Search results matching tag 'Fixed Income'

Association for Investor Awareness - Week of 10/29/2009

AIAAdvocate — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:49:00 GMT

In This Issue:

Investors Are Deciding Which Way To Jump
Earnings Count More Than The GDP
Beat The Fixed Income Blues
A Dividend Honor Roll
If You Can't Beat Them...
The Bottom Line This Week

The past 30+ days was a weak period for stocks. Since our September newsletter, the Dow fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq dropped 2.3%.

However, investors have little cause to complain. The market delivered a 56% gain since March 9. At this point, a timeout could be a pause that refreshes. That's especially true since October has often been a tough month for stocks, particularly when it was preceded by a run-up. Another such shock was definitely not welcomed.

Investors Are Deciding Which Way To Jump

Of course, we may still have a correction after investors have a chance to consult their crystal balls and compare what they see coming in the economy with current stock values.

Pessimists think the economy won't justify the big gains we have seen so far, much less any additional advances. They point to the World Bank's estimate that the U.S. will grow only about 1.2% next year. If that level proves to be correct, many stocks are undoubtedly overpriced.

More bullish investors think the World Bank has such a poor track record with estimates that it should stop making them. Several economists with much better credentials put growth in the 3% to 4% range for 2010. If that mark proves to be correct, stocks still have some catching up to do.

Earnings Count More Than The GDP

Since we don't buy the market, we are not particularly concerned with what the overall growth rate proves to be, so long as it is above the zero mark. What we care most about are the earnings of companies we are following.

Fortunately, earnings for most of our recommendations are doing very nicely. That's no surprise since we have been favoring blue chip exporters that benefit when the value of the dollar declines.

That was good strategy. So far this year the dollar has dropped about 14% against a basket of foreign currencies, and our exporters are reporting solid sales increases.

The outlook for earnings is actually much better than the dollar's decline would suggest. During the tough recession, most companies cut costs so much that they were able to remain profitable through the worst of the troubles. Now that orders are increasing, nearly every dime is going directly to their bottom lines.

Beat The Fixed Income Blues

As you probably know all too well, the returns from fixed income investments are on the floor. Most money market funds pay under 1%. CDs are paying more, but not by much. Even longer term bonds typically return only about 3.3%. As one retired person we know lamented recently, "Those returns are driving us to the local soup kitchen."

We think the solution for most people who need current income is to move some money to successful stocks that pay attractive dividends. Several of our recommendations fit the bill. Some of them pay about twice what can be earned in the fixed income market.

Of course, there is no sense buying a stock that pays good dividends if it is likely to drop sharply in price. That's a common trap for investors who only look at yields. Since the yield is calculated by dividing the most recent dividend by a stock's current price, the number will soar if the price starts heading for the cellar.

To make matters worse. If the price is tanking, it probably means the company's earnings are also declining. In that case, the dividend will probably be cut. That happened at many of America's largest and most prosperous banks during this tough recession.

The way to minimize your risk is to select stocks that have good yields, and are also doing well in the market. If the companies have long histories of paying dividends, all the better. The cream of the crop raise their dividends every year. Here are three stocks that hit all the bases.

A Dividend Honor Roll

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (KMP) heads the list. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=KMP The company owns and operates over 26,000 miles of oil, natural gas, and fuel pipelines in the U.S. In addition, the company has 150 terminals that store and transport petroleum, petrochemicals, coal and other bulk items by rail and truck.

Kinder Morgan also has a timely carbon dioxide business. Huge quantities of the greenhouse gas are now being pumped into older oil wells to increase their yields. Of course, the process also gets rid of the nasty gas. Talk about killing two birds with one stone.

Although Kinder Morgan trades like a stock on the NYSE, it is actually a limited partnership that distributes its available cash to investors each quarter. Over the past five years, the partnership had an attractive 6.5% average yield. Currently, the yield is an exceptional 7.4%. Best of all, only part of the payout is taxable.

When we look at Kinder Morgan's strong business and its excellent dividend, it is easy to see why it resisted the recent stock market sell-off. The company should make an excellent choice for investors who seek high current income plus a chance for long-term capital gains.

Consolidated Edison (ED) is also very attractive. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=ED The company supplies electric power, natural gas, and steam to a total of over 4 million customers in New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. The company also sells surplus power to other utilities in the Mid Atlantic region. Additionally, Con Ed designs and installs modern energy-efficient heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and lighting equipment throughout its service area.

There aren't many companies with a longer history of success than Con Ed. It was founded in 1884 after Thomas Edison proved that electric networks were feasible. More importantly to investors who seek income, the company raised its dividends 35 years in a row. That's an outstanding track record. The yield is currently an attractive 5.6%

Eli Lilly (LLY) was founded in 1876, which makes it one of the very few American companies with a longer history than Con Ed. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=LLY Lilly has a large line of drugs that treat diabetes, attention-deficit disorder, schizophrenia, osteoporosis, several cancers, and cardiovascular problems – to name only a few. The company also has a full line of successful animal health care products.

Nevertheless, investors are nervous about the company due, in part, to the impact the proposed national health care program may have on drug company profits. Investors are also unhappy that Lilly's patent on Prozac expired a few years ago, and Zyprexa, its best selling drug today, will go off-patent in 2011. However, Lilly has a large drug development pipeline that will bring many new products to market over the next few years.

Eli Lilly currently pays a healthy 6.0% dividend. In addition, the company has declared dividends since 1885, and it has raised them for 42 years. Lilly more than qualifies as one of Standard & Poors' elite Dividend Aristocrats.

If You Can't Beat Them. . .

Speaking of large banks, Goldman Sachs (GS) is emerging from the financial service turmoil in fine shape. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=GS Part of the reason is the banking meltdown removed several of its competitors. Now Goldman has a clear shot at rebound profits in many areas.

Goldman also shines because it is an international company that benefits from the expanding global economy that is growing several times faster than the U.S. China, for example, just announced that its growth rate reached an astounding 8.9%. Nearly all of Asia is also rolling along in high gear. As an international bank and trading company, economic growth will mean rising profits for Goldman.

Lastly, Goldman Sachs looks good for the very reason many people hate the company: its political connections are strong. Whatever you may think about that relationship, it should be worth millions of dollars in profits over the next several years.

Earnings are already on an upturn, an excellent achievement given the difficult climate that exists for banks. The yield is only 0.80%, but Goldman Sachs should be purchased for its potential appreciation, not for income.

The Bottom Line This Week

Notwithstanding the last few days, the stock market has continued to rise, but at a far slower rate than it did earlier this year. It does not surprise us to see some correction. Once it runs its course, however, we think the improving economy will justify another leg up for stocks.

A big problem many investors face today is a lack of good income opportunities. Everything from money market funds to long term Treasuries are paying very little.

On the other hand, some high quality stocks have attractive yields. Three that we like very much are Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Consolidated Edison, and Eli Lilly.

Investors who have been looking for a promising bank to emerge from the financial service carnage should consider Goldman Sachs. We think the company has a lock on growth.

Until Next Time

The AIA "Advocate For Absolute Returns", a publication of The Association for Investor Awareness, Inc., tracks market trends, industry news, the SEC, global trade and finance and Washington developments for you because they affect your investments. But who doesn't? Many sources report these issues as abstract facts. We feel that's not enough. The AIA Advocate's job is to warn you of what's important and how these developments translate to ground-level forces and threats that directly affect your wealth as well as your current investment opportunities. Not just information, but information you can use. Until next time ...

Big Names Predict Problematic Inflation: What's An Investor To Do?

RichardSchwartz — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:48:00 GMT

ECONOMIC VIEW. Rising Inflation Expected. So predicts a whole slew of big names, everyone seems to be jumping on board this train in the last few days. Now Warren Buffett and Bill Gross have joined Marc Faber and Jim Rogers and more in predicting problematic inflation just out there over the horizon. Yep, as soon as deflation became the consensus buzz word – recessions kill inflation is what I’ve heard repeated from many sources – we’re getting a groundswell of opposite opinion. Well, not quite opposite but close enough, let me explain. Everyone agrees this slump will preclude problematic inflation but all say that’s a temporary phenomenon. No one predicting rising inflation will go so far as to say just WHEN rising inflation is going to emerge but more and more observers are saying it’s definitely coming, arriving when this economic slump is over, whenever that is. Again, rising inflation, no, out of control inflation, no, to put it more accurately, hyperinflation is my biggest worry. That America printing money galore – yes, for bailing out businesses too important to the financial system to allow them to fail, and, yes, for keeping the economy greased and running, and, yes, for stimulating new growth and maintaining existing economic activity, and, yes, for overall deficit spending in this economic downturn – will come back to bite us in a big way. I can handle some inflation, I know how to shop for bargains which will help in food and clothing needs, what I’m worried about is a major currency devaluation which wipes out mine and America’s buffer. America’s savings becoming worthless as has happened time and again across the globe when some country’s finances just go kafluey. When a country can’t pay its bills compounded by a wholesale lack of trust in its currency. Schwartz View: Hasn’t happened in the US yet, but …

So I get more nervous when I hear Warren Buffett, America’s richest man and known as the best value investor of our time, say inflation could go as high as it was in the 1970s, that’s almost double digits! I get even more nervous when Bill Gross, who manages one of the largest bond funds going, says that US government efforts to break this recession will cause “costs for goods and services” to rise. I respect both these guys and their opinions. Now they join long term forecaster Jim Rogers, who is also more worried about rising inflation than deflation, best I can figure. He’s long been predicting an US dollar crisis and really bad inflation ahead and says he’s just waiting for the proper moment to essentially “short US Treasury bonds.” Rogers sees commodity inflation returning with a vengeance since today’s global economic slump in his view is just improving the fundamentals underpinning commodity prices. In other words today’s credit crunch and resulting recession causing miners to delay or even shut down exploration and thus leading to a further drop in supply. He loves to mention that global food inventories are already down to 50 year lows. Finally, Marc Faber, the well regarded international investor and past BARRON’S Roundtable panelist, sees rising inflation from another angle. He figures that the US government is going to have all kinds of problems in raising interest rates down the road or in effect withdrawing all the money it’s pushing into the system now to try to end today’s credit crisis. Schwartz View: This rising inflation camp is growing now, with many others predicting a forthcoming inflation problem as well. I am too.

Schwartz Recommendation. If you also worry about rising inflation, one strategy available today is to buy an inverse ETF or inverse sector fund. One that goes up when long term US interest rates go higher. That’s the natural reaction if inflation rises, yields generally rise forcing bond prices down. For example ProFunds has two such funds, RTPIX and RRPIX while Rydex offers up RYJUX and in the ETF camp there’s TBT which “correspond to twice the inverse” of the US Treasury bond. I recommend such.

Disclaimer! I don’t own any of the above now but can and do change positions without notice.

For a FREE week’s sampling of my complete daily e-letter, please email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

Monday Weekly Overview Sample Letter

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, July 28^th, 2008: Your New Paltz, NY SUNFLOWER update: A few sunflowers have popped but I noticed the farmer’s market has alternated its plantings so any time you visit you should see some. Just spectacular!

THE BIG PICTURE

Looks like one potential US and global leader gets it. Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama, to shore up his lack of experience on the global stage, embarked on a global tour last week. And was again able to put his finger on the pulse of the world and his audience, exhibiting his knowledge of history and this particular critical point in time speaking at the historic Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. While he didn’t rock star the crowd, fine with me, it was good to see he continues his role as alienate no one, moderator showing again he understands all sides of issues and is committed to leading by example. While not denigrating any political party, say our Republicans, or country, say Old Europe. Thus there is hope that America will soon embark on a new direction, one of getting things done by bringing all parties together and then making logical and effective, not ideological, decisions, forgoing our previous path of fostering divisiveness in the world, between our two political parties and among the American people ourselves.

Schwartz View: Enough said. I always get negative feedback when treading in political waters. I do like presumptive Republican presidential nominee and American hero John McCain quite a lot but just feel we have to drastically change policies going forward, not follow a similar path. America needs to get it’s act together quickly as all long range forecasters have reached consensus, saying we’re on a downward slide, financially, politically, economically, socially. We just need to start cohesively tackling our problems.

THE ECONOMY

Numerous economists last week admitted that the US economy is weakening. Among them Brian Bethune of Global Insight, James O’Sullivan at UBS and Moody’s John Lonski. So, in spite of the US not posting two straight quarters of negative GDP growth, the old and easy definition of a recession, and one not used any longer by the National Bureau of Economic Research which calls and dates recessions but problematically many months late -- remember in today’s new globalized world we need to learn new economic relationships! -- it looks like a recession is here. And in my view is going to stay with us for quite some time. That’s because America has been moneying-over all near term problems for many, many years, thus postponing the always needed recessionary cleansing and efficientizing of the US economy, while we’ve also avoiding developing and implementing solutions to our long term ills, like our increasing oil dependency, our underfunded government pension plans, Social Security and former Fed head Alan Greenspan’s #1 concern, Medicare. America does have a bad habit of avoiding problems until they reach crisis state. Maybe that’s because our representative democracy has become so dysfunctional here in the US. I would suggest we start fixing things right there in Washington by first getting rid of lobbying which skews everything toward those with the money to get their voices heard. Even corporate America, who now realizes it’s entrapped by this self-perpetuating system, would like nothing better than to see lobbying go away as big business now has to carry and fund a large and increasingly onerous lobbying budget.

Schwartz View: All I’ve read recently has been about how there are so many inefficiencies corrupting our inherently great economic and social framework that it’s a wonder anything can get done. Such as the US having 600,000 lawyers while Japan has 15,000 (those figures were about 10 years back but obviously haven’t changed for the better). And all the broken marriages and unwed mothers costing America a fortune as well. It’s almost funny, after encouraging the rest of the world to move to free markets for decades, when the Soviet Union collapsed and showed the economic rot hidden there, the world finally started followed our recommendations. And economic success followed suit but that led to tremendous and widespread global competition, so it’s vital we get our own act together as soon as possible, to just keep up. Thus the silver lining to this current economic slowdown, a slowdown that isn’t responding to our normal response of throwing money at it, is that crisis is when change really does occur in America

THE STOCK MARKET

Stocks have again gotten ahead of themselves on the downside although not as much out of whack as at the first bottom back in mid-March. Figuring the Dow Industrials and S&P 500’s previous bull market tops were set back last October, after nine months of a bear market or at the recent July 15^th lows, we are down on average about 2.5% per month versus the historic average bear market monthly decline of 2%. So we could easily see a backing and filling trading range here and now or even a modest rally, the two normal ways bear markets correct themselves. Much government intervention has come together to force down the price of oil and thus commodities in general, prop up housing and consumer spending, keep the financial system from breaking down completely and holding interest rates way below the rate of inflation. So all this government stimulus has to go somewhere just as previous stimulus found places to bubble up. Plus new government props and controls historically have been able to put a temporary fix in place.

Still, over a period of time the stock market reflects the economy and things aren’t really getting any better there, despite Q2 GDP growth out this Thursday going to again be positive. In point of fact, the economy is continuing to get worse if one looks under the surface at signals like credit spreads, a rough definition being the difference in yield between US government bonds and non-US government guaranteed bonds, which remain wide. Or if we factor in historic trends which show that economic downturns tend to surface hidden problems which end up feeding on themselves. Today’s continuing wide credit spreads mean at some point MBIA & Ambac and Fannie & Freddie, the other 17 big financials which have also been taken off the allowed short selling list & all the other financials who’ve lost billions of dollars aren’t going to be able to hide things any longer and are going to have to really own up. So stocks remain iffy for now. And with the rug pulled out from under the remaining stock leadership in the stock market over the last two weeks, out from under energy, the energy complex and other commodities, any market rallies are going to be just technically based, say from an oversold position or short sellers being forced to cover. Sure, a rally may then feed on itself and last longer than bears think, but should ultimately roll over as data worsens.

Schwartz View: Technically then, we could be embarking on a summer rally and if so sharp traders with the courage to risk their monies in the propped up financials may be able to scalp the stock market. And other pockets of strength should or may show up (hopefully in the health sector as that is now my focus with my few longs) normally searched out and propelled along by momentum players.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

LONG TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY continues to be hunkering down until this big storm passes. I expect that to be longer than most government and Wall Street economists and market strategists believe or at least publicly state. Publicly state because we all know that bearish Wal Street analysts and economists ultimately get fired and that in the aftermath of the dot.com bubble bursting, we got some theretofore hidden insight into what analysts really think. I see widely-followed, economist Nouriel Roubini, formerly holding various high level economic advisory positions in government, believes the US and European economies are now sinking as last Friday he said Wall Street was in spin mode and that financial institutions are “… manipulating at will their earnings, and analysts [are] falling for this supreme baloney.”

NEAR TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY depends more on whether this two-week, fledgling rally proves it has legs or not. I’m using as a key gauge whether the Dow and S&P are able to close above their last Wednesday’s closing highs, Dow 11,632.40 and S&P 1282.19. If these key indices close higher, then we will have the definition of a new up trend in place, a series of higher lows and higher highs. Strategy then will be to favor the long side but with say with no more than 50% at most market exposure. Planning on a modest summer rally for a month or two, with strategy being trying to scalp some short term profits.

AS FOR INCOME INVESTORS, we’ve all gotten used to our income fixes after 25 years of income investing being easy during a bull market in bonds, meaning just riding the trend toward lower and lower long term rates, I know it’s a struggle for you all today. My best suggestion is to watch for weakness in income sectors, say in utilities, royalty trusts and even REITs, then strike. Only move in and in a small manner AFTER a sector has just been blasted. This gives you some profit buffer as primary extended downtrends many times have sharp sell offs after disillusioned investors finally give up hope and sell, right before they rally. This can get you in at unusually good prices, at least for the near and intermediate term.

INCOME IDEAS. Thus I would currently search through the utility sector as the Dow Utility Index has just fallen a sharp -8% over the last two weeks. Or take another look at my previous July 11^th, 2008 two energy income recommendation Cross Timber Royalty Trust (CRT) and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT), both haven tumbled hard with crude. Both go ex-dividend tomorrow, meaning today’s the last day to get in to collect the substantial August dividend (both pay monthly). Or finally, revisit my other income recommendation, back on July 10^th, 2008, of two large European pharmas, GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) paying moderate dividend yields of 4.4% and 5.8% respectively. You need to buy GSK today to be entitled to this quarter’s dividend and buy AZN soon before it goes ex-dividend (not declared yet but last year it went ex on August 8^th). Good income investing!

Have a great week!

Is This Your Portfolio?

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:14:00 GMT

WHERE YOU SHOULD STAND TODAY. The Ideal Portfolio (another Schwartz View).

Yep, let me offer up one man’s view of what the ideal portfolio should be today and why:

· Very minimal exposure to the stock market! This major, modern day margin call on institutional investors is causing havoc. I’ve likened this margin call to the one which wiped out many individual investors quickly back after the 1929 stock market crash, only this time around its institutional investors getting slaughtered and thus the process of meeting their margin calls is being stretched out. All are deleveraging their portfolios big time and since the securitized investments killing them are so opaque and illiquid, it’s a terrible, long, drawn out process.

· Where you do have exposure, have some in the Energy Service sector. Business is going to remain strong and money is going to funnel into this sector as long as oil stays up there, even if oil tanks 50%. The world is in now in a new competitive battle to secure our energy futures. Thus companies which help countries like Brazil find and produce oil should do well.

· Where you can, hedge your long stock exposure. One does this by having some inverse mutual funds and/or ETFs (exchange traded funds). Happily today, investors have access to this modern day invention of being able to go short (bet on declines) with inverse investments. You just buy a fund or ETF which goes up as the market goes down. I would recommend having small inverse positions, especially in financials. This allows you to ride through a day like yesterday knowing that a part of your portfolio is rising while your long positions are falling. The next day you check your portfolio’s value and see how you did. That’s what I do each morning. Say the stock market fell -3.00%, like yesterday, & your account lost just -0.20% like my ProFunds managed account did you might figure your hedge is just right. Just tinker with the hedge until you get it right.

· Hold NO BONDS. I’ve been recommending this for some time now. Yes, we may get a deflationary collapse at the end of this 25 year “too much of everything” Kondratieff disinflationary economic backdrop we’ve been in since former Fed chairman Paul Volker broke the back of runaway inflation in the early 1980s. But the world is now experiencing our first return to higher inflation jolt. Thus we’ve started a new bear market in bonds. I can’t help but remember when I first became a stockbroker with Merrill Lynch back in the late 1970s, the client who say she would never, ever buy a bond again, after losing money on bonds going back two or three decades. Well, we’ve had a 25 year bull market in bonds and its over or close. Thus, my recommendation is no bonds. (Except some very short term laddered US Treasuries for income.)

· Hold a little Gold. Yes, some will keep warning of a deflationary collapse ahead, when the economy really tanks and thus say gold will collapse as well. But gold is in a long term uptrend, a bull market, and no one knows quite how it will react in various market and economic scenarios. Buy SPDR Gold Trust (symbol GLD) as opposed to the miners themselves, thus eliminating one unneeded uncertainty. FYI, I’ve seen gold rise and gold sector funds fall, so watch yourselves.

· Hold a little foreign currencies. Again, in today’s modern day investment world, the individual investor can easily bet on foreign currencies … by buying their ETFs or tracking stocks. I’ve been recommending & still am, buying Swiss francs & Japanese yen, symbols FXF and FXY. Both are Big Picture superstar guru Jim Rogers’ picks and are in long term bull markets and dipping now so it’s a good spot to buy in on weakness. Today let me add the Chinese renminbi, symbol CNY, to the buy list since there is a exchange-traded note in existence. Not a fast mover but it’s also in a long term bull market and probably is now one of the most reliable bull markets going.

· Hold a little agricultural commodity position. The middle class global world has grown tremendously, yay!, and thus the general commodity bull market has now spread out to foodstuffs. A larger global middle class, means more and better food is needed, especially increased protein. Food commodities are up so only buy on pullbacks here if you don’t own any now. My picks have been and remain symbols RJA and DBA. Again buy the commodities themselves as much as possible and not the companies which produce such although ETFs like MOO have been doing well to this point. Today, let me add iPath Livestock ETN (symbol COW) to the buy list if I haven’t already, a livestock play. Looks like with corn prices so high, cattle is being killed off (thus one can still get steak and hamburger at $1.99 a pound) because it costs too much to feed ‘em. But that will change too and red meat prices will skyrocket.

· Finally, hold small positions in lots of alternative, clean green energy stocks. I see new fortunes being made by those riding the wave of the US and globe getting off oil. The best way I’ve found to buy these is to keep the shopping list of alternate, clean green stocks I’ve compiled and posted for you back on June 6^th in this space handy. (If you don’t have it email me and I’ll send you a copy.) Buy a bunch of these stocks on weakness. I bought one for myself yesterday.

Disclaimer! I hold or plan on holding many of the ideas recommended above.

The Weak US Dollar & Fixed Incomes

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:34:00 GMT

A friend from up in Albany emailed me the following questions. I thought my answers may help others: ”I think I understand the basics of why the dollar has fallen so fast of late but I know you will know the details. It seems like there is always controversy about the economic future but consensus on reasons for the past. I believe the present dollar drop has to do with the ever growing US debt brought about from spending more than revenue received. The housing bust situation has added to the debt and the world has little confidence in us to turn it around any time soon. What is the best answer? Some seem to feel that a weakened dollar is the answer to our recovery? Did our government do things to help weaken the dollar to help our economy? Who does it help? I can not see it helping me but I guess if my investments in the stock market go up greatly and greater than the increase in the cost of living I will be better off? Our pensions will not go up though. It seems like they are saying with a weaker dollar we will be able to sell more American products and thus pay our debt, more jobs, etc. But who will profit? Will increased profits be shared with the stockholders and the workers? Will the corporate leaders share profits significantly with workers and professional staff and pay more taxes to government or will they take the profits and not share significantly with shareholders, workers, and professional staff but move operations out of US and/or bring in cheaper labor and professionals from other countries to work in US? Will they avoid paying more taxes through loopholes? I know I can not change anything but thought I should try to understand what is happening.” Schwartz Answers: Guess you’re wondering about the dollar and how its weakness affects you. The US Dollar. The greenback. The US dollar has been dropping against other major currencies going back decades with a couple big multiyear counterswing rallies along the way. It rallied from 1980 to 1984 when then Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volker broke the back of runaway inflation by raising interest rates through the roof. Then it again rallied from 1996 to the end of the 1990s when President Bill Clinton focused on balancing the budget. But in 2001 when President Bush II cut taxes and the twin deficits (trade and budget) ballooned the buck started a major decline which in February 2008 finally broke major support from 1979, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1995, 2004 and 2005. Yes, this decline has corresponded with us running major budget and trade deficits but that’s nothing new. And it has rallied from time to time in the midst of our budgets getting worse. It rallied for most of 2005 surprising everyone including the richest man in the world Warren Buffet who lost some money. Typical counterswing rallies occur when everyone has bet on one side, in this when everyone got on board the buck dropping. When a trade gets too crowded, it’s a natural phenomenon to counterswing, partially because everyone who wants in is “all in.” After the 2005 rally, the buck then resumed its decline and has been pretty much straight down ever since. And as I said it just recently broke decades old major support. Now some say if the US economic slowdown turns into recession, and then the Us-based recession spreads out globally, the US dollar will strengthen as in past slowdowns, as its been looked at as an investment haven of last resort. Generally though, the rest of the whole world is stuck with tons of US dollars and doesn’t quite know what to do with them. Some countries have stated they are going to diversify their holdings of foreign currency reserves into other currencies like the euro. Other countries with dollars flowing in from exports have started up these so called Sovereign Wealth Funds (pools of dollars) and taken to investing elsewhere other than US Treasuries. Which all points to an US dollar with even less support going forward. The US government does seem to like the strategy of saying they favor a strong dollar but acting otherwise. Obviously, as you mention, a weaker US dollar makes American goods less expensive for foreigners (who get more dollars from their pounds, euros, francs, yen, etc.). So it causes many to visit American cities like New York, Atlanta and Miami and buy the same goods at half price or buy real estate as 2^nd homes, all of which buttresses our firms’ near term profits. And the weak US dollar also makes our exports more competitive so we sell more and that’s helping keeping this economic slowdown, American consumer spending slowing, from morphing into a deep recession. Thus higher than otherwise corporate earnings does help keep a floor under US stock prices so your retirement portfolio, your investments, are higher than they would be. And other countries, notably Japan and the Asian Tigers, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan have followed an economic policy of keeping their currencies down, and that’s helped to drive their exports and make them prosper. So keeping one’s currency down has helped in the past. Now whether it’s a sound strategy for the United States, with the dollar being the world’s reserve currency, is another question. Jim Rogers, the long term investment seer extraordinaire, whose books I’ve advised you to read, says not. I particularly trust his long term views after studying up on his amazing background. Just like you, he’s visited China, by the way. Anyway he says debasing a country’s currency may help short term but in the long term it’s disastrous and he’s publicly trying to get all his investments and assets out of US dollars for the last year or so. He even sold his New York city townhouse and has moved to Asia! And, as to your follow-up concern, of course any increased profits gained from a weak dollar will go into corporate coffers, and may help shareholders by higher stock prices, but certainly will not be shared with workers. Sharing wealth equally was America’s way of operating back in the 1950s and 1960s when unions had some power, regulatory authorities were looked upon as good things performing necessary tasks, America’s big companies had no global competition and we had corporate statesmen who felt their responsibility were to share corporate wealth equitably. That’s no longer the case today, where bottom line profit drives everyone. So forget about that equitable sharing until somehow the country moves back to a better balance between capitalism and democracy. I’m not sure your choice, Hillary, will be able to move us in that direction even though she professes so. She may fervently want to but like most other politicians she is more prepared to battle the other party, fight, fight, fight, rather than get along and compromise. Schwartz View: As to your concern about now having to live on a fixed income, after retiring (thank goodness you have a couple pensions coming in!) there’s a big debate on about what strikes next, deflation or inflation. I mean many are worried about an economic slump turning into a big recession. And then big job losses and a period where prices including the cost of money, interest rates, stay low, but no one has the wherewithal to buy much. Many well-paying American jobs have indeed moved overseas, as you say, and that trend will continue. Business leaders today have to remain focused on the bottom line (or they will lose their jobs) and thus will look for the cheapest labor costs and ways to manufacture. Thus many worry that, similar to the 1930s, we’re in for a period of low employment or at least not enough livable wage jobs. But there is also the other camp which says the global economy is too strong, what with the size of the global economy having mushroomed with millions more people around the world moving now enjoying a bit more wealth, to go into a sustained recession now, that first inflation is going to be the next bogeyman. They say that gas and food prices are not going to come down, give us any relief, for a long time yet to come. I’d put Jim Rogers in that camp. Since he predicts this commodity bull market, commodities going way up in price, is going to last for at least another five to ten years, it could be that rising inflation is the next problem to take center stage, that’s what’s going to really pinch America and Americans. I go back and forth about which next, inflation or deflation. But I do sense myself developing an inflationary mindset recently. Watching Chinese export prices rise, I’ve taken to stockpiling presents, clothes, for next Christmas now. And I keep stockpiling meats at today’s still reasonable prices in the freezer. Obviously higher inflation doesn’t sit well for anyone with a fixed income. So keep up your teaching English as a second language. My best to you and family, Richard