Search results matching tags '1932' and 'Richard Schwartz'

Stocks Have Risen When The Economy Is Down

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:49:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

The key thought: History shows the economy can be bad and the stock market good! Understanding that one idea is key to making a logical decision about the stock market here. I tried to get this across at Elizabeth’s 9^th birthday party to the family Saturday. The stock market is climbing its “wall of worry.”

THE SITUATION. My stock market and economic history studies of the Great Depression of the 1930s convinced me that stock market can rise while the underlying economy remains in a very weak condition. Because it’s happened before. In the 1930s depression, even while US unemployment remained at horrific, double digit levels for the whole decade and with few safety nets in place to help destitute Americans and with great ongoing divisiveness between political parties, the stock market posted a five year bull market run up, from 1932 to 1937. So, yes, there can exist a great disparity between the stock market and the economy. This confounding, confusing conundrum can exist as long as the economy is not sinking and/or when the economy stabilizes, no matter at whatever low level of economy activity. I believe that’s because the US capitalistic economy is essentially revitalizing and self-healing. Helped today, because over our history our capitalistic system has grown so large and diverse. In other words, first because Americans, with our continued open borders to any nationality, are a breed of extremely ingenious risk takers and thus will find ways to survive and prosper if allowed to do so. If, from time to time, when capitalism gets in a bind, it gets jumpstarted. Or gets the table reset when it knocked awry. Secondly, because today, there just are so many different industries, businesses, ideas, innovations in all parts and regions of America. Just meaning that while construction and manufacturing are down, maybe technology and the media are up. Or while Michigan is down, Tennessee is up. Or while big business suffers, smaller businesses spring up. I’m too provincial to see all this metamorphosis first hand and thus explain this concept more completely but what I see today is an America in downsizing mode, say moving to a rightsizing scale, but not in total collapse mode. Just like China, America in our own way is using this crisis, individuals one by one, businesses one by one, even the government is adjusting, although not totally because the government is itself the ultimate safety net when any major crisis hits. Our government, we’ve learned from past crises, is the rarely needed (thank goodness!) jump start provider, booster or table setter. Thus today America is using this financial crisis to rid our economic system of the bloat, the fat, all the long built up excesses, our bad behaviors and habits, particularly our overspending, even the corruption which always builds up during “unfettered capitalism,” seemingly prosperous but under the surface unhealthy, unsustainable times. Exactly why economists look at recessions as normal, healthy and needed cleansing events and why throwing money at any and all past downturns in recent decades led to this larger than life recent disastrous event. Schwartz View: My conclusion thus -- to get back to my opening statement that stock markets can rise while our economy is down and dirty, weak and lackluster and in substantial downsizing mode -- is that what investors mainly have to fear today is indeed fear itself. That fear partially coming from not being able to understand how the stock market can rise as we read about and see big economic trouble all around us. As I see it that’s investor’s biggest bugaboo now. We all know or should know that, as William O’Neil, founder of Investor’s Business Daily has always stressed, that success favors the optimist. Now I don’t mean the Pollyannas, I won’t besmirch the many of this ilk whom get be angry, they got their comeuppances by getting blindsided and riding the stock market down for 17 straight months between October 2007 and March 2009. But today, since we’ve moved past the bankruptcy risk, at least for the time being, no guarantees about future shocks knocking not us back down, we should overcome our fears and our misunderstanding of the economy and stock market relationship and again participate in the stock market to the extent of our own financial goals and objectives and how we’ve performed over the last two, years, during the bear market since mid-2007. To reiterate since this concept is so darn important, the hardest move to make is to buy stocks after this financial earthquake and while we see all the resulting damage around us. In other words, to separate the stock market from the economy. It’s very difficult for us investment professionals as well because every day we watch the stock market closely and/or read every update about each remaining financial problem. We all need to overcome our fears to make money during this full cycle. Easier said than done!

THE ECONOMY

The economy is so large and varied now that even with the shock and resulting dead stoppage of economic activity for many months, we’ve been able to stabilize the economy. Thanks to our government learning from our past travails and understanding its role. President Bush gets much credit but he’s gone now and thus last Friday I heard the first words uttered about an “Obama Miracle.” Pulling totally out of this massive slump is another thing and may take much time yet although we could post some surprisingly great numbers in coming months. Inventory rebuilding looks good statistically and allowing home foreclosures provides changes of ownership from the overextended to new risk takers. Still, over America’s 200+ year capitalistic history we’ve built a vibrant and reenergizing economic system so there’s always something good taking place somewhere and while the distressed and/or overbuilt areas of our economy right size the in fashion areas keep us moving forward. And our government has and is still performing admirably (sorry, I know many readers don’t agree with me), stabilizing our financial system and thus setting the stage to allow capitalism to provide us with future growth while at the same time realizing that any and all government intervention always adds additional drags on the economy and is trying hard to avoid such. While at the same time smartly tackling our long term deeply entrenched and ignored major issues and thus pointing America towards a more fundamentally sound future, remaining as one of the world’s leaders. Such as taking the lead in going green as the “clunkers for cash” program epitomizes. Americans really want to do their part and this program is providing one capitalistic way to do so. Getting polluting cars off the road while stimulating growth at the same time and in essence cutting back money supporting terrorism. I gotta love it! Schwartz View: So, we’re back on the right track in lots of ways and I’m delighted. But don’t get complacent. Please keep reading!

Please email me at RichardStk@aol.com for how the stock market will respond to the above analysis and whether, in the following THE STOCK MARKET and PORTFOLIO STRATEGY sections it’s time to buy the stock market today or not.

Monday Weekly Strategy

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

1930s Parallels Keep Popping Up

RichardSchwartz — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:49:00 GMT

REVIEWING THE 1930s. The Principle of Knowing History. Let me get down on paper a bit about President Hoover (1928 to 1932) and President Roosevelt and the 1930s after nearly finishing up THE FORGOTTEN MAN (2007) by Amity Shlaes. Again, let me recommend you get yourself a copy as today’s happenings keep looking more & more like a redux. I’m still thinking about taking this book to the beach over the Christmas holidays. It’s entertaining reading. One back cover reviewer compared Shlaes to Frederick Lewis Allen and his wonderful early 1900 histories (which I loved and heartily recommend; ‘Only Yesterday,’ ‘Since Yesterday,’ ‘The Big Change’). Shlaes’ history of the Great Depression starts after President Coolidge, a hands off US president gave way to President Hoover, of the same party, who turned out to be much more hands on. This flies in the face of the old belief that Hoover was hands off.

Late 1920s. President Hoover was elected in 1928 and for his first year the economy and stock market was copasetic. But after the October 1929 terrible market crash, it was up to Hoover to decide how to proceed. To understand Hoover, we can go back to when he was Commerce Secretary and wrote a book entitled American Individualism although the name wasn’t appropriate, according to Shlaes: “Hoover rejected the old brand of absolute individualism and distained laissez-faire economics as ‘theoretical and emotional’.” So, when the crisis hit, President Hoover went right to work. First, he made very clear he was for regulation. Hoover believed in government help and loved standards, efficiency and organization and had done much in the middle 1920s to install such across America. But now, upon President Hoover getting a confidential report from the Fed that the market “readjustment” was going to last, and after asking himself a question he later wrote down: “The primary question at once arose as to whether the President and the federal government should undertake to mitigate and to remedy the evils,” Hoover concluded, yes, action was needed. President Hoover from the crash until President Roosevelt took over in March 1933 pushed for “expanded public buildings programs, requested a national system of cooperation among the states on public works programs, proposed expansion of the merchant marine, regulation of the new inter-State electric power system, consolidation of the railroads, development of public health services and departmental reorganization.”

In general terms, Hoover: (1) intervened in business, starting by calling business leaders to Washington and told them to keep up business as usual and to keep wages up, not allowing any free market cleansing, (2) signed one of the largest tariff bills in US history, which caused less trade and thus further contraction and (3) publicly assailed the stock market. All moves which backfired because they also caused a loss of confidence. Retired President Coolidge, the hands off president, railed against Hoover’s moves, calling them “socialistic notions of government.” Right up until President Roosevelt replaced Hoover in early 1933, Hoover continued using the government to try to make things better. In June 1931, for example, Hoover announced a moratorium on German debt repayment. And then created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to help banks and homeowners. Finally Hoover signed a big tax increase, the Revenue Act of 1932, because of his fear an unbalanced budget would cause a run on the dollar. During the interregnum between Roosevelt’s election in November 1932 and his inauguration in March 1933, Hoover even wrote to Roosevelt trying to get him to sign off on special war powers to handle the emergency, and a bank holiday. Roosevelt said no, even though upon taking office, he followed many of Hoover’s beginnings.

March 1933. Upon entering office, President Roosevelt showed he would try anything. He knew people wanted action and that this was a rare opportunity for change. Plus he just enjoyed activity, of any sort. I can imagine how activity uplifted him, he wore these heavy metal leg things, for his polio. He was inaugurated in March 1933 when their was prevalent despair and unemployment had soared to about 17% Thus from March 1933 on he tried whatever struck his fancy. Plus he had a group of advisors called the “brain trusters.” Whatever they proposed, Roosevelt went with. The Hundred Days this period was called as President Roosevelt legislated galore. People hear that arts flourished during the Depression but now I know why. President Roosevelt (FDR) spent big money on them. He hired artists and had them paint murals--we have some in local post offices here near Roosevelt’s Hudson River home. He hired movie people and had propaganda firms made, burnishing the image of his actions, action which became known as the New Deal. Basically the New Deal was trying to help certain constituencies which Roosevelt chose. Essentially, the middle class or “everyman” or common man. And policies against the rich (even though Roosevelt was one of those). FDR started passing law after law seeing what worked. Lots of his laws were later thrown out, in the latter 1930s by the Supreme Court (which he then attacked by trying to “pack” the court, increasing the number of justices to decrease their vote importance). But the people knew Roosevelt was using government to help them for once. So he kept garnering support in spite of his arbitrary, sort of kingly behavior. Maybe because he was also able to charm his way through most any siutation.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. Out of time this morning, so let me just summarize. Both President Hoover and President Roosevelt put government to work to stimulate the economy after the 1929 stock market crash. We still debate today whether that was the right move or not. Today our US government is following a similar path after a similar crisis. But the law of unintended consequences may again come into play; government may end up making things worse and thus cause a lackluster economy to last and last instead of allowing the natural process of the free market to clean out the old and bad and bring in the new. Still, if you were US president, what would you do? Be an ideologue? Sit back and stay out of the way? Doubtful since you’d be viciously attacked by the media and others to do something. As very interested bystanders, all the individual investor can do is sit back and watch developments and place them in historic perspective. Then plan out strategy. As of now, please just stay hunkered down and out of harm’s way as much as possible.

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

RichardSchwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

Re-Regulation Begins a Multi-Decade Road

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:39:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Today’s Big Picture view revolves around the probable coming re-regulation of the financial markets. History shows regulation of markets is similar to a grandfather’s clock pendulum swinging back and forth although not as regular. A brief look back to the start of the 20^th century, shows free markets and a first age of globalization, with the introduction of the telegraph and telephone, steamships and railways, at a peak. Millions even migrated without passports while trade flourished meaning free markets were in charge.

· Governments Take Charge. Then, in August 1914, with World War I, that age ended abruptly. WWI left people disillusioned and looking for something better and many turned to socialism and communism. The Russian Revolution in 1917 drew followers and essentially sought to end capitalism for good, making private property illegal. Socialists and other government controlled economic systems were winning the battle of ideas, governments were in charge, free markets were in retreat. In less than 30 years, one third of humanity, including Eastern Europe, China and the Soviet Union, would be living under socialism or communism. Capitalism looked to be doomed except for in America. The 1920s in America was still a boom time, Americans buying cars, buying illegal gin, buying stock. Radio was the Internet of the 1920s. It was a classic bubble. Finally the 1929 stock market crash started Americans on the way to despair, a complete economic collapse "with no ability to earn, repay, spend, consume." Everything spiraled downward while about half the banks in the US closed. America turned toward government for help and thus re-regulation with President Roosevelt’s numerous new government regulatory agencies. Around the globe, governments gained power … over free markets. In Italy, Spain and Germany fascism took charge. World War II then arrived and even afterwards people all around the globe still blamed capitalism for causing the depression. The whole world kept moving towards more regulated economies. England even went socialistic as Winston Churchill, the great war leader, was beaten by the socialists! Most of the world operated under this sort of government planning process for the next 30 years.

· Free Markets Regain Control. But in the 1970s free markets began a resurgence. Margaret Thatcher came to power in England with free market thoughts as did Ronald Regan here in the US. with his Reganomics. Both cut back on government regulations, giving markets more ascendancy and free markets again starting coming to the forefront. England started privatizing its economy while President Regan cut taxes and let free markets regain control as epitomized by breaking the air controllers strike. Thus capitalism got a free hand which lasted for aboutt 30 years, even through the dot.com boom and bust. But after last year’s incredible debacle with investment banks, money center banks, insurance companies, etc. losing billions after irresponsibly leveraging up their investments 20 or 30 times, it’s apparent to most everyone that, just like in the 1930s, we can’t afford to have any similar financial market collapse spawning from totally free markets to happen again any time soon.

Schwartz View: So after reviewing the history of the 20th century and seeing how over long periods, market regulation swings back and forth, I have to figure we’ve just started a long term swing back on the way to re-regulation. For more on this topic, I recommend you watch Commanding Heights, the Battle for the World Economy, by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw which was turned into a DVD and a PBS prouction, a wonderful esplanation of the battle for economic minds in the 20th century. Filled in some missing pieces for me and should for you all as well.

Papa Bear Market Downside Target

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:16:00 GMT

THE STOCK MARKET

Hope camouflaging a water torture, drip-by-drip decline is one way of describing today’s stock market. The big problem with all the bottom calling a few months back by Bob Doll, BlackRock’s “Trillion Dollar Man”, by Mad Man Cramer last week and by Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) putting the “bull back in the box” last Tuesday and by the majority of Wall Street guests on CNBC is that they all continue to offer up hope to other investors who don’t really watch or track the stock market and economy closely. This continuous bullishness follows the historic pattern of investors not believing a bear market is even here and thus not noticing or ignoring the financial damage they’re occurring by listening to the experts, until somewhere near the bear market’s ultimate bottom. Finally, when they’re surrounding by negative news and can actually feel the economy turn really sour all around them, they take to not sleeping well at night, sweating profusely under the intensifying pressure and end up selling right at the bear market bottom along with everyone else. I’ve studied economic and stock market history and unfortunately I see that normal historical pattern playing out again today.

To make matters worse for the minority who are now waking up to what’s going on, we’re already morphed into getting only sideways stock market corrections upward, not rallies, which means to most investors that it’s too late to sell. As regular readers know I believe we’re still in line to lose as much or more than we’ve already lost so it’s really not too late to sell. It just takes some courageous decision making, terribly difficult today after investors have seen their double digit losses on their quarterly statements. But down the line sometime decision making time will rear it’s ugly head again. Selling then, at or near the bottom, will finally provide short term relief although long term regrets.

Schwartz View: In terms of a long term Papa Bear market downside target, in the S&P 500, the professional’s benchmark, logic says we should “retest,” or go as low, as the previous Mama Bear market bottom set back in October 2002 of about 770. From 1261 now, that’s about another 35% or more on top of the 20% we’ve lost so far.. That would take us to the bottom end of a multi-year trading range which already has two tops in place. About S&P 500 1550, the early 2000 peak to the grand bull market of the 1990s and the late 2007 peak of about 1575. And put us into a similar multi-year trading range to the one the stock market stalled out into lasting from 1966 to 1982 before it finally broke Dow 1000 to the upside. And confirm a number of theories floating around today. Big picture specialist Jim Rogers’ view that long term bull markets run for about 18 years, www.ComstockFunds view that the 1982 bull market really did top out in 2000, past top dog guru Robert Prechter’s Super Cycle technical peak and super global investor George Soros’s fundamentally-based belief that the 30-year credit expansion which was the engine driving the US economy, as we gave up our manufacturing domination, is indeed over. And most likely prove that Rogers’ recommendation of getting out of the US dollar was correct. Schwartz View: Near term we certainly could rally some, but I wouldn’t bet too much on such. Especially since my previous warning of a weak stock market period surrounding Northeast homeowners getting our winter oil heating bills has arrived. Friday we got the oil bill for our small townhouse. It was at a rate of $4.699 versus last year’s rate of $2.649, an increase of 77%. Meaning the cost of heating is going up from $1181 to $1907.

Sample Monday Overview Letter

RichardSchwartz — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:55:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, June 30^th, 2008: Ok, I’m off this afternoon. For a week of revitalizing rest and recreation, I hope. Actually San Jose to Lake Tahoe runs through some of the worst housing bust in America, with one county near there declaring bankruptcy. So I may be back with some first hand knowledge & new insights. Have a great week and a greater 4^th of July. I hope everyone gets to listen to lots of patriotic songs. We all have to believe in this country which has done so many good things, for us, and the rest of the world too.

THE BIG PICTURE

In today’s Big Picture view, let me lay out how big bad bear markets historically have unfolded. Thereby to offer up some guidelines on what to expect over the next year or two. Essentially this model scenario comes from my many years of studying past history and also from my first hand experience of being in this fascinating stock market business for the last 35 years (dating myself). Yep, when I add it up, it’s been that long. Actually that’s also approximately how long its been since we suffered through the last Papa Bear market as I expect this one to prove to be. I had just gotten out of college and started work at “Mother” Merrill Lynch and asked a rep which stock to buy. He said buy Merrill Lynch, which I did and it promptly went down from about $23 to $8. I really didn’t understand what was going on back then.

Bear markets, Papa, Mama or Baby, go through psychological stages or phases. The first psychological phase is when investors deny and thus fight tooth and nail that a bear market has even really begun, after being so locked into bullish expectations for so darn long (in today’s case for five years, longer than normal). The second psychological phase is when the news turns so bad that even firmly entrenched bulls have to admit that something is wrong out there. That maybe the economy is sinking or in recession because the economic data (as inexact and easily manipulated as it is) then coming out is so negative. This phase can go on for quite a long time and is generally the longest of the three phases. Investors still look to find ways to invest and make profits through this phase although that becomes harder and harder as the incoming news goes from bad to worse. And finally the third psychological phase is capitulation.. That’s when even the most adamant bulls lose all hope, give up the ship. And sell. This capitulation phase can be short or long but is epitomized by massive selling all at once, as everyone still invested feels the heat and pressure, can’t sleep and somehow all give in to the pressure at the same time. After this massive selling, the pressure comes off stocks as everyone who wanted to sell has. Still we generally need additional time to heal, thus after a lack-of-sellers bounce, stocks generally retreat once again, but this time on shrinking trading volume, they successfully “retest” their capitulation lows and the stage is set for a new bull market.

Schwartz View: I think we’re in for a similar performance to the above scenario. President Bush probably thinks he did something truly good with his multiple tax cuts following in President Regan’s footsteps but the early 2000 tax cuts just went primarily to the super rich. And Bush’s Iraq invasion and following years of morass just went on our credit card. And our looming long term critical economic and social problems like Medicare & Medicaid, Social Security, energy and health care haven’t been tackled. Thus I see big problems accumulated for the next US president as he is going to have to tackle and come up with some very important solutions. During this period, say the first two years of a new presidential term, most everyone in America is going to have to change our lifestyles, from freewheeling and overspending and living on credit to living a more disciplined, controlled lifestyle. All in all in today’s very competitive global economy and world we live in the sooner America and Americans get our acts together the better. I want to turn bullish on America again asap and thus benefit from America showing the world what we can do when we’re all pull together on the same page and right path. But for now we’ve got a tough period to slug through, so hunker down. Our fortitude, intellect and culture should stand us in good stead.

THE STOCK MARKET

We could see a stock market bounce soon, any time now after stocks have dropped so much, so fast, recently. After the Dow Industrials plunged through its March lows last Thursday and the S&P 500 fast approaching its own March lows now, closing at 1278.38 on Friday, just +0.39% above its March 10^th closing low of 1273.37. Generally institutional, professional investors like to defend old lows and other key prices levels I’ve found. I mean there are sign posts in the stock market and besides low lows another is when a key index drops -20% from its peak, that’s a price level where market observers start calling a decline a bear market and no one wants that. For instance, the Dow hit that -20% point off last October’s high last Friday, CNBC started flashing the news and stocks promptly rallied, a bit. Again, some investors will fight new trends at these key price levels. We’ve seen this play out over the last few years during the bull market, at important correction points, like down -10% whereby mysteriously in came buyers time after time. Maybe it’s a black box phenomenon, some trading strategy hedge funds have and profit by.

Anyway, and on the other hand, we may NOT get such a bounce this time down or at this point. In fact, we’d better not count on it, not with crude oil making new highs every time we turn around, like this morning rising to another record, now about $143 a barrel. Yes, some are calling for oil and commodities to collapse, calling their rise just another bubble. Oil dropping $10 a barrel in a day and $30 in a few days would likely help the stock market but after the knee-jerk upside reaction, investors would probably decide lower commodities also broke the back of any and all remaining stock market strength and leadership. And that resulting sigh-of-despair would then lead to even more selling. Plus, who’s to really know whether the commodity boom isn’t really a sign that all the world wants to lock up vital crude oil, natural gas, foodstuffs and all other needed natural recourses to keep their economics functioning. We do live in a suddenly, very competitive one global marketplace after all. It’s interesting that the two super successful, first mover, hedge fund investors who teamed up way back in the 1970s with the Quantum Fund today have slightly different views of what’s going on in commodities, but pretty much the same. Jim Rogers, the analyst of the pair, says buy commodities, these soaring prices are because the supply-demand equation is way out of whack. Prior to recently soaring global demand there’d been no incentive and thus little search for new supplies in most any commodities going back two decades. And George Soros, the trader of the pair, says yes there is a bubble in place today in oil and commodities but it’s superimposed on an credible long term uptrend. In other words, both can see a big decline in demand during the next global slowdown, a major glitch, but both can see further commodity price rises over time ahead. All combining with past US history, there for anyone to look at, that oil and oil stocks did very well during the first year of the last major market, in 1973-1974, thus supporting my theory that oil will hang in there longer than most expect. And my recommendation to keep one toe in the energy patch; I’m recommending the oil service sector.

Schwartz View: Looks to me like a second leg down in stock prices (as contrasted to a second psychological phase which seems also to have started) in this bear market has begun and thus that this summer could offer up much lower stock prices rather than more sideways, complacent trading of the last three months. I would play your cards close to the vest. Please see PORTFOLIO STRATEGY below.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

With the stock market now down substantially -- and hopefully everyone reading my letter having already following my consistent and persistent advice over the last seven months of cutting back stock market exposure -- I still have to recommend “getting smaller” like well-known trader Dennis Gartman likes to say. I mean it’s so easy to just be complacent here, figuring stocks are already down -20% so most of the risk is over. But history shows the opposite, that stocks drop more like -50% or more during big bad bear markets. Just seems logical to cut back even more as a second leg of price trouble begins. And there’s no guarantee that these bear market legs will just number three, following along with the psychological phases of bear markets, as www.Comstockfunds.com calls them, denial, concern and capitulation. In the 1929 to 1932 bear market, I remember reading there were like seven legs down in stock prices. Thus, as I jet off on a quick vacation, be back writing next Monday, I’m reviewing my own managed portfolios to find the best places to cut back my exposure even while only being 40% exposed in one portfolio, only 30% in another and pretty well hedged with inverse sector funds in the other three more actively traded accounts. Please, yourselves, attempt to take a look out six months or a year ahead, over the horizon yourself, a necessary step when managing other people’s monies, and consider the Big Picture. Just say things unfold poorly. What would you do next summer if the economy is finally post terrible stats and corporate profits have plunged? And if your portfolios are then down -50% or more? Are you going to sell then? No. Today we still have time to sell and looking back selling would have been correct strategy if that likely scenario unfolds, wouldn’t you agree. Bottom line, in big bad bear markets it’s better to be safe than sorry. Wait until the next bull market comes along before you starting going for the gold. Oops, hold a little gold here.

Have a great week and a terrific 4^th of July!

* Please also, go ahead and overdose on America’s heritage this week, listen to a lot of wonderful July 4^th songs and let them infuse you with a renewed sense of patriotism.

Is This Your Portfolio?

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:14:00 GMT

WHERE YOU SHOULD STAND TODAY. The Ideal Portfolio (another Schwartz View).

Yep, let me offer up one man’s view of what the ideal portfolio should be today and why:

· Very minimal exposure to the stock market! This major, modern day margin call on institutional investors is causing havoc. I’ve likened this margin call to the one which wiped out many individual investors quickly back after the 1929 stock market crash, only this time around its institutional investors getting slaughtered and thus the process of meeting their margin calls is being stretched out. All are deleveraging their portfolios big time and since the securitized investments killing them are so opaque and illiquid, it’s a terrible, long, drawn out process.

· Where you do have exposure, have some in the Energy Service sector. Business is going to remain strong and money is going to funnel into this sector as long as oil stays up there, even if oil tanks 50%. The world is in now in a new competitive battle to secure our energy futures. Thus companies which help countries like Brazil find and produce oil should do well.

· Where you can, hedge your long stock exposure. One does this by having some inverse mutual funds and/or ETFs (exchange traded funds). Happily today, investors have access to this modern day invention of being able to go short (bet on declines) with inverse investments. You just buy a fund or ETF which goes up as the market goes down. I would recommend having small inverse positions, especially in financials. This allows you to ride through a day like yesterday knowing that a part of your portfolio is rising while your long positions are falling. The next day you check your portfolio’s value and see how you did. That’s what I do each morning. Say the stock market fell -3.00%, like yesterday, & your account lost just -0.20% like my ProFunds managed account did you might figure your hedge is just right. Just tinker with the hedge until you get it right.

· Hold NO BONDS. I’ve been recommending this for some time now. Yes, we may get a deflationary collapse at the end of this 25 year “too much of everything” Kondratieff disinflationary economic backdrop we’ve been in since former Fed chairman Paul Volker broke the back of runaway inflation in the early 1980s. But the world is now experiencing our first return to higher inflation jolt. Thus we’ve started a new bear market in bonds. I can’t help but remember when I first became a stockbroker with Merrill Lynch back in the late 1970s, the client who say she would never, ever buy a bond again, after losing money on bonds going back two or three decades. Well, we’ve had a 25 year bull market in bonds and its over or close. Thus, my recommendation is no bonds. (Except some very short term laddered US Treasuries for income.)

· Hold a little Gold. Yes, some will keep warning of a deflationary collapse ahead, when the economy really tanks and thus say gold will collapse as well. But gold is in a long term uptrend, a bull market, and no one knows quite how it will react in various market and economic scenarios. Buy SPDR Gold Trust (symbol GLD) as opposed to the miners themselves, thus eliminating one unneeded uncertainty. FYI, I’ve seen gold rise and gold sector funds fall, so watch yourselves.

· Hold a little foreign currencies. Again, in today’s modern day investment world, the individual investor can easily bet on foreign currencies … by buying their ETFs or tracking stocks. I’ve been recommending & still am, buying Swiss francs & Japanese yen, symbols FXF and FXY. Both are Big Picture superstar guru Jim Rogers’ picks and are in long term bull markets and dipping now so it’s a good spot to buy in on weakness. Today let me add the Chinese renminbi, symbol CNY, to the buy list since there is a exchange-traded note in existence. Not a fast mover but it’s also in a long term bull market and probably is now one of the most reliable bull markets going.

· Hold a little agricultural commodity position. The middle class global world has grown tremendously, yay!, and thus the general commodity bull market has now spread out to foodstuffs. A larger global middle class, means more and better food is needed, especially increased protein. Food commodities are up so only buy on pullbacks here if you don’t own any now. My picks have been and remain symbols RJA and DBA. Again buy the commodities themselves as much as possible and not the companies which produce such although ETFs like MOO have been doing well to this point. Today, let me add iPath Livestock ETN (symbol COW) to the buy list if I haven’t already, a livestock play. Looks like with corn prices so high, cattle is being killed off (thus one can still get steak and hamburger at $1.99 a pound) because it costs too much to feed ‘em. But that will change too and red meat prices will skyrocket.

· Finally, hold small positions in lots of alternative, clean green energy stocks. I see new fortunes being made by those riding the wave of the US and globe getting off oil. The best way I’ve found to buy these is to keep the shopping list of alternate, clean green stocks I’ve compiled and posted for you back on June 6^th in this space handy. (If you don’t have it email me and I’ll send you a copy.) Buy a bunch of these stocks on weakness. I bought one for myself yesterday.

Disclaimer! I hold or plan on holding many of the ideas recommended above.

Ho Hum, Another Bear Market Summer Day

RichardSchwartz — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:08:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Witten Friday, June 20th, 2008: 6:30 a.m.

Looked to me like yesterday’s stock market rally was a knee-jerk reaction to China announcing it was going to raise oil prices by 17%. Crude dove on the news while stocks jumped. But if one thinks it through, is China raising oil prices really such good news? The bullish knee-jerk was that higher prices for gasoline in China will mean lower overall oil demand from China and that will reduce oil prices globally. As we’ve been hearing a lot lately that it’s government subsidized gas prices in China, India and many other developing countries that isn’t allowing crude demand destruction to occur and thus lower global crude prices. I mean Americans drove 30 billion fewer miles from November through April and that hasn’t lowered prices. The bullish train of thought continues that if the world gets lower oil prices, everything will improve. But, with further thought, if gasoline prices go up in China, won’t that cause demands from Chinese workers for higher wages? I mean the very last thing that the current communist Chinese leadership wants is any revolution from the Chinese people. Already, super big picture investor and Chinese advocate Jim Rogers says its inevitable that China’s government will go capitalistic over time, what with the Chinese people getting a taste of free markets for the last decade or so and realizing that free markets are the pathway to future wealth. Remember: “To be rich is glorious,” is the Chinese people’s new mantra. Hm? … and won’t higher Chinese wages mean higher Chinese export prices, thus higher import prices for us here in the US since we import tons and tons of stuff from China? And thus higher consumer goods prices intensifying the already ongoing and tightening squeeze on US consumers? We’ve had stagnant wages for many, many years with no light at the end of that tunnel and now we’re seeing higher prices for just about everything; food, fuel, health care, taxes, etc. Guess the still entrenched bulls figure lower crude will lead to lower gasoline, diesel, heating oil, and food too, eventually. And since the trend is the thing in the stock market, meaning the markets start discounting immediately upon seeing a new trend emerge, stocks rose yesterday. Still, is a gas hike in China really going to bring down global energy prices? I mean China already raised gas prices late last year and that didn’t bring prices lower. And we now live in a very globally competitive world as all countries and regions want to secure their energy and other needed mineral futures. And food futures too now after the recent global rice shortage has exposed the fallacy that it’s ok to depend on other countries for food staples. Anyway, the first thought was that lower oil is good for stocks and thus the stock market got stronger as the afternoon proceeded, led by lower energy beneficiaries such as the Dow Transports. But while I turned bullish on the Transports back in late March, after technically it broke three fan lines and formed a Head & Shoulders Bottom, I’m now bearish on the group after the two-month dead cat rally ended and the transports formed a bearish, rarely seen Broadening Top, an indication of loss of intelligent sponsorship and leadership. Thus I would certainly use yesterday’s nice bounce back in the trannies to get out if you haven’t already. And, for aggressive traders, if you can find a way to short the transports, I’d do so in a small way now. Schwartz View: Again, yesterday seems like just another bounce in a larger bear market environment, caused by entrenched bulls who refuse to admit the primary trend has now changed and is now pointed downward. The problem with this bullishness -- investors refusing to admit they are wrong, a terrible habit in the stock market! -- is that it indicates we’re still in the early stages of this bear market. Again, safely position yourselves and, unless you’re a trader, take the summer off. Of course, keep reading my letters. Why? Well, let’s see, to improve your knowledge base of how the stock market works and to make sure you don’t miss the opportunity to get back in. Bear markets do have endings. The last Mama Bear market, 2000-2002, ran for slightly less than two years with the most damage coming in the 2^nd year. The last Papa Bear market, in 1973-1974 ran for two years. And that very famous big bad Papa Bear market, which this one is looking more & more like, ran from 1929-1932, or just under three years. So all bad times do pass.