<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.investorsinsight.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Elections &amp; Campaigns</title><link>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/28.aspx</link><description>General discussions about campaigns and elections anywhere in the world.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>Barack on the cover of The New Yorker</title><link>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/thread/1934.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:32:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">94e1e1ff-3922-415d-9584-19119299714b:1934</guid><dc:creator>MadeOmoney</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/thread/1934.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=28&amp;PostID=1934</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Barack Obama&amp;#39;s team has decried The New Yorker magazine for a cartoon cover depicting him in traditional Muslim garb and his wife as a terrorist. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7505953.stm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7505953.stm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="220" src="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/usa/newyorkercover220.jpg" height="320" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Video - John Edwards Endorses Barack</title><link>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/thread/1714.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:59:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">94e1e1ff-3922-415d-9584-19119299714b:1714</guid><dc:creator>forthefew</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/thread/1714.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=28&amp;PostID=1714</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s a&amp;nbsp;YouTube video announcing the endorsement...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillbama: The Largest Tax Increase since WWII</title><link>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/thread/1526.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:04:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">94e1e1ff-3922-415d-9584-19119299714b:1526</guid><dc:creator>Lowell405</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/thread/1526.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.investorsinsight.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=28&amp;PostID=1526</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hillbama believes that tax increases&amp;nbsp;are necessary to balance the budget and finance the coming heathcare crisis.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;From my understanding, letting the Bush tax cuts expire would 1) increase tax rates&amp;nbsp;across the board 2) the marriage penalty be re-imposed 3) increase long term capital gains to 20% 4) Tax on dividends will be increased up to 39% &amp;nbsp;5) AMT tax&amp;nbsp;will hit 20-30 million middle american&amp;#39;s and &amp;nbsp;6) bring back the estate tax.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now although I agree that it&amp;#39;s impossible to run a country without taxes and responsible spending, wouldn&amp;#39;t now be the wrong time to have the largest tax increase since WWII while the country is currently trying to recover through a&amp;nbsp;recession?&amp;nbsp; Furthermore, if you want an increase in economic growth, increasing taxes on investments is not&amp;nbsp;the answer.&amp;nbsp; Shouldn&amp;#39;t we maintain the current&amp;nbsp;tax cuts or even&amp;nbsp;reduce them further in the short term?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Furthermore, I fugure if you want more domestic and international&amp;nbsp;businsses to do business in the US&amp;nbsp;then&amp;nbsp;the US&amp;nbsp;needs to be more favorable on the corporate tax rate and regulatory enovirnment&amp;nbsp;(Sarbox)&amp;nbsp;as well.&amp;nbsp; I mean really, the more regulation and taxes you hammer into the system, the costlier it becomes to conduct business here.&amp;nbsp; Let&amp;#39;s make the business environment conducive for economic expansion and growth instead of the opposite.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BTW...here&amp;#39;s what Clinton and Obama would look like if they merged.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img height="780" alt="" src="http://www.dailyhaha.com/_pics/hillbama.jpg" width="555" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>