Economics
This Week’s Data
Fourth quarter productivity rose 3.2%, more than twice estimates of +1.5%; unit labor costs increased 1.8% versus expectations of up 2.5%. The bad news is that these positive numbers resulted from rising job cuts; the good news is that this is positive for corporate profits.
December factory orders fell 3.9% versus forecasts of a drop of 3.2% and November’s reading of -6.5%.
January nonfarm payrolls fell 598,000 versus expectations of a drop of 525,000. This put the unemployment rate at 7.6% versus estimates of 7.5% and 7.2% recorded in December.
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/02/january-employment-report-598000.html
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/02/jobless-claims-as-percent-of-payrolls.html
Other
Japan’s experience with its stimulus plan:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/world/asia/06japan.html?_r=1&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
The argument for not using TARP to bail out ‘bad’ banks:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123388681675555343.html
Politics
Domestic
The President, in His own words:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/04/AR2009020403174.html
More congressional mischief:
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/02/cap-and-trade-will-hammer-consumers.html
International War Against Radical Islam
Lest you have forgotten about Afghanistan:
http://www.slate.com/id/2210624/
The Market
Technical
Selling on strength:
http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2009/02/selling-on-strength-versus-weakness.html
The worse post election day return since 1900:
http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2009/02/worst-postelection-day-returns-since-at-least-1900.html
****************************************
The Averages (DJIA-8063, S&P 845) rebounded yesterday on hopes of more clarity on the bank bailout and the stimulus plan. They remain within the shorter term more narrow trading range of DJIA 7853/9004, S&P 804/942.
Fundamental
That clarity came in the form of:
(1) a report that Geithner will present the financial rescue plan on Monday. Assuming that it comes even remotely close to properly dealing with the disposition of the toxic assets on bank balance sheets, it should be a positive. However, rumors outlining its specifics suggest the plan is still in a state of flux; so the risk here is that Geithner presents some half baked scheme and the Markets puke.
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/02/bailout-more-equity-stakes.html
(2) Senate majority leader Harry ‘ready, fire, aim’ Reid says that he has the votes to pass a stimulus bill soon; and apparently that has made a lot Market participants feel all warm and fuzzy. I can’t argue with the notion that short term anything is better than nothing. However, based on the last iteration that I have seen, if that occurs, it would be [as I have made clear in these notes] a [budgetary/inflationary] disaster longer term. The good news for fiscal conservatives is, [again if I understand the make up of the bill and if republicans don’t weasel out and support it], the democrats will have sole possession of this bill and its consequences.
As an aside, I would be perfectly happy to have no stimulus plan until after we know how well the financial rescue plan is going to work.
(3) Chris ‘friend of Angelo’ Dodd has made it known that he favors a suspension of the ‘mark to market’ rule as part of the financial rescue plan; and again many banking industry participants and investors agree. Unfortunately, Geithner doesn’t.
The bottom line: short term, the added clarity brought by the announcements regarding the rescue plan and passage of the stimulus plan will likely work its magic with stock prices. That said, it will be their terms and conditions that impact equities in the longer run; and at the moment, I am not terribly optimistic on that score. If stocks continue to move up in advance of events, adding to our cash position might make sense. Stay tuned.
Posted
02-06-2009 8:29 AM
by
Steve Cook