Search results matching tags 'Day to Day Action' and 'Mama Bears'

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

Potential Rally Remains on Tightrope

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:49:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. Written Friday, August 1st, 2008: 6:30 a.m. EST

With the S&P 500 closing just above it’s week ago Wednesday’s close this past Wednesday and the Nasdaq Composite following suit, we have a series of higher lows and higher highs in both, i.e., an uptrend in place. So I was hoping for some follow through by the Dow and other indices yesterday to confirm such. But no such luck. Turned out the market couldn’t overcome more depressing, recessionary-like economic data and even oil turning down didn’t help that much. Just wonder if Mr. Market has already reached the conclusion that lower oil won’t resolve all our problems. Nah, it’s hard to believe we’ve squeezed all the bullishness and resulting rally out of lower oil just yet. The crude price continuing to drop should continue to help stocks, just looked like a breather to me yesterday. Getting back to the technical view, and Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) putting the “Bull back in the Box” after a bullish “follow-through” day after Tuesday’s big up day on higher volume, IBD always recommends watching closely in the days immediately following. So I pulled out an dog-eared IBD publication because I remember well they have a good explanation of whether a follow-through day is succeeding or not. Yep, here it is, in William O’Neil and Gil Morales’ short 2005 book HOW TO MAKE MONEY SELLING STOCKS SHORT (get yourself a copy): “In a few instances, you may have a strong follow-through day and the market will still fail. When this occurs, it usually happens rather fast and can be figured out in a few days.” [Schwartz: This latest follow through day came very late, past the 4 to 10 day normal limit.] IBD follows with this: “If the market is making very little price progress on decreased volume, or if it abruptly begins to fail badly after a sharp, one-day rally, you are probably at another short selling point, as far as the general market averages are concerned.”

Schwartz View: I was prepared to push a little more money thru the windows yesterday – not too much! -- figuring a rally was started but didn’t when I remembered the first Friday of each month we get the JOBS report. Better to wait one more day. So let’s see what the 8:30 am data brings today (although I don’t trust the data, short term traders do trade it). FLASH! Data not too bad, if one trusts it. And while yesterday wasn’t any bearish “distribution day” because of the reduced trading volume, it still looks like we could get a market failure as IBD warns us to always watch closely for. And in spite of me possibly buying a bit more today, please remember, overall, I believe a recession is here & the market will have to factor that in & move lower over the next year or so.

Portfolio Strategy: Monday, July 14th, 2008

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:34:00 GMT

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

This year’s mid-March to mid-May bear market rally was the first rally versus the new primary bear market downtrend. Usually the first rally is the best rally (just like the first loss is the best loss) because many investors believe the bull market still lives and thus it’s eminently playable as bears still have buyers to sell to. But this second time up, if we do get a rally going, the odds are higher it may not last as long and thus not be playable. It may be just a quick, sharp bounce – futures are way up today -- but then after a few days dissipate quickly. Comparing today to the last Papa Bear market (of 1973-1974) we did get a three-month playable rally seven months into the first year of that two-year decline. But I have to equate that to our just completed (in mid-May) two-month rally (which began five months into this bear market).

Generally this middle phase of a bear market is pretty consistently down, except for short, sharp rallies caused by events like the government stepping in. Thus, for aggressive market participants, correct strategy may be just to cover one’s shorts, temporarily. Taking advantage of this morning’s excitement that the long suffering financials may be bottoming. Remember that’s the consensus view on Wall Street, that when the financials finally bottom out, that will signal the bottom in the overall stock market. And for others who are still too long this bearish stock market, which is down -20% but over time looks destined to go as much again lower, any strength here on the latest Fed moves may be to just sell into strength. That’s sort of my strategy as I watch the market this morning. To watch this rally unfold and then to use it for our best interests, keeping in mind that its very likely only a “flashy-splashy” normal bear market rally.

Dow 12,000 Now A Memory

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:45:00 GMT

Thursday, June 26^th, 2008: Written 6:30 a.m. EST Going to find our “way to San Jose” next week, on vacation, so I’m been auditioning books for the plane rides. One coming along is Hamish McRae’s THE WORLD IN 2020. I previewed it and got caught up by his writing, the history he provides and his insights and conclusions. Anyway I’m in Monday am so one last missive then and next Friday is the 4^th of July so I’m only missing 3 letters.

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. After any break to new lows, one can generally expect a reflex rally. So after Tuesday’s confirming lows in numerous key US indices, “telling” us the near term stock market trend remains down, it wasn’t surprising to see the stocks up from the get-go yesterday, tracking a prior bounce in Europe. Later yesterday, the Federal Reserve’s 2:15 p.m. “no change” interest rate announcement didn’t change anything. Still, we had the normal late day sell off, common these days. As I see it, the mornings recently have been characterized by bulls rallying the market after the usual opening sell off runs its course, buyers stepping in after sellers temporarily exhaust themselves, just when a little buying can be very effective. Buyers looking to support their stance that things are and will be all right. Then these, now summer, afternoons are characterized by late day sell offs as large, institutional investors sell into the strength, lightening their heavy loads of stocks, as the bear camp grows slowly, but ever larger.

Schwartz View: We’re now very likely morphing into a steady and sustained stock market decline, i.e. a firmly entrenched bear market. Take a look around yourself, it could be sneaking up on you, you don’t want to be missing it. This bear is of the deceptive nature, not outright grizzly, not yet. Take the Dow Jones Industrials, “the Dow,” for example. Take a peek. We’re now below Dow 12,000 which we’ve only been below twice before now since the subprime implosion last summer, and then only briefly. First time down, the Dow closed below 12,000 for just one day, at 11,971 on January 22^nd, before jumping back above 12,000. Then the Dow closed below 12,000 on four days in mid-March, surrounding nervous weekends. The Dow closed at 11,893 on Friday, March 7^th and at 11,740 on the following Monday, March 10^th. Then after watching Bear Stearns rapidly fall apart the next week, from, oh, $70.08 down to $30.00 the Dow fiddled slightly above 12,000 for three days before closing again below its psychologically key, big Round Number on Friday, March 14^th at 11,951 and again the following Monday, March 17^th at 11,972. That was it. Since then its held above Dow 12,000 … until this past week. This third time down (may be the charm) the Dow closed below 12,000 last Friday and has traded below it for four straight days. To me this is a sign of more admittance and acknowledgement that things are getting worse not better, a sign of resignation. That likely a new and second leg down in stock prices has begun.

Ho Hum, Another Bear Market Summer Day

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:08:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Witten Friday, June 20th, 2008: 6:30 a.m.

Looked to me like yesterday’s stock market rally was a knee-jerk reaction to China announcing it was going to raise oil prices by 17%. Crude dove on the news while stocks jumped. But if one thinks it through, is China raising oil prices really such good news? The bullish knee-jerk was that higher prices for gasoline in China will mean lower overall oil demand from China and that will reduce oil prices globally. As we’ve been hearing a lot lately that it’s government subsidized gas prices in China, India and many other developing countries that isn’t allowing crude demand destruction to occur and thus lower global crude prices. I mean Americans drove 30 billion fewer miles from November through April and that hasn’t lowered prices. The bullish train of thought continues that if the world gets lower oil prices, everything will improve. But, with further thought, if gasoline prices go up in China, won’t that cause demands from Chinese workers for higher wages? I mean the very last thing that the current communist Chinese leadership wants is any revolution from the Chinese people. Already, super big picture investor and Chinese advocate Jim Rogers says its inevitable that China’s government will go capitalistic over time, what with the Chinese people getting a taste of free markets for the last decade or so and realizing that free markets are the pathway to future wealth. Remember: “To be rich is glorious,” is the Chinese people’s new mantra. Hm? … and won’t higher Chinese wages mean higher Chinese export prices, thus higher import prices for us here in the US since we import tons and tons of stuff from China? And thus higher consumer goods prices intensifying the already ongoing and tightening squeeze on US consumers? We’ve had stagnant wages for many, many years with no light at the end of that tunnel and now we’re seeing higher prices for just about everything; food, fuel, health care, taxes, etc. Guess the still entrenched bulls figure lower crude will lead to lower gasoline, diesel, heating oil, and food too, eventually. And since the trend is the thing in the stock market, meaning the markets start discounting immediately upon seeing a new trend emerge, stocks rose yesterday. Still, is a gas hike in China really going to bring down global energy prices? I mean China already raised gas prices late last year and that didn’t bring prices lower. And we now live in a very globally competitive world as all countries and regions want to secure their energy and other needed mineral futures. And food futures too now after the recent global rice shortage has exposed the fallacy that it’s ok to depend on other countries for food staples. Anyway, the first thought was that lower oil is good for stocks and thus the stock market got stronger as the afternoon proceeded, led by lower energy beneficiaries such as the Dow Transports. But while I turned bullish on the Transports back in late March, after technically it broke three fan lines and formed a Head & Shoulders Bottom, I’m now bearish on the group after the two-month dead cat rally ended and the transports formed a bearish, rarely seen Broadening Top, an indication of loss of intelligent sponsorship and leadership. Thus I would certainly use yesterday’s nice bounce back in the trannies to get out if you haven’t already. And, for aggressive traders, if you can find a way to short the transports, I’d do so in a small way now. Schwartz View: Again, yesterday seems like just another bounce in a larger bear market environment, caused by entrenched bulls who refuse to admit the primary trend has now changed and is now pointed downward. The problem with this bullishness -- investors refusing to admit they are wrong, a terrible habit in the stock market! -- is that it indicates we’re still in the early stages of this bear market. Again, safely position yourselves and, unless you’re a trader, take the summer off. Of course, keep reading my letters. Why? Well, let’s see, to improve your knowledge base of how the stock market works and to make sure you don’t miss the opportunity to get back in. Bear markets do have endings. The last Mama Bear market, 2000-2002, ran for slightly less than two years with the most damage coming in the 2^nd year. The last Papa Bear market, in 1973-1974 ran for two years. And that very famous big bad Papa Bear market, which this one is looking more & more like, ran from 1929-1932, or just under three years. So all bad times do pass.

1973-1974 Redux

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 22 May 2008 14:09:00 GMT

The Principle of History. Knowing one’s history gives us guidelines and a basis to work from. So yesterday I began to compare the last Papa Bear market we lived through, 1973-1974, which encompassed the first really oil crisis, to today’s ongoing bear market and oil shock. I said I was printing research off the (wonderful!) Internet & get back to you. Well, I’m baaack.

1973-1974 OIL CRISIS COMPARED TO TODAY

Studying the 1972 through 1974 period in more depth yesterday, please let me note that:

There were three separate legs down in the two-year Papa Bear bear market of 1973-1974:
The first leg down was sharp and came in January 1973. From a peak on January 11^th, 1973, the Dow fell -10% over the next 30 trading days. Then kept sawtoothing lower until late August when it completed a seven-month loss of over -18%. This first leg down can be compared to what the Dow has recently gone through, since its peak on October 9^th last year. From Dow 14,164.50 to the Dow low of 11,740.20 the Dow lost -17.12%. Schwartz View: So about comparable in time, seven months versus five months, and extent, -19% to -17% to the first leg down in the Papa Bear market of 1973-1974.
The stock market in 1973 then rallied +15% from its lows over the following two months. That brought us back to within about -6% of its old January 1973 high and peak. Schwartz View: This time around the Dow has rallied +11% from the March 10^th lows to the May 2^nd highs, so for just under two months. And has brought the Dow within -7.8% of its old highs. So a weaker, shorter rally, which may be bad, IF it’s indeed over.
Going forward from that bear market ally high in August 1973, the two-month rally where some investors “were likely lulled into believing that a new leg up was occurring” the market began its second leg down, which brings us up to date and to today.
Looking back again to what happened in 1973, and projecting forward to what unfolds today, the 1973 second leg down began in August and ran until December and the Dow dropped an additional and even more severe -20%. The leadership of that era, the “Nifty Fifty,” resolved its previous divergence, holding up while the smaller cap stocks got hurt during the first leg down, and caught up on the downside as shown by the -20% Dow drop. This drop took roughly three to four months. Schwartz View: Thus I have to project a second and more severe leg down starting now or soon. Probably including the remaining leading energy and commodity sector taking a hit.

Other similarities and/or dissimilarities from the oil shock and crisis back in 1973-1974 to today’s oil shock which I unearthed in my research yesterday are:

1. Rising inflation was a big issue in both periods.

2. The Vietnam War ended during that past bear market, something similar to what I expect to happen during this bear, us getting out of Iraq.

3. The US dollar was under pressure back then even in the early stages of the bear market, in February 1973, it was devalued by 10%. It’s losing value again, now.

4. Oil jumped from $3 a barrel to $5.11 a barrel, beginning with the October 1973 OPEC oil embargo, a quick jump of 70%. We all know oil has soared the last couple of years as well.

5. We had massive layoffs of 142,000 in the auto industry in 1974; yesterday American Airlines announced “large layoffs” ahead.

6. We had Franklin National Bank be declared insolvent in 1974; this year Bear Stearns effectively was declared insolvent by the Fed. Other banks, investment and money center remain under great pressure.

7. BARRON’s Roundtable was unanimously bullish starting off 1973; same thing from Barron’s Roundtable kicking off last year.

8. The US economy from 1972 to 1974 dropped from a growth rate of +7.2% to -2.1%. And the UK economy dropped from +5.1% to -1.1%. This time around both the US and UK economies are also dropping quickly.

9. Stocks priced in gold were priced very low back then. Same low valuation in terms of gold today with gold at 900$+.

10. We had a new Fed chairman, Arthur Burns, arrive in 1970, who encouraged inflation. We have a new Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, who is also encouraging inflation today.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. No use looking out too far, looking at the third leg down in 1974 for instance, which came after another always-to-be-expected stock market rally and multi-month trading range. Let’s hope this time around isn’t so bad although I must say things do look pretty bad to me.