Search results matching tags 'Commodity Bull Market' and 'Trend Reversals'

Oil Rally Likely Says Elliott Wave Theory

RichardSchwartz — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:18:00 GMT

COMMODITY VIEW. Oil Rally Begins. Elliott Wave theory, originally produced by R. N. Elliott in the early 1900s, and now carried forward by Bob Prechter, past #1 market guru, basically says Elliott waves or complete market movements come in threes. Well, to more accurate, Elliott says movements really come in fives, three in the prevailing direction, and two counterswings in the other direction. Right now I see three distinct and obvious movements downward in oil and other commodities. Meaning I see a complete movement just finished. So now I have to expect a move in the other direction, a rally upward in oil. For chart lover’s edification, and to see what I see, the three legs down are as follows.

Complete Elliott Wave Movement. The 1^st leg lower off the July 3^rd, 2008 crude oil top ended roughly August 12^th. After a minor sideways counterswing upward until August 29^th, oil, and commodities in general, began their 2^nd legs down with a gap lower the next day and continued downward to September 16^th, where the second counterswing rally upward began. This lasted for only a few days, until September 22^nd before the 3^rd leg down began. Starting September 22^nd, oil, and commodities in general, fell along with most everything else financial in the rare forced panic right through to the bottom on October 27^th. So we now have a complete three legged or Elliott Wave decline in place.

Schwartz View: At this point then I expect some type of oil and general commodity rally, which has already begun, beginning six days back. Maybe going hand in hand with a general stock market rally. But remember, there’s no saying oil can’t just keep on falling after this pause or rally attempt ends. We could easily soon start another whole new movement down in oil. But, bottom line important, this is the price and time point where it’s logical to play for a rally if one’s so inclined. I am so I took a small position in oil on Monday on the dip which took oil back down but not down below its October 27^th lows. Then yesterday we had a big up day in oil after which we were left posted a higher high. Add that to a higher low the day before and over the last week we’ve quickly met the definition on an uptrend, a series of higher lows and higher highs. Thus traders might want to take note and mirror me, using the next decline, oil’s down as I write this morning, to do so as long as we don’t break the old crude price lows. As for additional reasons oil why oil may have finally found its leveling off price, crude at its recent low was down a Fibonacci number, down very close to 61.8%. Normally a great point to expect a bounce. Plus hedge fund commodity deleveraging might just be ending along with the thawing and maybe long awaited ending to the horrific credit crisis. Finally, just use some common sense. No matter how poor the US and global economy gets, a certain amount of business is still going to need to be done.. And with no progress made in freeing ourselves from oil over the last 30 years, no matter what I want and believe will is on the way to happening, it’s not going to occur overnight. Oil is still going to have to be utilized for years to come; why not a rally to some leveling off point, say maybe at about 50% off its highs or in the low $70s?

Disclaimer! I own a little oil with small positions in Rydex Oil & Gas Ultra (RYEIX) and in ProFunds Energy (ENPIX).

Where Now Inflation?

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:39:00 GMT

THE FIRST INFLATION SURGE IN 25 YEARS IS OVER. So, what now?

First, let me give credit when credit is due. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed finally got one right. They’ve been promising us moderating inflation for a year or more and now with -30% lower crude oil prices and a big general commodity collapse we’re finally we’re seeing it happen. Or, at least, starting to (most things economic happen with a lag). And with the US dollar now surging, that’s going to reverse/diminish rising, problematic imported inflation as well. So now the deflationists out there, those who say deflation is our real problem facing us for some time – Gary Shilling, Robert Prechter, Ron Insana to name just three -- can really have their time in the sun.

Still, there remains some debate whether problematic rising inflation is going quiescent. Mac Courtenay of Seeking Alpha, I guess a boutique research firm, offers up seven reasons why inflation isn’t going away:

1. Inflation is already firmly entrenched. Schwartz View: I agree. I’ve been observing the Fed’s incessant jawboning that inflation expectations remain low is wrong and we all know that the government’s inflation data is terrible skewed to the downside from what inflation really is.

2. Inflation is already here. Schwartz View: The Producer Price Index (PPI) is up +9.8% over last year, and that’s only what the government grudgingly admits to.

3. Inflation is now moving its way through the “food chain” showing up in consumer prices as well. After some hope that because of global competition (globalization) producers would eat the higher inflation. Schwartz View: This rippling through is evidenced by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising too, again up the fastest in 17 years.

4. Average weekly earnings fell in July the largest since 1990. Schwartz View: I’d guess Mr. Courtenay’s point is that when earnings drop, we can’t buy as much. ???

5. More and more Federal Reserve governors are talking about raising interest rates next, not lowering them. Especially if we see energy prices stabilize above $100 and bounce. Schwartz View: Of course, these Fed officials, meeting again next Tuesday, can change their views.

6. Global (food?) consumption patterns are heading higher. Schwartz View: I don’t know if author Courtenay is talking about food, metals or just what. But I agree with him on food. As people get a little money, one of the first things they spend it on is more and better food. Thus global food consumption patterns should keep heading higher even if the global economy recesses.

7. The markets will take charge. If the Fed doesn’t raise rates, the marketplace will raise them. Schwartz View: Not sure about this reason he positing for inflation staying problematic. Right now the markets, the long US Treasury market, is still forecasting a slowdown by yields going lower and lower, which to me means more disinflation ahead, not rising inflation.

Schwartz View: He goes on to say part of oil’s recent comeuppance, coming down, is forced hedge fund liquidation because of Congressional pressure (I agree). And that it’s a great time to buy TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and the easiest way is to buy the symbol TIP. And to buy commodities on this correction, recommending also symbols DBC (a basket of commodities) and GDX (gold). Myself, while I believe this commodity pullback is indeed a correction, I think it’s too early to buy them back.

Schwartz BIG PICTURE Inflation View. My belief, garnered from studying stock market history and looking at thousands of charts over the last 20+ years, is that when any new trend begins, many times it begin with a surge in the new direction, then a pullback or at least a pause, sort of to regroup, consolidate gains, make believers out of disbelievers, open the eyes of others who are slow to see and just basically kill enough time to see if the new trend has legs. Then after this pullback correction, which more often than not can be large and long lasting, runs its course, the new trend reasserts itself.

Basically that’s where I see us today with rising inflation, in a pause to refresh. I’ve theorized over the last year than oil and other commodities would stay stronger, longer than most thought this year. I’d say that proved correct with oil going up all the way to about $147 and related sectors like natural gas, energy services, solar, wind and other alternative clean green leading the stock market for the whole first half of 2008. Similar to what happened during the first year of the last severe Papa Bear stock market back in 1973-1874 (oil stayed high the first year). But now, with commodities reversing downward and in major correction, it’s obvious change has occurred, that a pause to refresh is underway. And we can expect this new trend to last longer and correct deeper than many would think I’d venture. Sure, first because commodities are inherently extremely volatile, much more so than stocks and bonds. But also because of the emerging new, macroeconomic backdrop. We seem to be in line for a major, global economic slowdown which will throw a big detour on the road to a new long term trend to rising global inflation. If the global economy really goes blah for the next few years, commodities will take a longer than expected breather. Schwartz View: Still I’m in agreement with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan who predicted in his 2007 book The Age of Turbulence that we live in an inflationary world and that the disinflation trend dominating all during his tenure as Fed chief is coming to an end. And I’m in agreement also with famed, global investor Jim Rogers who says commodities normally correct 50% or more and that’s what we’re seeing now, a correction not the end, to this so far about 9-year commodity bull market.

Two Technicals: 1. Why No Capitulation; 2. How Inflation Returns

RichardSchwartz — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:40:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. The Principle of History. Two historical technical observations today:

1. Capitulation: Where the Heck is It? CNBC keeps interviewing floor traders and reporting from the New York Stock Exchange that everyone there is anxiously looking for that big bout of capitulation, selling, to end this latest market decline. But their wishes aren’t coming true. Guess they haven’t read my stock market letter as a study of the price action after the Bank Panic of 1907 , the most similar comparison to today’s credit crisis I could find, showed no capitulation back then. The reason and explanation was that since investors were so darn bearish, they shorted any and all rallies and thus stocks never got “quite out of hand” or saw that one day of massive selling or capitulation today’s traders want to see. Schwartz View: Similar to market crashes, we have to get blindsided to get capitulation. Or the problems and pressures have to get extremely severe with no light at the end of the tunnel. Today, we sure aren’t getting blindsided and numerous remedies are being floated and tried left and right, like economic stimulus packages, Fed rate cuts, Treasury announcements, yesterday’s SEC pronouncement about short selling, etc. Again, let me point out, it’s sort of ironic that we all preach free market capitalism when times are good but when times turn bad, we all scream for the government to bail us out.

2. The Return of Inflation. This commodity inflation -- rising prices in metals, oil and now food -- is the first bout of rising inflation we’ve seen since the early 1980s when then Fed chair Paul Volker jacked interest rates up through the roof and led the US into recession but in so doing also broke the back of multi-decade, out of control inflation. As my regular readers know, widely-followed big picture guru Jim Rogers says commodities are going to keep running up in price for approximately the next ten years, that a commodity bull market is in full force. And I don’t disagree. But let me add my alpha to the picture. My studies have shown that many, maybe most times, when any new trend begins it begins with a big burst. Then we get a large pullback in the early states of this new trend (whatever the time frame the new trend is, days, weeks, years, decades). Then after this large pullback, say because there remains many disbelievers who can’t quite believe things have changed, or because these quick gains need to be consolidated, or because the trend is moving too fast and has outrun itself, the new trend becomes more steady and reliable. Check back to the bull market which started in 1982, this pattern applies. Or think a bit about this new bear market. How stocks dropped last year in July and August when the subprime news first broke and then had a big bounce (to slight new highs) before the new down trend reasserted itself. Schwartz View: So it makes sense that inflation and this commodity bull are due for a big correction downward before reasserting themselves for the next few years.

Oil Near a Peak? Yes.

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 29 May 2008 18:56:00 GMT

OIL VIEW. I’ve been reading a lot about oil, the current state and the history of oil as we see prices keep rising and we all wonder where a top is. So below are some interesting tidbits which I’ve unearthed from the Internet (a great modern day development!) for you to ponder, some obvious, some insightful (I hope):

· OPEC has used oil as a weapon against western countries in the past. Schwartz View: A bad precedent. The October 1973 embargo effectively raised prices quickly and sharply to a new plateau (from $3 a barrel in 1972 to $12 a barrel) which lasted for the rest of the 1970s.

· The Iran revolution (getting rid of the Shah) in 1978 and the following war between Iraq and Iran in September 1980 again raised the price of oil quickly, doubling oil prices from $14 to $35 a barrel by 1981. Schwartz View: So both times oil rose sharply in price and stayed there.

· Oil is notoriously price inelastic according to some researchers. Another reports says: “The supply and demand for oil are both inelastic in the short run …” Which is what commodity guru Jim Rogers sees, that it takes many years for oil supplies to increase when demand increases which is his basis for the whole commodity complex to keep rising. Schwartz View: I’ve been waiting a year or so now for “higher prices to resolve higher prices.” Now I understand this is a too simplistic argument and why it hasn’t happened that way just yet. Another reason is because we are much less dependent on oil today. “Energy costs;’ share of GDP has fallen from 8% in 1973 to 2% today.” (From an Internet article written in 2005).

· Over time though, the supply and demand for oil is more elastic. Schwartz View: Thus the past history of oil prices rising sharply, then slowly sliding lower over time as more supply comes on board. Probably the price pattern we’ll follow again although we’ve likely raised the base price level or floor such as transpired in the past.

· Commodity (and China) guru Jim Rogers says his research shows commodity bull markets last roughly 17 years. Schwartz View: I see the price of oil slid from 1981 to November 1998 when it bottomed out about $13 a barrel. Just about when Rogers called a new commodity bull market.

· From the last bear market bottom in oil in 1998, we’ve had the first bull market leg up from the bottom in November 1998 to June 2000 as oil rose from $11 to $35 a barrel. Then after a price correction downward and a breather, we put in a 2^nd bull leg up from November 2001 at $20 to a peak around Hurricane Katrina at about $75. After that blow off peak, prices fell for five months coming back to $50. Since it’s been straight up in a third bull market leg. Schwartz View: Since we’ve now put in the normal three legs up which compose a full bull market we could easily be due for a sharp and severe pullback in oil.. Especially so since I see a guest on CNBC talking up $200 oil, bullish predictions being a normal sign of bulls getting carried away just before a top.

· The US placed price controls on domestically produced oil during the first energy shock in the early 1970s. This caused US consumers to pay less for gasoline than they otherwise would have. Longer term, price controls kept America from reducing our oil consumption in the middle 1970s and thus our dependence on foreign oil producers. Thus when the 2^nd oil shock hit in the late 1970s we were much more negatively impacted by prices jumping sharply. Schwartz View: This is why I advocate keeping oil prices high now, let America take the pain now, so money keeps flowing into developing alternate energy sources. Let’s not repeat the mistakes of the 1970s!

· History shows higher oil prices in the early 1970s, the late 1970s and then in 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait all led to recessions. Schwartz View: Maybe it will be different this time around but we all know predicting “this time it’s different” usually proves disastrously wrong.

· Here’s the rationale behind higher oil prices leading to recession: “Higher oil prices have historically led to recessions because they act as a tax on spending by absorbing consumer dollars that would be spent elsewhere, by reducing corporate profits through increased costs and lower demand, and by causing higher inflation which in turn causes higher interest rates.” Schwartz View: All of which seem to be developing today except, so far, higher interest rates because the Fed has been lowering shot term rates to free up the frozen-up financial system. These lower rates which ultimately should lead to even higher inflation.

· The 1970s were characterized by “stagflation” after sharply higher oil prices raised inflation levels while simultaneously reducing economic growth. Schwartz View: Isn’t the same economic ripple effect happening right now? I’d say yes.

· The 10-year US Treasury bond yield rose from 6% to 15% during the oil shocks in the early and late 1970s. Schwartz View: This time the 10-year, benchmark Treasury bond yield has stayed low because of the credit crunch and the “flight to safety” trade by investors. Doesn’t it seem logical that when the Fed stops lowering rates and/or says the credit markets are back to normal, long term interest rates will once again rise? Does to me. In fact, higher long term rates may be happening now. That’s one big reason why I’m not recommending bonds and haven’t been.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. Actually I could go on and on researching and commenting on oil. And I’m interested in continuing my research so I may add a few more comments/insights in coming days. But for now the history & current spike higher in oil makes me predict that soon we’ll see some type of peak in oil very soon!

4, 5, 6, 7 Straight Days! Sequences Can Turn Trends

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 20 May 2008 18:28:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Written, Tuesday, May 20th, 2008: 6:30 a.m.

Another one of those turnaround stock market days yesterday. At 2 p.m. things looked great but then stocks reversed downward and by the close there were more stocks down than up on the NYSE, 1479 vs. 1681. While numerous sectors actually ended slightly in the red. The Dow Industrials itself was up 150 points but closed up only 41 points. And it’s partner index, the Dow Transports reversed from a new intraday all-time high of 5536.52 (the old high was 5487.85 last July 18^th) down to a close at 5395.40. Thus the question for the Dow Transports, which is suddenly getting (too) much attention by CNBC, is why its leading the market higher directly in the face of soaring crude? My answer: Railroads, which dominate the 20 Dow Transport stocks, have a decided advantage over truckers and the like when diesel prices soar, like now. Anyway, does yesterday’s intraday turnaround mean the two-month rally is over? Or is now suspect? Swinging around in my chair, a review of my daily wall charts of the Dow, Dow Transports, Dow Utilities, S&P 500, 400, 600 and Nasdaq Composite really doesn’t show such. They are all safely locked into their upward trending channels although some, like the S&P 400 Midcap and Nasdaq Composite are ripe and ready to pull back near term, being near their upper boundaries. But I don’t see those bearish Rising Wedges anymore, they didn’t fully develop and I see no commonly-occurring, bearish Head & Shoulder Tops either. Instead I just see a continuation of higher low and higher highs which confirm the general market uptrend remains in place. Schwartz View: We’re due for some pullback, sure, after the S&P Midcap rose for some seven straight days prior to yesterday. And the Nasdaq and S&P Smallcap were up for four straight days. But I wouldn’t call this recent rally any “long move of intermediate proportions” which "Trader Vic" Sperandeo in his two excellent books of the early 1990s (get them on www.Amazon.com and elsewhere) says comes before his 4-Day Rule (of a change of trend). Maybe, but I don’t see it that way. I still assess the path of least resistance remains up, for now.

Let's look globally. ASIA just fell today after rising for six straight days so as I search around deeper my hackles remain up watching for Trader Vic’s 4-Day Rule or his reversal of trend rule. It may indeed be occurring, after I pooh-pooh it above, and that would mean the intermediate uptrend is over. Because we’ve just had four days or more up in the Nasdaq Composite, the S&P 500, 400, 600 and the Dow Transports and now I see it in the MSCI Asia Pacific Index too. Maybe it’s in EUROPE; let me check; BRB (be right back). Well, yep, it’s been four straight days up in England’s FTSE 100 Index as well, before today’s trading, in which, by the by, the “footsie” is trading down.

Schwartz View: Summing up, could this two month rally really be ending? No one could/would predict it starting off today. I didn’t see any top either waking up this morning; not before I’m realizing as I write that we’ve had so many different markets up for at least four straight days. So let’s review the background, quickly. Has anything changed since that fateful weekend of March 14^th -17^th which sparked off reversals in most financial markets? Do any of these new tow-month trends show any signs of ending? Remember when the Fed “bailed out” Bear Stearns, most bearish trends changed for the positive; the trend of stocks, gold and commodities (ex-oil), the US dollar and US Treasuries (higher yields, lower prices). Looking around, the US dollar rally may have run its course, tough to say. Treasuries have had a few days toward lower yields (higher prices), another possible reversal. Gold has rallied for three days in a row, moving back above $900 and commodities and foreign currencies are on the cusp now, with possible short term bases in effect after a two-month pullback correcting longer term uptrends. Net, net, still too soon to say with any certainty, this turn may just be a mirage, but there are some signals and sniffs that we may be reverting back to the bearish trends prevailing before the Fed backstopped the whole financial system. Stay tuned!