readers know that I truly like Norway, for their fiscal and monetary surplus prowess... And most recently, for their absence from the rolls of those countries that got involved in sub-prime and bad lending practices. Earlier this month, Norway's central bank, the Norges Bank, hiked rates 25 BPS, and is expected to raise them again in a month or two... So, now we have a country that has a strong fiscal and monetary position, no bad banks or loans, and a strong positive interest rate differential to the U.S.... Hmmm...

And then there was this... Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the $700 Billion TARP bailout said the program will "almost certainly result in a loss to taxpayers"... "We need to temper or be realistic about our expectations, a dollar-for-dollar return is just highly unrealistic." Barofsky also said that he's conducting 65 investigations of possible fraud...

OH MY! You're telling me that with the $700 Billion TARP funds that there could have been some fraud involved? I wouldn't have believed it! .... NOT! I bet you thought I had gone softy on you! The whole TARP was fraud to begin with! So, with all the corruption and scandals that have gone in before, the thought that there could be some fraud, should have been a belief that there "would be fraud for sure" when the TARP was issued!

Currencies today 11/13/09: American Style: A$ .9285, kiwi .7370, C$ .9495, euro 1.4890, sterling 1.6685, Swiss .9860, European Style: rand 7.4410, krone 5.62, SEK 6.8660, forint 180.80, zloty 2.76, koruna 17.10, RUB 28.83, yen 89.70, sing 1.3860, HKD 7.75, INR 46.34, China 6.8263, pesos 13.16, BRL 1.73, dollar index 75.39, Oil $77.45, 10-year 3.44%, Silver $17.36, and Gold... $1,109.30

That's it for today... Yes, today is a Friday the 13th... I don't get into that stuff, but if you do, be careful today! We're supposed to have another nice weekend here in St. Louis, weather wise, so we have that going for us! No football game this weekend though for my little buddy, Alex. I saw Chris Gaffney and his son Brendan on TV at the Blues game last night. The Blues lost the game though. UGH! Another week, and well be talking about Thanksgiving getting here so fast! The radio station that plays Christmas music every year, began broadcasting the Christmas music a couple of weeks ago! They used to at least wait until Thanksgiving came and went! Well... Let's get working on having a Fantastico Friday! And a Wonderful Weekend!

Chuck Butler
President
EverBank World Markets
1-800-926-4922
1-314-647-3837

Are We Sure the Recession is Really Over?

GaryHalbert — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:46:00 GMT

IN THIS ISSUE:

3Q GDP Report - Was It Really Better Than Expected?
What Else Was Missing in the 3Q GDP Report?
Worker Productivity Surges to Six-Year High
Latest Unemployment Numbers Not Encouraging
Roubini - Too Many People Are "Short" the Dollar

Introduction

When the government announced on October 29 that 3Q Gross Domestic Product surged 3.5% (annual rate), there was a collective sigh of relief around the world that the US economy had finally emerged from the most serious recession since the Great Depression. After all, the 3.5% number outpaced the pre-report consensus of around 3%.

On closer inspection, however, the latest GDP report was not nearly as rosy as the headline number of 3.5% seems to suggest. For example, if you consider all of the government's incentives for consumers to spend (think "cash-for-clunkers" which ended in August, the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit, and huge stimulus spending), GDP growth in the 3Q would have been significantly lower.

These and other caveats from the latest GDP report suggest that while we have turned the corner on the recession - barring any big negative surprises - economic growth over at least the next several quarters is likely to be disappointing. For example, most estimates I see for 4Q GDP growth are in the 1-2% range.

Last Thursday, the Labor Department reported that US worker productivity soared to a six-year high in the 3Q, well above expectations. Rising productivity is a good thing, right? Not necessarily, especially when it means that companies are laying off their best and brightest, such as scientists and engineers, that are focused on new product development (R&D).

On Friday, the Labor Department reported that the unemployment rate surged from 9.8% to 10.2% in October, well above the pre-report consensus of 9.9%. 10.2% is the highest unemployment rate since 1983. 15.7 million Americans are officially out of work, and that does not include those who are working part-time by necessity and those who have given up looking for work.

This week, we will examine the latest 3Q GDP report in detail and what that means for the future of the economy. We'll also take a look at some subsequent economic reports which seem to suggest that 4Q growth will be tepid. Next, we'll delve into the latest worker productivity report and what that may mean for the economy and the markets. Also, we will dissect the latest unemployment figures.

Finally, I will bring you the latest dire warning from noted forecaster Nouriel Roubini. You may recall that he predicted the housing/credit crisis back in 2005. Now he warns that too many people around the world are "short" the US dollar, and this could spark a second credit crisis.

3Q GDP Report - Was It Really Better Than Expected?

As noted above, the Commerce Department reported on October 29 that US GDP grew at an annual rate of 3.5% in the 3Q. Pre-report estimates varied widely with a consensus of 3%, so the actual report was better than expected. Stocks rallied sharply and closed 200 points higher following the report's release. In the Commerce Department's report, it stated: "The increase in real GDP in the third quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, private inventory investment, federal government spending, and residential fixed investment." The 3Q boost in the economy followed four consecutive losing quarters, including the 2Q that saw a drop of 0.7%. The 3Q GDP report, the so-called "advance" report, will be revised two more times before it goes "final", and the next revision will be released on November 24.

While stocks rallied strongly just after the report, it did not take long for analysts to see that the number was artificially pumped up. For example, if you take out surging auto sales ("cash-for-clunkers" which ended in August), GDP rose only apprx. 1.5% in the 3Q. Take away the government's $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers, which is scheduled to end on December 1, and economic growth was even weaker.

Consider also the fact that GDP was boosted by the federal "stimulus package" spending, which unlike cash-for-clunkers and home tax credits, is not going away anytime soon. But the point is, the GDP number would have been much lower without these artificial incentives. Actually, the White House admitted as much just after the report. Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, acknowledged that without all these government incentives, "real GDP would have risen little, if at all, this past quarter."

Looked at differently, the 3.5% GDP report noted that the overall economy rose to a seasonally adjusted $13.014 trillion (annual) in the 3Q, up from $12.901 trillion in the 2Q. In other words, the economy added apprx. $112 billion dollars in output quarter-over-quarter. Yet we have spent an estimated $173 billion worth of the $787 billion stimulus plan so far. This shows how heavily dependent the economy is on government spending.

Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc. and Halbert Wealth Management, Inc.
are not affiliated with nor do they endorse, sponsor or recommend the following product or service.

What Else Was Missing in the 3Q GDP Report?

There are a number of factors and trends that the government's GDP reports do not consider. For example, the official GDP statistics are not designed to pick up cutbacks in "intangible investments" such as business spending on research and development, product design, worker training, etc. There's plenty of evidence which indicates that companies are slashing this kind of spending, which is essential for innovation, in an effort to cut costs.

Without investment in intangibles, the U.S. can't compete in a knowledge-based global economy over the long-run. Yet we don't see that plunge reflected in the GDP numbers which are still too focused on more traditional sectors, such as motor vehicles, construction, housing, etc.

There are more signs that companies are robbing the future to cut costs and improve profits. For example, over the past year, US employment of scientists and engineers has fallen by 6.3% according to BusinessWeek. For the most part, these are the people who create the next generation of products and make the US more competitive over the long-term. Again, this trend is not considered in the GDP reports.

Another clear-cut sign that GDP growth is being overestimated is the sharp drop in venture capital investment, which goes directly to new businesses. Venture capital firms invested about $12 billion in the first three quarters of 2009, barely half the $22 billion invested during the first three quarters of 2008. Some of this shortfall would have been spent on computers and other physical equipment, which would have been picked up in GDP. But most of the drop in VC money would have gone to pay for scientists, engineers, and new product development - all valuable intangible investments that don't show up in the GDP reports.

Similarly, many companies have slashed their reported R&D spending, which also doesn't show up in GDP. Just to cite a couple of examples, Alcoa announced recently that it cut its 3Q R&D spending by 36% from the year before. Johnson & Johnson has reduced its R&D by 13% over the past year. Such cuts are going on across industry sectors, with few exceptions. Again, these significant cutbacks are not reflected in the GDP data.

Another big problem not reflected in the GDP statistics is that many companies are retreating from development of new products, especially in stressed industries. In many sectors of the economy, companies have not only cut back on new products, but in many cases are reducing the number of models or options they currently offer.

Likewise, US companies are significantly cutting their spending on worker training. The drop started in 2008, when employers reduced their per-worker "learning expenditures" by 3.8% on average, according to the American Society for Training & Development. No data are available for 2009, but "from anecdotal evidence, obviously there's a lot of cutback," says Pat Galagan, executive editor of publications.

Ideally, a big burst of training would occur during a severe recession such as this so that people can acquire the skills needed for the jobs of the future. The problem is how to pay for that training, since unemployed people rarely spend money on long-term training when they're worried about short-term survival.

Worker Productivity Surges to Six-Year High

Last Thursday, the Labor Department announced that worker productivity surged to the highest level in six years in the 3Q. Productivity nationally rose 9.5% on average, well above the pre-report consensus of 6.5%. Non-farm productivity and costs provide measures of the productivity of workers and the costs associated with producing a unit of output.

The report also noted that overall output rose 4.0% in the 3Q, while hours worked fell 5.0%. Non-farm businesses continued to get lean and mean, finding ways to squeeze more output out of fewer workers (more on this below). Unit labor costs also fell 5.2%, which will help keep inflation contained.

Productivity growth has risen at an 8.2% average annualized pace during the last two quarters, the fastest two-quarter surge off a recession trough since 1961. Unit labor costs, typically the flip side of the productivity numbers, collapsed at nearly a 6% annualized rate during the last two quarters - the largest two-quarter decline off a recession trough on record. Since corporate profits are directly related to productivity growth and inversely related to unit cost growth, this data is good news for earnings.

Normally, it is considered a good thing for productivity to go up but the question is, why so much? With the unemployment rate continuing to go up every month, we know that companies continue to terminate and/or lay off workers. In doing so, they are demanding more productivity from those employees that remain on the job.

Actually, it is not unusual for productivity to rise in the early stages of a recovery as businesses continue to aggressively cut costs even as output begins to rebound. Companies are reluctant to hire near the end of recessions and even in the early stages of a recovery, as they are not sure the economy has really turned the corner, especially with the unemployment rate rising month after month.

On a related note, the Labor Department also published monthly data on the "average work week." The average work week shrank to a new all-time low of 33 hours in June, and it remained the same in October, as reported in last Friday's unemployment data (more on that report below). While the manufacturing sectors are averaging well above 33 work hours per week, the much larger service/retail sectors are averaging less than 33 work hours per week.

Many economists believe, however, that the recent productivity gains and the shrinking of the average work week are not sustainable. At some point, hours worked and payrolls will have to rise in order to meet stepped-up production schedules. As this occurs, income growth should recover, allowing households to spend more even if they are setting aside a larger fraction of their income in savings. Of course, the question is, when?

Latest Unemployment Numbers Not Encouraging

On Friday, the Labor Department reported that the US unemployment rate rose from 9.8% to 10.2% in October, the highest level since April 1983. The report noted that in October, the number of unemployed persons increased by 558,000 to 15.7 million, a record high. The largest job losses over the month were in construction, manufacturing, and retail trade.

Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has risen by 8.2 million, and the unemployment rate has grown by 5.3 percentage points. Keep in mind that the official unemployment rate does not include those who are working part-time out of necessity, and does not include those who have given up on looking for a job.

The number of long-term unemployed, jobless for 27 weeks or more, and assumed to have given up on looking for work, was 5.6 million in October according to the latest report. The Labor Department estimates that 35.6% of unemployed persons were jobless for 27 weeks or more. Yet these people are not counted in the official unemployment rate.

The number of persons working part-time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as "involuntary part-time workers") was 9.3 million. These individuals were working part-time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. Here too, these people are not counted in the official unemployment rate.

If we include discouraged workers and those forced to work part-time, the unemployment rate surged to 17.5%, the highest on record.

The latest unemployment rate was considerably worse than expected. The pre-report consensus was for a rise from 9.8% in September to 9.9% in October. While many in the media have led us to believe in recent weeks that job losses were falling, the latest report clearly muzzles such optimism.

Most economists believe that the unemployment rate will continue to rise for at least a few more months. A Bloomberg survey of leading economists concludes that the unemployment rate will remain high for at least another year. The average forecast among the dozens of economists surveyed indicates that unemployment will average 9.7% for all of 2010.

If true, this is very bad news for the Obama administration and for Democrats who will be seeking re-election in 2010.

Is the World Too Bearish on the US Dollar?

There is now near-universal agreement that the US dollar will continue to fall for the foreseeable future. While not admitting to it, the Obama administration favors a weaker dollar as it is good for exports, just as the Bush administration did. The Fed is encouraging a weaker dollar by keeping short-term interest rates near zero for "an extended period."

As the dollar has fallen sharply since March, investors around the world have taken to "shorting" the dollar in various ways. Yet the US dollar is a commodity, after all, and commodities of all stripes have a way of not doing what the crowd expects. There is no way to know when the dollar will reverse higher, but when it does, it could well be explosive at least for a time.

Nouriel Roubini is a well-known professor of economics at the Stern School of Business at New York University and is chairman of RGE Monitor, an economic consulting firm. Roubini is best known for his public warnings in 2005 that we were in a housing bubble that was about to burst, and that it would lead to a financial crisis. At the time, he was called "Doctor Doom."

Last week, Roubini issued a serious warning that too many people around the world are "short" the US dollar, especially via so-called "carry trades" where investors borrow cheap dollars and then invest in other "risk assets" (stocks, etc.) that earn higher returns. Roubini believes that, at some point, the short dollar carry trade is going to blow up.

I have taken the liberty of reprinting his latest warning in the Financial Times (of London).

QUOTE:

Mother of all carry trades faces an inevitable bust

By Nouriel Roubini
November 1 2009

Since March there has been a massive rally in all sorts of risky assets - equities, oil, energy and commodity prices - a narrowing of high-yield and high-grade credit spreads, and an even bigger rally in emerging market asset classes (their stocks, bonds and currencies). At the same time, the dollar has weakened sharply, while government bond yields have gently increased but stayed low and stable.

The dollar and the sterling have weakened against a host of other currencies since the summer, promoting speculation that they could become the next carry trade currencies and supplant the yen as the ‘funding currency' of choice.

This recovery in risky assets is in part driven by better economic fundamentals. We avoided a near depression and financial sector meltdown with a massive monetary, fiscal stimulus and bank bail-outs. Whether the recovery is V-shaped, as consensus believes, or U-shaped and anemic as I have argued, asset prices should be moving gradually higher.

But while the US and global economy have begun a modest recovery, asset prices have gone through the roof since March in a major and synchronised rally. While asset prices were falling sharply in 2008, when the dollar was rallying, they have recovered sharply since March while the dollar is tanking. Risky asset prices have risen too much, too soon and too fast compared with macroeconomic fundamentals.

So what is behind this massive rally? Certainly it has been helped by a wave of liquidity from near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing. But a more important factor fuelling this asset bubble is the weakness of the US dollar, driven by the mother of all carry trades. The US dollar has become the major funding currency of carry trades as the Fed has kept interest rates on hold and is expected to do so for a long time. Investors who are shorting the US dollar to buy on a highly leveraged basis higher-yielding assets and other global assets are not just borrowing at zero interest rates in dollar terms; they are borrowing at very negative interest rates - as low as negative 10 or 20 per cent annualised - as the fall in the US dollar leads to massive capital gains on short dollar positions.

Let us sum up: traders are borrowing at negative 20 per cent rates to invest on a highly leveraged basis on a mass of risky global assets that are rising in price due to excess liquidity and a massive carry trade. Every investor who plays this risky game looks like a genius - even if they are just riding a huge bubble financed by a large negative cost of borrowing - as the total returns have been in the 50-70 per cent range since March.

People's sense of the value at risk (VAR) of their aggregate portfolios ought, instead, to have been increasing due to a rising correlation of the risks between different asset classes, all of which are driven by this common monetary policy and the carry trade. In effect, it has become one big common trade - you short the dollar to buy any global risky assets.

Yet, at the same time, the perceived riskiness of individual asset classes is declining as volatility is diminished due to the Fed's policy of buying everything in sight - witness its proposed $1,800bn (£1,000bn, €1,200bn) purchase of Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities (bonds guaranteed by a government-sponsored enterprise such as Fannie Mae) and agency debt. By effectively reducing the volatility of individual asset classes, making them behave the same way, there is now little diversification across markets - the VAR again looks low.

So the combined effect of the Fed policy of a zero Fed funds rate, quantitative easing and massive purchase of long-term debt instruments is seemingly making the world safe - for now - for the mother of all carry trades and mother of all highly leveraged global asset bubbles.

While this policy feeds the global asset bubble it is also feeding a new US asset bubble. Easy money, quantitative easing, credit easing and massive inflows of capital into the US via an accumulation of forex reserves by foreign central banks makes US fiscal deficits easier to fund and feeds the US equity and credit bubble. Finally, a weak dollar is good for US equities as it may lead to higher growth and makes the foreign currency profits of US corporations abroad greater in dollar terms.

The reckless US policy that is feeding these carry trades is forcing other countries to follow its easy monetary policy. Near-zero policy rates and quantitative easing were already in place in the UK, eurozone, Japan, Sweden and other advanced economies, but the dollar weakness is making this global monetary easing worse. Central banks in Asia and Latin America are worried about dollar weakness and are aggressively intervening to stop excessive currency appreciation. This is keeping short-term rates lower than is desirable. Central banks may also be forced to lower interest rates through domestic open market operations. Some central banks, concerned about the hot money driving up their currencies, as in Brazil, are imposing controls on capital inflows. Either way, the carry trade bubble will get worse: if there is no forex intervention and foreign currencies appreciate, the negative borrowing cost of the carry trade becomes more negative. If intervention or open market operations control currency appreciation, the ensuing domestic monetary easing feeds an asset bubble in these economies. So the perfectly correlated bubble across all global asset classes gets bigger by the day.

But one day this bubble will burst, leading to the biggest coordinated asset bust ever: if factors lead the dollar to reverse and suddenly appreciate - as was seen in previous reversals, such as the yen-funded carry trade - the leveraged carry trade will have to be suddenly closed as investors cover their dollar shorts. A stampede will occur as closing long leveraged risky asset positions across all asset classes funded by dollar shorts triggers a coordinated collapse of all those risky assets - equities, commodities, emerging market asset classes and credit instruments.

Why will these carry trades unravel? First, the dollar cannot fall to zero and at some point it will stabilise; when that happens the cost of borrowing in dollars will suddenly become zero, rather than highly negative, and the riskiness of a reversal of dollar movements would induce many to cover their shorts. Second, the Fed cannot suppress volatility forever - its $1,800bn purchase plan will be over by next spring. Third, if US growth surprises on the upside in the third and fourth quarters, markets may start to expect a Fed tightening to come sooner, not later. Fourth, there could be a flight from risk prompted by fear of a double dip recession or geopolitical risks, such as a military confrontation between the US/Israel and Iran. As in 2008, when such a rise in risk aversion was associated with a sharp appreciation of the dollar, as investors sought the safety of US Treasuries, this renewed risk aversion would trigger a dollar rally at a time when huge short dollar positions will have to be closed.

This unraveling may not occur for a while, as easy money and excessive global liquidity can push asset prices higher for a while. But the longer and bigger the carry trades and the larger the asset bubble, the bigger will be the ensuing asset bubble crash. The Fed and other policymakers seem unaware of the monster bubble they are creating. The longer they remain blind, the harder the markets will fall.
END QUOTE

Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc. and Halbert Wealth Management, Inc.
are not affiliated with nor do they endorse, sponsor or recommend the following product or service.

Conclusions

I titled this E-Letter "Are We Sure the Recession is Really Over" because I think this concern is still heavy on the minds of most Americans. Certainly, the latest 3Q GDP report is a welcome sign that we have turned a corner, at least for now. But as I have also pointed out above, the reported gain of 3.5% in the 3Q leaves many questions we should be concerned about.

There are still many weak spots in our economy. Most notable, the unemployment rate weakened even more than almost anyone expected in October, reaching the highest level in a quarter century, and is very likely headed even higher for a few more months at least. It will almost certainly remain high throughout 2010.

The worst of the housing and credit crisis appears to be behind us, but bank lending remains substantially below pre-crisis levels, even as short-term interest rates are at historical lows. The Fed continues to buy up toxic assets at unprecedented levels. At some point, this will have to stop and reverse itself, just as interest rates will have to be increased at some point.

The point is, while we may have emerged from the recession, there are many risks that could throw us right back into a further economic contraction in the next year or two. Nouriel Roubini's analysis just above regarding the US dollar is just one of several scenarios that could result in a "double-dip" recession in the next year or two.

As I discussed at length in my September 29 E-Letter, we are in the early stages of a commercial real estate bust that could very well be the next shoe to drop in the credit crisis. I will have a lot more to say about that next week, unless something more pressing comes about. In any event, we will be hearing a lot more about the commercial real estate problems in the weeks and months ahead.

While we all welcomed the latest GDP report, conflicted as it was, there are few indications that economic growth will continue at that rate going forward. As mentioned earlier, most estimates I am seeing on 4Q GDP growth are in the 1-2% range. Forecasts for 2010 are only marginally better.

Finally, the stock market overshoot since early March has surprised even the most optimistic forecasters. All of my most trusted sources believe that the equity markets are overbought and very susceptible to a downside correction, or worse anytime now. If Roubini's concerns about the dollar are realized, it could be much worse than a garden variety correction.

Everything I have discussed this week argues for having actively managed strategies in your investment portfolio, strategies that have the ability to move out of the markets, or hedge long positions, in case any one of the negative scenarios arises. If you agree, give us a call at 800-348-3601, or e-mail us at info@halbertwealth.com.

** If you are wondering just how bad the House healthcare reform bill that passed last Saturday is, be sure to read the link in SPECIAL ARTICLES below. It's awful!

Finally, our thoughts and prayers go out to all of the families of the innocent soldiers who were killed and injured in the tragedy at FortHood that occurred on November 5.

Very best regards,

Gary D. Halbert

SPECIAL ARTICLES:

What the Pelosi Health-Care Bill Really Says
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704795604574519671055918380.html

The Glide Path Option

JohnMauldin — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:54:00 GMT

The Present Contains All Possible Futures
The Ugly Unemployment Numbers
Argentinian Disease
The Austrian Solution
The Eastern European Solution
Japanese Disease
The Glide Path Option
Philadelphia, Orlando, and Phoenix

The present contains all possible futures. But not all futures are good ones. Some can be quite cruel. The one we actually get is dictated by the choices we make. For the last few months I have been addressing the choices in front of us, economically speaking. Today I am going to summarize them, and maybe we can look for some signposts that will tell us which path we're headed down. For those who are new readers and who would like a more in-depth analysis, you can go to the archives at www.investorsinsight.com and search for terms I am writing about. And I will start out by briefly touching on today's ugly unemployment numbers, with data you did not get in the mainstream media.

But first, let me welcome the readers of EQUITIES Magazine to this letter. The publisher is sending the letter to you directly. This letter is free, and all you have to do to continue receiving it is type in your email address at www.investorsinsight.com. Likewise, I have arranged for my regular readers to get a free subscription to EQUITIES Magazine, if you would like. You can go to www.equitiesmagazine.com. For those who don't know, I write a brief monthly column for them.

The Ugly Unemployment Numbers

The headlines said unemployment, as measured by the "establishment survey," was down by 190,000; and even though that was slightly worse than forecast, market bulls were cheered by the fact that the number was not as bad as last month's. It is an improvement that we are not falling as fast.

Well, maybe. What I did not see in many of the stories I read was that the number of unemployed actually soared by 558,000, to 15.7 million, as measured by the household survey. The establishment survey polls larger businesses; the household survey actually calls individual households.

Let's look at the real number in the establishment survey. If you don't seasonally adjust the number, the actual change in unemployment for October was 641,000, or about 450,000 more than the seasonally adjusted number. And the Bureau of Labor Statistics added 86,000 jobs that they simply guess were created through the so-called birth-death ratio. Interestingly, the birth-death ratio number is not seasonally adjusted, so it is just added to the unemployment number. http://www.bls.gov/web/cesbd.htm

The total (U-6) employment rate is at a record high of 17.5% (this includes those who are part-time for economic reasons). There are now over 10.5 million people who have lost their jobs since the beginning of the downturn.

My favorite slicer and dicer of data, Greg Weldon (www.weldononline.com), offers up an even more horrific number. As I have noted before, if you have not looked for work in the last four weeks, the BLS does not count you as unemployed. Quoting Greg:

"Moreover, when we combine the monthly change in the number of Unemployed, with the number Not in the Labor Force, we might consider the result to be a proxy for the actual 'change' in the underlying labor market situation ... in which case, October's figure of 817,000 represents the fourth LARGEST yet, behind last month's (September's) second largest figure of 1,021,000 ... for a two-month combined figure of 1.838 million, in newly Unemployed, or no longer 'in' the Labor Force ...

"... the second LARGEST two-month total EVER posted, barely trailing the December-08/January-09 total 1.955 million.

"Bottom line ... basis this measure AND the 'Total Unemployment Rate,' we could conclude that not only is there NO 'improvement' in the labor market, but moreover, that it continues to DETERIORATE, intently."

There are plenty more implications in the data, but let's turn to the topic of the day.

The Present Contains All Possible Futures

Like teenagers, we as a US polity have made a number of bad choices over the past decade. We allowed banks to overleverage and, in the case of AIG (and others), sell what were essentially naked call options of credit default swaps, based on their firm balance sheets, far in excess of their net worth; and that put our entire financial system at risk. We gave mortgages to people who could not pay them, and did so in such large amounts that we again brought down the entire world financial system to the point that only with staggering amounts of taxpayer money was it brought back from the brink of Armageddon. We assumed that home prices were not in a bubble but were a permanent fixture of ever-rising value, and we borrowed against our homes to finance what seemed like the perfect lifestyle. We did not regulate the mortgage markets. We ran large and growing government deficits. We did not save enough. We allowed rating agencies to degrade their ratings to a point where they no longer meant anything. The list is much longer, but you get the idea.

Now, we are faced with a continuing crisis and the aftermath of multiple bubbles bursting. We are left with a massive government deficit and growing public debt, record unemployment, and consumers who are desperately trying to repair their balance sheets.

If present trends are left unchecked, we will need to find $15 trillion in the next ten years, just to pay for US government debt, let alone state, county, and city debt. And perhaps some loans for business will be needed? Where can all this money come from? The answer is that it can't be found. Long before we get to 2019 there will be an upheaval in the market, forcing what could be unpleasant changes.

We are left with no good choices, only bad ones. We have created a situation that is going to cause a lot of pain. It is not a question of pain or no pain, it is just when and how we decide (or are forced) to take it. There are no easy paths, but some bad choices are less bad than others. So, let's review some of the choices we can make. (Again, I am being very general here. You can go to the archives for more specifics. This is a summary letter.)

Argentinian Disease

One way to deal with the deficit is to do what Argentina and other countries have done: simply print the money needed to cover the deficits. Of course, that eventually means hyperinflation and the collapse of the currency and all debt. There are writers who think this is an inevitable outcome. How else, they ask, can we deal with the debt? Where is the political willpower?

One large hedge-fund manager in Brazil humorously remarked that Argentina is a binomial country. When faced with two choices (hence binomial) they always made the bad choice. Could it happen here?

Hyperinflation is not an economic event; it is a political choice. I think last Tuesday's election is a sign that the voter population is beginning to pay attention to the need for something more than talk of change. There is growing discomfort with the size of the deficits. Further, the Fed would have to cooperate in order for there to be hyperinflation, and I think there is only a very slight (as in almost zero) chance of that happening. Could Congress change the rules and take over the Fed? Anything's possible, but I seriously doubt there is any appetite in saner Democratic circles for such a thing to happen.

I think the chances of hyperinflation in the US are quite low. It would be the worst of all possible bad choices.

The Austrian Solution

Here I refer to the Austrian school of economic theory, based on the work of Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, et al. There are those in the Austrian camp who argue the need to do away with the Fed, return to the gold standard, allow the banks that are now deemed too big to fail to go ahead and fail, along with any businesses that are also mismanaged (such as GM and Chrysler), and leave the high ground to new and more properly run.

In their model, government spending is slashed to the bone, as are (in most cases) taxes. The advantage is that, in theory, you get all your pain at once and then can begin to recover from what would be a very bad and deep recession. The bad news is that you risk getting 30% unemployment and another depression that could take a very long time to climb out of.

Now, let me say that I have GREATLY simplified their argument. If you want to learn more you can go to www.mises.org. It is an excellent web site for all things Austrian. While I am not Austrian, I have spent a lot of time reading the literature and have certain sympathies for this view.

That being said, this also has almost no chance of being implemented. In Congress, only my friend Ron Paul is its advocate. Most Austrian followers are Libertarian by nature, and that is just not a political reality for the coming decade.

The Eastern European Solution

As it turned out, Niall Ferguson (last week I wrote about his brilliant book, The Ascent of Money) was in Dallas last night, and I was graciously invited to hear him. He gave a great speech and signed books, and then we went to a local bar and proceeded to solve the world's problems over Scotch (Niall) and tequila (me), and went farther into the night than we originally intended. He's a very fun and knowledgeable guy.

As we were talking about possible paths, he brought one to mind that I hadn't thought of. He reminded me of the period after the fall of the Berlin Wall, as the nations of Eastern Europe broke from the former Soviet Union. They started with very weak economies and simply overhauled their entire governments and economies in a rather short period of time, though not in lockstep with one another. Privatization, lowered taxes, etc. were the order of the day.

We here in the US are always talking about the need for reform. We need to reform health care or education or energy. In Eastern Europe they did not reform in the sense that we use the word. In many cases they simply started from scratch and built new systems. They had the advantage that there was general agreement that things did not work the way they had been, so there was more room for change.

Today in the US there are large constituencies that resist change. We only get to tinker around the edges, when real structural change is needed. Sadly, we agreed that here there is not much chance of major change. We can't even get the obvious changes needed in the financial regulatory world.

Sidebar: I am outraged at the paltry proposed financial "reforms." Rahm Emanuel said that no crisis should be allowed to go to waste. The Obama administration is wasting this one. How can we allow banks to be too big to fail? Where is the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall? If we are going to allow large banks to exist, then their leverage must be reduced to the point where their failure would not risk the system and require taxpayer dollars. I don't care if that makes them less profitable. They are making those large profits because they have taxpayers implicitly behind them, and I get no dividend payments from them, the last time I checked. Where is Fannie and Freddie reform (and their breakup)? No mention of an exchange for credit default swaps? (And yes, I know that such an exchange would reduce the number of swaps and the profitability of them. That is the point. They are dangerous if allowed to become too big a market.) This bill reads as if bank lobbyists wrote it. Where is the populist outrage? We have let the fox set up the rules for running the hen house. Shame on us all if we allow this to happen.

Japanese Disease

I have written a lot over the past year about the problems facing Japan. Their population is shrinking, as is their work force. They are running massive fiscal deficits and have done so for almost 20 years. Government debt-to-GDP is now up to 178% and projected to rise to over 200% within a few years. They started their "lost decades" with a savings rate of almost 16%, and are now down to 2% as their aging population spends its savings in retirement. They have had no new job creation for 20 years, and nominal GDP is where it was 17 years ago.

As bad as our problems are here in the US, their bubble was far more massive. Values of commercial property fell 87%! Their stock market is still down 70%. They had twice as much bank leverage to GDP as the US. (Think about how bad off we would be if bank lending was twice as large and had even worse defaults and capital shortfalls!)

And yet, they Muddle Through. Productivity has kept their standard of living reasonable. Up until recently their exports were strong. The trading floors of the world are littered with the bodies of traders who have shorted Japanese government debt in the belief that it simply must implode. While I believe that it eventually will, if they stay on the path they are on, Japan is a very clear demonstration that things that don't make sense can go on longer than we think.

Richard Koo (chief economist of Nomura Securities, in Tokyo) argues passionately that Japan had a balance-sheet recession, and that the only way for Japan to fight it was to run massive deficits. Banks were not lending and businesses were not borrowing, as both groups were trying to repair their balance sheets, which were savaged by the bursting of the bubble. It is said that at one time the value of the land on which the Emperor's Palace sits in Tokyo was worth more than all of California. Clearly this was a bubble that puts our housing bubble to shame.

So, I understand the point that there are differences between Japan and the US . But there are also similarities. We too have had a balance sheet recession, although here it was mostly individuals and financial institutions that have had to retrench and repair their balance sheets.

Japan elected to run large deficits and raise taxes. As I wrote in the October 16^th letter (http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/thoughts_from_the_frontline/archive/2009/10/17/muddle-through-r-i-p.aspx), "Savings equal Investments:

GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is defined as Consumption (C) plus Investment (I) plus Government Spending (G) plus [Exports (E) minus Imports (I)] or:

GDP = C + I + G + (E-I)

I don't want to go on at length again, but basically, the literature I quoted suggests that government stimulus and deficits have no long-run positive effect on GDP. In fact, the work done by Christina Romer, Obama's chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, shows that tax cuts have a three-times-greater positive effect on GDP, and tax increases have the same level of negative effect.

In the equation above, if you increase government spending it will have a positive effect in the short run on GDP, but not in the long run. In essence, the increase in "G" must be made up by savings from consumers and businesses and foreigners.

But "G" does not enhance overall productivity. Government spending may be necessary but it is not especially productive. You increase productivity when private businesses invest and create jobs and products. But if government soaks up the investment capital, there is less for private business.

And that is Japanese disease. You run large deficits, sucking the air out of the room, and you raise taxes, taking the money from productive businesses and reducing the ability of consumers to save. Then you go for 20 years with little or no economic or job growth.

This is the path we currently seem to be on. The Japanese experience says that it could last a lot longer than people think before we hit the wall; because if savings rise in the US, and if banks, instead of lending, put that money on deposit with the Fed, as they are now doing (in order to repair their balance sheets), the US could run large deficits for longer than most observers currently believe.

We will need 15-18 million new jobs in the next five years, just to get back to where we were only a few years ago. Without the creation of whole new industries, that is not going to happen. Nearly 20% of Americans are not paying anywhere close to the amount of taxes they paid a few years ago, and at least ten million are now collecting some kind of unemployment benefits or welfare.

Choosing large deficits does not reduce the amount of pain we will experience, it just seemingly reduces it in the short term and creates the potential for a serious economic upheaval when the bond market finally decides to opt for higher rates. This path is a bad choice, but sadly, in reality it is one we could take.

The Glide Path Option

A glide path is the final path followed by an aircraft as it is landing. We need to establish a glide path to sustainable deficits (could we dream of surpluses?). That is because at some point there will be recognition, either proactively or forced upon us by the bond market, that large deficits are unsustainable in the long term.

If Congress and the president decided to lay out a real (and credible) plan to reduce the deficit over time, say 5-6 years, to where it was less than nominal GDP, the bond market would (I think) behave. Reducing deficits by $150 billion a year through a combination of cuts in growth and spending would get us there in five years.

The problem is that there is real pain associated with this option. Remember that equation above. Absent a growing private sector, if you reduce "G" (government spending) you also reduce GDP in the short run. You have to take some pain today in order to do that. But you avoid worse pain down the road: a bubble of massive federal debt that has to be serviced will be very painful when it blows up, as all bubbles do.

The Glide Path Option means that structural unemployment is going to be higher than we like (which is actually the case with all the options). And the large tax increases that come with this option will by their very nature be a drag on growth (and cause a double-dip recession in 2011). We can debate tax increases all we want, but I sadly think we will soon have a VAT tax. There are no good options. I just hope that we cut corporate taxes enough when we do create a VAT, that it will make our corporations more competitive, which will be a boost for jobs.

That's pretty much it. This is not a problem we can grow ourselves out of in the next few years. We have simply dug ourselves into a huge hole. This is not a normal recession. There is not a "V" ending to this recession. We are going to have deal with the pain. It will be the pain of reduced returns on traditional stock market investments, a lower dollar, low returns on bonds, European-like unemployment, lower corporate profits over the long term, and a very slow-growth environment. But if we choose this path, we will get through it in the fullness of time.

And of course, then we will eventually have to deal with the $70 trillion in our off-balance-sheet liabilities in Medicare and Social Security and pensions. Sigh. But that's for another time.

Philadelphia, Orlando, and Phoenix

I really am more optimistic than this letter makes me seem. But if you ignore reality, then you have no chance to figure out how to make the best of your situation. It is the efforts of hundreds of millions of individuals trying to make their own lot a little better than will get us back to a robust economy.

Monday I fly to Philadelphia and then the next day to Orlando for two speeches, and then the following week a quick trip to Phoenix, then home to start to plan for Thanksgiving. I will be in New York the first weekend of December (the 4^th) for Festivus, a great fundraiser for kids sponsored by Todd Harrison and the team at Minyanville (http://www.rpfoundation.org/), Interestingly, they hold it every year at a "Texas" barbecue joint. Look me up if you are there.

Tiffani has been out the last two days of this week. She is due in seven weeks or less, and her hips are expanding. The pain is too much right now for her to walk up the stairs to the office, so she is working from home. The doctor says this is the one time that her pain is not a sign of something bad. She is being a trooper and not taking any pain meds.

It has been 30 years since I was around a pregnant lady for more than a few hours, and it does bring back some memories. Watching her grow and change has brought back the sense of awe over how our bodies are designed.

Ryan and Tiffani have decided on the name Lively for my first granddaughter, to add to the two new grandsons this year. From zero to three grandkids in just six months! Kind of makes me dizzy.

I really enjoyed my time in South America. Rio is quite beautiful and I want to go back and spend some time.

Have a great week. There will be enough good friends and family that I know I will. And tomorrow night I finally get to go to a Dallas Mavericks game. We may have a real team this year.

Your always optimistic at the beginning of the season analyst,

John Mauldin

Dalbar Update: Investors Still Lagging The Market

GaryHalbert — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:04:00 GMT

IN THIS ISSUE:

Third Quarter GDP Surprises on the Upside
Why Investor Returns Can Trail the Market
The 2009 Dalbar QAIB Study Update
Investor Panic Leads to Poor Decisions
A Chink in Passive Investing’s Armor?
Same Study – Different Conclusions

Introduction

Since late 1994, studies have shown that many investors do not realize the same returns as the mutual funds in which they were investing. The first such study I saw back in the 1990s was one that Martin Zweig commissioned Morningstar to produce. This study analyzed cash flows in and out of stock mutual funds to see how the average investor did. I remember being surprised when I learned that over the period from 1989 through 1994, the average growth mutual fund returned 12.5% but the average investor in those funds actually lost 2.2%.

Soon, the Zweig/Morningstar study was joined by others, the most notable of which was the Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior (QAIB) Study conducted by Dalbar, Inc. in 1994. Dalbar confirmed that many investors were not participating in long-term mutual fund returns because of frequent switching among funds.

Until these studies were published, no one worried too much about what kind of returns investors were actually realizing. Everyone just assumed that whatever the large mutual fund firms reported as returns were what investors got. These studies, however, showed that many investors were chasing hot returns in order to get better returns. In other words, they’d jump from one hot fund to the other in hopes of increasing their return. But just the opposite occurred.

To say that these studies had a huge impact on my firm is an understatement, since they were the catalyst for the introduction of our AdvisorLink® Program back in 1995. Fortunately, Dalbar has continued to update its original study each year, and the general trend has remained the same – investors overall are not getting the kind of returns they should because of frequent switching among funds.

This week, I’m going to update you on the latest update of the Dalbar QAIB Study. It’s possible that you might see yourself in these statistics. After that, I’m going to discuss the original conclusion reached in the QAIB Study, and why we chose a different track when developing our AdvisorLink® Program.

First, however, I’m going to briefly discuss the 3Q GDP report that came out last week after my weekly E-Letter had been published. To say the least, the number surprised most analysts by coming in on the high side of economists’ forecasts. I think you’ll find both subjects to be very interesting reading, so let’s get started.

Third Quarter GDP Surprises on the Upside

Last Thursday, the Commerce Department reported that 3Q GDP rose 3.5% (annual rate). This was above pre-report estimates which averaged around 3%. The government noted that the rebound in the 3Q was led by increased consumer spending (think "cash for clunkers"), higher exports and a continued increase in federal spending.

Most analysts concluded that the better than expected 3Q GDP report confirms that the US economy came out of the recession in the July-September quarter. However, the Consumer Confidence Index unexpectedly fell sharply in October, partly due to the continued rise in unemployment, which raises questions about economic growth in the 4Q.

Finally, keep in mind that the 3Q GDP report will be revised two more times in the coming weeks, and it will not surprise me if it is revised downward, what with the unemployment rate on track to top 10% by the end of the year. And for most of us, this economy does not feel like it's growing at the rate of 3.5%.

Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc. and Halbert Wealth Management, Inc.
are not affiliated with nor do they endorse, sponsor or recommend the following product or service.

Why Do Investors’ Returns Trail the Market?

Before going into the most recent update of the Dalbar QAIB study, it is probably worthwhile to provide some background on exactly how investor returns and fund returns can differ. I would bet that many readers just assume that investors always earn returns in line with those of the equity and bond mutual funds they hold, but this is definitely not always the case.

In a nutshell, fund returns represent what someone buying and holding a particular mutual fund would have earned over a specific time period. Returns for the “average investor,” on the other hand, factor in behavioral measures that can (and do) affect the actual returns earned by investors in these funds. Dalbar explains it this way:

“…the [QAIB] study utilizes the net of aggregate mutual fund sales, redemptions and exchanges each month as a measure of investor behavior. These behaviors are then used to simulate the ‘average investor.’ Based on this behavior, the analysis calculates ‘average investor return’ …”

In other words, switching among investments has an effect on the eventual return received, both on a long-term and short-term basis. Dalbar and others have found that investors who tend to hop from one hot mutual fund to another not only fail to enhance their performance over industry benchmarks, but have been shown to actually end up earning a far smaller return because of their periodic switching among funds.

Why do investors hop from fund to fund so much? The reasons vary, but my experience has been that some investors panic when losses occur and get out of the market. Others frequently change their investments to chase the hottest returns. Unfortunately, this hot performance mindset is aided by financial publications that routinely list the top five or 10 or 20 best funds for the previous year. Investors often look at their own return during the year compared with the “hot” funds, and decide to switch and get in on some of that high-powered performance.

Unfortunately, the mass migration of investors to funds with the best previous performance often guarantees that those funds will not repeat as a top performer the next year. The end result is that funds with hot performance one year often lag behind other funds in subsequent years. Thus, those investors who flocked into these funds after their best performance often find that they would have been better off had they stayed in their old funds.

So, do investors learn their lesson and look for funds with consistent long-term performance? The answer for many of them is “no,” and they continue hopping to the next hot fund and hoping for a repeat performance that seldom happens. This is what we like to call becoming a “Dalbar statistic.”

The 2009 QAIB Study Update

The 2009 update of the original QAIB Study measures performance over the 20-year period extending from January 1, 1989 through December 31, 2008. Considering that this period includes both the 2000 – 2002 and 2007 – 2008 bear markets, one might conclude that investors who frequently switch among mutual funds on their own might have had better results than those of the actual mutual funds, but you’d be wrong.

Here’s what the most recent update to the Dalbar QAIB Study found:

Over the 20 years ending December 31, 2008, equity mutual fund investors had average annual returns of only +1.87% while the S&P 500 Index averaged +8. 35% over the same time period.
Fixed income fund investors had average annual returns of +0.77% over the same 20-year period, while the benchmark Barclays Aggregate Bond Index averaged +7.43%.
Note that both the equity and fixed income fund investors’ average returns were less than inflation, which clocked in at 2.89% over this 20-year period of time.
Confirming the “lost decade” concept, Dalbar’s study showed that the S&P 500 Index had negative returns over 10, 5, 3 and 1-year time windows. Fixed income investors, however, fared better with the Barclay’s Aggregate Bond Index averaging positive returns ranging from +4.65% to +5.63% over this period of time. However, neither the average equity fund investor nor average bond fund investor beat the benchmark returns over any of the 1 to 10-year time windows.

Thus, the QAIB Study again shows that investors’ own behavior is detrimental to their long-term investment goals. Following are graphic representations of the study’s findings. The first graph shows the performance of the various benchmarks used in the QAIB Study during various time windows:

The next graph shows the performance of the average equity, fixed income and asset allocation mutual fund investor over the same time windows:

To sum it all up, many mutual fund investors have been their own worst enemies over the last 20 years. The only bright spot, if you can call it that, was a statistic showing that the average asset allocation fund investor fared better than both the S&P 500 Index benchmark and average equity fund investors in 2008, losing “only” 30%. In fact, the average asset allocation investor lost less than the average equity fund investor in most time periods. Obviously, this is a function of having both equity and fixed income mutual funds in the typical asset allocation portfolio.

However, something even more interesting is that asset allocation did not enhance performance over the long haul. Note that the average asset allocation investor had an average annual gain of only 1.67% over 20 years, versus 1.87% for the average equity mutual fund investor.

News Flash – Investors Panic in Down Markets!

Another, rather obvious finding in this year’s QAIB Study update was the fact that “When the going gets tough, investors panic.” In all previous updates of the QAIB Study, Dalbar has pointed out that investors’ emotional behavior can significantly affect their returns. However, their advice has been to simply suppress this emotional behavior and stay in the market.

This advice tends to ring hollow in bear markets like we had in 2000 – 2002 and 2007 – 2009. It’s like being on the Titanic and Dalbar saying “please remain calm and proceed in an orderly fashion to the lifeboats.” Some may heed the call, but the average passenger, like the average investor, is likely going to panic.

Thus, Dalbar has finally realized that investors engage in irrational behavior despite scholarly advice to the contrary. To illustrate this behavior, Dalbar has developed a “Guess Right Ratio” that measures how often the average equity fund investor makes an accurate investment decision based on the market environment. In other words, this ratio measures how often the average investor buys low and sells high. Over the 20-year period covered in the study, Dalbar found that “Market declines caused panic and panic led to bad decisions. And bad decisions combined with declining markets resulted in exacerbated losses.”

What I find disappointing in all of this is why it took Dalbar so long to figure out that investors won’t necessarily heed a call to ignore losses and stay invested during bear markets and major corrections. When I read the first QAIB Study back in 1995, my initial reaction was that investors need professional management because they were not likely to have the discipline to remain invested in losing markets, no matter how many times their broker tells them to “stay the course.” After only 15 years, Dalbar finally sees the light.

A Chink in Passive Investing’s Armor?

Perhaps the most surprising revelation in the 2009 QAIB update compared to all previous years is that traditional passive buy-and-hold strategies are not seen as a solution to the problem. Not only did Dalbar decide against endorsing traditional asset allocation as a solution, they actually came to the realization that such strategies don’t work. Here’s how Dalbar put it in this year’s update:

“This year’s report … also demonstrates that simply adopting a one-size-fits-all asset allocation strategy will not suffice in the new investment paradigm.” [Dalbar QAIB, Page 2] “Portfolio performance during the market meltdown of 2008 is clear evidence that the current methods are ineffective, even independent of investor behavior. Current asset allocation and diversifi-cation strategies are based on uncorrelated asset classes that in 2008 became highly correlated, thus rendering all such strategies moot.” [Dalbar QAIB, Page 11, Emphasis added]

For a while, I thought that Dalbar may have been reading my E-Letters. After all, I have been making similar observations about buy-and-hold strategies for a very long time. However, I soon learned that they are not running plays from my playbook when I began reading their new recommendations to help investors keep from being their own worst enemies.

While space does not permit me to go into detail about each of Dalbar’s recommended solutions to inferior investment returns, I’ll discuss each of them briefly below:

1. Dalbar’s first suggestion to help investors get better returns was to consider using Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) to ease back into the market. I have written about DCA in the past in the E-Letter, and it is essentially a method of investing where you gradually invest your portfolio in increments over time. This means that you buy into the market at different price levels and are somewhat less susceptible to a major market downturn. In fact, investing during these market downturns can result in buying at bargain prices, which should be good for your portfolio in the long run.

Of course, this only works if you have moved your money to the sidelines or are making periodic contributions to a retirement plan. I think that DCA can be a good idea if you are in a 401(k) or other type of plan where you have only mutual fund options and cannot access actively managed investment strategies. Obviously, this technique is not available for anyone who is already fully invested in the market. For those investors, Dalbar had other alternatives as discussed below.

2. The second strategy that Dalbar suggested was to consider a portfolio management technique known as Purpose-Based Asset Management, or PBAM. This strategy has the benefit of being available to both investors on the sidelines and those already fully invested. That’s the good news. The bad news is that this approach is little more than buy-and-hold “lite.”

According to Dalbar, traditional asset allocation strategies often assume only one level of risk tolerance for the entire portfolio. The main premise behind PBAM is that investors actually have multiple risk tolerances depending upon the particular investment goal. Investors may be more comfortable with higher risk on investments held for longer periods, such as for retirement, than they are for investments held for shorter-term goals.

Thus, investors are encouraged to allocate assets into separate strategic “compartments” based on the ultimate goal for that part of the portfolio, and then design an asset allocation strategy based on the appropriate risk level for each compartment. The hope is that money allocated more conservatively will lose less in down markets than the more aggressive compartments, resulting in less panic on the part of the investor.

In reality, this simply means that instead of having one big asset allocation portfolio, they will have multiple small buy-and-hold portfolios that will be subject to the same limitations as any other passive asset allocation strategy. My personal opinion is that PBAM is simply a marketing gimmick that will result in little difference in overall performance or emotional decision making.

3. A final recommendation from the Dalbar report is to explore the use of leverage within portfolio holdings, both at the portfolio and individual holding level. In essence, Dalbar is acknowledging that leverage, especially in the credit markets, played a big part in the subprime meltdown and resulting credit crisis.

Since this leverage can occur in the private sector, government and international markets, Dalbar suggests that investment experts begin requiring issuers of securities to compute and disclose their true leverage. Once disclosed, Dalbar suggests that leverage should be incorporated into computer models that screen investments as well as asset allocation models.

Same Study, Very Different Conclusions

While the conclusion reached by this most recent update of the QAIB Study pretends to offer a new approach to investing, it’s really just a tweak of traditional buy-and-hold. This really isn’t all that different than the findings in prior years when Dalbar recommended investors follow buy-and-hold strategies and suppress the emotional desire to exit mutual fund investments when (not if) they begin to lose money.

I noted above that the Dalbar and Zweig studies were the catalyst for the development of my firm’s AdvisorLink® Program. Yet, AdvisorLink® is anything but a buy-and-hold investment program, so how did we get from Dalbar’s recommendation to an innovative collection of active management strategies?

It happened this way: I reported the findings of these studies in my monthly client newsletter (remember when publications were actually printed on paper?), but pretty much dismissed its applicability to my audience since most were experienced investors in my managed futures funds. Anyone sophisticated enough to invest in futures funds must be able to handle their own mutual fund investments, right?

Wrong! Imagine my surprise when a very large percentage of my futures funds’ investors responded to my newsletter saying that the Dalbar QAIB Study described their own behavior. They resoundingly supported our research into a way to keep from becoming a “Dalbar statistic.”

We then had to develop a strategy to try to get investors to avoid emotional decisions in down markets. While Dalbar suggested just saying “no” to switching among funds, we knew that investor psychology would dictate moving away from equities when the pain became too great. As a result, we took a different track in addressing investor psychology.

First, we reasoned that investors who are doing everything on their own were becoming confused with all of the conflicting information in the marketplace. We called this “information overload,” and this was just the early days of the Internet. Thus, our first principle was that investors should seek out the help of professional money managers rather than trying to do everything themselves. This helps take some of the emotion out of the equation, since a third party is responsible for investment decisions. This first principle was the genesis of our AdvisorLink® name, since we were linking investors to qualified Investment Advisors.

The next principle we adopted was that all of the strategies in our AdvisorLink® Program had to be actively managed. We saw no benefit in strategies that would stay fully invested in the face of a bear market or major correction. It just makes sense to move to cash or hedge long positions when the markets are going against you. This, too, helped to reduce the emotional impulse to sell during bad markets. We even included more aggressive programs that were able to “short” the market with the potential to actually make money during down markets.

A final principle in the establishment of our AdvisorLink® Program was that it needed to be mutual fund based. While we were aware of active money managers using individual stocks and bonds, many had minimum investments in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, and some required over a million. By concentrating on Advisors who used mutual funds, we were able to bring the advantage of professional money management to our clients at reasonable minimum investment levels.

Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc. and Halbert Wealth Management, Inc.
are not affiliated with nor do they endorse, sponsor or recommend the following product or service.

Conclusions

The Dalbar QAIB Study has been a valuable tool in educating both investors and Advisors about the dangers of emotional trading. While QAIB is instructive in showing weaknesses of the average investor’s actions, it falls short on solutions. I predict that you’ll be hearing more about Purpose-Based Asset Management in the future as this marketing gimmick catches on with brokers who want their asset allocation programs to sound like something other than what they are. Just remember that PBAM is nothing more than buy-and-hold lite.

The purpose of my short history lesson about our AdvisorLink® Program is to give you some insight as to why it is structured the way it is and why we feel it’s important to have active management represented in your portfolio. These strategies not only address the issue of investor panic and emotional trading, but also offer additional strategic diversification over buy-and-hold.

If you would like more information about AdvisorLink® or the various strategies offered within that program, you can learn more by going to our website at www.halbertwealth.com. Or, feel free to give one of our Investment Consultants a call at 800-348-3601. I think you’ll be glad you did.

Very best regards,

Gary D. Halbert

SPECIAL ARTICLES:

How the Economic Crisis Changed Us
http://www.parade.com/news/2009/11/01-how-the-economic-crisis-changed-us.html

Election results today could signal political trends
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/us/politics/04nagourney.html?_r=2&ref=politics

Republicans to announce alternative healthcare reform
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125711811707721639.html

RBA Raises Rates Again!

ChuckButler — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:44:43 GMT

..But First, A Word From Our Sponsor..
Gain exposure to currencies of emerging BRIC countries-and don't lose a dime on market risk

* 4 BRIC currencies: Brazilian real, Russian ruble, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi
* High upside potential
* No market risk to deposited principal
* Low $1,500 minimum deposit

Don't miss this unique opportunity. Deadline to buy the BRIC MarketSafe CD is Dec. 3rd, 2009. Apply today or learn more at http://www.everbank.com/001CertificatesMSBRIC.aspx?referId=11808
.

In This Issue..

* Risk Aversion boosts dollar...
* U.S. manufacturing is strong...
* More stimulus? Please say it ain't so Joe!
* Thoughts from the Big Boss!

And Now... Today's Pfennig!

RBA Raises Rates Again!

Good day... And a Terrific Tuesday to you! Well, I'm here! Just when you thought I would be gone for the week, and you would get away from my rants, and get the calm Chris Gaffney, the rug gets pulled out from you! I am so bummed! I was told that I could not travel to Cabo for the Sovereign Society's Offshore Advantage Conference, and I was to remain at home, with my leg up, blah, blah, blah... What a crock!

OK, now that we've got that out of the way... Front and Center this morning, we have a very strong dollar rally going on... It began yesterday mid-morning, when things turned on one thin dime. First, we had the U.S. Manufacturing Index rise in September and the Trading Theme kicked in with the dollar getting sold on the good news for the economy... But then a strange thing happened on the way to the forum. Everyone began to fear what's been going on in Banking... Friday, the 115th bank failed this year, and suddenly, traders, investors, hedge fund dudes, and everyone else, got a case of the flu... Not the "pandemic" H1N1 flu... This is the "chicken flu"... Chicken to continue to takes risks in the face of a banking problems... Well, to think of it, maybe, just maybe, it's not the "chicken flu" but the "prudent flu"!

So... The dollar's losses were reversed by mid-day, and the non-dollar currencies were taken to the woodshed... Shoot Rudy, even a rate hike by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) couldn't reverse the Risk Aversion trading... I'll get back to the rate hike by the RBA in just a minute... But first I need to talk about this shift to Risk Aversion once again... We saw this briefly last week, and it faded into the wind... I hope this shift to Risk Aversion is soon a small item in our rear view mirrors!

Now... The ISM Manufacturing Index rose to 55.7 from the prior month's 52.6 reading. This marks the strongest reading for the index since the April 2006 reading of 56.0. Let me explain something to you, that I've explained before, but this really illustrates what I'm talking about... And that is... This Manufacturing renaissance here in the U.S. comes as a benefit of the weak dollar that's been in place for over 6 months now. It's that simple folks... You want Manufacturing in the U.S. to be robust? Then you need a discounted clearing mechanism... And that is the dollar...

For, the Asians are learning to trade among themselves without the U.S., and the Eurozone already has 80% of their trade among themselves, with out the U.S. that doesn't bode well for U.S. exports unless... Unless there is a discount... And that discount comes in the price they have to pay / convert their currency for the dollars that are needed to buy the export... So... Why shoot the goose that lays the golden eggs?

OK... As I mentioned above... The RBA raised rates 25 BPS (1/4%) last night, as I expected them to, and had told you they would! The A$ got sold though after rallying briefly... Traders go spooked when the RBA Gov said that "it was prudent to lessen gradually" the stimulus to the economy provided by lower borrowing costs... OK... Folks, that's Central Bank parlance for: The interest rate hikes are going to slow down from here on out... So don't expect a rate hike at every subsequent meeting!

Oh come on A$ Traders! The A$ yield differential to the U.S. is now staggering! As it is to Japan, Europe, and Canada! Only New Zealand and Brazil can play on the same team as Australia when it comes to significant yield differentials! But NOOOOOOOOO OOOO! You get spooked! Have you no intestinal fortitude? HEY! The good news is that it gives late comers a chance to buy at cheaper levels, or... Those that already own, a chance to pick up more at a cheaper level! Courtesy of the Chicken Little A$ traders!

Well... I guess I can't blame them too much, with the Risk Aversion campers taking over the campground... Here's another thing that I saw last night that has the Risk Aversion campers spreading like wildfire... A long time reader of the Pfennig and Bloomberg TV personality, Pimm Fox reported last night that: President Barack Obama's advisers are "seriously" considering proposing a second stimulus measure to boost the economy, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said in an interview. Locke said another stimulus would be "very targeted and specific and we need to be mindful of the deficit as well."

Hmmm... OK... How many times have I said in the past 8 months that the Gov't was going to see the need for more stimulus? The answer? MANY! I've got a question... If the GDP was "so robust" as the Gov't officials claimed it to be, then why are they discussing more stimulus? BECAUSE THE GDP WAS A FRAUD! We all know that... I explained it all to you yesterday! But the announcement that more stimulus is being "seriously considered" is what we used to call as kids as "cheaters proof"!

What does "very targeted and specific" mean? It means the Gov't is going to get deeper and deeper into the private sector... That's what it means!

I have a question for the Gov't... You told us the $787 Billion stimulus package last February was going to keep unemployment from reaching 10%... Guess what? That didn't work! So, what makes you think whatever taxpayer money you spend now is going to work? Oh, and don't give me that barrel of baloney that you've "saved" 650,000 jobs... Saved Jobs CAN NOT BE PROVED! So why not say you saved 1 Million or 2 Million jobs? I mean, what difference does it make... It's not true, and can't be proved!

Whoa, there big boy... You had better stop before the Pfennig gets sent to the White House to shut me down! Yeah, like it hasn't been sent there before now!

OK... Did you hear about the IMF Gold Sale? The IMF sold 200 tons of Gold... Not to worry though, the Reserve Bank of India stepped to the plate and bought the Gold... Gold revisited $1,060 after this announcement, but in reality it should have been a wash, and the price of Gold has backed off a few dollars overnight... But still pretty well bid, given the Risk Aversion going on in the currencies.

And why not? Gold is a store of value... Of wealth... Whey wouldn't it buck the trend?

Speaking of which... The Big Boss, Frank Trotter, and I were talking last week about Gold, and we kicked around this thought of sharing a lesson of money with kids... And he sent me this...

The weather turned around here in about three weeks. Great fall, then 10 days of deluge, now the chill of late fall. And instead of Thanksgiving displays, the march of catalogues imploring us to turn away from savings and save the world through spending have begun to hit the door. In the past few years as our children have become young adults we have started to turn away from the quest for unneeded presents and zombie-like consumption and have started to implement a contribution concept: research and choose a cause that will appeal to the recipient, ensure that the cause is not acting like your average NGO running around in white land cruisers or and staying at five star hotels in the third world, and make a modest contribution. It isn't working perfectly and we certainly backslide enough but it's underway. We may turn it into a gift of a few shares of a good company but enough of this.

Something else that meets the need of a physical gift, but one with a message has been on my mind lately. It isn't easy to start a conversation with a young person, especially quite young about global economics and the transient value of money. In fact it's hard to start a conversation with almost anyone on the topic. So what's a better way to provide a gift box and a message? Readers of "A Pfennig for your Thoughts" will certainly be ahead of me ( the gift of real money of course ) gold coins.

With the gift of a coin, or a set of coins you can tell so many stories or impart values in a variety of ways. Coins are struck around the world providing a geography lesson and of course an insightful and cogent discussion of central bank attention to their country's money supply (well okay, you might want to skip that one). You can tell the story of gold in the history of the world, and if you are brave and the audience attentive, how gold has held its value over the centuries and will probably do so for centuries to come. Bringing things up to date you can cover the astounding fiscal and monetary policy that has become our new national pastime over the current and past administrations (but be sure to take your blood pressure medicine). Tell 'em "you are worth an ounce a year" (or more).

If you are buying for one or two friends or children or grandchildren head down to the local coin store and grab a couple bullion coins. If you have a good size list or have the capacity to do something substantial then give the team here at EverBank a call. In any event lets all be sure to teach our kids, grand-kids and generally people around us about the monetary value of gold.

WOW! That was great Frank! I love it when the Big Boss puts down his thoughts in writing and shares them with the rest of us!

OK... To recap... The dollar is enjoying a strong rally thanks to the Risk Aversion crowd, that is getting spooked about the banks, after the 115th U.S. Bank this year failed... The Reserve Bank of Australia raised rates again by 25 BPS, and the Reserve Bank of India bought 200 tons of Gold that the IMF felt it needed to sell, so a wash if you will. And then Chuck went on a rant about stimulus...

Currencies today 11/3/09: American style: A$ .8935, kiwi .7115, C$ .9235, euro 1.46540, sterling 1.6285, Swiss .9685, European style: rand 7.9210, krone 5.8325, SEK 7.1625, forint 191, zloty 2.94, koruna 18.03, RUB 29.42, yen 90.10, sing 1.4030, HKD 7.75, INR 47.41, China 6.8279, pesos 13.35, BRL 1.7725, Dollar Index 76.73, Oil $77.19, 10-year 3.38% (see the Risk Aversion with the drop in the 10-year yield fall from 3.62% yesterday!) Silver $16.36, and Gold... $1,057.70

That's it for today... A little long today with the Big Boss's thoughts, but well worth them I must say! For all of you that are heading out to Cabo to the Sovereign Society's Conference, specifically to see me, I apologize for not being there! HA! Yeah, like someone was going just to see me! HAHAHAHAHAHA! Seriously though... I feel real bad that I had to remain at home... UGH! OH well, this way I won't miss my little buddy Alex's last game this Saturday, or son Andrew's girlfriend Rachel's birthday on Sunday! Gotta go... I hope your Tuesday is Terrific!

Chuck Butler
President
EverBank World Markets
1-800-926-4922
1-314-647-3837

Consumer Spending Drives GDP?

ChuckButler — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:44:08 GMT

..But First, A Word From Our Sponsor..
Gain exposure to currencies of emerging BRIC countries-and don't lose a dime on market risk

* 4 BRIC currencies: Brazilian real, Russian ruble, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi
* High upside potential
* No market risk to deposited principal
* Low $1,500 minimum deposit

Don't miss this unique opportunity. Deadline to buy the BRIC MarketSafe CD is Dec. 3rd, 2009. Apply today or learn more at http://www.everbank.com/001CertificatesMSBRIC.aspx?referId=11808
.

In This Issue..

* Dollar rebounds after spending fades...
* Chinese Manufacturing rises...
* Eurozone Manufacturing rises...
* Australia as the proxy for global growth...

And Now... Today's Pfennig!

Consumer Spending Drives GDP?

Good day... And a Marvelous Monday to you! And Welcome to November! My least liked month! But that's a story for another time! I hope your Halloween was fun! The rain stopped here, there was a near full moon shining in the sky, and the little kids had a blast! And Hey! The Rams won a football game! WOW!

OK... Well... Friday was a blur to me, as I went to the doctor's office for a test, and then on my way to work, they called my cell and asked me to turn around and go to a lab for more tests... UGH! So, by the time I got to work, Jennifer had set everything up and begun trading for me... Then it was time to go home! So, I'm sitting here this morning, scratching my bald head trying to recall the currency prices on Friday... And Oh yeah! Now I remember! Do you recall the Thursday action after the GDP report showed such strength (whether you believe it or not) and the dollar got sold like pet rocks?

Well the Gov't had made such a big deal out of the fact that a good portion of the GDP report was consumer spending during the quarter... In fact 1.6% of the 3.5% increase was the Cash for Clunkers program! Well... That was a bad thing to do, for on Friday, Personal Spending and Income printed, and the Spending piece had fallen in September... So much for the euphoria of Consumer Spending bringing the economy out of the recession! Oh, and like I said last week, this plays right into my thoughts from long ago, that we would see some growth near the end of this year, but would slip right back into recession, thus a double-dip... So, the first two parts are in the books...

So... The currencies slid VS the dollar on Friday, and haven't really rebounded overnight from what I can see here at home, as I write the Pfennig at my kitchen table! The Aussie dollar (A$) seems to be champing at the bit to move higher VS the U.S. dollar, but just can't get the Big Dog, euro, to get off the porch this morning!

The reason the A$ is champing at the bit to move higher, is the news from China this past weekend that their Manufacturing data from October showed the fastest gain in 18 months! So, in keeping the Manufacturing Index here in the U.S. in mind, the Chinese Manufacturing Index moved to 55.4 in October, from the 55 in September, and the Chinese say that exports were strong... Ok... We have to apply the "believe 1/2 of what the Chinese tell us about their economy... If that's so, then the Manufacturing Index still is above the expansion line of 50... And that's a good thing for the global economies!

I would think that news like this from China would be a springboard for Commodities, and the Commodity Currencies of Australia, Brazil, Norway, New Zealand, and Canada...

Speaking of strong manufacturing... The Eurozone printed a strong Manufacturing Index report this morning too! Manufacturing in Europe expanded for the first time in 17 months, in October, increasing to 50.7 VS 49.3 in September!

The dollar index is beginning to show some weakness as I write this morning... And one would certainly think that news like this from China and the Eurozone, would push the dollar down... But, there's that stinkin' Trading Theme hanging over us like the Sword of Damocles! And with the news this past weekend that CIT Group was going to have to file bankruptcy, if things hold true, it would be good for the dollar... The flight to safety, and all that!

Hey! Doesn't this news about CIT Group tick you off a bit? It does me... And I'll tell you why! CIT Group had received $2.33 Billion of taxpayer money in an attempt to bail them out last year, but they failed any way! Again! Wouldn't it have been far better to just let them fail when they first showed signs of not being able to compete, and survive? I know that in the whole scheme of things $2.33 Billion doesn't sound like that much... Considering the Trillions that have been spend, allocated or guaranteed! But... $2.33 Billion here, and $2.33 Billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about a nice sized pile of cash, that would not have been wasted!

The Business Section of our local paper had an article this past weekend on what I was referring to last week regarding GMAC and Ally Bank... Here's David Nicklaus saying what I wanted to last week... "That clever Ally Bank ad, the one where a boy is denied a toy truck because of a "limited-time offer," omits a fact that would interest most viewers.

You, the taxpayer, are propping up Ally, the bank that's so good at making fun of other banks. And it looks like Ally's parent, GMAC Financial Services, will ask for more money soon."

So... The Gov't is in competition with private sector banks... And they can pay interest rates that are higher than other banks, because... If they lose money, they can just go back to the well and get more bailout money!

This is all just becoming one Big Mess folks... You've got to see what's going on here! It's called Big Gov't... And when you have Big Gov't, you have Big Deficits! The Gov't does not have any money to spend unless they steal it, I mean take it from taxpayers first! And they're spending what they don't have! Tax receipts are falling, and the Gov't's expenditures are rising! That's a bad formula folks...

And one that makes you so aware of the need to be diversified with a portion of your investments out of the dollar!

OK... I've got to stop there, I have to go to the doctor's office this morning, and I don't need my blood pressure boiling!

Hey! I was reading an article on Friday about Australia in which the Australian Treasurer, Wayne Swan, told reporters that he truly believes that the Australian economy is going to outpace most of the world in 2010... This plays well with my thought that I've held for so long, and have told you dear readers about for some time now, and that is... That Australia is the proxy for global growth... And if the "insiders" in Australia think their economy will outpace most of the world, that's a good sign for the global growth! And one that I think traders should be taking notice of!

I think that Brazil has a long way to go to catch up with Australia but, Brazil has made great leaps in the past 5 years, and has really taken the steps to be in the same conversation when talking about Australia... The country is still an Emerging Market though, and with that, you get wild swings in the currency... Just so you know!

I want to get back to the GDP report in the U.S. from last week... Recall that above, I told you that the Gov't made a Big Deal out of the fact that a large portion of the rise in GDP was consumer spending... But you have to ask yourself this question... "how are consumers propping up GDP with spending in the face of over 16% unemployment? Personal Consumption climbed while Personal Income fell in the quarter, as documented in the Pfennig each time they printed... So, the only way that works is if, you don't think, nah, we've had to have learned our lesson, right? Oh well, I'll throw it out there... The only way that works is if the money is borrowed... Credit cards, etc. OH NO! Tell me we're not going down this road again! Ahhh grasshopper, but Christmas is just around the corner... With 16% unemployment going on, this should be a very "plastic" Christmas shopping season!

Ok... The week ahead is chock-full-o-data and events... Like... The FOMC meeting tomorrow, that carries over to Wednesday... You know what I say about those two-day FOMC meetings! Got any Aces? Go Fish!

We'll see our own version of Manufacturing Index the ISM as it prints this morning... We'll also see Pending Home Sales. Tomorrow is the Auto Sales, and Factory Orders. Wednesday we'll get the Treasury Refunding Announcement, and Thursday is weekly initial Jobless Claims, and the stupid Productivity reports, and then Friday is the Jobs Jamboree!

So... We've got a lot to talk about his week... I'm supposed to be leaving for Cabo tomorrow, but I doubt the doctor is going to let me travel, so I'll probably be here all week. So, Chris gets off the hook this week most likely...

To recap... The euphoria that was all over the markets after the GDP report was wiped out by a very weak Consumer Spending report for September. The dollar rebounded on the "bad news for the economy" thus confirming that the "trading theme" is still in place. CIT Group filed for bankruptcy this weekend, thus wasting the $2.33 Billion, that was given to them by the Gov't from taxpayers! And both China and the Eurozone's manufacturing indexes were strong last month, which should be a good thing for the global economies, commodities, and so on...

I'm going to try something different this morning... I still get emails from people that question why I quote currencies in two different ways... Well, there are two pricing conventions in currencies, and so I try to keep currencies in the form they are quoted... But to make things easier... We'll break out the American Style, and the European Style...

Currencies today 11/2/09: American Style: A$ .9045, kiwi .72, C$ .9255, euro 1.4780, sterling 1.6360, Swiss .9790, European Style: rand 7.9175, krone 5.70, SEK 7.0315, forint 186.05, zloty 2.8740, koruna 17.88, RUB 29.20, yen 89.90, sing 1.3990, HKD 7.75, INR 46.97, China 6.8279, pesos 13.22, BRL 1.7635, dollar index 76.15, Oil $78.17, 10-year 3.62%, Silver $16.62, and Gold... $1,054.30

That's it for today... Well.. For once, it was a good football weekend here in St. Louis, as our Rams stopped a 17-game losing streak, and my beloved Missouri Tigers posted a Big 12 win. Little Buddy Alex's team remained undefeated, but tied. Two absolutely glorious sunny, blue sky days here after the what seemed to be 40 days of rain finally ended! November is off to a good start weather wise, but I know all too well what it has in store for us! Well, I'm off to see the Wizard! Speaking of which, my little granddaughter, Delaney Grace was the cutest Dorothy you've ever seen! She came by the office on Friday to show every here just how darn cute she is! OK... Time to go, this time for real... I hope you have a Marvelous Monday, and a good start to the week and month!

Chuck Butler
President
EverBank World Markets
1-800-926-4922
1-314-647-3837