Principles of the Stock Market : Stock Market Lessons

Watch One Particular Stock Market Guru!

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:36:00 GMT

AN HISTORIC GURU VIEW. Written Friday morning, August 14^th, 2009.

Being in and around the stock market for the last 35 years -- I can’t believe it’s been that long! -- I’ve seen market gurus burn hot and cold. In my early years I was in more of a daze, doing ancillary brokerage jobs rather than following the stock market closely, just trying to figure out the whole brokerage industry. What a stock broker did, etc. Did I want to be one? Would I be recommending my own stuff? And again not being in New York city, the epicenter of finance, I was on the outside looking in. Even today that’s ones largest hurdle. So anyone wanting into the business I’d advise going where the action is, New York or another financial center like London. If not New York or London are not for you, find a big firm, say a big mutual fund family and get to its headquarters, be it in Boston or Singapore, etc. Anyway, back to point.

Granville & More. I’ve seen Joe Granville burn hot (and drop his pants to show stock quotes on his boxers and walk on water on a hidden board) and turn ice cold in popularity and heard about Jim Dines. I used to follow that curly haired woman guru, yes, that image is bringing her name back, Elaine Garzarelli. For many years I read Richard Russell, one of the deans of newsletter writers and whom I modeled my own letter after, took sample letters to numerous letter writers including Ned Davis, Dan Sullivan, Harry Schultz, Norman Fosback, Lou Navellier, .Marty Zweig, Stan Weinstein and unearthed Ted Warren’s one book (one of my favorites) and read everything I could find. I like William O’Neal’s approach and regular readers know I use and recommend his paper and its IBD 100 list. Having an economics background I gravitated to Ed Hyman’s work and read a number of economist A. Gary Shilling’s books. And read John Naisbitt’s Megatrends series with his long range projections. I’ve read and studied all the Dow theorists from Dow to Hamilton to Rhea to E. George Schaefer to Russell. I continue to read many new guys too, Alexander Elder, “Trader Vic” Sperandeo and on and on. Etc., etc. etc. Many unknown letter writers too. I really could throw a ton of names around if I sat down and reviewed my stock market library and mine and other’s old market letters. So I’ve seen many gurus come and go and burn hot and cold. But one who I continue to admire and track is Bob Prechter of Elliott Wave fame who was the #1 guru way back when. He was a major market mover like Joe Granville. While he uses charts -- which Wall Street loves to disdain, I think that’s mainstream Wall Street spinning a veil and case on the public to justify their big bucks, they all surreptitiously use ‘em -- Mr. Prechter also is now ties market swings to societal mood changes (which makes good sense to me). And is in the process of attempting to add and formalize to current investment analysis the concept of tying stock market trends to mood shifts. “Go for it Bob!”

SCHWARTZ RECOMMENDATION: TRACK MR. PRECHTER GOING FORWARD!

Anyway, I have to strongly recommend keeping one eye peeled on what Mr. Prechter is advising right now. Especially now! I’ve related the histories of Granville and Dines going terribly wrong in this letter, getting stubbornly bearish right at major market bottoms, so I realize the danger now for Prechter in remaining so adamantly bearish but I can’t fault his analysis, what he’s saying and my 35 years in the business tells me to not pooh-pooh his foresight. After reading everyone I can and adding in own my market intuition formed over those 35 years in and around the stock market, I’d say he’s on track. So I’m with him and the other bears, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, Gary Shilling, the Comstock guys and others out there, still recommending extreme caution going forward. Remember us outsiders were bearish but correct at the July through October 2007 bull market peak while most of those bullish today were also bullish back then and missed that major top completely. Amazing! I mean even after the subprime disaster unfolding ahead became plain in August 2007 and on the head fake rally to new highs in October 2007 they remained Pollyannaishly [sic] blinded. (And no, for all you individual investor skeptics out there about Mr. Prechter’s work, and I know there’s a lot by reading the responses and comments now added at the end of most all Internet carried research, no I’m not a shill for Prechter. Never met, emailed or corresponded with him at all.)

So, yes, play this rally which will likely run longer than most bears think, but stay near the exit; somehow!

For a FREE sample of my daily, emailed stock market letter and advisory, email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

Stocks Have Risen When The Economy Is Down

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:49:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

The key thought: History shows the economy can be bad and the stock market good! Understanding that one idea is key to making a logical decision about the stock market here. I tried to get this across at Elizabeth’s 9^th birthday party to the family Saturday. The stock market is climbing its “wall of worry.”

THE SITUATION. My stock market and economic history studies of the Great Depression of the 1930s convinced me that stock market can rise while the underlying economy remains in a very weak condition. Because it’s happened before. In the 1930s depression, even while US unemployment remained at horrific, double digit levels for the whole decade and with few safety nets in place to help destitute Americans and with great ongoing divisiveness between political parties, the stock market posted a five year bull market run up, from 1932 to 1937. So, yes, there can exist a great disparity between the stock market and the economy. This confounding, confusing conundrum can exist as long as the economy is not sinking and/or when the economy stabilizes, no matter at whatever low level of economy activity. I believe that’s because the US capitalistic economy is essentially revitalizing and self-healing. Helped today, because over our history our capitalistic system has grown so large and diverse. In other words, first because Americans, with our continued open borders to any nationality, are a breed of extremely ingenious risk takers and thus will find ways to survive and prosper if allowed to do so. If, from time to time, when capitalism gets in a bind, it gets jumpstarted. Or gets the table reset when it knocked awry. Secondly, because today, there just are so many different industries, businesses, ideas, innovations in all parts and regions of America. Just meaning that while construction and manufacturing are down, maybe technology and the media are up. Or while Michigan is down, Tennessee is up. Or while big business suffers, smaller businesses spring up. I’m too provincial to see all this metamorphosis first hand and thus explain this concept more completely but what I see today is an America in downsizing mode, say moving to a rightsizing scale, but not in total collapse mode. Just like China, America in our own way is using this crisis, individuals one by one, businesses one by one, even the government is adjusting, although not totally because the government is itself the ultimate safety net when any major crisis hits. Our government, we’ve learned from past crises, is the rarely needed (thank goodness!) jump start provider, booster or table setter. Thus today America is using this financial crisis to rid our economic system of the bloat, the fat, all the long built up excesses, our bad behaviors and habits, particularly our overspending, even the corruption which always builds up during “unfettered capitalism,” seemingly prosperous but under the surface unhealthy, unsustainable times. Exactly why economists look at recessions as normal, healthy and needed cleansing events and why throwing money at any and all past downturns in recent decades led to this larger than life recent disastrous event. Schwartz View: My conclusion thus -- to get back to my opening statement that stock markets can rise while our economy is down and dirty, weak and lackluster and in substantial downsizing mode -- is that what investors mainly have to fear today is indeed fear itself. That fear partially coming from not being able to understand how the stock market can rise as we read about and see big economic trouble all around us. As I see it that’s investor’s biggest bugaboo now. We all know or should know that, as William O’Neil, founder of Investor’s Business Daily has always stressed, that success favors the optimist. Now I don’t mean the Pollyannas, I won’t besmirch the many of this ilk whom get be angry, they got their comeuppances by getting blindsided and riding the stock market down for 17 straight months between October 2007 and March 2009. But today, since we’ve moved past the bankruptcy risk, at least for the time being, no guarantees about future shocks knocking not us back down, we should overcome our fears and our misunderstanding of the economy and stock market relationship and again participate in the stock market to the extent of our own financial goals and objectives and how we’ve performed over the last two, years, during the bear market since mid-2007. To reiterate since this concept is so darn important, the hardest move to make is to buy stocks after this financial earthquake and while we see all the resulting damage around us. In other words, to separate the stock market from the economy. It’s very difficult for us investment professionals as well because every day we watch the stock market closely and/or read every update about each remaining financial problem. We all need to overcome our fears to make money during this full cycle. Easier said than done!

THE ECONOMY

The economy is so large and varied now that even with the shock and resulting dead stoppage of economic activity for many months, we’ve been able to stabilize the economy. Thanks to our government learning from our past travails and understanding its role. President Bush gets much credit but he’s gone now and thus last Friday I heard the first words uttered about an “Obama Miracle.” Pulling totally out of this massive slump is another thing and may take much time yet although we could post some surprisingly great numbers in coming months. Inventory rebuilding looks good statistically and allowing home foreclosures provides changes of ownership from the overextended to new risk takers. Still, over America’s 200+ year capitalistic history we’ve built a vibrant and reenergizing economic system so there’s always something good taking place somewhere and while the distressed and/or overbuilt areas of our economy right size the in fashion areas keep us moving forward. And our government has and is still performing admirably (sorry, I know many readers don’t agree with me), stabilizing our financial system and thus setting the stage to allow capitalism to provide us with future growth while at the same time realizing that any and all government intervention always adds additional drags on the economy and is trying hard to avoid such. While at the same time smartly tackling our long term deeply entrenched and ignored major issues and thus pointing America towards a more fundamentally sound future, remaining as one of the world’s leaders. Such as taking the lead in going green as the “clunkers for cash” program epitomizes. Americans really want to do their part and this program is providing one capitalistic way to do so. Getting polluting cars off the road while stimulating growth at the same time and in essence cutting back money supporting terrorism. I gotta love it! Schwartz View: So, we’re back on the right track in lots of ways and I’m delighted. But don’t get complacent. Please keep reading!

Please email me at RichardStk@aol.com for how the stock market will respond to the above analysis and whether, in the following THE STOCK MARKET and PORTFOLIO STRATEGY sections it’s time to buy the stock market today or not.

Weekly Monday Overview

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:17:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, April 6^th, 2009: It’s Master’s week so I’m pumped up. It’s golf’s 1^st major of the year, tradition packed, for you non-golfers. Should be great with Tiger back, Phil Mickelson saying he’s playing the best golf of his life, Paddy Harrington going for his 3^rd major in a row and lots of up & comers. All I can say is wow! Even just watching this old southern flower nursery turned into a golf course in the spring, lavished with money for decades, may be worth the watching for any non-golfers out there. For me, it’s just heaven.

THE KEY QUESTION

Instead of discussing The Big Picture today, let’s focus on The Key Question. Since that’s what I keep pondering. Plus it has to be on every investor’s mind as well. “Could this rally be the start of a new bull market?” To intelligently answer -- as during every bear market rally -- necessitates rehashing all the available evidence. I can make a solid case for a cyclical bull market having just started and I can make an even more solid case that this is just a normal bounce in a Papa Bear market. Consider:

MINI BULL MARKET HAS STARTED

·        The economic stimulus is now starting to kick in which will stabilize and bounce the economy.

·        The monetary stimulus, lower interest rates, is also now kicking in and housing sales are increasing.

·        Inventories have been drawn down and need to be restocked which will pump up GDP growth near term.

·        The US and other governments have done everything possible to mitigate this downturn.

·        We now have more coordinated and get along global leadership than in many years.

·        The US economy has proven itself wonderfully resilient to shocks in recent decades.

·        Markets can counter-swing at any time for long periods, posting mini bull markets, versus primary trends.

·        Almost two years has passed since the beginning of the credit implosion back in July 2007.

·        Many independent market gurus think the March 2009 lows will last for a good while, months or longer.

·        The latest government bailout plan has more enthusiasts and support for it than previous plans.

·        Oil stopped falling back in December and is now on the rise possibility indicating growth rebounding.

·        We have recently had a number of better economic data reports from both retail and housing.

JUST A BEAR MARKET BOUNCE

·        The bear market hasn’t lasted long enough to discount all the problems that have come to light.

·        More problems, coming as bearish ripple effects and because of long lag times, are due to show up.

·        The bear market hasn’t fallen deeply enough to factor in the sudden massive shock to the global economy.

·        There hasn’t been enough overall selling or liquidation for a solid bottom. Stock and mutual fund liquidation haven’t reached previous classic big bear market bottom levels.

·        No solid bottom appears on the charts. We need a climatic sell off or a long low volume erosion to bottom.

·        Interest rates have to go up at some point, soon – either with and because of an economic rebound or from panic selling -- which normally depresses stock prices because of this new competitiveness from bonds.

·        The American consumer has suddenly stopped spending. This has slowed down business all over the world and finally exposed the global imbalances problems. Too much manufacturing in China and Asia and too much spending coming from America. Now those imbalances are being forced to readjust. Takes time.

·        The stock market is ignoring soaring unemployment. Yes, employment is a lagging indicator but continuing jobless claims isn’t. A new report just out says that in coming weeks and months, hundreds of thousands of jobless Americans will exhaust their unemployment benefits. Finally, 600,000 new job losses each month is going to add to weaker consumer spending, problems for local communities and cause negative ripple effects.

SCHWARTZ CONCLUSION: In review, we started this big bad bear market back in the year 2000. That was the peak of the last big bull market and thus the beginning of this big bear market. This is evidenced by the benchmark S&P 500 Double Topping in March 2000 and October 2007 and then subsequently and decisively breaking below October 2002’s previous decade-long lows by over 10% in March 2009. Showing that since 2000 and the ending of the Internet boom we’ve really been living on lower interest rates and big tax cuts, a false, “pump me up,” house of cards. Really not any wealth building going on, just paper shuffling to make things look great fueled by easy money credit creation. But now reality has set in. Thus, looking around, we see we’re almost nine years into a bear market which has been interspersed with one bull market, running for five years. So stocks were down almost two & a half years, up five years, now down about another one & a half years, sort of repeating The Visit of the Three Bears. In that infamous and extended bear market run of nine years, netting a -50% loss, there were two cyclical bull markets sprinkled in and surrounded and book-ended by the three bears, Baby, Mama and Papa.

My conclusion remains that this bear market is not over. But that the form and shape of it may get tricky going forward. Because the market has a history of posting cyclical or short term or mini bull markets on the way down when the bear gets ahead of itself. Which is why the stock market remains so fascinating!

THE ECONOMY

Well, the BUZZ has died down about how the economy is slowing its prior quick rate of descent. Guess because we’ve started seeing more bad economic data pop up or because the conversation has moved on. But some investors have decided an end to the economic collapse is out there, just over the horizon, so they are shifting into cyclical stocks now as a result. One can see this money rotating out of defensive sectors such as medical care, consumer staples and even gold. You know the concept, buying in advance of a recession’s end since history shows stocks rise roughly six months before the economy turns up. But if we indeed are stuck with a very mild even “anemic” economic recovery, as many figure, then stocks could also soon level off to mirror that trend as well. That is if the economic and earnings data don’t start sinking fast once again showing the economy is still sinking. For example, last Friday it was reported that the ISM Non-Manufacturing Index which now measures almost 90% of America’s economy - America now being a service oriented economy instead of a manufacturing economy - fell faster in March than in February somewhat debunking the idea that the economy has stabilized. Schwartz View: Yes, there is the possibility that economy-wise we are going to V- back up because sharp moves, in whatever areas of endeavor, are generally followed by responding sharp moves back up. We’re seeing that now in the stock market but after this bounce is over, I agree with the camp forecasting an anemic slow economic recovery.

THE STOCK MARKET

The stock market extended its rally to four straight weeks last week. We did see the first crack in this rally a week ago when the market fell sharply for two days. But then we quickly rebounded to new rally highs. That’s normal, the first crack being overcome but it does show this rally may be starting to struggle. We are getting closer to my minimum upside targets of Dow 8303 and S&P 1627, closing Friday at Dow 8017 and S&P 1621. And one can note trading volume has been slowing some, another sign of sluggishness. Or maybe cautiousness. Makes sense as we’re now moving into another corporate earnings reporting season starting tomorrow, the 1^st quarter January-March 2009 report kicking off after the close with Alcoa (AA), traditionally the first of the 30 Dow stocks to report. With the fall-off-the-cliff economy occurring early in last year’s fourth quarter, it only stands to reason that investors have to be wary of forthcoming earnings and thus wary of this rally as well. Schwartz View: It looks like the stock market has some more strength left in it so with stocks already having rallied beyond the 50% retracement level from their latest leg down, the early January peak, the teeter-totter phenomenon comes into play. Getting halfway up means it’s very likely to go all the way back up. Thus we kick off this week at roughly another key Fibonacci 61.8% price in both the Dow and S&P 500. That’s about 8088 and 838 respectively. If we break through those levels, then the next target is those January highs, Dow 9088 & S&P 944. Not guaranteed but increasingly likely.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

2009 may indeed prove to be the year to trade. If stocks fluctuate but go nowhere net, up or down, for many months ahead then it’s going to prove very frustrating for investors. In these times and they do happen, more often than the uninformed investor may realize, the best way to make profits is to: (1) trade individual stocks and (2) discipline yourself to continuously fade the market, buying on dips and selling on strength. Toward that end I’ve started incorporating the Commodity Channel Index (CCI) technical indicator into my work. Comes on most charting services like Bloomberg. Basically it shows deviations from the moving average, when stocks get too far overbought or oversold. Naturally you buy when a stock or index gets oversold. For more on the CCI I suggest getting Oliver Perez’s Swing Trading Tactics DVD or Alexander Elder’s book TRADING FOR A LIVING. Over the last month of rally for instance certain stocks have far outperformed the averages. And numerous tradable asset classes or market sectors like the US dollar and oil have been both up and down offering trading profits but no net profits for buy & holders.

Otherwise than scalping profits what should we do? For now favor the long side and the cyclicals. I like technology, renewable energy and natural resources. Move up a notch in your market exposure to about 30% if you haven’t already but continue to hedge your bets and don’t get out on a limb by going too long. Just subdue your ego, don’t think you know more than Mr. Market does and just go with the flow, modestly. Bottom line take what the market gives you, right now there are some trading opportunities but don’t get carried away. There’s lots more trouble to come but the path ahead is likely to get more tricky as well. So don’t fall into the camp that says “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.”

Have a good week!

Go Tiger Go!

US Dollar Peaking?

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:18:00 GMT

US Dollar’s Possible Turning Point. A Possible Trade For Traders? Written St. Patrick’s Day.

The US Dollar Index (symbol DXY) has fallen back just after breaking out above an old high. Hm, very interesting as some predict the US dollar weakening will be a first sign of normalcy coming back into the marketplace, that it will signal increased liquidity and a return to a bull market. We’ll find out whether these prognosticators are right or not and about the relationship between the buck and stocks over time.

Today though, this doubling back by the US dollar is a bad sign for continuing dollar strength This chart formation is what “Trader Vic” calls a 2B. That’s when a new high is set but quickly reversed. Let’s see, the DXY on March 2^nd closed above its prior closing high of 88.191 set back on November 21^st at 88.940 (Interesting. November 21 was almost exactly when the November to January stock market rally began.)

Anyway the US dollar index stayed up above that November high for seven days and then last Wednesday closed below that November close, at 87.868. Now, for the last four days, as stocks have risen, it’s stayed below its high and fallen further. “Trader Vic” in his first book, METHODS OF A WALL STREET MASTER wrote: “At major market turning points, long-term 2B’s, the new high or low will usually break within seven to ten days.” In this current case, the US dollar index fell back below its old high after seven days of being above its November high. That fits Vic’s time frame nicely. Let’s review a bit further back as well. This US dollar rally started last July 15^th or its run for eight months now. OK, could have run its course. The question is whether we have a “short the dollar play” here or not. For more evidence, let me go check another dollar index, Bloomberg symbol USTW$, the related, broader-based dollar index, which measures a much larger basket of currencies including a lot of developing market currencies. You may remember that most all currencies have been falling versus the dollar over the last year as the old rule has held up, “When America sneezes the rest of the world gets a cold.” Just meaning that tough times get real tough elsewhere when America stops buying; you can imagine the hardship this brings to other exporting countries, etc. Anyway, the broad based index has tracked the DXY pretty closely, moving higher since last July. It’s last high was 84.91 set back on November 21^st last year. Then on February 27^th, it closed higher, at 84.93. And stayed higher for the next ten trading days or until last Friday. Today it’s trading lower, at 84.628, as I write. So after ten days above its November high, it also has reversed lower or doubled back. Net, net, there does seem to me a trading opportunity. And in today’s modern age of investing we have vehicles to easily short the US dollar. In the ProFunds mutual fund family, there’s the ProFunds Falling US Dollar fund (FDPIX), in the Rydex family, there’s Rydex Weakening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund (RYWBX) and over in the ETF (exchange traded fund) market there is PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN). Obviously the ETF allows you greater liquidity because it trades like a stock, you can buy and/or sell it any day during the trading day.

SCHWARTZ RECOMMENDATION. Ok, after looking at the evidence let me recommend for an intermediate term trade going short the dollar using one of the three vehicles above. Do so in a very modest way and as just one of a variety of strategies. While keeping lots of cash on the sidelines. Also figure I’m wrong … and thus you need to sell to cover, if the DXY index again reverses upward and closes above its old high, higher than 89.105, your mental stop loss point. Your risk is about a point in UDN while the reward if the dollar has turned down from a major top is much larger. I like that risk vs. reward.

Disclaimer! I hold no positions in the three symbols above but can and do change positions without notice.

SCHWARTZ TIP: Finally, there are three very useful trading tips spelled out in Trader Vic Sperandeo’s two great, early 1990s published books: METHODS etc. and PRINCIPLES OF PROFESSIONAL SPECULATION. I’ve used them repeatedly over the last couple of years and they’ve proven reliable, not perfect but reliable. So I’d suggest any market follower needs to be aware of, knowledgeable about and applying all three in everyday activity. They are the two I refer to in today’s letter; the 2B Rule and the 4-Day Rule. The other is the “As easy as 1-2-3” change-of-trend rule. Actually there are more tips in his two books that are very useful too. But for any trader or speculator, spotting change of trends early on is very useful and profitable information. Get his books, know his rules. “Yay Trader Vic!”

To get FREE sample or subscribe, please email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

Principles of the Stock Market: Sample

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:56:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Tuesday, January 6^th, 2009: OK, back to the rat race. The weather remains ugly. Yesterday am it was all ice. Tonight it seems like snow, then severe ice again tomorrow morning. This is the time of year I wish I lived in southern California or other warmer clime. Still, tiny New Paltz is a college, mountain town with open space, a walk around lifestyle so Lucy & I are there for the duration. Of course with beach vacations.

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. The latest gigundo $800 billion economic stimulus plan, now called the Obama Recovery Plan or some such, as he puts his fingerprints on it, may cause a bigger stock market rally than I previously thought, I realized last night as I watched the Nightly Business Report (before I got in the bathtub with reams of printed research to read). The Nightly Business Report (NBR) showed very wide differences in economic growth rates. Much stronger economic growth with the plan. Or rather much less economic weakness with next year showing positive Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with the plan and negative GDP without. Now I know the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) just said we’ve been in recession since December 2007, sort of bypassing the outdated GDP stat altogether but not every investor realizes this yet. CNBC and other financial media still take the easy way out, constantly stating a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP, but as Peter Schiff writes in his latest book, THE LITTLE BOOK of BULL MOVES in BEAR MARKETS, most government stats are really skewed, biased toward what government wants to say, today. Also please remember, a stronger GDP really measures mostly spending … and overspending which is what we’re trying, what we need for the sake of America’s future, to get away from. More investing our money, not spending (blowing) it on unneeded gadgets, etc. But that’s a story for another day. Yes, what a mess!

THIS RALLY. Right now I can visualize stocks rising right into Senator Obama’s inauguration on January 20^th as the 44^th US president. (Obama as US president? Amazing!) Stocks rise as the plan comes into clearer focus, and as it becomes -- hopefully, cross fingers! -- a non-ideological, non-partisan bill. Hey, many Republicans should be very happy to come on board as surprise tax cuts are included and surprises also about the large size of the tax cuts, importantly including tax cuts and larger depreciation write offs for business! (We have to encourage, not discourage, business to invest, just the opposite of what FDR did during the 1930s.) Schwartz: Myself, I love what I’m seeing from our president-elect. Press conferences actually focused on improving America, not arguing among parties, open and honest talk and also a proposed web site so Americans can see where each of our dollars is going. “Go America Go!”

RALLY ENDS WHEN? Then maybe it’s all over, this bear market rally ends on inauguration day or shortly thereafter, say when the bill gets passed. But if those GDP interpretations I saw on NBR last night are reasonably correct ( it will take much time to discredit and change how we figure GDP to make it more relevant again) then maybe the US economy gets a sizable lift which lasts for some longer period of time before our still emerging problems pull us back down again. If that happens I can see a mini bull market or cyclical (short term) bull market unfolding this year, say starting back at the November 21^st intraday lows.

Schwartz View: Bottom line, my best recommendation this morning is that traders and many slightly longer term investors too get further reinvested back into the stock market. Not 100% for sure yet but higher exposure than in a long while. When? Say right now or very soon. Many key market indices and averages confirmed this new rally once again, on the first trading day of the year, last Friday. That’s the exact point – when we have a “Trader Vic” identified change-of-trend in place, we do, along with a higher low followed by a higher high, we do, and then we get another breakout move up and above that higher high (like occurred last Friday) – where correct strategy is to invest more.

ECONOMIC VIEW. Like I noted yesterday, I’m seeing more and more record statistical drops, like yesterday’s drop-off-the-cliff report from the auto industry; Chrysler leading the way down with a year over year drop of a mere 53%! My point is that just like the phenomenon in stocks when the economy drops fast it may also have a tendency to bounce back rapidly. I note some are now saying the same for oil, using history of something called the forward curve of futures prices. Of course this almost automatic, stock rally back likely doesn’t go all that far. Just like when a car crashes into a wall, bounces back, but still in drive, comes on again. Depends on how bad the crash was on how long the engine keeps running fueling the bounce back. Schwartz View: I have to think this financial crash of ours was extremely bad. Still I can see another big stimulus plan, if pointed at and framed correctly, using our brains and learning from past mistakes, doing a lot to produce some positive stats for a time after implementation.

TECHNICAL VIEW. Many Individual Stock Charts Looking Good! I drew up charts of almost all 100 companies on the latest IBD 100 weekly computerized list of leading stocks, stocks with good fundamentals and generally leading the market upward, yesterday afternoon. And I must say most now look good. A few of them are even already back above their highs set BEFORE the October panic sell off. That’s one of my parameters for possible buying as per my Principle of Relative Strength telling us what to buy. As to what other technical screens I used as I reviewed their charts on two charting services I get, Bloomberg, and for FREE on www.Marketwatch.com, I used RSI and DMI primarily. Briefly RSI stands for Relative Strength Index, it’s an oscillator, and measures market consensus psychology. While DMI stands for Directional Movement Indicator and is a trend-following indicator showing how fast a trend is moving and thus when a trend is worth jumping on board. Traders of all sorts should be familiar with both indicators I’d say. I would recommend Alexander Elder’s 1993 book TRADING FOR A LIVING as the best reference I’m aware of to bone up on these and other indicators.

Here’s a listing of a few companies and their underlying industry sectors which look ripe for trading this latest rally. Remember Investor’s Business Daily turned bullish, put the bull back in the box, back on December 3^rd and hasn’t been forced, by stocks hitting lower lows, to take it out since. This is a major difference for months prior to that. A bullish change. So let me post some stocks which look good to me.

Disclaimer! I own none of these stocks today but am considering buying a package of about three to five today or soon. Please remember my positions can and do change without notice.

IBD 100 STOCKS LOOKING TEMPTING

Market Industry

Price Cap Ranking Business

SXCI SXC Health Solutions 19.03 455m 2 Pharmacy Services

LPHI Life Partners 42.27 502m 3 Insurance Brokers

ESI ITT Educational 92.28 3570m 5 Schools

TWGP Tower Group 28.74 700m 8 Property/Casualty Insurance

HOME Home Federal Bancorp 10.65 184m 11 S&L/Thrifts-Western US

VSEC VSE Corp 42.34 215m 18 Engineering/R&D Services

SXE Stanley, Inc. 35.74 839m 18 Engineering/R&D Services

SYKE Sykes Enterprises 19.65 810m 18 Computer Services

AVAV Aerovironment Inc. 39.38 831m 23 Aerospace/Defense

TDG TransDigm Group 35.00 1703m 44 Aerospace/Defense

NPK National Presto Inds. 77.88 533m 63 Aerospace/Defense

NCIT NCI, Inc. 30.66 410m 70 Computers-Integrated Systems

SXL Sunoco Logistics 48.80 1398m 90 Energy Pipelines

CMP Compass Minerals 63.12 2046m 117 Quarrying

Schwartz View: It’s been some time since I posted stocks off IBD 100 weekly list. Because of this bear market. But this rally looks like it may just have some legs and my market philosophy is to play all decent looking rallies, modestly. I would thus suggest a three to five stock trading portfolio chosen from the stocks above. Some points to keep in mind. Don’t overdue it! We’re still in a bear market after all and one which looks to have more downside, even if it doesn’t come immediately. Also remember IBD recommends investors always focus on the top 40 or so industry groups. Finally, look for a quick +10% profit but cut your losses, individually or whole port6folio-wise, quickly. Remember we just might be starting some type of cyclical (short) bull market now but, on the other hand, the odds still favor much lower prices over time. So participate but always concentrate on your downside, how much you could lose.

Good trading! Have a great day!

Monday Weekly Strategy

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Patience: Outlast This Bear Market

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 1^st, 2008: Since Lucy’s birthday was a Round Number & fell on Thanksgiving, everyone surprised her & came back Friday for tea. At the Tea House in the village, a reconverted barn on a hill with a great view of the mountain, a view I hadn’t seen before. Almost everywhere in town has a mountain view which makes me feel like I live in Lake Placid, another charming mountain town. Love it!

PS. I caught a bug which I’m working through today but possibly no letter tomorrow if I feel worse.

THE BIG PICTURE

I spent Thanksgiving evening discussing the past, present and future with my son Brian. In essence he asked me for a simple explanation of what caused the stock market to drop so much, what terms like deregulation, re-regulation, privatization, etc. mean & what the big picture looks like. Here’s my answer:

Let’s start with the two classical economic theories of thought. One, let free markets operate on their own, the old Austrian school of economics as promulgated in the early and mid 1900s by Friedrich Hayek versus two, getting government involved in the economy as advocated during the same time period by John Maynard Keynes. Both gentlemen lived through both world wars, the Great Depression and for decades beyond and their influence ebbed and flowed. Both economic theories had their time to shine, alternating roughly 30 year periods. The last totally free market cycle began its ascendancy when President Ronald Regan was elected to office in 1980. Since then union’s power has declined dramatically, corporate statesmen who shared equitably corporate wealth have became obsolete and bottom line profit became the only goal which caused stock price to rule business actions. During this long run in a totally free market direction whereby prosperity grew larger and larger spreading out to millions worldwide, normal prudence, probity and recognition of investment risk ultimately got lost. Greed took over completely when Wall Street came up with its latest round of newfangled, supposedly sophisticated investments, especially those incorporating securitization. Securitization just meaning turning all types of debt into securities which could be sold while spinning off huge commission style profits to everyone involved in the process or food chain. This, along with the 30-year trend to more and more deregulation, allowed commercial banks into previously banned investment areas, using heretofore unheard of leverage which caused capitalism to finally go off the deep end. By this I mean a 20% correction in our overheated, overdone, overblown US residential housing boom led to a bust after one bank woke up one day last summer to huge paper losses which soon showed everyone else was stuck with similar losses. This blow off following by an implosion and meltdown are the types of culminating events which cause these 30-year cycles to start swinging in the other direction. I now believe we’re just started a new long term swing away from free market economics as advocated by Mr. Hayek and towards a government role in economics as advocated by Mr. Keynes.

Summing up, we’ve just gone through that part of the long cycle which allows capitalism to run unfettered and thus grows the pie for everyone. The downside is that the gap between the rich and poor grows ever larger when we practice laissez-faire capitalism, essentially letting the marketplace alone which leads to the strongest doing best. But cycles are cycles and all eventually go to extremes and then swing the other way. Again, as I see it, we’ve just gone to one extreme and are now just beginning to cycle the other way, down the path whereby government steps in and applies regulations to the latest, most egregious ways of gaming the system. Which interferes with the magic of letting the free marketplace find its own proper price levels between consumers and producer providers and thus drags down the overall efficiency of the market. The rationale is that something has to be done to avoid another rare but normal breakdown by capitalism. Net, net our free market capitalistic system normally goes from one extreme to another, that deregulation goes so far it causes problems, then re-regulation sets in. With privatization or the selling off of previously government run businesses or business sectors being one form or aspect of deregulation. Thus, the last year’s breakdown and implosion in our financial system didn’t really show free market capitalism doesn’t work anymore, it just shows we’ve come to the end of the normal continuing pendulum swing out to one extreme and are now starting the long journey back to a middle ground and then out to the other extreme.

THE ECONOMY

Not much to comment about on the economy today.. We’re in that middle time period of this bear market and at the start of an economic downturn. Thus I expect the economic data, corporate earning reports and most other news to be pretty consistently bad for some time to come yet. One rule we do know about how the stock market operates and how it relates to the economy is that stocks turn up a few months before the economy does (with exceptions). So finding a bear market bottom will incorporate more than just watching the data. Waiting for the economic data to turn positive will make most investors months late in reentering the stock market. Schwartz View: Thus, myself, I watch the charts and believe in what I’ve espoused for many years, that charts tell you when to buy and then the fundamentals confirm down the road.

THE STOCK MARKET

Mr. Stock Market keeps trying its best to rally now. Last week the economic data was just plain awful and stocks rallied anyway. I wrote previously that stocks refusing to go down on bad news would be a good clue that the market has gone down enough, at least for the moment. Still, some remaining problems are: (1) I don’t see a proper base to support a big rally, unless I’m getting tricked by the undercutting of that possible base built from October 10^th through November 19^th, (2) I don’t see any improved fundamentals and still expect lots more bad news to become known next year and (3) history shows after financial glitches and consumer confidence losses of this magnitude bear markets and recessions following lead to once-in-a-generation market declines which don’t get over in just one year, roughly the time period we’ve seen this bear market last for so far. Yes, big bad bear markets generally last at least a year and a half to two years to even three years. Also this bounce reminds me very much of numerous temporary previous V-bottoms and short lasting rallies we’ve seen over the last few months. But a rally is a rally is a rally. And we have to play them. Eventually one rally will morph into the next bull market. Thus the key is to always keep sight of the Big Picture. Today the big picture perspective shows we’re firmly entrenched in a big bad bear market. So, in general strategy should be to sell and sell short rallies instead of buying dips. But when rallies periodically begin, we should modestly go along with them,, go with the flow, one toe in the water. That way if any rally proves to have legs we’ll start profiting immediately and know about it right away. But not to jump in with both feet because primary bear markets, just like primary bull markets, do reassert themselves, and until proven differently, it’s a whole lot easier to profit swimming with any tide or trend than swimming into it. Schwartz View: I’m trying to find a technical reason, say a good looking chart pattern at least, to buy a particular sector, but so far no luck. The one bullish trend which I see today is in the US dollar. Strength began back in mid-July and thus when strength continued past the three month normal max time frame identifying a bear market rally, or past mid-October in this case, and kept on going, I termed the strength as a new bull market. Otherwise everything else looks like iffy trends.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Strategy remains one of outlasting this bear market. Of proving you have more patience than Mr. Bear Market does. This is a difficult job which will test your discipline again and again if the past is any guide (which I believe it is). Over time you’ll be tempted to buy back in again and again whether you see a believable bear market bottom or not. Especially if you’re one who really watch stocks, the whole Wall Street show, daily. So continue to do any irresistible buying and or investing in a much smaller, subdued manner. Keep just enough money in the stock market to keep you interested and not so much that future declines can put you out of the game and out of business. And stay tuned here to find the real bottom.

Have a good week!

"No One Can Time The Stock Market"

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:18:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. The Principle of Technical Analysis. I don’t want to jinx myself but I can’t keep quiet. Not after hearing the usual Wall Street mantra again this morning. That is, that no one can time the stock market so it’s always best to ride out its ups and downs. I mean this type of misleading & confusing information is one big reason why I started this stock market letter back some 18 years ago. Part of my motivation, to quote myself, was to “unveil the mystery surrounding the stock market.” I saw numerous misstatements and unfounded general beliefs which I just thought were plain wrong being foisted on the investing public, not large institutional investors but aimed at individual investors. After working as a stockbroker/financial consultant for 15 years, I realized that Wall Street kept nurturing the stock market’s mystery. Why? For Wall Street’s best interest. Why pay a stockbroker or brokerage firm big bucks if individuals could understood for themselves the market? No, only if individuals felt (and kept feeling) overwhelmed by the market’s workings would there be a need for advisors and a way to charge big fees.

Anyway, I don’t want to get off track. I just want to comment on the one line of reasoning which we’ve all heard repeated so often that most now take it as fact. That is that no one can call the tops or bottoms of bull and bear markets. We hear it from about 50% of the mutual fund managers, market strategists and others every time they come on TV. Many begin with something like: “Since no one can call a bottom, …” Not only does this perpetuate the need for market advisors it also justifies the roller coaster performance of these money managers. Hey, it takes the pressure off them, right? As long as they are doing about as well or as poorly as the overall stock market, then they are doing their jobs well. At least that’s the thinking.

But then what about all the traders out there? Why did hedge funds start then? If no one can time the market what about this whole cadre of people trying to outperform the market? And what about those fabulously successful speculators we hear about? Some do time the market correctly is my answer.

Schwartz View: I’m sure many others did as well so I’m speaking just for myself now. After studying the stock market for 35 years, all facets from timing to investment themes and much, much more, I was able to correctly identify last year’s market collapse as the beginning of a bear market pretty early on. In spite of those who say no one can do such a thing. And I stepped up, following my own reasoning and got Lucy’s 401k or 403b or whatever it is into 100% cash. Right before we went away on our annual Christmas beach vacation last year. And thus kept her retirement account from falling about in half! With my managed accounts, I followed generally the same path, figuring my top priority was protecting our downsides because the market was turning bearish. Since then I’ve been able to keep mostly to the sidelines, watching this bear market unfold, gather steam and keep on rolling. This in spite of hearing the “Trillion Dollar Man,” BlackRock’s Bob Doll, incorrectly call a bottom in March, Mad Man Cramer call a bottom in July and other bullish, skin-in-the-game advisors come on CNBC and say they are buying, that a bottom is near or building a bottom is a process and you’d better get in now “…since no one can call the bottom.” Well, the bear market continues and we keep seeing further and deeper declines. My sense, as I’ve been writing for months now, is that this bear market will last for at least two years or until at least next October simply because what’s hit us is the worst mess since the Great Depression of the 1930s. So why wouldn’t this bear market last at least as long as the last Papa Bear market, the two year long drop in 1973-1974?

Bottom line, while I don’t expect to call the bear market bottom before it arrives or to the day (except in hindsight) I believe with the tools, skill sets and experience I’ve now got, after studying the market’s primary trend, history, psychology, value, technicals, etc. for decades, I should be able to identify the bottom reasonably well. Part of my overall game plan entails trading most possible rallies so when one does prove to be the real thing, I’m in with at least one foot near the start. Then, as I see prices rising, I should be able to get in more heavily. Bottom line, I believe anyone who’s willing to put in the time and effort should be able to quickly identity tops and bottoms in the stock market, totally counter to what we always hear. Oh, one last point. Be careful of the fear that these always 100% invested advisors love to leave you with (just like dentists do). That is the mantra that if you miss the first days of a new bull market, you’re in trouble. Sure the first days up are normally exciting and big. But bottoms generally are retested, providing the sharp-eyed observer more than one reentry point. And bull markets run for years not just for a couple of days. So don’t worry, be happy, if you’re now 50% or more in cash on the sidelines. Just stay tuned here. Because one way to indeed miss the bottom is to lose interest in stocks during a long bear market. Go ahead, lose interest if you’re 100% invested now because you’re already in a bind. But don’t lose interest if you’ve played out this hand fundamentally correct. If you’re saved yourself a bundle by already going against the Wall Street mantra of staying invested “because no one can time the market,” then stay in touch with stocks for your reentry point. One good and easy way to do so is by just reading this letter each day. It’s only a couple pages long, doesn’t take much time to read, you’ll learn something new most of the time AND you’ll be aware pretty quickly, & ready to profit, when this market turns up.

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

To Risk "Cleaning Out the System" or Not

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:37:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Written Monday, September 29th, 2008: 6:30 a.m..

What happened in Congress last Friday – House Republicans refusing to go along with the government’s rescue plan – was caused by political/economic ideology combined with Americans not wanting to bail out Wall Street. With the men and women on Main Street contacting their representatives en masse to protest any plan at all to bail out Wall Street, some Republicans decided they were willing to test the thesis that not going along with the government’s plan risked Armageddon for the whole American financial system. Conservative capitalistic ideology says the best and only way to handle economic crises is to let the free marketplace work, meaning let those individuals and corporations who’ve made bad decisions fail. Famed investor Jim Rogers, who’s consistently said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulsen have been following the wrong road during this crisis, must have been pleased. Rogers also feels the best path is to let underwater financial concerns go bankrupt. He says bankruptcies have happened before, will again, and serve a purpose. They effectively clean out the distortions and excesses built up in the economic system so in the future we can start over and move ahead on a strong foundation. Not doing so would set up the same situation here in the US that caused Japan’s “lost decade” of the 1990s whereby the Japanese government let failed banks keep operating. Bailing out and keeping zombie-like banks alive here as well would just slow dramatically or even block America’s economic recovery. Bottom line, with terrific public opposition – calls coming in 100 to 1 against bailing out Wall Street -- late last week some conservatives decided to risk taking the whole country down and into the economic abyss and see what happens. They backtracked a bit over the weekend, giving in to the mantra that “we had to have a deal before the Asian markets opened.” Schwartz View: Boy, do I have mixed feelings! Invading Iraq because of itsreported stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, proved that acting out of fear can be wrong. Thus when the government forecasts disaster ahead today unless we follow their rescue plan, it feels like they are crying wolf again. Plus I fervently believe we do need to “clean out the system” and show Wall Street we’ve stopped socializing their losses. On the other hand, common sense tells me at all costs we should avoid any economic meltdown which could morph into another 1930s-style depression. Finally I believe in letting the marketplace operate as freely as possible and I agree with the man on street that rich players who’ve gamed the system for so long should share the economic pain the rest of America has been feeling for many depressing years now. Making matters even worse and even more complicated is the absolute horrendous timing of this crisis. Our politicians wanted to recess and get out of Washington, DC last Friday to go campaign in their districts and certainly didn’t want to have to be forced into voting YES on any detested bailout plan. Now they all will have to explain to voters how “we’ll all sink or swim together.”

Where Now Inflation?

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:39:00 GMT

THE FIRST INFLATION SURGE IN 25 YEARS IS OVER. So, what now?

First, let me give credit when credit is due. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed finally got one right. They’ve been promising us moderating inflation for a year or more and now with -30% lower crude oil prices and a big general commodity collapse we’re finally we’re seeing it happen. Or, at least, starting to (most things economic happen with a lag). And with the US dollar now surging, that’s going to reverse/diminish rising, problematic imported inflation as well. So now the deflationists out there, those who say deflation is our real problem facing us for some time – Gary Shilling, Robert Prechter, Ron Insana to name just three -- can really have their time in the sun.

Still, there remains some debate whether problematic rising inflation is going quiescent. Mac Courtenay of Seeking Alpha, I guess a boutique research firm, offers up seven reasons why inflation isn’t going away:

1. Inflation is already firmly entrenched. Schwartz View: I agree. I’ve been observing the Fed’s incessant jawboning that inflation expectations remain low is wrong and we all know that the government’s inflation data is terrible skewed to the downside from what inflation really is.

2. Inflation is already here. Schwartz View: The Producer Price Index (PPI) is up +9.8% over last year, and that’s only what the government grudgingly admits to.

3. Inflation is now moving its way through the “food chain” showing up in consumer prices as well. After some hope that because of global competition (globalization) producers would eat the higher inflation. Schwartz View: This rippling through is evidenced by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising too, again up the fastest in 17 years.

4. Average weekly earnings fell in July the largest since 1990. Schwartz View: I’d guess Mr. Courtenay’s point is that when earnings drop, we can’t buy as much. ???

5. More and more Federal Reserve governors are talking about raising interest rates next, not lowering them. Especially if we see energy prices stabilize above $100 and bounce. Schwartz View: Of course, these Fed officials, meeting again next Tuesday, can change their views.

6. Global (food?) consumption patterns are heading higher. Schwartz View: I don’t know if author Courtenay is talking about food, metals or just what. But I agree with him on food. As people get a little money, one of the first things they spend it on is more and better food. Thus global food consumption patterns should keep heading higher even if the global economy recesses.

7. The markets will take charge. If the Fed doesn’t raise rates, the marketplace will raise them. Schwartz View: Not sure about this reason he positing for inflation staying problematic. Right now the markets, the long US Treasury market, is still forecasting a slowdown by yields going lower and lower, which to me means more disinflation ahead, not rising inflation.

Schwartz View: He goes on to say part of oil’s recent comeuppance, coming down, is forced hedge fund liquidation because of Congressional pressure (I agree). And that it’s a great time to buy TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and the easiest way is to buy the symbol TIP. And to buy commodities on this correction, recommending also symbols DBC (a basket of commodities) and GDX (gold). Myself, while I believe this commodity pullback is indeed a correction, I think it’s too early to buy them back.

Schwartz BIG PICTURE Inflation View. My belief, garnered from studying stock market history and looking at thousands of charts over the last 20+ years, is that when any new trend begins, many times it begin with a surge in the new direction, then a pullback or at least a pause, sort of to regroup, consolidate gains, make believers out of disbelievers, open the eyes of others who are slow to see and just basically kill enough time to see if the new trend has legs. Then after this pullback correction, which more often than not can be large and long lasting, runs its course, the new trend reasserts itself.

Basically that’s where I see us today with rising inflation, in a pause to refresh. I’ve theorized over the last year than oil and other commodities would stay stronger, longer than most thought this year. I’d say that proved correct with oil going up all the way to about $147 and related sectors like natural gas, energy services, solar, wind and other alternative clean green leading the stock market for the whole first half of 2008. Similar to what happened during the first year of the last severe Papa Bear stock market back in 1973-1874 (oil stayed high the first year). But now, with commodities reversing downward and in major correction, it’s obvious change has occurred, that a pause to refresh is underway. And we can expect this new trend to last longer and correct deeper than many would think I’d venture. Sure, first because commodities are inherently extremely volatile, much more so than stocks and bonds. But also because of the emerging new, macroeconomic backdrop. We seem to be in line for a major, global economic slowdown which will throw a big detour on the road to a new long term trend to rising global inflation. If the global economy really goes blah for the next few years, commodities will take a longer than expected breather. Schwartz View: Still I’m in agreement with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan who predicted in his 2007 book The Age of Turbulence that we live in an inflationary world and that the disinflation trend dominating all during his tenure as Fed chief is coming to an end. And I’m in agreement also with famed, global investor Jim Rogers who says commodities normally correct 50% or more and that’s what we’re seeing now, a correction not the end, to this so far about 9-year commodity bull market.

Summer Rally Ahead?

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:44:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. Summer Rally Ahead Or Not?

Now is the time for all good men and women to watch the key stock market indices very closely!

We have a possible bottom in place (if it is a bottom I have to believe it’s a temporary one). Yep, after basically falling out of bed for two months, from mid-May to mid-July, the stock market stopped going down a week and a half ago now. We then rallied sharply based on an accumulation of propping up moves by all parts of the US government. Then yesterday, we had the normal fall back, after any sharp move up. Now things get interesting and critical. Do we fall back and successfully retest and firm up those July 15^th lows, setting the stage for further gains and a lasting late summer rally? Or lapse into a sideways trading range, the other normal way for bear markets to correct themselves? Or do we take out those lows and thus continue the stock market slump for, say, the rest of the summer? Last I heard, #1 market guru of the past Joe Granville says that’s what’s ahead, more declines for the rest of the year.

If we do lapse back into what I’ve predicted as a “rough and rocky summer” and thus suggested it’s time to get your vacations in, then thus those of you following my advice and reading this advisory from your summer beach place or mountain vacation, please just settle in for more swimming, golfing and fly fishing for trout. Or whatever you like to do in the summer time (“when the living is easy”). My son Brian, by the by, is certainly getting to know Iowa and the heat in the summer time as he’s stationed in Iowa as a field organizer preparing for the November general election. He emails me: “Meeting lots of Iowans. Rural is rural. There is definitely a different way of life here from the city. Lots of cultural mix, county fairs.” I say “Go Brian Go! Live the dream! Hey, wonder if you’ll come home to Boston with an Iowan girl on your arm; wouldn’t doubt it.

Schwartz View: Back to point, if we do hold above the July 15^th lows and then rise above Wednesday’s closing highs, say of Dow 11,632.40 and S&P 500 1282.19, I’d suggest trading this rally. We would then have in place a successful retest of the old lows, a lower low in place. And also a higher high and thus enough technical evidence to buy (for a summer rally anyway).

IBD 100 Weekly: Two Ways to Profit

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:22:00 GMT

IBD 100 VIEW. Usually I report to you the ‘new names’ in the weekly IBD 100 list of leading companies, those companies outperforming most other stocks in price and with good fundamentals and earnings and revenues. With the idea that there is a ‘first mover’ advantage in becoming cognizant of and familiar with these new companies before the crowd does, say before Cramer on MAD MONEY recommends them. A first mover’s advantage especially for those of you who will make the extra effort to go look them up and find out what’s driving them higher. Lot’s of time one can get on to the newest, latest fashion or hottest thing by doing some homework. I believe that extra effort can really prove illuminating and profitable. So, although I’m not recommending running out and buying a package of them in this bear market summer, below are this week and last week’s new names, some totally new and some rehashes, rejoining the IBD 100 list after being squeezed off it.

IBD 100 NEW NAMES (IBD dated Monday, July 21^st, 22008)

IBD Mkt Industry

Rank Symbol Name Price Cap Rank Business Line

18 EZPW EZCORP 16.78 694m 52 Pawn shops

43 CFX Colfax Corp 27.26 1120m 3 Diversified manufacturing; fluids, valves

63 ATVID Activison Blizzard 36.82 24,219m 57 Entertainment software (the old Activision)

68 SYUT Synutra Intl 30.57 1650m 164 Vitamins & nutrition – CHINA

79 MANT ManTech Intl 50.91 1774m 30 Enterprise software to US government

85 AIMC Altra Holdings 16.66 440m 3 Machinery; motion control products

93 BKE The Buckle 48.96 1500m 23 Retail; youth casual apparel

100 GIFI Gulf Island 43.16 614m 7 Oil field equipment

But today with the stock market mired in a bear market although maybe with it’s recent 2^nd steep leg down or decline just ended, let me add a second or different approach as well. That of capitalizing on IBD’s own offered up insights. IBD agrees we’re in a market correction but the weekend paper asks: “Which groups and stocks will emerge as the new leaders?” And then offers up a partial answer highlighting a few stocks to put on our watch list as possible new leaders and describes their current chart patterns; below:

IBD POSSIBLE NEW MARKET LEADERS

IBD Chart Review

5 MA MasterCard, Inc. 267.90 34,830m 52 Could be building right side of base

8 CF CF Industries 156.73 8835m 5 Four weeks into potential base -on-base

28 CLHB Clean Harbors 75.91 1771m 28 In 4^th week of possible flat base

42 CMED China Medical 46.04 1261m 70 Now shaping handle to Double Bottom

55 SDA Sadia 22.55 5134m 51 Quickly shaping right side of base

59 SXE Stanley Inc. 31.93 731m 59 Shaping handle to base started in January

Schwartz View: My plan, and what I’d recommend to you all, is to follow chart developments on the above possible new leadership candidates. This should give us a “2-fer.” First, some possible profits if these stocks do become market leaders as the first stocks up after any market decline usually perform very well. And second, some more study and thus understanding into how IBD analyzes bases. In that regard, I would recommend any & all books which William O’Neil, founder of IBD, has written or co-written. The market student can learn O’Neil’s CANSLIM strategy & much about chart reading too. And at this point, make sure you get his HOW TO MAKE MONEY SELLING STOCKS SHORT (2005) with Gil Morales.

Stock Market Strategy: 6:30 am EST, Thursday, July 17th, 2008

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:55:00 GMT

STRATEGY VIEW. This morning please let me warn a bit further about using inverse vehicles. Appropriate because yesterday’s big rally must have gotten everyone’s attention, longs and shorts alike, but especially those now using these shorting vehicles. And because I’ve been getting increased interest in my hedging strategy of offsetting my longs and this bear market with inverse mutual funds and short ETFs. I’ve been recommending starting small and going slow. Exactly because even during sustained and extended bear markets, as I believe this one will prove to be, a too aggressive investor can get taken and/or shaken by jumping into new territory. Hey, it only is fundamentally correct policy to proceed into new, unexplored territory v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y, right? I mean there’s sayings about such like: “Fools rush in where wise men never go.” And wagon trains sent out just a couple advance scouts to test out unexplored territory (I know from watching all those old cowboy and Indian movies). But I know we’re all impatient and want to resolve gray matters quickly, to get that monkey off our backs, especially so when it comes to investing, so we can get back to sleeping well at nights. But enough of those warnings … for the second.

My advice remains putting one foot slowly ahead of the other. Say if you have a $100,000 account. First, I would be keeping roughly half of it in cash or laddered short term US Treasury notes (for a little more income). Then with the other half I’d have roughly half long and half short, shifting with the tide.

· Longs. Say have the longs spread over the strongest acting market specific sectors, picking the strongest acting sector charts in technology, health care, and maybe chemicals or transports as a continuing cyclical play (likely boosted if oil keeps coming down). So try to play the strongest relative strength sectors you can find in an overall declining stock market.

· Shorts. Then on the short side I’d be short the S&P and or Dow, as both indexes have a diversified mix of industry sectors. Yesterday, for example, while the banks jumped sharply, utilities, energy and precious metals fell. So a diversified mix will benefit you if the whole stock market slumps as I continue to expect (although we could easily see somewhat of a sustained rally here on the hope that the government is going to fix things).

Go Slow! No matter what, (from first hand experience!), I would advise moving slow. Say today, tomorrow or soon take your first step. Again with that $100,000 portfolio, if you are 100% long, I’d lighten up into this rally, again doing so in steps in case this rally proves sustainable, trying to sell a little each step higher. And of the projected goal of putting the remaining 50% or $50,000 to work, $25,000 long, $25,000 short, I’d start off by going short with just 20% of the $25,000. Say buy an inverse fund or a short ETF with $5000 or 20% of the $25,000 you’re now long. Then watch the account’s value for a few trading days. If you’re still seeing your portfolio value fall more than you can stomach, go short another $5000, thus giving you a position of $10,000 short and $25,000 long. And so on, step by step. And, of course, only go short on or after up days. You need to sell most anytime midway through a big bear market, not waiting for rallies, but to go short you have to wait for rallies. You need to build yourself a profit buffer as you go otherwise big up days like yesterday will devastate you mentally and hurt too much financially. And cause you to abandon the whole scheme (scheme used in the best sense of the term).

Schwartz Summing Up. The goal again is to hedge your downside, not make a bundle going short!

Respect The Bear But Nibble On Energy Savers

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:52:00 GMT

MORE RECOMMENDATIONS ON MY NEW ENERGY SAVERS THEME

On Friday, June 13^th, I began a new investment theme, what I called the Energy Savings (Savers) Theme. Essentially a new theme is when some macro force is seen as boosting a whole group of companies, not just one hot company with a new product. And a macro force is one that isn’t going to dissipate quickly.

I began this theme by recommending five companies which should benefit from business in general looking for ways to save themselves energy, and thus money, listed below. Then on Wednesday, June 18^th, I followed up recommending another four stocks, also listed and updated price-wise below. Today, let me recommend two more companies which fall under this same energy savers category as well, also listed below. I first recommended stocks in established uptrends but that strategy is sketchy because when a bear market is on, most all stocks go down, it’s just a matter of time. Today chart patterns show one stock in a sideways trend which just dropped considerably, Altai Nano, and one stock in an uptrend on a sharp pullback, American Superconductor. Summarizing what’s in the table below, I’ve updated my two previous recommended groups and added the two new recommendations below that.

June 13^th, 2008 Recommendations

ENERGY SAVERS

Buy Current

Price Price Business Line

CPST Capstone Turbine Corp. $3.41 3.50 Low-emission turbines; hybrids

BCON Beacon Power $1.72 1.30 Flywheel-based power systems

WGOV Woodward Governor $37.78 35.64 Energy control systems

MXWL Maxwell Technologies $12.57 11.11 Power conversion/purification

CHP C&D Tech $8.40 8.74 Reserve power systems

Disclaimer! I own a small amount of CPST. And plan to buy small portions of the stocks above. Update: I now own a small amount of Beacon Power as well.

June 18th, 2008 Recommendations

ENERGY SAVERS

COMV Comverge Inc. $12.73 13.95 Peak electric demand reduction

ENOC EnerNOC, Inc. $15.65 20.74 Manages electricity consumption across networks

ITRI Itron, Inc. $94.75 88.60 Computerized electric, gas & water meter reading

BMI Badger Meter $50.04 52.50 Water meter measurement

Disclaimer! I own a tiny amount of COMV and may buy some of the others as well.

Schwartz Update: Comverge and EnerNOC both had big up days yesterday. In spite of the down stock market. They seem to being coming into fashion now, being discovered as the notoriously, tortoise-moving utility industry is starting to realize what they offer and employ their energy saving products.

Today’s New Recommendations

Price Mkt Cap

ALTI Altair Nanotech $1.80 152m Supplies a variety of nonmaterial & nanotechnology

AMSC American Superconductor $32.15 1258m Provides superconductor products

Disclaimer! I own a little of Altair and am watching America Superconductor to buy a small position.

Altair is testing their battery and energy storage products with AES Corp (a utility company). American Superconductor is testing chilled superconductor wires in the Holbrook Superconductor project on Long Island. AMSC is seeing much increased revenues; ALTI is still in the revenue start up phase. Please check both company’s business lines and satisfy yourselves before dipping your toe in the water.

Schwartz View: Since we’re deeply enmeshed into a big, bad bear stock market, proper strategy is not to jump into the above recommendations with your normal financial allotment or size. The best way I’ve found is to buy a small portion of stocks you like, figuring that they will probably go down for awhile with the general market. But buy a little since you don’t want to miss the boat departing! And buying a little gets you actively involved. Holding shares makes you more aware of daily or weekly price movements and keeps you interested in what news comes out about your investment and what news comes out about the industry. Again, today’s modern technology, a.k.a the Internet, allows you to list this stocks and prices you bought them and get a free dynamic update whenever you want it. And you can designate also having any related news reports for a stock or industry come right to you automatically as emails. It’s great!

Again, I would suggest buying a small amount of some of the above 11 recommendations, on weakness. Then keeping yourself informed as to their price progress or regression and the industry news with the plan to buyi more down the road.

Good investing!