Principles of the Stock Market : Recessions

Monday Weekly Strategy

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Patience: Outlast This Bear Market

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 1^st, 2008: Since Lucy’s birthday was a Round Number & fell on Thanksgiving, everyone surprised her & came back Friday for tea. At the Tea House in the village, a reconverted barn on a hill with a great view of the mountain, a view I hadn’t seen before. Almost everywhere in town has a mountain view which makes me feel like I live in Lake Placid, another charming mountain town. Love it!

PS. I caught a bug which I’m working through today but possibly no letter tomorrow if I feel worse.

THE BIG PICTURE

I spent Thanksgiving evening discussing the past, present and future with my son Brian. In essence he asked me for a simple explanation of what caused the stock market to drop so much, what terms like deregulation, re-regulation, privatization, etc. mean & what the big picture looks like. Here’s my answer:

Let’s start with the two classical economic theories of thought. One, let free markets operate on their own, the old Austrian school of economics as promulgated in the early and mid 1900s by Friedrich Hayek versus two, getting government involved in the economy as advocated during the same time period by John Maynard Keynes. Both gentlemen lived through both world wars, the Great Depression and for decades beyond and their influence ebbed and flowed. Both economic theories had their time to shine, alternating roughly 30 year periods. The last totally free market cycle began its ascendancy when President Ronald Regan was elected to office in 1980. Since then union’s power has declined dramatically, corporate statesmen who shared equitably corporate wealth have became obsolete and bottom line profit became the only goal which caused stock price to rule business actions. During this long run in a totally free market direction whereby prosperity grew larger and larger spreading out to millions worldwide, normal prudence, probity and recognition of investment risk ultimately got lost. Greed took over completely when Wall Street came up with its latest round of newfangled, supposedly sophisticated investments, especially those incorporating securitization. Securitization just meaning turning all types of debt into securities which could be sold while spinning off huge commission style profits to everyone involved in the process or food chain. This, along with the 30-year trend to more and more deregulation, allowed commercial banks into previously banned investment areas, using heretofore unheard of leverage which caused capitalism to finally go off the deep end. By this I mean a 20% correction in our overheated, overdone, overblown US residential housing boom led to a bust after one bank woke up one day last summer to huge paper losses which soon showed everyone else was stuck with similar losses. This blow off following by an implosion and meltdown are the types of culminating events which cause these 30-year cycles to start swinging in the other direction. I now believe we’re just started a new long term swing away from free market economics as advocated by Mr. Hayek and towards a government role in economics as advocated by Mr. Keynes.

Summing up, we’ve just gone through that part of the long cycle which allows capitalism to run unfettered and thus grows the pie for everyone. The downside is that the gap between the rich and poor grows ever larger when we practice laissez-faire capitalism, essentially letting the marketplace alone which leads to the strongest doing best. But cycles are cycles and all eventually go to extremes and then swing the other way. Again, as I see it, we’ve just gone to one extreme and are now just beginning to cycle the other way, down the path whereby government steps in and applies regulations to the latest, most egregious ways of gaming the system. Which interferes with the magic of letting the free marketplace find its own proper price levels between consumers and producer providers and thus drags down the overall efficiency of the market. The rationale is that something has to be done to avoid another rare but normal breakdown by capitalism. Net, net our free market capitalistic system normally goes from one extreme to another, that deregulation goes so far it causes problems, then re-regulation sets in. With privatization or the selling off of previously government run businesses or business sectors being one form or aspect of deregulation. Thus, the last year’s breakdown and implosion in our financial system didn’t really show free market capitalism doesn’t work anymore, it just shows we’ve come to the end of the normal continuing pendulum swing out to one extreme and are now starting the long journey back to a middle ground and then out to the other extreme.

THE ECONOMY

Not much to comment about on the economy today.. We’re in that middle time period of this bear market and at the start of an economic downturn. Thus I expect the economic data, corporate earning reports and most other news to be pretty consistently bad for some time to come yet. One rule we do know about how the stock market operates and how it relates to the economy is that stocks turn up a few months before the economy does (with exceptions). So finding a bear market bottom will incorporate more than just watching the data. Waiting for the economic data to turn positive will make most investors months late in reentering the stock market. Schwartz View: Thus, myself, I watch the charts and believe in what I’ve espoused for many years, that charts tell you when to buy and then the fundamentals confirm down the road.

THE STOCK MARKET

Mr. Stock Market keeps trying its best to rally now. Last week the economic data was just plain awful and stocks rallied anyway. I wrote previously that stocks refusing to go down on bad news would be a good clue that the market has gone down enough, at least for the moment. Still, some remaining problems are: (1) I don’t see a proper base to support a big rally, unless I’m getting tricked by the undercutting of that possible base built from October 10^th through November 19^th, (2) I don’t see any improved fundamentals and still expect lots more bad news to become known next year and (3) history shows after financial glitches and consumer confidence losses of this magnitude bear markets and recessions following lead to once-in-a-generation market declines which don’t get over in just one year, roughly the time period we’ve seen this bear market last for so far. Yes, big bad bear markets generally last at least a year and a half to two years to even three years. Also this bounce reminds me very much of numerous temporary previous V-bottoms and short lasting rallies we’ve seen over the last few months. But a rally is a rally is a rally. And we have to play them. Eventually one rally will morph into the next bull market. Thus the key is to always keep sight of the Big Picture. Today the big picture perspective shows we’re firmly entrenched in a big bad bear market. So, in general strategy should be to sell and sell short rallies instead of buying dips. But when rallies periodically begin, we should modestly go along with them,, go with the flow, one toe in the water. That way if any rally proves to have legs we’ll start profiting immediately and know about it right away. But not to jump in with both feet because primary bear markets, just like primary bull markets, do reassert themselves, and until proven differently, it’s a whole lot easier to profit swimming with any tide or trend than swimming into it. Schwartz View: I’m trying to find a technical reason, say a good looking chart pattern at least, to buy a particular sector, but so far no luck. The one bullish trend which I see today is in the US dollar. Strength began back in mid-July and thus when strength continued past the three month normal max time frame identifying a bear market rally, or past mid-October in this case, and kept on going, I termed the strength as a new bull market. Otherwise everything else looks like iffy trends.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Strategy remains one of outlasting this bear market. Of proving you have more patience than Mr. Bear Market does. This is a difficult job which will test your discipline again and again if the past is any guide (which I believe it is). Over time you’ll be tempted to buy back in again and again whether you see a believable bear market bottom or not. Especially if you’re one who really watch stocks, the whole Wall Street show, daily. So continue to do any irresistible buying and or investing in a much smaller, subdued manner. Keep just enough money in the stock market to keep you interested and not so much that future declines can put you out of the game and out of business. And stay tuned here to find the real bottom.

Have a good week!

1930s Parallels Keep Popping Up

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:49:00 GMT

REVIEWING THE 1930s. The Principle of Knowing History. Let me get down on paper a bit about President Hoover (1928 to 1932) and President Roosevelt and the 1930s after nearly finishing up THE FORGOTTEN MAN (2007) by Amity Shlaes. Again, let me recommend you get yourself a copy as today’s happenings keep looking more & more like a redux. I’m still thinking about taking this book to the beach over the Christmas holidays. It’s entertaining reading. One back cover reviewer compared Shlaes to Frederick Lewis Allen and his wonderful early 1900 histories (which I loved and heartily recommend; ‘Only Yesterday,’ ‘Since Yesterday,’ ‘The Big Change’). Shlaes’ history of the Great Depression starts after President Coolidge, a hands off US president gave way to President Hoover, of the same party, who turned out to be much more hands on. This flies in the face of the old belief that Hoover was hands off.

Late 1920s. President Hoover was elected in 1928 and for his first year the economy and stock market was copasetic. But after the October 1929 terrible market crash, it was up to Hoover to decide how to proceed. To understand Hoover, we can go back to when he was Commerce Secretary and wrote a book entitled American Individualism although the name wasn’t appropriate, according to Shlaes: “Hoover rejected the old brand of absolute individualism and distained laissez-faire economics as ‘theoretical and emotional’.” So, when the crisis hit, President Hoover went right to work. First, he made very clear he was for regulation. Hoover believed in government help and loved standards, efficiency and organization and had done much in the middle 1920s to install such across America. But now, upon President Hoover getting a confidential report from the Fed that the market “readjustment” was going to last, and after asking himself a question he later wrote down: “The primary question at once arose as to whether the President and the federal government should undertake to mitigate and to remedy the evils,” Hoover concluded, yes, action was needed. President Hoover from the crash until President Roosevelt took over in March 1933 pushed for “expanded public buildings programs, requested a national system of cooperation among the states on public works programs, proposed expansion of the merchant marine, regulation of the new inter-State electric power system, consolidation of the railroads, development of public health services and departmental reorganization.”

In general terms, Hoover: (1) intervened in business, starting by calling business leaders to Washington and told them to keep up business as usual and to keep wages up, not allowing any free market cleansing, (2) signed one of the largest tariff bills in US history, which caused less trade and thus further contraction and (3) publicly assailed the stock market. All moves which backfired because they also caused a loss of confidence. Retired President Coolidge, the hands off president, railed against Hoover’s moves, calling them “socialistic notions of government.” Right up until President Roosevelt replaced Hoover in early 1933, Hoover continued using the government to try to make things better. In June 1931, for example, Hoover announced a moratorium on German debt repayment. And then created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to help banks and homeowners. Finally Hoover signed a big tax increase, the Revenue Act of 1932, because of his fear an unbalanced budget would cause a run on the dollar. During the interregnum between Roosevelt’s election in November 1932 and his inauguration in March 1933, Hoover even wrote to Roosevelt trying to get him to sign off on special war powers to handle the emergency, and a bank holiday. Roosevelt said no, even though upon taking office, he followed many of Hoover’s beginnings.

March 1933. Upon entering office, President Roosevelt showed he would try anything. He knew people wanted action and that this was a rare opportunity for change. Plus he just enjoyed activity, of any sort. I can imagine how activity uplifted him, he wore these heavy metal leg things, for his polio. He was inaugurated in March 1933 when their was prevalent despair and unemployment had soared to about 17% Thus from March 1933 on he tried whatever struck his fancy. Plus he had a group of advisors called the “brain trusters.” Whatever they proposed, Roosevelt went with. The Hundred Days this period was called as President Roosevelt legislated galore. People hear that arts flourished during the Depression but now I know why. President Roosevelt (FDR) spent big money on them. He hired artists and had them paint murals--we have some in local post offices here near Roosevelt’s Hudson River home. He hired movie people and had propaganda firms made, burnishing the image of his actions, action which became known as the New Deal. Basically the New Deal was trying to help certain constituencies which Roosevelt chose. Essentially, the middle class or “everyman” or common man. And policies against the rich (even though Roosevelt was one of those). FDR started passing law after law seeing what worked. Lots of his laws were later thrown out, in the latter 1930s by the Supreme Court (which he then attacked by trying to “pack” the court, increasing the number of justices to decrease their vote importance). But the people knew Roosevelt was using government to help them for once. So he kept garnering support in spite of his arbitrary, sort of kingly behavior. Maybe because he was also able to charm his way through most any siutation.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. Out of time this morning, so let me just summarize. Both President Hoover and President Roosevelt put government to work to stimulate the economy after the 1929 stock market crash. We still debate today whether that was the right move or not. Today our US government is following a similar path after a similar crisis. But the law of unintended consequences may again come into play; government may end up making things worse and thus cause a lackluster economy to last and last instead of allowing the natural process of the free market to clean out the old and bad and bring in the new. Still, if you were US president, what would you do? Be an ideologue? Sit back and stay out of the way? Doubtful since you’d be viciously attacked by the media and others to do something. As very interested bystanders, all the individual investor can do is sit back and watch developments and place them in historic perspective. Then plan out strategy. As of now, please just stay hunkered down and out of harm’s way as much as possible.

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

Monday Weekly Overview Sample Letter

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, July 28^th, 2008: Your New Paltz, NY SUNFLOWER update: A few sunflowers have popped but I noticed the farmer’s market has alternated its plantings so any time you visit you should see some. Just spectacular!

THE BIG PICTURE

Looks like one potential US and global leader gets it. Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama, to shore up his lack of experience on the global stage, embarked on a global tour last week. And was again able to put his finger on the pulse of the world and his audience, exhibiting his knowledge of history and this particular critical point in time speaking at the historic Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. While he didn’t rock star the crowd, fine with me, it was good to see he continues his role as alienate no one, moderator showing again he understands all sides of issues and is committed to leading by example. While not denigrating any political party, say our Republicans, or country, say Old Europe. Thus there is hope that America will soon embark on a new direction, one of getting things done by bringing all parties together and then making logical and effective, not ideological, decisions, forgoing our previous path of fostering divisiveness in the world, between our two political parties and among the American people ourselves.

Schwartz View: Enough said. I always get negative feedback when treading in political waters. I do like presumptive Republican presidential nominee and American hero John McCain quite a lot but just feel we have to drastically change policies going forward, not follow a similar path. America needs to get it’s act together quickly as all long range forecasters have reached consensus, saying we’re on a downward slide, financially, politically, economically, socially. We just need to start cohesively tackling our problems.

THE ECONOMY

Numerous economists last week admitted that the US economy is weakening. Among them Brian Bethune of Global Insight, James O’Sullivan at UBS and Moody’s John Lonski. So, in spite of the US not posting two straight quarters of negative GDP growth, the old and easy definition of a recession, and one not used any longer by the National Bureau of Economic Research which calls and dates recessions but problematically many months late -- remember in today’s new globalized world we need to learn new economic relationships! -- it looks like a recession is here. And in my view is going to stay with us for quite some time. That’s because America has been moneying-over all near term problems for many, many years, thus postponing the always needed recessionary cleansing and efficientizing of the US economy, while we’ve also avoiding developing and implementing solutions to our long term ills, like our increasing oil dependency, our underfunded government pension plans, Social Security and former Fed head Alan Greenspan’s #1 concern, Medicare. America does have a bad habit of avoiding problems until they reach crisis state. Maybe that’s because our representative democracy has become so dysfunctional here in the US. I would suggest we start fixing things right there in Washington by first getting rid of lobbying which skews everything toward those with the money to get their voices heard. Even corporate America, who now realizes it’s entrapped by this self-perpetuating system, would like nothing better than to see lobbying go away as big business now has to carry and fund a large and increasingly onerous lobbying budget.

Schwartz View: All I’ve read recently has been about how there are so many inefficiencies corrupting our inherently great economic and social framework that it’s a wonder anything can get done. Such as the US having 600,000 lawyers while Japan has 15,000 (those figures were about 10 years back but obviously haven’t changed for the better). And all the broken marriages and unwed mothers costing America a fortune as well. It’s almost funny, after encouraging the rest of the world to move to free markets for decades, when the Soviet Union collapsed and showed the economic rot hidden there, the world finally started followed our recommendations. And economic success followed suit but that led to tremendous and widespread global competition, so it’s vital we get our own act together as soon as possible, to just keep up. Thus the silver lining to this current economic slowdown, a slowdown that isn’t responding to our normal response of throwing money at it, is that crisis is when change really does occur in America

THE STOCK MARKET

Stocks have again gotten ahead of themselves on the downside although not as much out of whack as at the first bottom back in mid-March. Figuring the Dow Industrials and S&P 500’s previous bull market tops were set back last October, after nine months of a bear market or at the recent July 15^th lows, we are down on average about 2.5% per month versus the historic average bear market monthly decline of 2%. So we could easily see a backing and filling trading range here and now or even a modest rally, the two normal ways bear markets correct themselves. Much government intervention has come together to force down the price of oil and thus commodities in general, prop up housing and consumer spending, keep the financial system from breaking down completely and holding interest rates way below the rate of inflation. So all this government stimulus has to go somewhere just as previous stimulus found places to bubble up. Plus new government props and controls historically have been able to put a temporary fix in place.

Still, over a period of time the stock market reflects the economy and things aren’t really getting any better there, despite Q2 GDP growth out this Thursday going to again be positive. In point of fact, the economy is continuing to get worse if one looks under the surface at signals like credit spreads, a rough definition being the difference in yield between US government bonds and non-US government guaranteed bonds, which remain wide. Or if we factor in historic trends which show that economic downturns tend to surface hidden problems which end up feeding on themselves. Today’s continuing wide credit spreads mean at some point MBIA & Ambac and Fannie & Freddie, the other 17 big financials which have also been taken off the allowed short selling list & all the other financials who’ve lost billions of dollars aren’t going to be able to hide things any longer and are going to have to really own up. So stocks remain iffy for now. And with the rug pulled out from under the remaining stock leadership in the stock market over the last two weeks, out from under energy, the energy complex and other commodities, any market rallies are going to be just technically based, say from an oversold position or short sellers being forced to cover. Sure, a rally may then feed on itself and last longer than bears think, but should ultimately roll over as data worsens.

Schwartz View: Technically then, we could be embarking on a summer rally and if so sharp traders with the courage to risk their monies in the propped up financials may be able to scalp the stock market. And other pockets of strength should or may show up (hopefully in the health sector as that is now my focus with my few longs) normally searched out and propelled along by momentum players.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

LONG TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY continues to be hunkering down until this big storm passes. I expect that to be longer than most government and Wall Street economists and market strategists believe or at least publicly state. Publicly state because we all know that bearish Wal Street analysts and economists ultimately get fired and that in the aftermath of the dot.com bubble bursting, we got some theretofore hidden insight into what analysts really think. I see widely-followed, economist Nouriel Roubini, formerly holding various high level economic advisory positions in government, believes the US and European economies are now sinking as last Friday he said Wall Street was in spin mode and that financial institutions are “… manipulating at will their earnings, and analysts [are] falling for this supreme baloney.”

NEAR TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY depends more on whether this two-week, fledgling rally proves it has legs or not. I’m using as a key gauge whether the Dow and S&P are able to close above their last Wednesday’s closing highs, Dow 11,632.40 and S&P 1282.19. If these key indices close higher, then we will have the definition of a new up trend in place, a series of higher lows and higher highs. Strategy then will be to favor the long side but with say with no more than 50% at most market exposure. Planning on a modest summer rally for a month or two, with strategy being trying to scalp some short term profits.

AS FOR INCOME INVESTORS, we’ve all gotten used to our income fixes after 25 years of income investing being easy during a bull market in bonds, meaning just riding the trend toward lower and lower long term rates, I know it’s a struggle for you all today. My best suggestion is to watch for weakness in income sectors, say in utilities, royalty trusts and even REITs, then strike. Only move in and in a small manner AFTER a sector has just been blasted. This gives you some profit buffer as primary extended downtrends many times have sharp sell offs after disillusioned investors finally give up hope and sell, right before they rally. This can get you in at unusually good prices, at least for the near and intermediate term.

INCOME IDEAS. Thus I would currently search through the utility sector as the Dow Utility Index has just fallen a sharp -8% over the last two weeks. Or take another look at my previous July 11^th, 2008 two energy income recommendation Cross Timber Royalty Trust (CRT) and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT), both haven tumbled hard with crude. Both go ex-dividend tomorrow, meaning today’s the last day to get in to collect the substantial August dividend (both pay monthly). Or finally, revisit my other income recommendation, back on July 10^th, 2008, of two large European pharmas, GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) paying moderate dividend yields of 4.4% and 5.8% respectively. You need to buy GSK today to be entitled to this quarter’s dividend and buy AZN soon before it goes ex-dividend (not declared yet but last year it went ex on August 8^th). Good income investing!

Have a great week!

Ho Hum, Another Bear Market Summer Day

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:08:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Witten Friday, June 20th, 2008: 6:30 a.m.

Looked to me like yesterday’s stock market rally was a knee-jerk reaction to China announcing it was going to raise oil prices by 17%. Crude dove on the news while stocks jumped. But if one thinks it through, is China raising oil prices really such good news? The bullish knee-jerk was that higher prices for gasoline in China will mean lower overall oil demand from China and that will reduce oil prices globally. As we’ve been hearing a lot lately that it’s government subsidized gas prices in China, India and many other developing countries that isn’t allowing crude demand destruction to occur and thus lower global crude prices. I mean Americans drove 30 billion fewer miles from November through April and that hasn’t lowered prices. The bullish train of thought continues that if the world gets lower oil prices, everything will improve. But, with further thought, if gasoline prices go up in China, won’t that cause demands from Chinese workers for higher wages? I mean the very last thing that the current communist Chinese leadership wants is any revolution from the Chinese people. Already, super big picture investor and Chinese advocate Jim Rogers says its inevitable that China’s government will go capitalistic over time, what with the Chinese people getting a taste of free markets for the last decade or so and realizing that free markets are the pathway to future wealth. Remember: “To be rich is glorious,” is the Chinese people’s new mantra. Hm? … and won’t higher Chinese wages mean higher Chinese export prices, thus higher import prices for us here in the US since we import tons and tons of stuff from China? And thus higher consumer goods prices intensifying the already ongoing and tightening squeeze on US consumers? We’ve had stagnant wages for many, many years with no light at the end of that tunnel and now we’re seeing higher prices for just about everything; food, fuel, health care, taxes, etc. Guess the still entrenched bulls figure lower crude will lead to lower gasoline, diesel, heating oil, and food too, eventually. And since the trend is the thing in the stock market, meaning the markets start discounting immediately upon seeing a new trend emerge, stocks rose yesterday. Still, is a gas hike in China really going to bring down global energy prices? I mean China already raised gas prices late last year and that didn’t bring prices lower. And we now live in a very globally competitive world as all countries and regions want to secure their energy and other needed mineral futures. And food futures too now after the recent global rice shortage has exposed the fallacy that it’s ok to depend on other countries for food staples. Anyway, the first thought was that lower oil is good for stocks and thus the stock market got stronger as the afternoon proceeded, led by lower energy beneficiaries such as the Dow Transports. But while I turned bullish on the Transports back in late March, after technically it broke three fan lines and formed a Head & Shoulders Bottom, I’m now bearish on the group after the two-month dead cat rally ended and the transports formed a bearish, rarely seen Broadening Top, an indication of loss of intelligent sponsorship and leadership. Thus I would certainly use yesterday’s nice bounce back in the trannies to get out if you haven’t already. And, for aggressive traders, if you can find a way to short the transports, I’d do so in a small way now. Schwartz View: Again, yesterday seems like just another bounce in a larger bear market environment, caused by entrenched bulls who refuse to admit the primary trend has now changed and is now pointed downward. The problem with this bullishness -- investors refusing to admit they are wrong, a terrible habit in the stock market! -- is that it indicates we’re still in the early stages of this bear market. Again, safely position yourselves and, unless you’re a trader, take the summer off. Of course, keep reading my letters. Why? Well, let’s see, to improve your knowledge base of how the stock market works and to make sure you don’t miss the opportunity to get back in. Bear markets do have endings. The last Mama Bear market, 2000-2002, ran for slightly less than two years with the most damage coming in the 2^nd year. The last Papa Bear market, in 1973-1974 ran for two years. And that very famous big bad Papa Bear market, which this one is looking more & more like, ran from 1929-1932, or just under three years. So all bad times do pass.

Once a Century Day of Reckoning Starting?

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:44:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Ok, here’s a Big Picture of where America and we Americans stand today. A fairly downbeat Big Picture so buckle your seatbelts. America has been on the verge of a major comeuppance for many, many years. But its been postponed and postponed. Because the US dollar is the world’s reserve currency we’ve been able to play by different rules than the rest of the world but now we’ve pushed that special benefit to the limit and beyond. But each time we’ve come close to going into a major economic recession, which almost by definition means a near term cleansing out and thus longer term strengthening of the economy, we get “bailed out,” so to speak, by the Federal Reserve or by our much deteriorated if not totally corrupted political system, i.e., by the sitting president and his staff or by Congress. Our economic problems which terribly need to be resolved, just get more and more money thrown at them (which just makes them worse and more deeply entrenched) say by President Bush’s multiple tax cuts upon taking office in 2000 or by the Fed dropping interest rates rapidly or through the floor or both. For example, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan numerous, back to back to back interest rate cuts in 2001 and 2002 and current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s dramatic rate cuts since September. So our economy has been artificially pumped up and stimulated by what I call, financial “steroids.” time and time again for many years now. But now this use of steroids just isn’t working. Now all the money the Fed is pumping into the system to mitigate the credit crunch and crisis is just causing a big bubble in gasoline (and heating fuel prices) in America which at $4.00+ a gallon is now being felt widely. I say $4.00 is the tipping point and things are going to get worse quickly now because of the four following examples over the past weekend. First, Lucy let her Honda get down to a quarter of a tank for the first time in a long time. She called the dollar cost to fill it up

“eye-opening” numerous times as we drove off and away. I could hear the wheels turning in her head. Second, a real estate owner told me he was feeling this recession with a massive increase in real estate taxes, etc. and that he never felt any previous economic downturns in his life. Knowing me I probably blurted out it was just beginning, but I hope not. Third, awhile after my Sunday early morning bird walk, while reading the paper and drinking my coffee I heard the morning manager of Stewart’s, the local all purpose convenience store, tell another customer, a bit desperately, she couldn’t afford to drive to work now. And lastly, when I called to wish my brother-in-law Happy Birthday, my sister, retired but who was a bank trust officer in Buffalo for many years, says she’s never seen anything like this looming downturn. All in all, I expect $4 gas or out of control oil prices in general, is what the stock market discounted roughly six months back, it’s normal advance foresight time frame, when it really collapsed back in January, it’s first leg down in this bear market.

Now, Price Inflation. This commodity inflation, this cost of living inflation or price inflation, is starting to work its way through the economy in food prices as well. Watching the free marketplace work, in effect dramatically weeding out, killing off cattle herds because it costs too much to feed the cattle, that’s going to reverberate into higher hamburger and steak prices down the road. Plus Chinese wage demands will now work their way into much US clothing prices as well during this cycle. And if the US dollar keeps dropping, as it will because the US balance sheet is in such terrible shape, all prices will rise even faster. I’d go so far as to say commodity guru Jim Rogers’ and Peter Schiff’s predictions of hyperinflation are becoming a distinct possibility. All this rising inflation as the economy sinks and US wages stagnate or go lower and jobs shrink. So it’s not a pretty picture. And it’s possibly worse than a normal recession because we’ve put off this day of reckoning for so, so long. For example, in Trader Vic Sperandeo’s two early 1990s books, Trader Vic – Methods of a Wall Street Trader and Trader Vic II – Principles of Professional Speculation, he predicted a day of reckoning right then or very soon. And related to us a little history of how the US government operates, trying to paper over our problems by lowering rates, cutting taxes and whatever else they can think up to throw more money at our problems. This works and works and works … until it doesn’t work anymore. So far no one really has been able to predict when the day of reckoning will arrive. In the late 1980s/early 1990s was a flash point for trouble but we muddled through. Then another flash point around the dot.com bust from 2000 to 2002. But lower taxes and lower interest rates got us through. But now, 2008 -- 10 is the next flash point. Who knows? This time may indeed by the real thing. It sure looks it. Why? Obviously because the extremely important financial sector, the very area which has been driving the stock market higher by soaking up all the Fed and other government liquidity and manipulating it to make things look better and better on paper, has now imploded and gone bust. As Peter Schiff writes in his 2007 book, Crash Proof and Robert Prechter Jr. wrote in his 2002 book Conquer The Crash manipulating financial paper/assets/capital around to make it seem like we’re getting wealthier is a lot different than when America did grow wealthy by actual manufacturing, producing things people need and thus were willing to pay for. In the 1950s and 1960s we were the manufacturing colossus we lived on some of our profit and saved the rest. That’s how you build wealth. This disparity is one of Mr. Schiff’s key theses. Also one of Mr. Prechter’s major theses as well, just illustrated differently. Mr. Prechter, a chartist, says the US economy performed its best in the 2^nd leg up of this long term business cycle, say from the 1950s through the 1970s which shows this 3^rd leg up is nearing a major top. Schwartz View: So it’s all coming together now, seemingly. All the wrong paths we’ve followed for years coming home to roost now. That’s my guesstimate anyway. So, is this latest market decline really the beginning of America’s day of reckoning whereby the rest of the world finally loses confidence in America, waking up to the deception of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, as Mr. Schiff describes it? Does the US dollar really head down as the world unloads our Treasury bonds, thus forcing up long term interest rates, which in turn ratchets up the already gigundo squeeze on America and us individual Americans and make the situation even worse? No one really knows for sure as Mr. Prechter reports these true economic disasters only occur about once a century! Like in the 1930s in the just departed 20^th century and once in the 19^th century as well. Why would this once in a century event be beginning now? As bad as things now look, maybe somehow we’ll get bailed out and the day of reckoning postponed once again. But since I began this stock market letter, 18 years ago in September 1990, I’ve watched things get worse and worse, not on the surface where we had a great stock market run in the 1990s, but under the surface, as democracy got pushed back and back, as labor unions lost power, as corporate statesmen became extinct, as much needed government regulation somehow morphed into a swear word and became despised, as liberalism or helping the unfortunate became obsolete behavior and as capitalism ran away unchecked, benefiting from fiscal and monetary stimulus over and over again whenever the economy lapsed into the normal down wave of a business cycle leaving us today with just a shell of the old wealth producing US economy. Yep, all looming economic crises and recessions have been pushed to the back burner by our dysfunctional political system which now listens only to corporations through their lobbying efforts. A system which even business if fed up with. Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid, pensions, health care, energy, the environment, a big wow! when I write them all down, all these long term vital issues have been avoided because of capitalism gone wild, because doing anything about them would “… hurt the economy and be bad for business … .” The same mantra Congress just used as its reason last week to kill a critical climate bill! Just awful action. Politicians should know there’s more to the economy than keeping the steroid sham going year after year, there’s more than keeping the business lobbyists happy near term and there’s more than their next election result. The US economy needs to be cleansed out from time to time and thus made fundamentally stronger for the longer term and more competitive in today’s new global economy. We still have the strongest, most fundamentally sound economic, financial and social system going from all I can tell. And the country has more than just our economy to worry about and strengthen for the longer run. We also need to re-strengthen our democracy once again after the loss of common man representation that’s taken place over the last 30 to 40 years. Actually, it’s no one’s fault, this push into Supercapitalism as Robert Reich terms it in his latest book of the same name, what has happened in America over the last few decades. But now it’s time to look at and push the flip side of the coin, to reawake democracy which is vital to American life as well. We need to regain representation for little towns and smaller groups, non-profits, etc., etc., all those groups who can’t get their sides of the story heard any more today as corporate lobbyists dominate. Again, I don’t blame anyone for what’s evolved. That’s capitalism, if left “unfettered” as even Republican presumptive presidential nominee Senator John McCain has described today’s economy, it will go to an extreme … as it now has. * For the record, one can get all five books I’ve just mentioned above from www.Amazon.com or elsewhere. And I recommend them all.

Don't Be Waylaid by Economic Spin!

Richard Schwartz — Wed, 28 May 2008 15:03:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Last Monday I presented the bull’s three pronged case, that: (1) the credit crisis is past it’s worst stages, (2) that we can skirt a recession or just experience a mild one and (3) that we have good value in stocks today. I offered the bull’s view up for balance, to see both sides to a story but I have to admit I don’t fully believe in it. Sure no one can predict the future therefore the bull’s argument may turn out to be correct but after trying to look at both sides fairly, I still wouldn’t doubt that the credit crisis lingers, that we do have an US recession which spreads out globally and that stocks thus really don’t offer good value here, not with the economy getting worse, not better, which is still my conclusion.

Thus today, for today’s Big Picture perspective, let me highlight a few key points made in Peter Schiff’s 2007 book, Crash Proof. First, Mr. Schiff (who gets lots of face time on CNBC anytime they want a bear on) says America is headed in the wrong direction morphing from an industrial economy over to a service economy. He says we need to continue to produce goods, one key way to produce wealth. Schwartz: Sort of a shocker to me as I haven’t read many economists taking this position. But it makes good common sense, right? Manufacturing is what got America this wealthy in the first place. Today’s service economy – flipping hamburgers, working in Macy’s, processing lawsuits, etc. – doesn’t seem like it’s producing any wealth. Second, Mr. Schiff has a big problem with measuring how much Americans spend as equal to economic growth. Schwartz: Again, common sense agrees with Mr. Schiff. Spending doesn’t produce wealth, just the opposite, it uses up what wealth we’ve built up. Third, people have to live within their means, why shouldn’t countries like America be bound by the same rules? Schwartz: As a country, we’ve gotten around balancing our budget because of the Bretton Woods Conference & agreement in 1944 which established the US dollar as the world’s exchange currency. But nothing lasts forever and the trend today is away from the dollar. Fourth, that the US government and our Federal Reserve has lost its way. The Fed was set up in 1913, after the Bank Panic of 1907, to provide an elastic money supply, expanding during economic expansions and shrinking during economic contractions. Schwartz: But somehow the money supply now just keeps expanding through good times and bad. Fifth, the US government keeps pumping up inflation by its constant increase in the money supply but keeps concealing inflation’s rise through the use of distorted economic data which they change whenever it serves their purposes. Schwartz: We all know that kicking out food and energy is a big ruse. That inflation today indeed is a lot higher than reported. Sixth, recessions are normal occurrences and serve an important purpose. Sure, economic fallbacks are no fun but they do clean out the imbalances built and fostered during previous economic expansions. Schwartz: Today, politicians go out of their way to attempt to avoid recessions. You know why, because of their own self interests.

Schwartz View: I’m only halfway through Mr. Schiff’s book but one key point I’m unearthing in chapter after chapter is his application of pure common sense when it comes to economics. Liars figure is an old saying and maybe what this generation of investors has lost is plain old common sense, sort of disguised by government figuring and refiguring in their data reporting. And of course, today we now have constant, 24-hour media coverage of financial markets which obviously is going to always highlight Pollyanna bulls like Larry Kudlow. Thus we have to fight through this constant bullish spin which can be incredibly tough to do. After spin after spin takes over any argument, eventually we’re all lost at sea about what the truth is. Mr. Schiff tries to cut through this maze by bringing common sense back to the equation. Thanks Peter! (You can get his book on www.Amazon.com. I recommend it.)