Search results matching tag 'Change'

Why I am an Optimist

JohnMauldin — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:10:48 GMT

Subprime Dubai
More Government Data Fun:
Unemployment Claims Were Not Down
Why I Am Optimistic About the Future
The Millennium Wave
New York and My Own Psychic Income

I admit that of late my writings have had a rather dark tone. There are certainly a number of severe long-term problems that we must deal with, and they're going to serve up a lot of economic pain. But the Thanksgiving weekend with the kids has me in a reflective mood, and one that has only served to underscore my long-term optimism. This week we look at why 2007 will not be the good old days we will yearn for in 20 years, after we briefly visit Dubai and the latest unemployment numbers.

Subprime Dubai

While we in the US spent our Thursday eating turkey and watching football, the rest of the world's markets went into a downward spiral as Dubai announced it wanted its lenders to give the country a six-month moratorium on some $80-90 billion in debt. This has the potential to be the largest sovereign debt default since Argentina. Somehow this was a shocking development. (How can too much debt and real estate be a problem?) And by markets I mean gold, commodities, oil, stocks, and risk assets everywhere. They all went down. Today the US markets experienced their own sell-off, though not as deeply as the rest of the world.

As I wrote last Friday, the world is now negatively correlated with the dollar, and as money went into the dollar and US treasuries, everything else went down. Vietnam devalues, Greece is looking increasingly risky, Russia wants to devalue some more, the world is still deleveraging, etc. Is this another repeat of 1998, when Russia and the Asian debt crisis tanked the markets?

To get an answer, let's look at some facts about Dubai. It is one of the Arab Emirates; but unlike its neighbor Abu Dhabi, oil is only about 6% of the economy. While the foundations of the country were built with oil, the country has diversified into finance, real estate, tourism, trading, and manufacturing. It is a small country, with a little under 1.5 million residents, but with less than 20% being natural citizens - the rest are expatriates. The gross domestic product is around US $50 billion.

(Note: http://www.ameinfo.com/67802.html and then converting the currency. I found the numbers on various websites and services strangely at wide discrepancies. This seems close to a median number. I think the discrepancy is mostly people confusing the GDP for the United Arab Emirates as a whole, which includes Abu Dhabi, rather than just Dubai.)

Dubai has become a byword for thinking large. The world's tallest building, underwater hotels, the largest manmade islands (plural), indoor snow skiing in the desert... For links to more information try this from Wikipedia: "The large-scale real estate development projects have led to the construction of some of the tallest skyscrapers and largest projects in the world, such as the Emirates Towers, the Burj Dubai, the Palm Islands and the world's second tallest, and most expensive hotel, the Burj Al Arab." The list goes on and on.

UBS suggests that the $80-90 billion in debt may not include rather large off-balance-sheet debt (where have we seen that one?). So, a country with a GDP of $50 billion borrows $100 billion. They build massive projects, which are now among the most expensive real estate in the world. The latest manmade island plans for one million people to buy property there. Seriously. Talk about Field of Dreams.

Then came the credit crunch. Property values dropped by as much as 50%. Sales, say the developers in understatements, have slowed. Seems there was a lot of debt used to speculate on real estate, not to mention buying Barney's, Las Vegas casinos, banks, etc. And while US banks have little exposure, it seems England has about 50% or so of the debt, with the rest of Europe having the lion's share of the remainder. Admittedly, the estimates seem to confuse the debt of Dubai with that of Abu Dhabi, so it is hard to know a reliable number, other than that European banks are the most exposed.

Now, here's the deal. Abu Dhabi has the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, at over $650 billion. Dubai has a "mere" $15 billion. If they cared to, Abu Dhabi could write a small check and make all the problems disappear. It just seems that they are not ready to do that, at least not yet. Abu Dhabi already got the world's tallest building on past debt problems.

Construction and real estate were as much as 25% of the economy. Let's see. Large leverage with maybe $5 billion in interest in a $50 billion economy that is 25% construction? A construction and real estate-driven economy. A real estate bubble. Sound like California, Florida, Spain? How can this be a surprise, except that everyone expected big brother Abu Dhabi to pick up the check?

While Abu Dhabi did advance $5 billion earlier, Dubai is not letting that money out of the country. There are projects to be finished, you understand. From where I sit, this is just rather hard-headed negotiations, a restructuring of who owns what and who will get what assets. It will all settle out. Given the massive losses that world banks have already taken, this is rather small potatoes.

So why the reaction by the markets? Because I think many participants know that the potential for there to be a serious correction is quite real. When anything as relatively small as Dubai spooks the market, it should serve as a warning sign. The world has priced in 5% GDP growth for the US and much of the developed world in the equity and commodity markets. Either we have to get that or the markets are going to have to come back to the reality of what I think is going to be a much lower growth figure.

But in any event, one of the lessons to be learned is that investors should pay attention to where the leverage is. Unsustainable debt trends end in tears. They always do. Spain, Greece, Italy, the UK, and Japan will all have to face major restructuring in the next decade due to leverage. And we in the US will also find that we cannot grow debt at our current levels. Will we pare our debt willingly or be forced to by the market? Either way, it will make for a less than optimal economy over the coming years. Muddle Through, indeed.

More Government Data Fun:
Unemployment Claims Were Not Down

The headlines said that initial claims dropped to 466,000 here in the US, finally falling below 500,000. This was greeted with proclamations of recovery. First, let me say that 466,000 people filing for unemployment is still way too high. That is a lot of people losing their jobs, and when we first crossed over 450,000 a few years ago that level was seen as a sign of recession.

Second, the headline number was a seasonally adjusted number. The actual number was 543,926. What is happening is that we are coming off of wickedly high numbers in 2008 and a seasonal number that was much lower in the preceding years. It is another part of the Statistical Recovery. And this trend is likely to keep on for the rest of the quarter. My friend John Vogel, who analyzes the unemployment numbers for me each week, shows pretty convincingly that the average for this current quarter will be over 500,000 per week on a non-seasonally adjusted basis. This is less than a 10% drop from last year for the same quarter. Job losses are continuing to mount, and we are on our way to an 11%-plus unemployment number by next summer. Statistical Recovery, indeed.

Why I Am Optimistic About the Future

I am optimistic by nature. An entrepreneur friend of mine gave me a term that I have grown to love. She calls it "psychic income." It's that bit of hoped-for future income that is in our minds, that drives some of us, inflicted with the entrepreneurial gene, to do the next deal, make the next big plan, scheme yet another scheme to finally hit whatever counts as the big one for each of us. How much better would our life be, how our problems would go away, if only this one thing would come about! It has not yet become real income, yet we live and act as if it is almost real. We can feel it getting ready to happen. It is still in our heads, this psychic income. Yet it is in some ways real for us.

I get my propensity for psychic income naturally. My Less-Than-Sainted Dad lived on psychic income. He was always trying to invent something or launch a new business. He had large ups and downs, and at times we would be now classified as below the poverty line. Not that I knew that as a kid. Mostly, Dad lived in his dreams, though often alcoholic ones, of a better future, but he never gave up. In his mid-70s he was re-inventing the small printing press in his garage, with plans for national production. It was only after we had to take his car from him in his mid-80s that he quit. It was a very sad day. I now know we had not just taken his car, but far more than that: his dreams, his psychic income.

For some, I should note, psychic income is not just about money. It may be about the next promotion or the next big discovery. For some of us, it is just having our ideas accepted and validated in the court of human opinion. It is simply what drives us.

I graduated from seminary in the winter of 1974, entering the workforce in the hard year of 1975. We were coming off a recession, about which I technically knew little. I did know jobs were tight. I was unknowingly faceing another eight years of high unemployment, a tumultuous stock market, rising commodity prices, high inflation, and rising interest rates. Japan was just beginning to be a real force in the world. People were still buying bomb shelters, as Russia was a feared and powerful enemy. As the price of gold rose, there were those who told us the dollar would soon be worthless (the Fed was a problem and the deficit was out of control), and so we needed to buy yet more gold and also a year's worth of dried food.

Not the best time to start a business; yet within a year or so, I ended up starting my own print brokering business, as jobs were scarce and that is what I knew. I often get letters from readers giving me grief about my rich hedge-fund friends and our fabulous wealth, and how little we relate to the real world. And for some of my rich hedge-fund friends, that may be true (although for most of my friends that is not true). And I am sadly far from rich, although I have dreams.

I remember waking up in the late 70s at 2 AM with a knot in my stomach, because a small bank was in trouble and had called my loan (an amount which now seems so small, but at the time it was all the money in the world). How would I make payroll? Gas and food? I know what it is like to work long hours and live on a very tight budget, with some months being behind on everything, while all the while your family is growing.

But I got lucky, and through a series of events got into the investment publishing field in the early '80s, then partnered in an investment firm, and then went on my own in 1999. I stuck this letter on the internet in August of 2000, and things just took off.

But how many setbacks, bumpy rides, and false starts have I gone through over the decades? Frankly, I try to forget. But the point is that each of those episodes was another learning opportunity. And I woke up the next morning and started trying to figure it all out.

But it's not just me, it' is tens of millions of entrepreneurs and businessmen and women in the US, and hundreds of millions worldwide, that have the same ambitions and drive. Every night we go to sleep on our psychic income, and every day we get up and try to figure out how to turn it into real income. And some of us are talented or lucky (that would be me) enough to make it happen.

Long-time readers know that I think we are in the midst of a secular bear cycle, much like 1966-82. The next decade is likely to produce less than average growth, due to structural problems and the bad choices we have made with personal and government debt. I am perfectly cognizant that unemployment will be over 10% for a protracted time. That is tragic for those unemployed and underemployed. I realize the entire developed world has huge and seemingly insurmountable pension and medical obligations over the next few decades, which we cannot possibly hope to meet. The level of angst that we will live through as we adjust will not be fun.

But the point is, that is just what we do - we live through it. In spite of the problems, we get up every day and figure out how to make it. Would it be better if we could get our act together in (pick a country) and not be forced to adjust because we have come to the end of the line? Yes, I know we will likely have some very tumultuous times ahead of us, making business and investment decisions more than a little difficult.

So what? The future is never easy for all but a few of us, at least not for long. But we figure it out. And that is why in 20 years we will be better off than we are today. Each of us, all over the world, by working out our own visions of psychic income, will make the real world a better place.

The Millennium Wave

Let's look at some changes we are likely to see over the next few decades. My view is that we have a number of waves of change getting ready to erupt on the world stage. The combination of them is what I call the Millennium Wave, the most significant period of change in human history. And one for which most of us are not yet ready.

Some time next year, we are going to see the three-billionth person get access to the telecosm (phones and internet, etc.). By 2015 it will be five billion people. Within ten years, most of the world will be able to access cheap (I mean really cheap) high-speed wireless broadband at connection rates that dwarf what we now have.

That is going to unleash a wave of creativity and new business that will be staggering. That heretofore hidden genius in Mumbai or Vladivostok or Kisangani will now have the ability to bring his ideas, talent, and energy to change the world in ways we can hardly imagine. When Isaac Watts was inventing the steam engine, there were a handful of engineers who could work with him. Now we throw a staggering number of scientists and engineers at trivial problems, let alone the really big ones.

And because of the internet, the advances of one person soon become known and built upon in a giant dance of collaboration. It is because of this giant dance, this unplanned group effort, that we will all figure out how to make advances in so many ways. (Of course, that is hugely disruptive to businesses that don't adapt.)

Ever-faster change is what is happening in medicine. None of us in 2030 will want to go back to 2010, which will then seem as barbaric and antiquated as, say, 1975. Within a few years, it will be hard to keep up with the number of human trials of gene therapy and stem cell research. Sadly for the US, most of the tests will be done outside of our borders, but we will still benefit from the results.

I spend some spare study time on stem cell research. It fascinates me. We are now very close to being able to start with your skin cells and grow you a new liver (or whatever). Muscular dystrophy? There are reasons to be very encouraged.

Alzheimer's disease requires somewhere between 5-7% of total US health-care costs. Defeat that and a large part of our health-care budget is fixed. And it will be first stopped and then cured. Same thing with cancers and all sorts of inflammatory diseases. There is reason to think a company may have found a generic cure for the common flu virus.

A whole new industry is getting ready to be born. And with it new jobs and investment opportunities.

Energy problems? Are we running out of oil? My bet is that in less than 20 years we won't care. We will be driving electric cars that are far superior to what we have today in every way, from power sources that are not oil-based.

For whatever reason, I seem to run into people who are working on new forms of energy. They are literally working in their garages on novel new ways to produce electric power; and my venture-capital MIT PhD friend says they are for real when I introduce them. And if I know of a handful, there are undoubtably thousands of such people. Not to mention well-funded corporations and startups looking to be the next new thing. Will one or more make it? My bet is that more than one will. We will find ourselves with whole new industries as we rebuild our power grids, not to mention what this will mean for the emerging markets.

What about nanotech? Robotics? Artificial intelligence? Virtual reality? There are whole new industries that are waiting to be born. In 1980 there were few who saw the rise of personal computers, and even fewer who envisioned the internet. Mapping the human genome? Which we can now do for an individual for a few thousand dollars? There are hundreds of new businesses that couldn't even exist just 20 years ago.

I am not sure where the new jobs will come from, but they will. Just as they did in 1975.

There is, however, one more reason I am optimistic. Sitting around the dinner table, I looked at my kids. I have seven kids, five of whom are adopted. I have two Korean twins, two black kids, a blond, a (sometimes) brunette, and a redhead. They range in age from 15 to 32. It is a rather unique family. My oldest black son is married to a white girl and my middle white son is with a black girl. They both have given me grandsons this year (shades of Obama!). One of my Korean daughters is married to a white young man, and the other is dating an Hispanic. And the oldest (Tiffani) is due with my first granddaughter in less than a month.

And the interesting thing? None of them think any of that is unusual. They accept it as normal. And when I am with their friends, they also see the world in a far different manner than my generation. (That is not to say the trash talk cannot get rather rough at the Mauldin household at times.)

I find great cause for optimism in that. I am not saying we are in a post-racial world. We are not. Every white man in America should have a black son. It would open your eyes to a world we do not normally see. But it is better, far better, than the world I grew up in. And it is getting still better.

My boys play online video games with kids from all over the world. And the kids from around the world get on the internet and see a much wider world than just their local neighborhoods.

Twenty years ago China was seen as a huge military threat. Now we are worried about them not buying our bonds and becoming an economic power. Niall Ferguson writes about "Chimerica" as two countries joined together in an increasingly tight bond. In 20 years, will Iran be our new best friend? I think it might be, and in much less time than that, as an increasingly young and frustrated population demands change, just as they did 30 years ago. Will it be a smooth transition? Highly unlikely. But it will happen, I think.

I look at my kids and their friends. Are they struggling? Sure. They can't get enough hours, enough salaries, the jobs they want. They now have kids and mortgages. And dreams. Lots of dreams. That is cause for great optimism. It is when the dreams die that it is time to turn pessimistic.

I believe the world of my kids is going to be a far better world in 20 years. Will China and the emerging world be relatively better off? Probably, but who cares? Do I really begrudge the fact that someone is making their part of the world better? In absolute terms, none of my kids will want to come back to 2009, and neither will I. Most of the doom and gloom types (and they seem to be legion) project a straight-line linear future. They see no progress beyond that in their own small worlds. If you go back to 1975 and assume a linear future, the projections were not all that good. Today you can easily come up with a less-than-rosy future if you make the assumption that things in 20 years will roughly look the same as now. But that also assumes there will not be even more billions of people who now have the opportunity to dream up their own psychic income and work to make it happen.

We live in a world of accelerating change. Things are changing at an ever-increasing pace. The world is not linear, it is curved. And we may be at the beginning of the elbow of that curve. If you assume a linear world, you are going to make less-than-optimal choices about your future, whether it is in your job or investments or life in general.

In the end, life is what you make of it. With all our struggles, as we sat around the table, our family was content, just like 100 million families around the country. Are there those who are in dire distress? Homeless? Sick? Of course, and that is tragic for each of them. And those of us who are fortunate need to help those who are not.

We live in the most exciting times in human history. We are on the verge of remarkable changes in so many areas of our world. Yes, some of them are not going to be fun. I see the problems probably more clearly than most.

But am I going to just stop and say, "What's the use? The Fed is going to make a mess of things. The government is going to run us into debts to big too deal with? We are all getting older, and the stock market is going to crash?"

Even the most diehard bear among us is thinking of ways to improve his personal lot, even if it is only to buy more gold and guns. We all think we can figure it out or at least try to do so. Some of us will get it right and others sadly will not. But it is the collective individual struggles for our own versions of psychic income, the dance of massive collaboration on a scale the world has never witnessed, that will make our world a better place in the next 20 years.

All that being said, while I am an optimist, I am a cautious and hopefully realistic optimist. I do not think the stock market compounds at 10% a year from today's valuations. I rather doubt the Fed will figure the exact and perfect path in removing its quantitative easing. I doubt we will pursue a path of rational fiscal discipline in 2010 or sadly even by 2012, although I pray we do. I expect my taxes to be much higher in a few years.

But thankfully, I am not limited to only investing in the broad stock market. I have choices. I can be patient and wait for valuations to come my way. I can look for new opportunities. I can plan to make the tax burden as efficient as possible, and try and insulate myself from the volatility that is almost surely in our future - and maybe even figure out a way to prosper from it.

A pessimist never gets in the game. A wild-eyed optimist will suffer the slings and arrows of boom and inevitable bust. Cautious optimism is the correct and most rewarding path. And that, I hope, is what you see when you read my weekly thoughts.

New York and My Own Psychic Income

This week I go to New York to be with Todd Harrison and so many friends at the annual Festivus, put on by the folks from Minyanville. Then the theater on Saturday with Barry and Toni Habib to see Gods of Carnage. Then back home for the rest of the month, turning to book writing and waiting for my granddaughter to appear.

And speaking of psychic income, I remarked to some of the kids the other day that for the first time in my life I have no psychic income. There is no scheme I am working on that will change the world, no dramatic visions of grandeur. Just working on improving what we do in the best ways we can, which should be enough; but for me it is a different feeling. I worried that I was losing my edge, my drive.

"Dad," said Tiffani, hopefully prophetically, "that just means the best and most exciting thing of all is actually going to happen. Finally."

I love the future. It is going top be the best thing ever. Have a great week.

Your going to have fun on the ride analyst,

John Mauldin

IBD 100 'New Names': Using Sir John Templeton's Approach

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:17:00 GMT

IBD 100 ‘NEW NAMES.’ Only three new names hit the latest weekly (September 14^th, 2009), computer-generated IBD 100 list of “leading growth companies,” those companies showing good fundamentals, having some institutional sponsorship, producing solid earnings growth and outperforming the average stock. Three new names is about the norm. And Investor’s Business Daily(IBD) in its commentary, is pretty calmed down and happy now that its list is acting normally, leading the general stock market, writing this week that: “Whenever leading stocks post the best gains, it’s a sign of health for the market and its leaders.” When this list lags, it worries IBD and until recently it had been lagging for many months now.

New Names Mkt IBD Industry

Price Cap Rank Rank Business Line

ECPG Encore Capital 16.47 378m 72 45 Resale of unsecured, discounted loans

CNSL Consolidated Comm. 15.26 451m 88 152 Local phone service in TX/IL

WLT Walter Energy 61.86 3240m 99 48 Goal miner/degasifies coal beds

Schwartz View: My continuing strong suggestion for growth investors searching for big winners is to research in depth all ‘new name’ companies when they first show up on the IBD 100 list. I believe this one approach alone could pretty consistently make you handsome profits. (My opinion is arrived at after trying out as many stock market approaches as I could unearth searching full time for over 20 years.) Many of these companies go on to become ‘ten baggers’ over time and you’re finding them, when they first appear on this list, before the crowd, and thus if you do follow through and finding out exactly why they are in fashion, you can be a ‘first mover’ in buying them. Plus your research -- so easy in today’s world of the Internet -- clues you in to many, not so incidental, trends in the economy providing you insight into the Big Picture as well. Again, because companies appear on this list for some reason, “your mission, if you decide to accept it,” is to find out EXACTLY why. One way to manage this approach, once you satisfy yourself about just why a company hit this list, is to use the Sir John Templeton approach, buy a small amount of each stock and put it away for some time. Remember Mr. Templeton bought 100 shares of all NYSE traded depressed stocks trading under $1 a share during WWII. A few years later he had quadrupled his money. His missive to us future generations is that some won’t work out, some will trade sideways but the big winners will provide you with a handsome overall profit. Thanks Sir John Templeton!

Let’s see, this week a cursory look tells me that Encore Capital seems to be in a sweet spot. There’s a ton of bad loans floating around today so business is there for the company which comes up with a way to profit. As for Consolidated Communications, I’m not sure why a company in a very low ranked sector (IBD rank 157 of 197) and a local phone service provider made the list. Maybe a takeover? Your job, again, is to find out why and if you’re satisfied there’s big potential, buy a few shares. Finally Walter Energy, a coal coking company, maybe made the list as coal companies surge as natural gas rebounds on speculation of increased steel output from China. I’m not sure I buy into that as a good enough reason but again there may be some hidden, deeper reason which in depth research will unearth. Net, net, if you find solid reasons for these and/or any ‘new name’ stocks, one fundamentally solid market approach would be to buy a small equal dollar amount of each. Then put ‘em away. Yes, ‘buy & hold,’ exactly the approach most advisors today are saying doesn’t work anymore. Remember, take the road less traveled in your stock market approaches and you’ll generally come out on top. Ask Mr. Buffett and others of his ilk.

Watch One Particular Stock Market Guru!

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:36:00 GMT

AN HISTORIC GURU VIEW. Written Friday morning, August 14^th, 2009.

Being in and around the stock market for the last 35 years -- I can’t believe it’s been that long! -- I’ve seen market gurus burn hot and cold. In my early years I was in more of a daze, doing ancillary brokerage jobs rather than following the stock market closely, just trying to figure out the whole brokerage industry. What a stock broker did, etc. Did I want to be one? Would I be recommending my own stuff? And again not being in New York city, the epicenter of finance, I was on the outside looking in. Even today that’s ones largest hurdle. So anyone wanting into the business I’d advise going where the action is, New York or another financial center like London. If not New York or London are not for you, find a big firm, say a big mutual fund family and get to its headquarters, be it in Boston or Singapore, etc. Anyway, back to point.

Granville & More. I’ve seen Joe Granville burn hot (and drop his pants to show stock quotes on his boxers and walk on water on a hidden board) and turn ice cold in popularity and heard about Jim Dines. I used to follow that curly haired woman guru, yes, that image is bringing her name back, Elaine Garzarelli. For many years I read Richard Russell, one of the deans of newsletter writers and whom I modeled my own letter after, took sample letters to numerous letter writers including Ned Davis, Dan Sullivan, Harry Schultz, Norman Fosback, Lou Navellier, .Marty Zweig, Stan Weinstein and unearthed Ted Warren’s one book (one of my favorites) and read everything I could find. I like William O’Neal’s approach and regular readers know I use and recommend his paper and its IBD 100 list. Having an economics background I gravitated to Ed Hyman’s work and read a number of economist A. Gary Shilling’s books. And read John Naisbitt’s Megatrends series with his long range projections. I’ve read and studied all the Dow theorists from Dow to Hamilton to Rhea to E. George Schaefer to Russell. I continue to read many new guys too, Alexander Elder, “Trader Vic” Sperandeo and on and on. Etc., etc. etc. Many unknown letter writers too. I really could throw a ton of names around if I sat down and reviewed my stock market library and mine and other’s old market letters. So I’ve seen many gurus come and go and burn hot and cold. But one who I continue to admire and track is Bob Prechter of Elliott Wave fame who was the #1 guru way back when. He was a major market mover like Joe Granville. While he uses charts -- which Wall Street loves to disdain, I think that’s mainstream Wall Street spinning a veil and case on the public to justify their big bucks, they all surreptitiously use ‘em -- Mr. Prechter also is now ties market swings to societal mood changes (which makes good sense to me). And is in the process of attempting to add and formalize to current investment analysis the concept of tying stock market trends to mood shifts. “Go for it Bob!”

SCHWARTZ RECOMMENDATION: TRACK MR. PRECHTER GOING FORWARD!

Anyway, I have to strongly recommend keeping one eye peeled on what Mr. Prechter is advising right now. Especially now! I’ve related the histories of Granville and Dines going terribly wrong in this letter, getting stubbornly bearish right at major market bottoms, so I realize the danger now for Prechter in remaining so adamantly bearish but I can’t fault his analysis, what he’s saying and my 35 years in the business tells me to not pooh-pooh his foresight. After reading everyone I can and adding in own my market intuition formed over those 35 years in and around the stock market, I’d say he’s on track. So I’m with him and the other bears, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, Gary Shilling, the Comstock guys and others out there, still recommending extreme caution going forward. Remember us outsiders were bearish but correct at the July through October 2007 bull market peak while most of those bullish today were also bullish back then and missed that major top completely. Amazing! I mean even after the subprime disaster unfolding ahead became plain in August 2007 and on the head fake rally to new highs in October 2007 they remained Pollyannaishly [sic] blinded. (And no, for all you individual investor skeptics out there about Mr. Prechter’s work, and I know there’s a lot by reading the responses and comments now added at the end of most all Internet carried research, no I’m not a shill for Prechter. Never met, emailed or corresponded with him at all.)

So, yes, play this rally which will likely run longer than most bears think, but stay near the exit; somehow!

For a FREE sample of my daily, emailed stock market letter and advisory, email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

Big Names Predict Problematic Inflation: What's An Investor To Do?

RichardSchwartz — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:48:00 GMT

ECONOMIC VIEW. Rising Inflation Expected. So predicts a whole slew of big names, everyone seems to be jumping on board this train in the last few days. Now Warren Buffett and Bill Gross have joined Marc Faber and Jim Rogers and more in predicting problematic inflation just out there over the horizon. Yep, as soon as deflation became the consensus buzz word – recessions kill inflation is what I’ve heard repeated from many sources – we’re getting a groundswell of opposite opinion. Well, not quite opposite but close enough, let me explain. Everyone agrees this slump will preclude problematic inflation but all say that’s a temporary phenomenon. No one predicting rising inflation will go so far as to say just WHEN rising inflation is going to emerge but more and more observers are saying it’s definitely coming, arriving when this economic slump is over, whenever that is. Again, rising inflation, no, out of control inflation, no, to put it more accurately, hyperinflation is my biggest worry. That America printing money galore – yes, for bailing out businesses too important to the financial system to allow them to fail, and, yes, for keeping the economy greased and running, and, yes, for stimulating new growth and maintaining existing economic activity, and, yes, for overall deficit spending in this economic downturn – will come back to bite us in a big way. I can handle some inflation, I know how to shop for bargains which will help in food and clothing needs, what I’m worried about is a major currency devaluation which wipes out mine and America’s buffer. America’s savings becoming worthless as has happened time and again across the globe when some country’s finances just go kafluey. When a country can’t pay its bills compounded by a wholesale lack of trust in its currency. Schwartz View: Hasn’t happened in the US yet, but …

So I get more nervous when I hear Warren Buffett, America’s richest man and known as the best value investor of our time, say inflation could go as high as it was in the 1970s, that’s almost double digits! I get even more nervous when Bill Gross, who manages one of the largest bond funds going, says that US government efforts to break this recession will cause “costs for goods and services” to rise. I respect both these guys and their opinions. Now they join long term forecaster Jim Rogers, who is also more worried about rising inflation than deflation, best I can figure. He’s long been predicting an US dollar crisis and really bad inflation ahead and says he’s just waiting for the proper moment to essentially “short US Treasury bonds.” Rogers sees commodity inflation returning with a vengeance since today’s global economic slump in his view is just improving the fundamentals underpinning commodity prices. In other words today’s credit crunch and resulting recession causing miners to delay or even shut down exploration and thus leading to a further drop in supply. He loves to mention that global food inventories are already down to 50 year lows. Finally, Marc Faber, the well regarded international investor and past BARRON’S Roundtable panelist, sees rising inflation from another angle. He figures that the US government is going to have all kinds of problems in raising interest rates down the road or in effect withdrawing all the money it’s pushing into the system now to try to end today’s credit crisis. Schwartz View: This rising inflation camp is growing now, with many others predicting a forthcoming inflation problem as well. I am too.

Schwartz Recommendation. If you also worry about rising inflation, one strategy available today is to buy an inverse ETF or inverse sector fund. One that goes up when long term US interest rates go higher. That’s the natural reaction if inflation rises, yields generally rise forcing bond prices down. For example ProFunds has two such funds, RTPIX and RRPIX while Rydex offers up RYJUX and in the ETF camp there’s TBT which “correspond to twice the inverse” of the US Treasury bond. I recommend such.

Disclaimer! I don’t own any of the above now but can and do change positions without notice.

For a FREE week’s sampling of my complete daily e-letter, please email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

To Stimulate Or Not To Stimulate The US Economy

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:29:00 GMT

ANTI-Stimulus Protest Demonstrations; Say What?

That’s a big global fear surrounding this global economic slump. History shows economic debacles like this breed unrest, anger, frustration among those losing their jobs, etc. and thus protest demonstrations. If one watches www.worldfocus.com or any other news global news show, you’ll see violent protests happening globally. In Eastern Europe as one example. In China too and especially. China’s government’s big fear, knowing it’s own history, is protests which bring down the government there. Making the upturn in global protests there and elsewhere important for all investors to track.

Yesterday’s Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) newspaper had a front page article reporting that anti-stimulus demonstrations have occurred in 35 American cities. Yes, these are small demonstrations so far, 100 or 200 people and organized by interest groups, but maybe they will grow in size after IBD gave them face time, i.e. publicity -- I hadn’t even heard about these protests at all until yesterday -- and also gave them such a nationalistic and catchy name: “Nationwide Tea Parties.” I read where these events are being organized by those groups who sarcastically say we should: “Legalize Capitalism!” Or who believe: “The best government, governs least.” And those who sardonically and exaggeratedly say: “No to socialism!” And are epitomized by one protestor’s sign which read: “Your mortgage is not my problem!”

Obviously US government stimulus spending to try to keep this weakened economy from getting worse is anathema to those who believe in the strict Austrian school of economics. That economic school says things just get screwed up terribly whenever the government gets involved. And who knows, maybe doing nothing, to try to shorten this downturn, was indeed the right move. But as I see it it’s too late now; we’re already committed. I’ve given up opining on what were the right and wrong roads to follow but let me also report there are a lot of other angry people in America today, those that say they are tired of lavish retreats and concerts, tired of private jets, tried of companies paying out huge bonuses with or without government money. Regular readers know I’ve been angry and pounding the table for many years about these excesses. So maybe we do or will have class warfare, that is if these anti-stimulus demonstrations get larger and cause more of a divide among all kinds of angry Americans.

Schwartz View: But as I see it, we’re now committed to this “bail out” path, we got committed a year ago when we bailed out the first company, Bear Stearns or whoever came first. This far along this path I can’t foresee us stopping now. Plus it only makes common sense for any government to try to stimulate the economy when the two other major sources of normal demand, consumer spending and business investment, are in total hunker down mode. The even bigger picture, as I see things from up on the mountaintop looking down at the valley and what’s happening, is that these demonstrations by those who say your problem is not my problem, are the last desperate efforts by those who still believe in the “me first” path America has been on for roughly three decades now. As I see it, the results of the recent US presidential election announced that the majority of Americans want big change in America, a change which returns the America Dream to the average working person once again and returns us to a more level playing field. And that means, even though there is some opposition, that America has now crossed the Rubicon, so to speak. Meaning we’ve just begun a 10-year or so cycle which puts public interest over private interest. History shows we do swing back and forth from longer periods, or about 20 years, of letting capitalism run unchecked and America showing strong economic growth as a result to shorter periods of about 10 years or so where we put the unfortunate and forgotten Americans first, which yes, also means slower economic growth as a result. (Please read Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s THE CYCLES OF AMERICAN HISTORY if you’d like more on this repetitive cycle.) All signs that I can detect today tell me that America is going to level the playing field, get rid of the excesses, the corruption and scamming of the system, in general just the overall greed which always naturally arises from allowing capitalism unchecked to run for too darn long. Again, I’m just observing what I see happening not opining whether it’s right or not. As for investment implications, for now stay hunkered down, practice extreme patience and proper money management while out waiting this Papa Bear market.

To subscribe to my daily letter PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET or to receive a week’s worth of FREE letters, please email me at RichardStk@oaol.com.

Good trading, speculating and investing!

Monday Weekly Strategy

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Patience: Outlast This Bear Market

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 1^st, 2008: Since Lucy’s birthday was a Round Number & fell on Thanksgiving, everyone surprised her & came back Friday for tea. At the Tea House in the village, a reconverted barn on a hill with a great view of the mountain, a view I hadn’t seen before. Almost everywhere in town has a mountain view which makes me feel like I live in Lake Placid, another charming mountain town. Love it!

PS. I caught a bug which I’m working through today but possibly no letter tomorrow if I feel worse.

THE BIG PICTURE

I spent Thanksgiving evening discussing the past, present and future with my son Brian. In essence he asked me for a simple explanation of what caused the stock market to drop so much, what terms like deregulation, re-regulation, privatization, etc. mean & what the big picture looks like. Here’s my answer:

Let’s start with the two classical economic theories of thought. One, let free markets operate on their own, the old Austrian school of economics as promulgated in the early and mid 1900s by Friedrich Hayek versus two, getting government involved in the economy as advocated during the same time period by John Maynard Keynes. Both gentlemen lived through both world wars, the Great Depression and for decades beyond and their influence ebbed and flowed. Both economic theories had their time to shine, alternating roughly 30 year periods. The last totally free market cycle began its ascendancy when President Ronald Regan was elected to office in 1980. Since then union’s power has declined dramatically, corporate statesmen who shared equitably corporate wealth have became obsolete and bottom line profit became the only goal which caused stock price to rule business actions. During this long run in a totally free market direction whereby prosperity grew larger and larger spreading out to millions worldwide, normal prudence, probity and recognition of investment risk ultimately got lost. Greed took over completely when Wall Street came up with its latest round of newfangled, supposedly sophisticated investments, especially those incorporating securitization. Securitization just meaning turning all types of debt into securities which could be sold while spinning off huge commission style profits to everyone involved in the process or food chain. This, along with the 30-year trend to more and more deregulation, allowed commercial banks into previously banned investment areas, using heretofore unheard of leverage which caused capitalism to finally go off the deep end. By this I mean a 20% correction in our overheated, overdone, overblown US residential housing boom led to a bust after one bank woke up one day last summer to huge paper losses which soon showed everyone else was stuck with similar losses. This blow off following by an implosion and meltdown are the types of culminating events which cause these 30-year cycles to start swinging in the other direction. I now believe we’re just started a new long term swing away from free market economics as advocated by Mr. Hayek and towards a government role in economics as advocated by Mr. Keynes.

Summing up, we’ve just gone through that part of the long cycle which allows capitalism to run unfettered and thus grows the pie for everyone. The downside is that the gap between the rich and poor grows ever larger when we practice laissez-faire capitalism, essentially letting the marketplace alone which leads to the strongest doing best. But cycles are cycles and all eventually go to extremes and then swing the other way. Again, as I see it, we’ve just gone to one extreme and are now just beginning to cycle the other way, down the path whereby government steps in and applies regulations to the latest, most egregious ways of gaming the system. Which interferes with the magic of letting the free marketplace find its own proper price levels between consumers and producer providers and thus drags down the overall efficiency of the market. The rationale is that something has to be done to avoid another rare but normal breakdown by capitalism. Net, net our free market capitalistic system normally goes from one extreme to another, that deregulation goes so far it causes problems, then re-regulation sets in. With privatization or the selling off of previously government run businesses or business sectors being one form or aspect of deregulation. Thus, the last year’s breakdown and implosion in our financial system didn’t really show free market capitalism doesn’t work anymore, it just shows we’ve come to the end of the normal continuing pendulum swing out to one extreme and are now starting the long journey back to a middle ground and then out to the other extreme.

THE ECONOMY

Not much to comment about on the economy today.. We’re in that middle time period of this bear market and at the start of an economic downturn. Thus I expect the economic data, corporate earning reports and most other news to be pretty consistently bad for some time to come yet. One rule we do know about how the stock market operates and how it relates to the economy is that stocks turn up a few months before the economy does (with exceptions). So finding a bear market bottom will incorporate more than just watching the data. Waiting for the economic data to turn positive will make most investors months late in reentering the stock market. Schwartz View: Thus, myself, I watch the charts and believe in what I’ve espoused for many years, that charts tell you when to buy and then the fundamentals confirm down the road.

THE STOCK MARKET

Mr. Stock Market keeps trying its best to rally now. Last week the economic data was just plain awful and stocks rallied anyway. I wrote previously that stocks refusing to go down on bad news would be a good clue that the market has gone down enough, at least for the moment. Still, some remaining problems are: (1) I don’t see a proper base to support a big rally, unless I’m getting tricked by the undercutting of that possible base built from October 10^th through November 19^th, (2) I don’t see any improved fundamentals and still expect lots more bad news to become known next year and (3) history shows after financial glitches and consumer confidence losses of this magnitude bear markets and recessions following lead to once-in-a-generation market declines which don’t get over in just one year, roughly the time period we’ve seen this bear market last for so far. Yes, big bad bear markets generally last at least a year and a half to two years to even three years. Also this bounce reminds me very much of numerous temporary previous V-bottoms and short lasting rallies we’ve seen over the last few months. But a rally is a rally is a rally. And we have to play them. Eventually one rally will morph into the next bull market. Thus the key is to always keep sight of the Big Picture. Today the big picture perspective shows we’re firmly entrenched in a big bad bear market. So, in general strategy should be to sell and sell short rallies instead of buying dips. But when rallies periodically begin, we should modestly go along with them,, go with the flow, one toe in the water. That way if any rally proves to have legs we’ll start profiting immediately and know about it right away. But not to jump in with both feet because primary bear markets, just like primary bull markets, do reassert themselves, and until proven differently, it’s a whole lot easier to profit swimming with any tide or trend than swimming into it. Schwartz View: I’m trying to find a technical reason, say a good looking chart pattern at least, to buy a particular sector, but so far no luck. The one bullish trend which I see today is in the US dollar. Strength began back in mid-July and thus when strength continued past the three month normal max time frame identifying a bear market rally, or past mid-October in this case, and kept on going, I termed the strength as a new bull market. Otherwise everything else looks like iffy trends.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Strategy remains one of outlasting this bear market. Of proving you have more patience than Mr. Bear Market does. This is a difficult job which will test your discipline again and again if the past is any guide (which I believe it is). Over time you’ll be tempted to buy back in again and again whether you see a believable bear market bottom or not. Especially if you’re one who really watch stocks, the whole Wall Street show, daily. So continue to do any irresistible buying and or investing in a much smaller, subdued manner. Keep just enough money in the stock market to keep you interested and not so much that future declines can put you out of the game and out of business. And stay tuned here to find the real bottom.

Have a good week!

Where Now Inflation?

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:39:00 GMT

THE FIRST INFLATION SURGE IN 25 YEARS IS OVER. So, what now?

First, let me give credit when credit is due. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed finally got one right. They’ve been promising us moderating inflation for a year or more and now with -30% lower crude oil prices and a big general commodity collapse we’re finally we’re seeing it happen. Or, at least, starting to (most things economic happen with a lag). And with the US dollar now surging, that’s going to reverse/diminish rising, problematic imported inflation as well. So now the deflationists out there, those who say deflation is our real problem facing us for some time – Gary Shilling, Robert Prechter, Ron Insana to name just three -- can really have their time in the sun.

Still, there remains some debate whether problematic rising inflation is going quiescent. Mac Courtenay of Seeking Alpha, I guess a boutique research firm, offers up seven reasons why inflation isn’t going away:

1. Inflation is already firmly entrenched. Schwartz View: I agree. I’ve been observing the Fed’s incessant jawboning that inflation expectations remain low is wrong and we all know that the government’s inflation data is terrible skewed to the downside from what inflation really is.

2. Inflation is already here. Schwartz View: The Producer Price Index (PPI) is up +9.8% over last year, and that’s only what the government grudgingly admits to.

3. Inflation is now moving its way through the “food chain” showing up in consumer prices as well. After some hope that because of global competition (globalization) producers would eat the higher inflation. Schwartz View: This rippling through is evidenced by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising too, again up the fastest in 17 years.

4. Average weekly earnings fell in July the largest since 1990. Schwartz View: I’d guess Mr. Courtenay’s point is that when earnings drop, we can’t buy as much. ???

5. More and more Federal Reserve governors are talking about raising interest rates next, not lowering them. Especially if we see energy prices stabilize above $100 and bounce. Schwartz View: Of course, these Fed officials, meeting again next Tuesday, can change their views.

6. Global (food?) consumption patterns are heading higher. Schwartz View: I don’t know if author Courtenay is talking about food, metals or just what. But I agree with him on food. As people get a little money, one of the first things they spend it on is more and better food. Thus global food consumption patterns should keep heading higher even if the global economy recesses.

7. The markets will take charge. If the Fed doesn’t raise rates, the marketplace will raise them. Schwartz View: Not sure about this reason he positing for inflation staying problematic. Right now the markets, the long US Treasury market, is still forecasting a slowdown by yields going lower and lower, which to me means more disinflation ahead, not rising inflation.

Schwartz View: He goes on to say part of oil’s recent comeuppance, coming down, is forced hedge fund liquidation because of Congressional pressure (I agree). And that it’s a great time to buy TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and the easiest way is to buy the symbol TIP. And to buy commodities on this correction, recommending also symbols DBC (a basket of commodities) and GDX (gold). Myself, while I believe this commodity pullback is indeed a correction, I think it’s too early to buy them back.

Schwartz BIG PICTURE Inflation View. My belief, garnered from studying stock market history and looking at thousands of charts over the last 20+ years, is that when any new trend begins, many times it begin with a surge in the new direction, then a pullback or at least a pause, sort of to regroup, consolidate gains, make believers out of disbelievers, open the eyes of others who are slow to see and just basically kill enough time to see if the new trend has legs. Then after this pullback correction, which more often than not can be large and long lasting, runs its course, the new trend reasserts itself.

Basically that’s where I see us today with rising inflation, in a pause to refresh. I’ve theorized over the last year than oil and other commodities would stay stronger, longer than most thought this year. I’d say that proved correct with oil going up all the way to about $147 and related sectors like natural gas, energy services, solar, wind and other alternative clean green leading the stock market for the whole first half of 2008. Similar to what happened during the first year of the last severe Papa Bear stock market back in 1973-1874 (oil stayed high the first year). But now, with commodities reversing downward and in major correction, it’s obvious change has occurred, that a pause to refresh is underway. And we can expect this new trend to last longer and correct deeper than many would think I’d venture. Sure, first because commodities are inherently extremely volatile, much more so than stocks and bonds. But also because of the emerging new, macroeconomic backdrop. We seem to be in line for a major, global economic slowdown which will throw a big detour on the road to a new long term trend to rising global inflation. If the global economy really goes blah for the next few years, commodities will take a longer than expected breather. Schwartz View: Still I’m in agreement with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan who predicted in his 2007 book The Age of Turbulence that we live in an inflationary world and that the disinflation trend dominating all during his tenure as Fed chief is coming to an end. And I’m in agreement also with famed, global investor Jim Rogers who says commodities normally correct 50% or more and that’s what we’re seeing now, a correction not the end, to this so far about 9-year commodity bull market.

September 2008 Investment Strategy

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:27:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Tuesday, September 2^nd, 2008: Had lovely, blue sky, humidity down weather to wind up the summer and the long Labor Day weekend. Indeed, the weather is supposed to stay gorgeous the early part of this week here as well. But don’t mention the grand weather to Lucy since it’s back to school for her today!

THE BIG PICTURE

Last week I wrote about the necessity of staying positive during a downbeat economy and stock market. Staying upbeat right when there’s near term problems and long term concern that America is losing status in the pecking order of the new, globalized world we live in. Hey, America has long encouraged the rest of the globe to go capitalistic and got a massive, all-encompassing global push in that capitalistic direction after so much economic rot was discovered in the Soviet Union sphere after the Berlin Wall came down. Countries switched and let the marketplace work and, voila, the world started moving forward, growing and getting wealthier. So now, with so much new global competition around and thriving, America has to respond in kind by redoubling our efforts to efficientize, modernize and improve our own financial, economic, social, and especially our dysfunctional political system(s). In other words, take our fundamentally solid, well-working capitalistic system and adjust it to today’s new globalized marketplace. Make some fundamentally sound and foresighted long range decisions about energy, education, health, finance, politics, etc. and then exhibit sacrifice and discipline. Again, all while seeing the glass half full.

Schwartz View: That’s why I’m dismayed by hearing friends, including one back from Iraq duty, tell me it really doesn’t matter who gets elected as the next president of the United States. Their rationale? It doesn’t matter since nothing will change anyway. Maybe my generation and the one coming immediately after us is just too jaded. But, from longtime trafficking in the stock market, the one thing I’ve found we can bet on consistently is change. Change does happen. So, I’d say we have to have hope. We have to believe that our votes will prove meaningful. And the youth of America, not being so long disappointed and denied, frustrated and jaded like their elders, us, have responded to this upcoming presidential election. Grass roots efforts by thousands of inspired youth and the ready adoption of the Internet for fundraising from the masses is how Barack Obama overcame sure bet Hillary Clinton to get the Democrat’s nomination in the first place. So I say re: politics, energy use, etc., just like in the stock market, we need to keep upbeat that positive change is out there just over the horizon. So buck up. The realistic investor can forecast hard times ahead and yet get up each day, plaster a smile on his and her face and still believe that better times are out there, knowing that just like the daily cycle, it’s darkest right before dawn … arrives.

Schwartz Reading Recommendations: For those of you who are interested in Big Picture investing, by that I mean not the nuts and bolts of everyday stock trading, charting, etc. but, say financial planning, etc. I’d like to add former Fed chief Alan Greenspan’s tomb of the 20^th century, The Age of Turbulence, to my recommending reading list. It offers up a wonderful history of America growing wealthy, explains how decisions at the Fed are made and gives forward looking guidance to the world ahead. Also let me add the even newer book, THE POST-AMERICAN WORLD (2008) by Fareed Zakaria, which after I got over my provincial American bias, was wonderful in explaining the world’s likely scenario going forward. a world of shared power with extra kudos to author Zakaria in how he gets into the heads of the Chinese and Indians, explaining how they think, operate and their cultures. Interestingly, India with its long-established democracy, and Indians in their outlook on life, are extremely close to how Americans think. Again these books are for those of you interested in longer range financial planning and the like.

THE ECONOMY

Dell Computer’s report last Friday that the US technology spending slump has spread to Western Europe and some Asian countries just confirms all the other evidence showing up that today’s world, economically and financially is very closely intertwined, not decoupled as the Wall Street argument goes. Of course, this intertwined relationship and what that means isn’t that easy to define, it’s gray, not black or white. But for the near term, negative economic ripples sent streaming outward last year when the US subprime mortgage market imploded are now being sighted and felt in other parts of the globe. How severe these global ripples get, these so-called 3^rd-order effects, as economists like to term them, remains to be seen. Bulls say they will prove minor; bears like me say they will prove more severe; only time will provide the answers.

Still, right now, everywhere one looks negative ripples sent outward from the US tsunami in collateralized asset-backed investments are starting to show up. One major problematic ripple in the US and globally is the effect being felt by banks and their business. It isn’t, can’t be “:business as usual” any more. Banks’ fortunes – with huge paper losses and their opaque, illiquid, very leveraged and still deteriorating loans on the books – are now directly tied to US house prices. As house prices fall, the value of these locked in bank investments keep tumbling as well. Leading to write-offs. It’s all a negative domino effect. The lingering loss of confidence leads to a continuing reluctance to make loans, thus to lower stock prices and thus also to a growing need for banks and other financials to repair their balance sheets by raising more and more capital. Which in turn dilutes earnings and the vicious cycle continues.

Schwartz View: My ongoing view is that this widespread consumer, business and investor loss of confidence, combined with the first bout of problematic inflation and a weakening US and now global economy is not some short term event. That we’re now in a downward spiral that will take much time to bottom out and reverse. We’re, bottom line, in an economic event and economic changes just can’t move along anywhere near as fast as stock market participants would like them to. Thus, we see frustration by strategists, money managers and all the bulls out there to find and call a bear market bottom way too early. I believe investors have to exhibit extreme patience for the foreseeable future.

THE STOCK MARKET

Impatient investors keep fishing for a bottom, thus causing the periodic “flashy-splashy” big rallies we get, like last Thursday’s +2% move up. These big one and two day moves up are actually symptoms and signs of a stock market still on the way down, actually now firmly controlled by the grizzly bear, if you believe a recent report by Merrill Lynch after they studied all the ups and downs of the just completed full stock market cycle, starting with the bear market running from 2000 to 2002 and the following bull market running from 2002 to 2007. Big pops happen in bear markets but then get completely washed away over time. Certainly during these bear markets stocks can also cobble together rallies which last for weeks or even months at a time, such as two-month rally we put in from mid-March to mid-May this year. Or the rally we are now experiencing; so far six weeks long and still alive and kicking although very saw tooth in nature. Obviously, nothing ever goes in just one direction. That’s especially so in the stock market whereby prices normally shoot out to extremes, up or down, and then need to balance themselves off.

Right now that’s where I see us. Stocks balancing off upwards after a downward movement that dropped too far, too fast. Actually that’s normal in any extended, economically-catalyzed bear market, investors losing confidence periodically, then regaining their nerve, then losing it again. Again, deteriorating economic trend(s) causing some major decline in stock prices just can’t cycle through its phases anywhere near fast enough to please myopic, very rapidly moving stock market players. So we get quick moves down, then bounces up or sideways movements to get time & price back in sync. Then it repeats again.

Schwartz View: These bounces are when and where traders try to make their profits during multi-year bear markets. Most traders early on realize it’s a lot easier and more profitable in the long run to always stay bullish, thick or thin, bull or bear market. Thus the extreme bullishness shown by a very experienced NYSE floor trader when interviewed late last week by CNBC. His time frame is so much different than the rest of us, he can be very bullish right now, right in the midst of a firmly entrenched bear market.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Net, net this six-week rally may last for another month or even two but I wouldn’t get too attached to it. In fact today, let’s hope the market goes up a whole heck of a lot. I plan to book some profits. The first trading day after Labor Day is normally a seasonally strong day but then September can go south very fast and has proven to be the worst overall month of the year on average. Plus August was our first monthly advance in four months for many key indices so I’d like to take advantage of this normal “rally in a downtrend” and lighten up on some short term trading positions established back in July or early August. And suggest readers do the same, review everything else you now hold as well to see if any sectors are now timely to get out of. Again, to take advantage of this recent bear market rally. For example, please review the technology sector after Dell’s news last week warning it sees spreading, global tech weakness now.

Schwartz View: With big players coming back to work this week and with oil resuming its steep decline, we may extend this recent rally. Rallies can last upwards of three months in bear markets and since this one started on July 15^th, the best case scenario says it can run through October 15^th. Still, best I can deduce, all we’ve been doing this summer is killing time before the next round of bearish news hits. So I would continue to book trading profits as you go, sort of imitating the always in traders on the NYSE floor.

Have a grand week!

Reasons For a Summer Rally

RichardSchwartz — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:22:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Written Wednesday, July 30th, 2008: 6:30 am EST.

Another ‘flashy-splashy’ rally yesterday So typical of bear markets, especially those with much further in time and points to go. Grizzly bear markets thrive on investors’ hope and adamant investor reluctance to believe things can get worse. Bear markets end when that hope is gone. Anyway, everyone jumped on board the stock market yesterday, figuring that, once again, the credit crunch is over or at least winding down. I doubt that and really doubt that the nine month bear market is over but one never knows the future for sure so we always have to keep an open mind.

A SCHWARTZ RECAP. Bulls, still fighting this bear market, did a great job of spinning (it’s always easier to spin when there is a germ of truth) that Merrill Lynch’s capital raising move yesterday and more billions in write offs showed we’re in the “end game” of this crisis. That Merrill selling some distressed assets, doing what no one has wanted to do, selling out and thus setting a low market price, about 20 cents on the dollar, for some of their CDO’s, means that everyone else may be forced to follow suit and thus that will call an end to the prevailing uncertainty. But this game doesn’t end with Merrill alone, this may just be the beginning of the end, which, as we all know, can go on seemingly interminably. And subprime write downs are now just one piece of the now larger and still spreading problem, although a big part I admit. And subprime sell offs at whatever price would have been better if done many months ago, following the old Wall Street rule which Wall Street, when pressed, totally disregarded: “The first loss is the best loss.” Not many are noting the awful details either, that Merrill is paying Temasek Holdings, a Singapore-owned SWF (no, not meaning Single White Female!), a sovereign wealth fund to buy more stock. Previously Temasek bought Merrill stock and lost a bundle. Thus in this deal Merrill is now paying Temasek a cool $2.5 billion to offset some of Temasek’s losses on that first buy. Plus Merrill is financing the deal for Temasek and this deal will increase and dilute Merrill’s outstanding shares by 36%. And, ironically, the sale of these CDO’s are at a price lower than Merrill’s just announced mark-to-market quarterly earnings report and stated value. Finally, this whole new deal flies in the face of what John Thain, Merrill’s relatively new boss, has said previously, that Mother Merrill wouldn’t need or be raising any new capital. Schwartz View: Net, net, some say Merrill is a goner, that it will have to be taken over down the road some. I don’t know any details but agree with the concept, that brokers will have to merge.

TECHNICAL VIEW. IBD PUTS THE BULL BACK IN THE BOX!

Yep, yesterday was a bullish “follow-through” day according to Investor’s Business Daily (IBD). On the 11^th day, pretty late, after the recent July 14^th bottom, a number of key market indices followed through yesterday, that is rallied more than +1.7% and on heavier trading volume than the day before. Obviously lower oil has been the underlying linchpin to this rally; oil down stocks up and vice versa. Schwartz View: My stated view is that this drop in oil will help stocks for a time, for the time it takes investors to realize that lower oil isn’t going to be the panacea for this bearish stock market. That at some point lower oil will scare the pants off investors (so to speak) because they will see lower oil as confirmation that a recession is here and spreading globally. But we’ll have to wait on this theory of mine as for now lower oil does means higher stock prices.

IBD goes on to remind us that: “Every bull market in Wall street history started with a follow-through. But not every follow-through launches a new bull market.” I believe their stats but also know IBD has put the bull back in the box and then had to take it out a few days or a week or so later a couple times during the last few months. So, remember, nothing, no particular indicator, is perfect, by any means.

More Reasons For a Rally. But I’ve also been writing that the market is oversold, that the US government has come up with a boat load of temporary fixes and props to support the stock market including the stimulus plan, unprecedented lending to non-banks and barring short selling or at least making it extremely difficult to short the financials (the SEC extended this one week ban to August 12^th yesterday). And that a historical study of the pace of declines during extended bear markets show the market is now ahead of itself on the downside. Plus I must say I am impressed by many European stock markets posting a sequence of five straight up days after an extended, inexorable, grinding-lower decline, i.e. a bullish Trader Vic 4-Day Rule and change of intermediate trend. So we could certainly have a summer rally now.

Schwartz View: Myself I’d like to see and have written that a Dow Industrials and S&P 500 close above last Wednesday’s highs would give us a series of higher highs and higher lows, the definition of an uptrend. Well, we didn’t get quite that high a close yesterday another good day or two could do it. As for “Trader Vic’s” as easy as 1-2-3 change of trend, we have condition #1, a broken downtrend line and condition #2, a market which has stopped going down in place. We don’t have, as of yet, condition #3, that’s the higher high I’m watching for. Still, Trader Vic Sperandeo in his two excellent books from the early 1990s, get them, writes we don’t need all three, we can turn bullish with just one or two conditions met. Just be more cautious in proceeding and realize there’s always the chance for a whipsaw and have a backup plan for what you’ll do if that happens, how fast you’ll backtrack. With those caveats in mind, I put on some longs yesterday, not a lot and not terribly risky ones. Basically my theme is that as crude and other commodities correct, pressure should come off the food companies, off their raw material and input and power costs. And that at the same time these pressures diminish, food companies are successfully pushing through price increases such as mentioned by Kraft yesterday. If this summer rally holds together, say we get a new higher high by the Dow and S&P, I’ll push the envelope for short term trading purposes further.

Search results matching tag 'Change'

Why I am an Optimist

Subprime Dubai

More Government Data Fun: Unemployment Claims Were Not Down

Why I Am Optimistic About the Future

The Millennium Wave

New York and My Own Psychic Income

IBD 100 'New Names': Using Sir John Templeton's Approach

Watch One Particular Stock Market Guru!

Big Names Predict Problematic Inflation: What's An Investor To Do?

To Stimulate Or Not To Stimulate The US Economy

Monday Weekly Strategy

Patience: Outlast This Bear Market

Where Now Inflation?

September 2008 Investment Strategy

Reasons For a Summer Rally

More Government Data Fun:
Unemployment Claims Were Not Down