Search results matching tag '1973'

Monday Weekly Strategy

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

Re-Regulation Begins a Multi-Decade Road

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:39:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Today’s Big Picture view revolves around the probable coming re-regulation of the financial markets. History shows regulation of markets is similar to a grandfather’s clock pendulum swinging back and forth although not as regular. A brief look back to the start of the 20^th century, shows free markets and a first age of globalization, with the introduction of the telegraph and telephone, steamships and railways, at a peak. Millions even migrated without passports while trade flourished meaning free markets were in charge.

· Governments Take Charge. Then, in August 1914, with World War I, that age ended abruptly. WWI left people disillusioned and looking for something better and many turned to socialism and communism. The Russian Revolution in 1917 drew followers and essentially sought to end capitalism for good, making private property illegal. Socialists and other government controlled economic systems were winning the battle of ideas, governments were in charge, free markets were in retreat. In less than 30 years, one third of humanity, including Eastern Europe, China and the Soviet Union, would be living under socialism or communism. Capitalism looked to be doomed except for in America. The 1920s in America was still a boom time, Americans buying cars, buying illegal gin, buying stock. Radio was the Internet of the 1920s. It was a classic bubble. Finally the 1929 stock market crash started Americans on the way to despair, a complete economic collapse "with no ability to earn, repay, spend, consume." Everything spiraled downward while about half the banks in the US closed. America turned toward government for help and thus re-regulation with President Roosevelt’s numerous new government regulatory agencies. Around the globe, governments gained power … over free markets. In Italy, Spain and Germany fascism took charge. World War II then arrived and even afterwards people all around the globe still blamed capitalism for causing the depression. The whole world kept moving towards more regulated economies. England even went socialistic as Winston Churchill, the great war leader, was beaten by the socialists! Most of the world operated under this sort of government planning process for the next 30 years.

· Free Markets Regain Control. But in the 1970s free markets began a resurgence. Margaret Thatcher came to power in England with free market thoughts as did Ronald Regan here in the US. with his Reganomics. Both cut back on government regulations, giving markets more ascendancy and free markets again starting coming to the forefront. England started privatizing its economy while President Regan cut taxes and let free markets regain control as epitomized by breaking the air controllers strike. Thus capitalism got a free hand which lasted for aboutt 30 years, even through the dot.com boom and bust. But after last year’s incredible debacle with investment banks, money center banks, insurance companies, etc. losing billions after irresponsibly leveraging up their investments 20 or 30 times, it’s apparent to most everyone that, just like in the 1930s, we can’t afford to have any similar financial market collapse spawning from totally free markets to happen again any time soon.

Schwartz View: So after reviewing the history of the 20th century and seeing how over long periods, market regulation swings back and forth, I have to figure we’ve just started a long term swing back on the way to re-regulation. For more on this topic, I recommend you watch Commanding Heights, the Battle for the World Economy, by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw which was turned into a DVD and a PBS prouction, a wonderful esplanation of the battle for economic minds in the 20th century. Filled in some missing pieces for me and should for you all as well.

Where Now Inflation?

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:39:00 GMT

THE FIRST INFLATION SURGE IN 25 YEARS IS OVER. So, what now?

First, let me give credit when credit is due. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed finally got one right. They’ve been promising us moderating inflation for a year or more and now with -30% lower crude oil prices and a big general commodity collapse we’re finally we’re seeing it happen. Or, at least, starting to (most things economic happen with a lag). And with the US dollar now surging, that’s going to reverse/diminish rising, problematic imported inflation as well. So now the deflationists out there, those who say deflation is our real problem facing us for some time – Gary Shilling, Robert Prechter, Ron Insana to name just three -- can really have their time in the sun.

Still, there remains some debate whether problematic rising inflation is going quiescent. Mac Courtenay of Seeking Alpha, I guess a boutique research firm, offers up seven reasons why inflation isn’t going away:

1. Inflation is already firmly entrenched. Schwartz View: I agree. I’ve been observing the Fed’s incessant jawboning that inflation expectations remain low is wrong and we all know that the government’s inflation data is terrible skewed to the downside from what inflation really is.

2. Inflation is already here. Schwartz View: The Producer Price Index (PPI) is up +9.8% over last year, and that’s only what the government grudgingly admits to.

3. Inflation is now moving its way through the “food chain” showing up in consumer prices as well. After some hope that because of global competition (globalization) producers would eat the higher inflation. Schwartz View: This rippling through is evidenced by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising too, again up the fastest in 17 years.

4. Average weekly earnings fell in July the largest since 1990. Schwartz View: I’d guess Mr. Courtenay’s point is that when earnings drop, we can’t buy as much. ???

5. More and more Federal Reserve governors are talking about raising interest rates next, not lowering them. Especially if we see energy prices stabilize above $100 and bounce. Schwartz View: Of course, these Fed officials, meeting again next Tuesday, can change their views.

6. Global (food?) consumption patterns are heading higher. Schwartz View: I don’t know if author Courtenay is talking about food, metals or just what. But I agree with him on food. As people get a little money, one of the first things they spend it on is more and better food. Thus global food consumption patterns should keep heading higher even if the global economy recesses.

7. The markets will take charge. If the Fed doesn’t raise rates, the marketplace will raise them. Schwartz View: Not sure about this reason he positing for inflation staying problematic. Right now the markets, the long US Treasury market, is still forecasting a slowdown by yields going lower and lower, which to me means more disinflation ahead, not rising inflation.

Schwartz View: He goes on to say part of oil’s recent comeuppance, coming down, is forced hedge fund liquidation because of Congressional pressure (I agree). And that it’s a great time to buy TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and the easiest way is to buy the symbol TIP. And to buy commodities on this correction, recommending also symbols DBC (a basket of commodities) and GDX (gold). Myself, while I believe this commodity pullback is indeed a correction, I think it’s too early to buy them back.

Schwartz BIG PICTURE Inflation View. My belief, garnered from studying stock market history and looking at thousands of charts over the last 20+ years, is that when any new trend begins, many times it begin with a surge in the new direction, then a pullback or at least a pause, sort of to regroup, consolidate gains, make believers out of disbelievers, open the eyes of others who are slow to see and just basically kill enough time to see if the new trend has legs. Then after this pullback correction, which more often than not can be large and long lasting, runs its course, the new trend reasserts itself.

Basically that’s where I see us today with rising inflation, in a pause to refresh. I’ve theorized over the last year than oil and other commodities would stay stronger, longer than most thought this year. I’d say that proved correct with oil going up all the way to about $147 and related sectors like natural gas, energy services, solar, wind and other alternative clean green leading the stock market for the whole first half of 2008. Similar to what happened during the first year of the last severe Papa Bear stock market back in 1973-1874 (oil stayed high the first year). But now, with commodities reversing downward and in major correction, it’s obvious change has occurred, that a pause to refresh is underway. And we can expect this new trend to last longer and correct deeper than many would think I’d venture. Sure, first because commodities are inherently extremely volatile, much more so than stocks and bonds. But also because of the emerging new, macroeconomic backdrop. We seem to be in line for a major, global economic slowdown which will throw a big detour on the road to a new long term trend to rising global inflation. If the global economy really goes blah for the next few years, commodities will take a longer than expected breather. Schwartz View: Still I’m in agreement with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan who predicted in his 2007 book The Age of Turbulence that we live in an inflationary world and that the disinflation trend dominating all during his tenure as Fed chief is coming to an end. And I’m in agreement also with famed, global investor Jim Rogers who says commodities normally correct 50% or more and that’s what we’re seeing now, a correction not the end, to this so far about 9-year commodity bull market.

Sample Monday Overview Letter

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:55:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, June 30^th, 2008: Ok, I’m off this afternoon. For a week of revitalizing rest and recreation, I hope. Actually San Jose to Lake Tahoe runs through some of the worst housing bust in America, with one county near there declaring bankruptcy. So I may be back with some first hand knowledge & new insights. Have a great week and a greater 4^th of July. I hope everyone gets to listen to lots of patriotic songs. We all have to believe in this country which has done so many good things, for us, and the rest of the world too.

THE BIG PICTURE

In today’s Big Picture view, let me lay out how big bad bear markets historically have unfolded. Thereby to offer up some guidelines on what to expect over the next year or two. Essentially this model scenario comes from my many years of studying past history and also from my first hand experience of being in this fascinating stock market business for the last 35 years (dating myself). Yep, when I add it up, it’s been that long. Actually that’s also approximately how long its been since we suffered through the last Papa Bear market as I expect this one to prove to be. I had just gotten out of college and started work at “Mother” Merrill Lynch and asked a rep which stock to buy. He said buy Merrill Lynch, which I did and it promptly went down from about $23 to $8. I really didn’t understand what was going on back then.

Bear markets, Papa, Mama or Baby, go through psychological stages or phases. The first psychological phase is when investors deny and thus fight tooth and nail that a bear market has even really begun, after being so locked into bullish expectations for so darn long (in today’s case for five years, longer than normal). The second psychological phase is when the news turns so bad that even firmly entrenched bulls have to admit that something is wrong out there. That maybe the economy is sinking or in recession because the economic data (as inexact and easily manipulated as it is) then coming out is so negative. This phase can go on for quite a long time and is generally the longest of the three phases. Investors still look to find ways to invest and make profits through this phase although that becomes harder and harder as the incoming news goes from bad to worse. And finally the third psychological phase is capitulation.. That’s when even the most adamant bulls lose all hope, give up the ship. And sell. This capitulation phase can be short or long but is epitomized by massive selling all at once, as everyone still invested feels the heat and pressure, can’t sleep and somehow all give in to the pressure at the same time. After this massive selling, the pressure comes off stocks as everyone who wanted to sell has. Still we generally need additional time to heal, thus after a lack-of-sellers bounce, stocks generally retreat once again, but this time on shrinking trading volume, they successfully “retest” their capitulation lows and the stage is set for a new bull market.

Schwartz View: I think we’re in for a similar performance to the above scenario. President Bush probably thinks he did something truly good with his multiple tax cuts following in President Regan’s footsteps but the early 2000 tax cuts just went primarily to the super rich. And Bush’s Iraq invasion and following years of morass just went on our credit card. And our looming long term critical economic and social problems like Medicare & Medicaid, Social Security, energy and health care haven’t been tackled. Thus I see big problems accumulated for the next US president as he is going to have to tackle and come up with some very important solutions. During this period, say the first two years of a new presidential term, most everyone in America is going to have to change our lifestyles, from freewheeling and overspending and living on credit to living a more disciplined, controlled lifestyle. All in all in today’s very competitive global economy and world we live in the sooner America and Americans get our acts together the better. I want to turn bullish on America again asap and thus benefit from America showing the world what we can do when we’re all pull together on the same page and right path. But for now we’ve got a tough period to slug through, so hunker down. Our fortitude, intellect and culture should stand us in good stead.

THE STOCK MARKET

We could see a stock market bounce soon, any time now after stocks have dropped so much, so fast, recently. After the Dow Industrials plunged through its March lows last Thursday and the S&P 500 fast approaching its own March lows now, closing at 1278.38 on Friday, just +0.39% above its March 10^th closing low of 1273.37. Generally institutional, professional investors like to defend old lows and other key prices levels I’ve found. I mean there are sign posts in the stock market and besides low lows another is when a key index drops -20% from its peak, that’s a price level where market observers start calling a decline a bear market and no one wants that. For instance, the Dow hit that -20% point off last October’s high last Friday, CNBC started flashing the news and stocks promptly rallied, a bit. Again, some investors will fight new trends at these key price levels. We’ve seen this play out over the last few years during the bull market, at important correction points, like down -10% whereby mysteriously in came buyers time after time. Maybe it’s a black box phenomenon, some trading strategy hedge funds have and profit by.

Anyway, and on the other hand, we may NOT get such a bounce this time down or at this point. In fact, we’d better not count on it, not with crude oil making new highs every time we turn around, like this morning rising to another record, now about $143 a barrel. Yes, some are calling for oil and commodities to collapse, calling their rise just another bubble. Oil dropping $10 a barrel in a day and $30 in a few days would likely help the stock market but after the knee-jerk upside reaction, investors would probably decide lower commodities also broke the back of any and all remaining stock market strength and leadership. And that resulting sigh-of-despair would then lead to even more selling. Plus, who’s to really know whether the commodity boom isn’t really a sign that all the world wants to lock up vital crude oil, natural gas, foodstuffs and all other needed natural recourses to keep their economics functioning. We do live in a suddenly, very competitive one global marketplace after all. It’s interesting that the two super successful, first mover, hedge fund investors who teamed up way back in the 1970s with the Quantum Fund today have slightly different views of what’s going on in commodities, but pretty much the same. Jim Rogers, the analyst of the pair, says buy commodities, these soaring prices are because the supply-demand equation is way out of whack. Prior to recently soaring global demand there’d been no incentive and thus little search for new supplies in most any commodities going back two decades. And George Soros, the trader of the pair, says yes there is a bubble in place today in oil and commodities but it’s superimposed on an credible long term uptrend. In other words, both can see a big decline in demand during the next global slowdown, a major glitch, but both can see further commodity price rises over time ahead. All combining with past US history, there for anyone to look at, that oil and oil stocks did very well during the first year of the last major market, in 1973-1974, thus supporting my theory that oil will hang in there longer than most expect. And my recommendation to keep one toe in the energy patch; I’m recommending the oil service sector.

Schwartz View: Looks to me like a second leg down in stock prices (as contrasted to a second psychological phase which seems also to have started) in this bear market has begun and thus that this summer could offer up much lower stock prices rather than more sideways, complacent trading of the last three months. I would play your cards close to the vest. Please see PORTFOLIO STRATEGY below.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

With the stock market now down substantially -- and hopefully everyone reading my letter having already following my consistent and persistent advice over the last seven months of cutting back stock market exposure -- I still have to recommend “getting smaller” like well-known trader Dennis Gartman likes to say. I mean it’s so easy to just be complacent here, figuring stocks are already down -20% so most of the risk is over. But history shows the opposite, that stocks drop more like -50% or more during big bad bear markets. Just seems logical to cut back even more as a second leg of price trouble begins. And there’s no guarantee that these bear market legs will just number three, following along with the psychological phases of bear markets, as www.Comstockfunds.com calls them, denial, concern and capitulation. In the 1929 to 1932 bear market, I remember reading there were like seven legs down in stock prices. Thus, as I jet off on a quick vacation, be back writing next Monday, I’m reviewing my own managed portfolios to find the best places to cut back my exposure even while only being 40% exposed in one portfolio, only 30% in another and pretty well hedged with inverse sector funds in the other three more actively traded accounts. Please, yourselves, attempt to take a look out six months or a year ahead, over the horizon yourself, a necessary step when managing other people’s monies, and consider the Big Picture. Just say things unfold poorly. What would you do next summer if the economy is finally post terrible stats and corporate profits have plunged? And if your portfolios are then down -50% or more? Are you going to sell then? No. Today we still have time to sell and looking back selling would have been correct strategy if that likely scenario unfolds, wouldn’t you agree. Bottom line, in big bad bear markets it’s better to be safe than sorry. Wait until the next bull market comes along before you starting going for the gold. Oops, hold a little gold here.

Have a great week and a terrific 4^th of July!

* Please also, go ahead and overdose on America’s heritage this week, listen to a lot of wonderful July 4^th songs and let them infuse you with a renewed sense of patriotism.

Ho Hum, Another Bear Market Summer Day

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:08:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Witten Friday, June 20th, 2008: 6:30 a.m.

Looked to me like yesterday’s stock market rally was a knee-jerk reaction to China announcing it was going to raise oil prices by 17%. Crude dove on the news while stocks jumped. But if one thinks it through, is China raising oil prices really such good news? The bullish knee-jerk was that higher prices for gasoline in China will mean lower overall oil demand from China and that will reduce oil prices globally. As we’ve been hearing a lot lately that it’s government subsidized gas prices in China, India and many other developing countries that isn’t allowing crude demand destruction to occur and thus lower global crude prices. I mean Americans drove 30 billion fewer miles from November through April and that hasn’t lowered prices. The bullish train of thought continues that if the world gets lower oil prices, everything will improve. But, with further thought, if gasoline prices go up in China, won’t that cause demands from Chinese workers for higher wages? I mean the very last thing that the current communist Chinese leadership wants is any revolution from the Chinese people. Already, super big picture investor and Chinese advocate Jim Rogers says its inevitable that China’s government will go capitalistic over time, what with the Chinese people getting a taste of free markets for the last decade or so and realizing that free markets are the pathway to future wealth. Remember: “To be rich is glorious,” is the Chinese people’s new mantra. Hm? … and won’t higher Chinese wages mean higher Chinese export prices, thus higher import prices for us here in the US since we import tons and tons of stuff from China? And thus higher consumer goods prices intensifying the already ongoing and tightening squeeze on US consumers? We’ve had stagnant wages for many, many years with no light at the end of that tunnel and now we’re seeing higher prices for just about everything; food, fuel, health care, taxes, etc. Guess the still entrenched bulls figure lower crude will lead to lower gasoline, diesel, heating oil, and food too, eventually. And since the trend is the thing in the stock market, meaning the markets start discounting immediately upon seeing a new trend emerge, stocks rose yesterday. Still, is a gas hike in China really going to bring down global energy prices? I mean China already raised gas prices late last year and that didn’t bring prices lower. And we now live in a very globally competitive world as all countries and regions want to secure their energy and other needed mineral futures. And food futures too now after the recent global rice shortage has exposed the fallacy that it’s ok to depend on other countries for food staples. Anyway, the first thought was that lower oil is good for stocks and thus the stock market got stronger as the afternoon proceeded, led by lower energy beneficiaries such as the Dow Transports. But while I turned bullish on the Transports back in late March, after technically it broke three fan lines and formed a Head & Shoulders Bottom, I’m now bearish on the group after the two-month dead cat rally ended and the transports formed a bearish, rarely seen Broadening Top, an indication of loss of intelligent sponsorship and leadership. Thus I would certainly use yesterday’s nice bounce back in the trannies to get out if you haven’t already. And, for aggressive traders, if you can find a way to short the transports, I’d do so in a small way now. Schwartz View: Again, yesterday seems like just another bounce in a larger bear market environment, caused by entrenched bulls who refuse to admit the primary trend has now changed and is now pointed downward. The problem with this bullishness -- investors refusing to admit they are wrong, a terrible habit in the stock market! -- is that it indicates we’re still in the early stages of this bear market. Again, safely position yourselves and, unless you’re a trader, take the summer off. Of course, keep reading my letters. Why? Well, let’s see, to improve your knowledge base of how the stock market works and to make sure you don’t miss the opportunity to get back in. Bear markets do have endings. The last Mama Bear market, 2000-2002, ran for slightly less than two years with the most damage coming in the 2^nd year. The last Papa Bear market, in 1973-1974 ran for two years. And that very famous big bad Papa Bear market, which this one is looking more & more like, ran from 1929-1932, or just under three years. So all bad times do pass.

1973-1974 Redux

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 22 May 2008 14:09:00 GMT

The Principle of History. Knowing one’s history gives us guidelines and a basis to work from. So yesterday I began to compare the last Papa Bear market we lived through, 1973-1974, which encompassed the first really oil crisis, to today’s ongoing bear market and oil shock. I said I was printing research off the (wonderful!) Internet & get back to you. Well, I’m baaack.

1973-1974 OIL CRISIS COMPARED TO TODAY

Studying the 1972 through 1974 period in more depth yesterday, please let me note that:

There were three separate legs down in the two-year Papa Bear bear market of 1973-1974:
The first leg down was sharp and came in January 1973. From a peak on January 11^th, 1973, the Dow fell -10% over the next 30 trading days. Then kept sawtoothing lower until late August when it completed a seven-month loss of over -18%. This first leg down can be compared to what the Dow has recently gone through, since its peak on October 9^th last year. From Dow 14,164.50 to the Dow low of 11,740.20 the Dow lost -17.12%. Schwartz View: So about comparable in time, seven months versus five months, and extent, -19% to -17% to the first leg down in the Papa Bear market of 1973-1974.
The stock market in 1973 then rallied +15% from its lows over the following two months. That brought us back to within about -6% of its old January 1973 high and peak. Schwartz View: This time around the Dow has rallied +11% from the March 10^th lows to the May 2^nd highs, so for just under two months. And has brought the Dow within -7.8% of its old highs. So a weaker, shorter rally, which may be bad, IF it’s indeed over.
Going forward from that bear market ally high in August 1973, the two-month rally where some investors “were likely lulled into believing that a new leg up was occurring” the market began its second leg down, which brings us up to date and to today.
Looking back again to what happened in 1973, and projecting forward to what unfolds today, the 1973 second leg down began in August and ran until December and the Dow dropped an additional and even more severe -20%. The leadership of that era, the “Nifty Fifty,” resolved its previous divergence, holding up while the smaller cap stocks got hurt during the first leg down, and caught up on the downside as shown by the -20% Dow drop. This drop took roughly three to four months. Schwartz View: Thus I have to project a second and more severe leg down starting now or soon. Probably including the remaining leading energy and commodity sector taking a hit.

Other similarities and/or dissimilarities from the oil shock and crisis back in 1973-1974 to today’s oil shock which I unearthed in my research yesterday are:

1. Rising inflation was a big issue in both periods.

2. The Vietnam War ended during that past bear market, something similar to what I expect to happen during this bear, us getting out of Iraq.

3. The US dollar was under pressure back then even in the early stages of the bear market, in February 1973, it was devalued by 10%. It’s losing value again, now.

4. Oil jumped from $3 a barrel to $5.11 a barrel, beginning with the October 1973 OPEC oil embargo, a quick jump of 70%. We all know oil has soared the last couple of years as well.

5. We had massive layoffs of 142,000 in the auto industry in 1974; yesterday American Airlines announced “large layoffs” ahead.

6. We had Franklin National Bank be declared insolvent in 1974; this year Bear Stearns effectively was declared insolvent by the Fed. Other banks, investment and money center remain under great pressure.

7. BARRON’s Roundtable was unanimously bullish starting off 1973; same thing from Barron’s Roundtable kicking off last year.

8. The US economy from 1972 to 1974 dropped from a growth rate of +7.2% to -2.1%. And the UK economy dropped from +5.1% to -1.1%. This time around both the US and UK economies are also dropping quickly.

9. Stocks priced in gold were priced very low back then. Same low valuation in terms of gold today with gold at 900$+.

10. We had a new Fed chairman, Arthur Burns, arrive in 1970, who encouraged inflation. We have a new Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, who is also encouraging inflation today.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. No use looking out too far, looking at the third leg down in 1974 for instance, which came after another always-to-be-expected stock market rally and multi-month trading range. Let’s hope this time around isn’t so bad although I must say things do look pretty bad to me.