Principles of the Stock Market : Papa Bears

Watch One Particular Stock Market Guru!

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:36:00 GMT

AN HISTORIC GURU VIEW. Written Friday morning, August 14^th, 2009.

Being in and around the stock market for the last 35 years -- I can’t believe it’s been that long! -- I’ve seen market gurus burn hot and cold. In my early years I was in more of a daze, doing ancillary brokerage jobs rather than following the stock market closely, just trying to figure out the whole brokerage industry. What a stock broker did, etc. Did I want to be one? Would I be recommending my own stuff? And again not being in New York city, the epicenter of finance, I was on the outside looking in. Even today that’s ones largest hurdle. So anyone wanting into the business I’d advise going where the action is, New York or another financial center like London. If not New York or London are not for you, find a big firm, say a big mutual fund family and get to its headquarters, be it in Boston or Singapore, etc. Anyway, back to point.

Granville & More. I’ve seen Joe Granville burn hot (and drop his pants to show stock quotes on his boxers and walk on water on a hidden board) and turn ice cold in popularity and heard about Jim Dines. I used to follow that curly haired woman guru, yes, that image is bringing her name back, Elaine Garzarelli. For many years I read Richard Russell, one of the deans of newsletter writers and whom I modeled my own letter after, took sample letters to numerous letter writers including Ned Davis, Dan Sullivan, Harry Schultz, Norman Fosback, Lou Navellier, .Marty Zweig, Stan Weinstein and unearthed Ted Warren’s one book (one of my favorites) and read everything I could find. I like William O’Neal’s approach and regular readers know I use and recommend his paper and its IBD 100 list. Having an economics background I gravitated to Ed Hyman’s work and read a number of economist A. Gary Shilling’s books. And read John Naisbitt’s Megatrends series with his long range projections. I’ve read and studied all the Dow theorists from Dow to Hamilton to Rhea to E. George Schaefer to Russell. I continue to read many new guys too, Alexander Elder, “Trader Vic” Sperandeo and on and on. Etc., etc. etc. Many unknown letter writers too. I really could throw a ton of names around if I sat down and reviewed my stock market library and mine and other’s old market letters. So I’ve seen many gurus come and go and burn hot and cold. But one who I continue to admire and track is Bob Prechter of Elliott Wave fame who was the #1 guru way back when. He was a major market mover like Joe Granville. While he uses charts -- which Wall Street loves to disdain, I think that’s mainstream Wall Street spinning a veil and case on the public to justify their big bucks, they all surreptitiously use ‘em -- Mr. Prechter also is now ties market swings to societal mood changes (which makes good sense to me). And is in the process of attempting to add and formalize to current investment analysis the concept of tying stock market trends to mood shifts. “Go for it Bob!”

SCHWARTZ RECOMMENDATION: TRACK MR. PRECHTER GOING FORWARD!

Anyway, I have to strongly recommend keeping one eye peeled on what Mr. Prechter is advising right now. Especially now! I’ve related the histories of Granville and Dines going terribly wrong in this letter, getting stubbornly bearish right at major market bottoms, so I realize the danger now for Prechter in remaining so adamantly bearish but I can’t fault his analysis, what he’s saying and my 35 years in the business tells me to not pooh-pooh his foresight. After reading everyone I can and adding in own my market intuition formed over those 35 years in and around the stock market, I’d say he’s on track. So I’m with him and the other bears, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, Gary Shilling, the Comstock guys and others out there, still recommending extreme caution going forward. Remember us outsiders were bearish but correct at the July through October 2007 bull market peak while most of those bullish today were also bullish back then and missed that major top completely. Amazing! I mean even after the subprime disaster unfolding ahead became plain in August 2007 and on the head fake rally to new highs in October 2007 they remained Pollyannaishly [sic] blinded. (And no, for all you individual investor skeptics out there about Mr. Prechter’s work, and I know there’s a lot by reading the responses and comments now added at the end of most all Internet carried research, no I’m not a shill for Prechter. Never met, emailed or corresponded with him at all.)

So, yes, play this rally which will likely run longer than most bears think, but stay near the exit; somehow!

For a FREE sample of my daily, emailed stock market letter and advisory, email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

Weekly Monday Overview

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:17:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, April 6^th, 2009: It’s Master’s week so I’m pumped up. It’s golf’s 1^st major of the year, tradition packed, for you non-golfers. Should be great with Tiger back, Phil Mickelson saying he’s playing the best golf of his life, Paddy Harrington going for his 3^rd major in a row and lots of up & comers. All I can say is wow! Even just watching this old southern flower nursery turned into a golf course in the spring, lavished with money for decades, may be worth the watching for any non-golfers out there. For me, it’s just heaven.

THE KEY QUESTION

Instead of discussing The Big Picture today, let’s focus on The Key Question. Since that’s what I keep pondering. Plus it has to be on every investor’s mind as well. “Could this rally be the start of a new bull market?” To intelligently answer -- as during every bear market rally -- necessitates rehashing all the available evidence. I can make a solid case for a cyclical bull market having just started and I can make an even more solid case that this is just a normal bounce in a Papa Bear market. Consider:

MINI BULL MARKET HAS STARTED

·        The economic stimulus is now starting to kick in which will stabilize and bounce the economy.

·        The monetary stimulus, lower interest rates, is also now kicking in and housing sales are increasing.

·        Inventories have been drawn down and need to be restocked which will pump up GDP growth near term.

·        The US and other governments have done everything possible to mitigate this downturn.

·        We now have more coordinated and get along global leadership than in many years.

·        The US economy has proven itself wonderfully resilient to shocks in recent decades.

·        Markets can counter-swing at any time for long periods, posting mini bull markets, versus primary trends.

·        Almost two years has passed since the beginning of the credit implosion back in July 2007.

·        Many independent market gurus think the March 2009 lows will last for a good while, months or longer.

·        The latest government bailout plan has more enthusiasts and support for it than previous plans.

·        Oil stopped falling back in December and is now on the rise possibility indicating growth rebounding.

·        We have recently had a number of better economic data reports from both retail and housing.

JUST A BEAR MARKET BOUNCE

·        The bear market hasn’t lasted long enough to discount all the problems that have come to light.

·        More problems, coming as bearish ripple effects and because of long lag times, are due to show up.

·        The bear market hasn’t fallen deeply enough to factor in the sudden massive shock to the global economy.

·        There hasn’t been enough overall selling or liquidation for a solid bottom. Stock and mutual fund liquidation haven’t reached previous classic big bear market bottom levels.

·        No solid bottom appears on the charts. We need a climatic sell off or a long low volume erosion to bottom.

·        Interest rates have to go up at some point, soon – either with and because of an economic rebound or from panic selling -- which normally depresses stock prices because of this new competitiveness from bonds.

·        The American consumer has suddenly stopped spending. This has slowed down business all over the world and finally exposed the global imbalances problems. Too much manufacturing in China and Asia and too much spending coming from America. Now those imbalances are being forced to readjust. Takes time.

·        The stock market is ignoring soaring unemployment. Yes, employment is a lagging indicator but continuing jobless claims isn’t. A new report just out says that in coming weeks and months, hundreds of thousands of jobless Americans will exhaust their unemployment benefits. Finally, 600,000 new job losses each month is going to add to weaker consumer spending, problems for local communities and cause negative ripple effects.

SCHWARTZ CONCLUSION: In review, we started this big bad bear market back in the year 2000. That was the peak of the last big bull market and thus the beginning of this big bear market. This is evidenced by the benchmark S&P 500 Double Topping in March 2000 and October 2007 and then subsequently and decisively breaking below October 2002’s previous decade-long lows by over 10% in March 2009. Showing that since 2000 and the ending of the Internet boom we’ve really been living on lower interest rates and big tax cuts, a false, “pump me up,” house of cards. Really not any wealth building going on, just paper shuffling to make things look great fueled by easy money credit creation. But now reality has set in. Thus, looking around, we see we’re almost nine years into a bear market which has been interspersed with one bull market, running for five years. So stocks were down almost two & a half years, up five years, now down about another one & a half years, sort of repeating The Visit of the Three Bears. In that infamous and extended bear market run of nine years, netting a -50% loss, there were two cyclical bull markets sprinkled in and surrounded and book-ended by the three bears, Baby, Mama and Papa.

My conclusion remains that this bear market is not over. But that the form and shape of it may get tricky going forward. Because the market has a history of posting cyclical or short term or mini bull markets on the way down when the bear gets ahead of itself. Which is why the stock market remains so fascinating!

THE ECONOMY

Well, the BUZZ has died down about how the economy is slowing its prior quick rate of descent. Guess because we’ve started seeing more bad economic data pop up or because the conversation has moved on. But some investors have decided an end to the economic collapse is out there, just over the horizon, so they are shifting into cyclical stocks now as a result. One can see this money rotating out of defensive sectors such as medical care, consumer staples and even gold. You know the concept, buying in advance of a recession’s end since history shows stocks rise roughly six months before the economy turns up. But if we indeed are stuck with a very mild even “anemic” economic recovery, as many figure, then stocks could also soon level off to mirror that trend as well. That is if the economic and earnings data don’t start sinking fast once again showing the economy is still sinking. For example, last Friday it was reported that the ISM Non-Manufacturing Index which now measures almost 90% of America’s economy - America now being a service oriented economy instead of a manufacturing economy - fell faster in March than in February somewhat debunking the idea that the economy has stabilized. Schwartz View: Yes, there is the possibility that economy-wise we are going to V- back up because sharp moves, in whatever areas of endeavor, are generally followed by responding sharp moves back up. We’re seeing that now in the stock market but after this bounce is over, I agree with the camp forecasting an anemic slow economic recovery.

THE STOCK MARKET

The stock market extended its rally to four straight weeks last week. We did see the first crack in this rally a week ago when the market fell sharply for two days. But then we quickly rebounded to new rally highs. That’s normal, the first crack being overcome but it does show this rally may be starting to struggle. We are getting closer to my minimum upside targets of Dow 8303 and S&P 1627, closing Friday at Dow 8017 and S&P 1621. And one can note trading volume has been slowing some, another sign of sluggishness. Or maybe cautiousness. Makes sense as we’re now moving into another corporate earnings reporting season starting tomorrow, the 1^st quarter January-March 2009 report kicking off after the close with Alcoa (AA), traditionally the first of the 30 Dow stocks to report. With the fall-off-the-cliff economy occurring early in last year’s fourth quarter, it only stands to reason that investors have to be wary of forthcoming earnings and thus wary of this rally as well. Schwartz View: It looks like the stock market has some more strength left in it so with stocks already having rallied beyond the 50% retracement level from their latest leg down, the early January peak, the teeter-totter phenomenon comes into play. Getting halfway up means it’s very likely to go all the way back up. Thus we kick off this week at roughly another key Fibonacci 61.8% price in both the Dow and S&P 500. That’s about 8088 and 838 respectively. If we break through those levels, then the next target is those January highs, Dow 9088 & S&P 944. Not guaranteed but increasingly likely.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

2009 may indeed prove to be the year to trade. If stocks fluctuate but go nowhere net, up or down, for many months ahead then it’s going to prove very frustrating for investors. In these times and they do happen, more often than the uninformed investor may realize, the best way to make profits is to: (1) trade individual stocks and (2) discipline yourself to continuously fade the market, buying on dips and selling on strength. Toward that end I’ve started incorporating the Commodity Channel Index (CCI) technical indicator into my work. Comes on most charting services like Bloomberg. Basically it shows deviations from the moving average, when stocks get too far overbought or oversold. Naturally you buy when a stock or index gets oversold. For more on the CCI I suggest getting Oliver Perez’s Swing Trading Tactics DVD or Alexander Elder’s book TRADING FOR A LIVING. Over the last month of rally for instance certain stocks have far outperformed the averages. And numerous tradable asset classes or market sectors like the US dollar and oil have been both up and down offering trading profits but no net profits for buy & holders.

Otherwise than scalping profits what should we do? For now favor the long side and the cyclicals. I like technology, renewable energy and natural resources. Move up a notch in your market exposure to about 30% if you haven’t already but continue to hedge your bets and don’t get out on a limb by going too long. Just subdue your ego, don’t think you know more than Mr. Market does and just go with the flow, modestly. Bottom line take what the market gives you, right now there are some trading opportunities but don’t get carried away. There’s lots more trouble to come but the path ahead is likely to get more tricky as well. So don’t fall into the camp that says “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.”

Have a good week!

Go Tiger Go!

To Stimulate Or Not To Stimulate The US Economy

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:29:00 GMT

ANTI-Stimulus Protest Demonstrations; Say What?

That’s a big global fear surrounding this global economic slump. History shows economic debacles like this breed unrest, anger, frustration among those losing their jobs, etc. and thus protest demonstrations. If one watches www.worldfocus.com or any other news global news show, you’ll see violent protests happening globally. In Eastern Europe as one example. In China too and especially. China’s government’s big fear, knowing it’s own history, is protests which bring down the government there. Making the upturn in global protests there and elsewhere important for all investors to track.

Yesterday’s Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) newspaper had a front page article reporting that anti-stimulus demonstrations have occurred in 35 American cities. Yes, these are small demonstrations so far, 100 or 200 people and organized by interest groups, but maybe they will grow in size after IBD gave them face time, i.e. publicity -- I hadn’t even heard about these protests at all until yesterday -- and also gave them such a nationalistic and catchy name: “Nationwide Tea Parties.” I read where these events are being organized by those groups who sarcastically say we should: “Legalize Capitalism!” Or who believe: “The best government, governs least.” And those who sardonically and exaggeratedly say: “No to socialism!” And are epitomized by one protestor’s sign which read: “Your mortgage is not my problem!”

Obviously US government stimulus spending to try to keep this weakened economy from getting worse is anathema to those who believe in the strict Austrian school of economics. That economic school says things just get screwed up terribly whenever the government gets involved. And who knows, maybe doing nothing, to try to shorten this downturn, was indeed the right move. But as I see it it’s too late now; we’re already committed. I’ve given up opining on what were the right and wrong roads to follow but let me also report there are a lot of other angry people in America today, those that say they are tired of lavish retreats and concerts, tired of private jets, tried of companies paying out huge bonuses with or without government money. Regular readers know I’ve been angry and pounding the table for many years about these excesses. So maybe we do or will have class warfare, that is if these anti-stimulus demonstrations get larger and cause more of a divide among all kinds of angry Americans.

Schwartz View: But as I see it, we’re now committed to this “bail out” path, we got committed a year ago when we bailed out the first company, Bear Stearns or whoever came first. This far along this path I can’t foresee us stopping now. Plus it only makes common sense for any government to try to stimulate the economy when the two other major sources of normal demand, consumer spending and business investment, are in total hunker down mode. The even bigger picture, as I see things from up on the mountaintop looking down at the valley and what’s happening, is that these demonstrations by those who say your problem is not my problem, are the last desperate efforts by those who still believe in the “me first” path America has been on for roughly three decades now. As I see it, the results of the recent US presidential election announced that the majority of Americans want big change in America, a change which returns the America Dream to the average working person once again and returns us to a more level playing field. And that means, even though there is some opposition, that America has now crossed the Rubicon, so to speak. Meaning we’ve just begun a 10-year or so cycle which puts public interest over private interest. History shows we do swing back and forth from longer periods, or about 20 years, of letting capitalism run unchecked and America showing strong economic growth as a result to shorter periods of about 10 years or so where we put the unfortunate and forgotten Americans first, which yes, also means slower economic growth as a result. (Please read Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s THE CYCLES OF AMERICAN HISTORY if you’d like more on this repetitive cycle.) All signs that I can detect today tell me that America is going to level the playing field, get rid of the excesses, the corruption and scamming of the system, in general just the overall greed which always naturally arises from allowing capitalism unchecked to run for too darn long. Again, I’m just observing what I see happening not opining whether it’s right or not. As for investment implications, for now stay hunkered down, practice extreme patience and proper money management while out waiting this Papa Bear market.

To subscribe to my daily letter PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET or to receive a week’s worth of FREE letters, please email me at RichardStk@oaol.com.

Good trading, speculating and investing!

Trading Ideas In A Bear Market

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:45:00 GMT

SECTOR VIEW. Biotech, Small Caps, US Treasuries and the US Dollar. Let’s comment on a couple market sectors and asset classes today. First, two stock market sectors which may prove profitable. Ha, you scoff! Profitable? In a bear market? Before you laugh, at least read my reasoning.

1. BIOTECH. The biotech sector was having a nice run up last year leading the stock market before trouble hit. From July 7th to August 14^th, the NASDAQ Biotech Index of 136 stocks jumped +16.2% as not many sectors were participating while the market, looking back, was building a top just before the October panic. Of course when worries about financial concerns, etc. got too heavy, the market, and the biotech sector, fell sharply until the November 21^st bottom. Since then biotech has regained +16%. What I’m saying is I’m seeing more relative strength in biotech than elsewhere. Even on down or mixed days I’m seeing the medical industry and the biotech niche hold up better than most. For example, just look at yesterday. Even after the reversal upward, not everything worked its way into positive territory by the close. Banks and financials ended lower, computers were up only slightly, utilities and large caps were only modestly higher yet the aforementioned NASDAQ Biotech Index gained +2.32% on the day. Plus I noticed a health care fund manager saying two days back on CNBC saying biotech is the particular niche of health care to be in going forward. Based largely on the fact that large pharma needs to restock its pipeline and that generally means takeovers of smaller companies like promising biotech concerns. Schwartz View: The large pharma companies have financial staying power so it’s likely they can build a fuller new drug pipeline by buying up biotech companies. Net, net I would use biotech as a core position in your modest long exposure, the allocation of both depending on whether we hold down here near the trading range’s bottom or not. Disclaimer! I hope modest long biotech positions in the sector rotation portfolios I manage but can and do change positions without notice.

2. SMALL CAPS. Then I’ve also noted some relative strength in small caps recently as well. In fact when I cut back my market exposure, increased some to participate in the last month and a half of modest rally, earlier this week, a little late, darn, I decided to keep my small cap sector fund and dump my large cap one. Then yesterday I see Mark Hulbert, who tracks stock market newsletters like this one, report the January Effect is underway. That’s when small caps outperform near the end of the year and in the beginning of the following new year. Generally works best when there are a lot of losses to take at the end of any calendar year, you know brokers work the phones to get investors to book losses for tax purposes. Anyway, Mr. Hulbert posits that this relative stronger showing by small caps shows investors are starting to embrace more risk. I don’t know about that but let’s hope he’s right. Myself, I’m looking at this relative strength as small caps NOT being exposed, or as exposed, to and hurt by the now strengthening US dollar and also that many small and mid cap companies hold far less debt than most large caps. Schwartz View: Still, Hulbert says this return to small caps outperforming now means investors can go back to analyzing individual companies again rather than worrying about total systemic risk. That would be a step forward if there are actually some winners and winning groups around once more instead of a sinking ship taking everything down with it. Note the online, vocational schools for working adults, like Apollo (symbol APOL) which jumped some +7.8% yesterday as a bit of proof that something’s working normally again. Disclaimer! As in biotech above, I hold small positions in some small and mid cap sector funds but can and do change quickly.

Ok, after two actual buy ideas for you in this Papa Bear market, not bad, let’s discuss briefly two asset classes which in today’s modern investing world, the individual investor can easily participate in through ETFs (exchange traded funds) and sector and inverse sector funds. One is just an update, the other a buy..

· US TREASURIES. Long term Wall Street economist, but not of the mainstream ilk, Dr. A. Gary Shilling just announced that “The 27-year rally in US Treasury bonds is over.” Wow! I know Gary has been 1000% correct on long dated US Treasury paper for a long time, for many years now, especially over the last year as the global “flight to safety” trade pushed long government bond yields lower and lower and lower. Gary long ago predicted rates would go below 3% eventually and they sure have. The plunged below 3% recently until bottoming, at least for now, on December 18^th at 2.074% for the benchmark 10-year Treasury and at 2.546% on the 30-year “long” US Treasury bond. But I don’t see Gary predicting a move up in yields, not yet. Schwartz View: That’s the key question. When to short long US Treasuries? Deciding whether yields will V-upward or go into a long L formation, remaining down here around a 3% yield. Myself, I’ve predicted that this Papa Bear market will include a ratcheting upward of long Treasury yields somewhere in say the second or third years (hopefully we don’t have a 3^rd year to this bear market!) So I’m just watching now and not betting on higher yields, not quite yet. Not with the Fed & Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly saying that one next step for the Fed in getting credit flowing once again is for the Fed itself to become a buyer of government debt. Most feel he means shorter term US Treasuries, say up to 5 years in duration rather than longer term Treasuries but who knows for sure. So I wait and suggest patience, monitoring and waiting for just that right time to initiate a short ETF or inverse sector fund position inversing tracking long Treasuries. Jim Rogers, the renowned long term investor, is also licking his lips, getting ready to short US Treasuries as he’s stated more than once but I haven’t heard he pulled the trigger yet. Actually Rogers, like myself, previously shorted long Treasuries last year and then had to step in and cover at a small loss. Net, net for now we have to exhibit ultimate patience, desperately needed during any extended bear market like this one, and wait for our opportunity.

· THE US DOLLAR. The greenback has now been rallying since July 15^th so this long length of time, longer than the normal three month maximum time frame normally associated with intermediate term corrections up or down versus primary trends, likely means that a bull market in the buck is underway. But the jury is out right now on which way the primary direction if one just looks at the charts. The US dollar dropped sharply for three weeks in December and while it’s been working on regaining the large amount of ground lost then, it’s still not above its highs posted in late October. Schwartz View: My best gueestimate is that the buck does regain all lost ground and moves above its late November highs and continues on in a bull market. Again, “Mr. Correct,” Dr. Shilling, predicts the dollar will keep rallying this year. Why? Because he sees the stock market again dropping similar to last year, possibly losing another -35% or so. And thus the dollar is the best of a bad lot of global currencies, all trying to devalue to keep their economies moving, net, net meaning that there will remain a flight to safety in the dollar. Schwartz Recommendation: I don’t hold any long, or short, positions in the US dollar today but am considering putting one on as I see and agree with Gary’s logic and myself feel this big bad bear market isn’t going to be able to wind up in just one year. The breakdown being so severe needs time to heal. And if we do have another bad year in the stock market, the US dollar should hold up at least for the foreseeable future.

Monday Weekly Strategy

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Patience: Outlast This Bear Market

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 1^st, 2008: Since Lucy’s birthday was a Round Number & fell on Thanksgiving, everyone surprised her & came back Friday for tea. At the Tea House in the village, a reconverted barn on a hill with a great view of the mountain, a view I hadn’t seen before. Almost everywhere in town has a mountain view which makes me feel like I live in Lake Placid, another charming mountain town. Love it!

PS. I caught a bug which I’m working through today but possibly no letter tomorrow if I feel worse.

THE BIG PICTURE

I spent Thanksgiving evening discussing the past, present and future with my son Brian. In essence he asked me for a simple explanation of what caused the stock market to drop so much, what terms like deregulation, re-regulation, privatization, etc. mean & what the big picture looks like. Here’s my answer:

Let’s start with the two classical economic theories of thought. One, let free markets operate on their own, the old Austrian school of economics as promulgated in the early and mid 1900s by Friedrich Hayek versus two, getting government involved in the economy as advocated during the same time period by John Maynard Keynes. Both gentlemen lived through both world wars, the Great Depression and for decades beyond and their influence ebbed and flowed. Both economic theories had their time to shine, alternating roughly 30 year periods. The last totally free market cycle began its ascendancy when President Ronald Regan was elected to office in 1980. Since then union’s power has declined dramatically, corporate statesmen who shared equitably corporate wealth have became obsolete and bottom line profit became the only goal which caused stock price to rule business actions. During this long run in a totally free market direction whereby prosperity grew larger and larger spreading out to millions worldwide, normal prudence, probity and recognition of investment risk ultimately got lost. Greed took over completely when Wall Street came up with its latest round of newfangled, supposedly sophisticated investments, especially those incorporating securitization. Securitization just meaning turning all types of debt into securities which could be sold while spinning off huge commission style profits to everyone involved in the process or food chain. This, along with the 30-year trend to more and more deregulation, allowed commercial banks into previously banned investment areas, using heretofore unheard of leverage which caused capitalism to finally go off the deep end. By this I mean a 20% correction in our overheated, overdone, overblown US residential housing boom led to a bust after one bank woke up one day last summer to huge paper losses which soon showed everyone else was stuck with similar losses. This blow off following by an implosion and meltdown are the types of culminating events which cause these 30-year cycles to start swinging in the other direction. I now believe we’re just started a new long term swing away from free market economics as advocated by Mr. Hayek and towards a government role in economics as advocated by Mr. Keynes.

Summing up, we’ve just gone through that part of the long cycle which allows capitalism to run unfettered and thus grows the pie for everyone. The downside is that the gap between the rich and poor grows ever larger when we practice laissez-faire capitalism, essentially letting the marketplace alone which leads to the strongest doing best. But cycles are cycles and all eventually go to extremes and then swing the other way. Again, as I see it, we’ve just gone to one extreme and are now just beginning to cycle the other way, down the path whereby government steps in and applies regulations to the latest, most egregious ways of gaming the system. Which interferes with the magic of letting the free marketplace find its own proper price levels between consumers and producer providers and thus drags down the overall efficiency of the market. The rationale is that something has to be done to avoid another rare but normal breakdown by capitalism. Net, net our free market capitalistic system normally goes from one extreme to another, that deregulation goes so far it causes problems, then re-regulation sets in. With privatization or the selling off of previously government run businesses or business sectors being one form or aspect of deregulation. Thus, the last year’s breakdown and implosion in our financial system didn’t really show free market capitalism doesn’t work anymore, it just shows we’ve come to the end of the normal continuing pendulum swing out to one extreme and are now starting the long journey back to a middle ground and then out to the other extreme.

THE ECONOMY

Not much to comment about on the economy today.. We’re in that middle time period of this bear market and at the start of an economic downturn. Thus I expect the economic data, corporate earning reports and most other news to be pretty consistently bad for some time to come yet. One rule we do know about how the stock market operates and how it relates to the economy is that stocks turn up a few months before the economy does (with exceptions). So finding a bear market bottom will incorporate more than just watching the data. Waiting for the economic data to turn positive will make most investors months late in reentering the stock market. Schwartz View: Thus, myself, I watch the charts and believe in what I’ve espoused for many years, that charts tell you when to buy and then the fundamentals confirm down the road.

THE STOCK MARKET

Mr. Stock Market keeps trying its best to rally now. Last week the economic data was just plain awful and stocks rallied anyway. I wrote previously that stocks refusing to go down on bad news would be a good clue that the market has gone down enough, at least for the moment. Still, some remaining problems are: (1) I don’t see a proper base to support a big rally, unless I’m getting tricked by the undercutting of that possible base built from October 10^th through November 19^th, (2) I don’t see any improved fundamentals and still expect lots more bad news to become known next year and (3) history shows after financial glitches and consumer confidence losses of this magnitude bear markets and recessions following lead to once-in-a-generation market declines which don’t get over in just one year, roughly the time period we’ve seen this bear market last for so far. Yes, big bad bear markets generally last at least a year and a half to two years to even three years. Also this bounce reminds me very much of numerous temporary previous V-bottoms and short lasting rallies we’ve seen over the last few months. But a rally is a rally is a rally. And we have to play them. Eventually one rally will morph into the next bull market. Thus the key is to always keep sight of the Big Picture. Today the big picture perspective shows we’re firmly entrenched in a big bad bear market. So, in general strategy should be to sell and sell short rallies instead of buying dips. But when rallies periodically begin, we should modestly go along with them,, go with the flow, one toe in the water. That way if any rally proves to have legs we’ll start profiting immediately and know about it right away. But not to jump in with both feet because primary bear markets, just like primary bull markets, do reassert themselves, and until proven differently, it’s a whole lot easier to profit swimming with any tide or trend than swimming into it. Schwartz View: I’m trying to find a technical reason, say a good looking chart pattern at least, to buy a particular sector, but so far no luck. The one bullish trend which I see today is in the US dollar. Strength began back in mid-July and thus when strength continued past the three month normal max time frame identifying a bear market rally, or past mid-October in this case, and kept on going, I termed the strength as a new bull market. Otherwise everything else looks like iffy trends.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Strategy remains one of outlasting this bear market. Of proving you have more patience than Mr. Bear Market does. This is a difficult job which will test your discipline again and again if the past is any guide (which I believe it is). Over time you’ll be tempted to buy back in again and again whether you see a believable bear market bottom or not. Especially if you’re one who really watch stocks, the whole Wall Street show, daily. So continue to do any irresistible buying and or investing in a much smaller, subdued manner. Keep just enough money in the stock market to keep you interested and not so much that future declines can put you out of the game and out of business. And stay tuned here to find the real bottom.

Have a good week!

1930s Parallels Keep Popping Up

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:49:00 GMT

REVIEWING THE 1930s. The Principle of Knowing History. Let me get down on paper a bit about President Hoover (1928 to 1932) and President Roosevelt and the 1930s after nearly finishing up THE FORGOTTEN MAN (2007) by Amity Shlaes. Again, let me recommend you get yourself a copy as today’s happenings keep looking more & more like a redux. I’m still thinking about taking this book to the beach over the Christmas holidays. It’s entertaining reading. One back cover reviewer compared Shlaes to Frederick Lewis Allen and his wonderful early 1900 histories (which I loved and heartily recommend; ‘Only Yesterday,’ ‘Since Yesterday,’ ‘The Big Change’). Shlaes’ history of the Great Depression starts after President Coolidge, a hands off US president gave way to President Hoover, of the same party, who turned out to be much more hands on. This flies in the face of the old belief that Hoover was hands off.

Late 1920s. President Hoover was elected in 1928 and for his first year the economy and stock market was copasetic. But after the October 1929 terrible market crash, it was up to Hoover to decide how to proceed. To understand Hoover, we can go back to when he was Commerce Secretary and wrote a book entitled American Individualism although the name wasn’t appropriate, according to Shlaes: “Hoover rejected the old brand of absolute individualism and distained laissez-faire economics as ‘theoretical and emotional’.” So, when the crisis hit, President Hoover went right to work. First, he made very clear he was for regulation. Hoover believed in government help and loved standards, efficiency and organization and had done much in the middle 1920s to install such across America. But now, upon President Hoover getting a confidential report from the Fed that the market “readjustment” was going to last, and after asking himself a question he later wrote down: “The primary question at once arose as to whether the President and the federal government should undertake to mitigate and to remedy the evils,” Hoover concluded, yes, action was needed. President Hoover from the crash until President Roosevelt took over in March 1933 pushed for “expanded public buildings programs, requested a national system of cooperation among the states on public works programs, proposed expansion of the merchant marine, regulation of the new inter-State electric power system, consolidation of the railroads, development of public health services and departmental reorganization.”

In general terms, Hoover: (1) intervened in business, starting by calling business leaders to Washington and told them to keep up business as usual and to keep wages up, not allowing any free market cleansing, (2) signed one of the largest tariff bills in US history, which caused less trade and thus further contraction and (3) publicly assailed the stock market. All moves which backfired because they also caused a loss of confidence. Retired President Coolidge, the hands off president, railed against Hoover’s moves, calling them “socialistic notions of government.” Right up until President Roosevelt replaced Hoover in early 1933, Hoover continued using the government to try to make things better. In June 1931, for example, Hoover announced a moratorium on German debt repayment. And then created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to help banks and homeowners. Finally Hoover signed a big tax increase, the Revenue Act of 1932, because of his fear an unbalanced budget would cause a run on the dollar. During the interregnum between Roosevelt’s election in November 1932 and his inauguration in March 1933, Hoover even wrote to Roosevelt trying to get him to sign off on special war powers to handle the emergency, and a bank holiday. Roosevelt said no, even though upon taking office, he followed many of Hoover’s beginnings.

March 1933. Upon entering office, President Roosevelt showed he would try anything. He knew people wanted action and that this was a rare opportunity for change. Plus he just enjoyed activity, of any sort. I can imagine how activity uplifted him, he wore these heavy metal leg things, for his polio. He was inaugurated in March 1933 when their was prevalent despair and unemployment had soared to about 17% Thus from March 1933 on he tried whatever struck his fancy. Plus he had a group of advisors called the “brain trusters.” Whatever they proposed, Roosevelt went with. The Hundred Days this period was called as President Roosevelt legislated galore. People hear that arts flourished during the Depression but now I know why. President Roosevelt (FDR) spent big money on them. He hired artists and had them paint murals--we have some in local post offices here near Roosevelt’s Hudson River home. He hired movie people and had propaganda firms made, burnishing the image of his actions, action which became known as the New Deal. Basically the New Deal was trying to help certain constituencies which Roosevelt chose. Essentially, the middle class or “everyman” or common man. And policies against the rich (even though Roosevelt was one of those). FDR started passing law after law seeing what worked. Lots of his laws were later thrown out, in the latter 1930s by the Supreme Court (which he then attacked by trying to “pack” the court, increasing the number of justices to decrease their vote importance). But the people knew Roosevelt was using government to help them for once. So he kept garnering support in spite of his arbitrary, sort of kingly behavior. Maybe because he was also able to charm his way through most any siutation.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. Out of time this morning, so let me just summarize. Both President Hoover and President Roosevelt put government to work to stimulate the economy after the 1929 stock market crash. We still debate today whether that was the right move or not. Today our US government is following a similar path after a similar crisis. But the law of unintended consequences may again come into play; government may end up making things worse and thus cause a lackluster economy to last and last instead of allowing the natural process of the free market to clean out the old and bad and bring in the new. Still, if you were US president, what would you do? Be an ideologue? Sit back and stay out of the way? Doubtful since you’d be viciously attacked by the media and others to do something. As very interested bystanders, all the individual investor can do is sit back and watch developments and place them in historic perspective. Then plan out strategy. As of now, please just stay hunkered down and out of harm’s way as much as possible.

"No One Can Time The Stock Market"

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:18:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. The Principle of Technical Analysis. I don’t want to jinx myself but I can’t keep quiet. Not after hearing the usual Wall Street mantra again this morning. That is, that no one can time the stock market so it’s always best to ride out its ups and downs. I mean this type of misleading & confusing information is one big reason why I started this stock market letter back some 18 years ago. Part of my motivation, to quote myself, was to “unveil the mystery surrounding the stock market.” I saw numerous misstatements and unfounded general beliefs which I just thought were plain wrong being foisted on the investing public, not large institutional investors but aimed at individual investors. After working as a stockbroker/financial consultant for 15 years, I realized that Wall Street kept nurturing the stock market’s mystery. Why? For Wall Street’s best interest. Why pay a stockbroker or brokerage firm big bucks if individuals could understood for themselves the market? No, only if individuals felt (and kept feeling) overwhelmed by the market’s workings would there be a need for advisors and a way to charge big fees.

Anyway, I don’t want to get off track. I just want to comment on the one line of reasoning which we’ve all heard repeated so often that most now take it as fact. That is that no one can call the tops or bottoms of bull and bear markets. We hear it from about 50% of the mutual fund managers, market strategists and others every time they come on TV. Many begin with something like: “Since no one can call a bottom, …” Not only does this perpetuate the need for market advisors it also justifies the roller coaster performance of these money managers. Hey, it takes the pressure off them, right? As long as they are doing about as well or as poorly as the overall stock market, then they are doing their jobs well. At least that’s the thinking.

But then what about all the traders out there? Why did hedge funds start then? If no one can time the market what about this whole cadre of people trying to outperform the market? And what about those fabulously successful speculators we hear about? Some do time the market correctly is my answer.

Schwartz View: I’m sure many others did as well so I’m speaking just for myself now. After studying the stock market for 35 years, all facets from timing to investment themes and much, much more, I was able to correctly identify last year’s market collapse as the beginning of a bear market pretty early on. In spite of those who say no one can do such a thing. And I stepped up, following my own reasoning and got Lucy’s 401k or 403b or whatever it is into 100% cash. Right before we went away on our annual Christmas beach vacation last year. And thus kept her retirement account from falling about in half! With my managed accounts, I followed generally the same path, figuring my top priority was protecting our downsides because the market was turning bearish. Since then I’ve been able to keep mostly to the sidelines, watching this bear market unfold, gather steam and keep on rolling. This in spite of hearing the “Trillion Dollar Man,” BlackRock’s Bob Doll, incorrectly call a bottom in March, Mad Man Cramer call a bottom in July and other bullish, skin-in-the-game advisors come on CNBC and say they are buying, that a bottom is near or building a bottom is a process and you’d better get in now “…since no one can call the bottom.” Well, the bear market continues and we keep seeing further and deeper declines. My sense, as I’ve been writing for months now, is that this bear market will last for at least two years or until at least next October simply because what’s hit us is the worst mess since the Great Depression of the 1930s. So why wouldn’t this bear market last at least as long as the last Papa Bear market, the two year long drop in 1973-1974?

Bottom line, while I don’t expect to call the bear market bottom before it arrives or to the day (except in hindsight) I believe with the tools, skill sets and experience I’ve now got, after studying the market’s primary trend, history, psychology, value, technicals, etc. for decades, I should be able to identify the bottom reasonably well. Part of my overall game plan entails trading most possible rallies so when one does prove to be the real thing, I’m in with at least one foot near the start. Then, as I see prices rising, I should be able to get in more heavily. Bottom line, I believe anyone who’s willing to put in the time and effort should be able to quickly identity tops and bottoms in the stock market, totally counter to what we always hear. Oh, one last point. Be careful of the fear that these always 100% invested advisors love to leave you with (just like dentists do). That is the mantra that if you miss the first days of a new bull market, you’re in trouble. Sure the first days up are normally exciting and big. But bottoms generally are retested, providing the sharp-eyed observer more than one reentry point. And bull markets run for years not just for a couple of days. So don’t worry, be happy, if you’re now 50% or more in cash on the sidelines. Just stay tuned here. Because one way to indeed miss the bottom is to lose interest in stocks during a long bear market. Go ahead, lose interest if you’re 100% invested now because you’re already in a bind. But don’t lose interest if you’ve played out this hand fundamentally correct. If you’re saved yourself a bundle by already going against the Wall Street mantra of staying invested “because no one can time the market,” then stay in touch with stocks for your reentry point. One good and easy way to do so is by just reading this letter each day. It’s only a couple pages long, doesn’t take much time to read, you’ll learn something new most of the time AND you’ll be aware pretty quickly, & ready to profit, when this market turns up.

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

Re-Regulation Begins a Multi-Decade Road

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:39:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Today’s Big Picture view revolves around the probable coming re-regulation of the financial markets. History shows regulation of markets is similar to a grandfather’s clock pendulum swinging back and forth although not as regular. A brief look back to the start of the 20^th century, shows free markets and a first age of globalization, with the introduction of the telegraph and telephone, steamships and railways, at a peak. Millions even migrated without passports while trade flourished meaning free markets were in charge.

· Governments Take Charge. Then, in August 1914, with World War I, that age ended abruptly. WWI left people disillusioned and looking for something better and many turned to socialism and communism. The Russian Revolution in 1917 drew followers and essentially sought to end capitalism for good, making private property illegal. Socialists and other government controlled economic systems were winning the battle of ideas, governments were in charge, free markets were in retreat. In less than 30 years, one third of humanity, including Eastern Europe, China and the Soviet Union, would be living under socialism or communism. Capitalism looked to be doomed except for in America. The 1920s in America was still a boom time, Americans buying cars, buying illegal gin, buying stock. Radio was the Internet of the 1920s. It was a classic bubble. Finally the 1929 stock market crash started Americans on the way to despair, a complete economic collapse "with no ability to earn, repay, spend, consume." Everything spiraled downward while about half the banks in the US closed. America turned toward government for help and thus re-regulation with President Roosevelt’s numerous new government regulatory agencies. Around the globe, governments gained power … over free markets. In Italy, Spain and Germany fascism took charge. World War II then arrived and even afterwards people all around the globe still blamed capitalism for causing the depression. The whole world kept moving towards more regulated economies. England even went socialistic as Winston Churchill, the great war leader, was beaten by the socialists! Most of the world operated under this sort of government planning process for the next 30 years.

· Free Markets Regain Control. But in the 1970s free markets began a resurgence. Margaret Thatcher came to power in England with free market thoughts as did Ronald Regan here in the US. with his Reganomics. Both cut back on government regulations, giving markets more ascendancy and free markets again starting coming to the forefront. England started privatizing its economy while President Regan cut taxes and let free markets regain control as epitomized by breaking the air controllers strike. Thus capitalism got a free hand which lasted for aboutt 30 years, even through the dot.com boom and bust. But after last year’s incredible debacle with investment banks, money center banks, insurance companies, etc. losing billions after irresponsibly leveraging up their investments 20 or 30 times, it’s apparent to most everyone that, just like in the 1930s, we can’t afford to have any similar financial market collapse spawning from totally free markets to happen again any time soon.

Schwartz View: So after reviewing the history of the 20th century and seeing how over long periods, market regulation swings back and forth, I have to figure we’ve just started a long term swing back on the way to re-regulation. For more on this topic, I recommend you watch Commanding Heights, the Battle for the World Economy, by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw which was turned into a DVD and a PBS prouction, a wonderful esplanation of the battle for economic minds in the 20th century. Filled in some missing pieces for me and should for you all as well.

Strategy for a New Leg Down

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:18:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. Written Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

A New Bear Market Leg Down Likely Starting! Schwartz Strategy.

Right at the close yesterday, the Dow Industrials dropped sharply going from -400 points down to -500 points down, closing at 10,917.50, below its previous bear market July 15^th closing low of 10.962.50. The S&P 500 did the same, closing at 1192.70, below its previous bear market low of 1214.91 also set on July 15^th. Thus, after yesterday’s big down day, the Dow & S&P have both gotten back in sync to the downside with the Nasdaq Composite and S&P 400 Midcap, both of which closed below their previous bear market lows last Tuesday. The question is which way next. Is this breaking of support just a head fake, a false move, and stocks will ultimately hold around here? Meaning that these new, still modest new lows are just widening out the bottom end of the trading range we’ve been in since mid-July. Maybe if the Fed or government again rushes in on their white horses to save the day. OR is this the beginning of another leg lower in stock prices during this grizzly bear market? I suggest the latter.

Bear market corrections upward usually last from three weeks to three months and take the form of either a bounce, or if technically too weak to bounce, some sideways, killing-time price action. Earlier on in bear markets, upward corrections are likely to be just that, upward bounces, since many investors still don’t believe a primary downtrend has taken charge. Note our recent mid-March to mid-May, two-month bounce. But now, a few months later in this now widely-acknowledged bear market, when its more obvious that something is deeply wrong, we were only able to post a weak, one-month, July 15^th to August 15^th killing time sideways “upward” correction. Thus I make the odds high we’re now breaking lower.

Schwartz View: Yep, my guesstimate is that indeed we’re beginning another new leg down in stock prices. Just common sense alone tells us after the major convulsions and damage going on in the investment banking sector, the financial & economic backdrops are in worse shape than back in July. Thus lower stock prices should result as the market gropes for a new lower price level to make its next stand.

The next few days should tall the tale for sure about a new break lower or not, but if you agree with me, correct strategy is to again follow my Schwartz Rule: Move Early! That means moving today! Shorting something today. Whatever happens, up or down. Remember, when cutting back after any market index or individual stock tops out, the “first loss is normally the best and smallest loss.” Well, the same thing applies when buying or when selling short. The first early move is generally your best.

· WHY? So if you haven’t been able to follow through on my consistent, persistent advice to lower your market exposure since I first starting calling this decline a bear market last November, now’s another point in time to do so. I know, I know, many advisors on CNBC say it’s too late to sell now but I disagree. Please remember these are the same advisors who’ve been seeing bottoms each step downward and who have to always carry a bullish market bias. As I see it, the downside from here could be just as great as the -20%+ we’ve lost so far. I’ve been writing that for awhile now. And now a move to lower prices may be starting. Thus if you have previously cut way back, to 50% or less market exposure, I applaud you since I know it’s very hard to make the decision to sell anytime, especially after you’ve seen and felt your portfolio at higher valuations.

· WHEN? The other, second, fundamentally logical time to sell or sell short is in a day or two or three when the stock market bounces. Say if we go lower for the next few days, then bounce for a day or two. The closer to the July 15^th lows the better because old downside support, when broken, becomes new upside resistance.

· WHAT? As to what to short, that gets more sticky. Remember the marketplace itself, by money once more quickly flowing into US Treasuries, is lowering long term interest rates on its own. Thus rounding up the usual suspects, REITs, utilities and the other beaten up, battered down financials (which many still adamantly say bottomed out back on July 15^th) may not be the way to go. Lower interest rates should take some near term pressure off these interest-sensitive sectors. Better may be finding a way to short the real economy, namely those businesses that aren’t really financial in nature but that actually produce or manufacturer something tangible. That’s what I’m investigating today. To find some inverse sector funds and or ETFs which suit this purpose.

September 2008 Investment Strategy

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:27:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Tuesday, September 2^nd, 2008: Had lovely, blue sky, humidity down weather to wind up the summer and the long Labor Day weekend. Indeed, the weather is supposed to stay gorgeous the early part of this week here as well. But don’t mention the grand weather to Lucy since it’s back to school for her today!

THE BIG PICTURE

Last week I wrote about the necessity of staying positive during a downbeat economy and stock market. Staying upbeat right when there’s near term problems and long term concern that America is losing status in the pecking order of the new, globalized world we live in. Hey, America has long encouraged the rest of the globe to go capitalistic and got a massive, all-encompassing global push in that capitalistic direction after so much economic rot was discovered in the Soviet Union sphere after the Berlin Wall came down. Countries switched and let the marketplace work and, voila, the world started moving forward, growing and getting wealthier. So now, with so much new global competition around and thriving, America has to respond in kind by redoubling our efforts to efficientize, modernize and improve our own financial, economic, social, and especially our dysfunctional political system(s). In other words, take our fundamentally solid, well-working capitalistic system and adjust it to today’s new globalized marketplace. Make some fundamentally sound and foresighted long range decisions about energy, education, health, finance, politics, etc. and then exhibit sacrifice and discipline. Again, all while seeing the glass half full.

Schwartz View: That’s why I’m dismayed by hearing friends, including one back from Iraq duty, tell me it really doesn’t matter who gets elected as the next president of the United States. Their rationale? It doesn’t matter since nothing will change anyway. Maybe my generation and the one coming immediately after us is just too jaded. But, from longtime trafficking in the stock market, the one thing I’ve found we can bet on consistently is change. Change does happen. So, I’d say we have to have hope. We have to believe that our votes will prove meaningful. And the youth of America, not being so long disappointed and denied, frustrated and jaded like their elders, us, have responded to this upcoming presidential election. Grass roots efforts by thousands of inspired youth and the ready adoption of the Internet for fundraising from the masses is how Barack Obama overcame sure bet Hillary Clinton to get the Democrat’s nomination in the first place. So I say re: politics, energy use, etc., just like in the stock market, we need to keep upbeat that positive change is out there just over the horizon. So buck up. The realistic investor can forecast hard times ahead and yet get up each day, plaster a smile on his and her face and still believe that better times are out there, knowing that just like the daily cycle, it’s darkest right before dawn … arrives.

Schwartz Reading Recommendations: For those of you who are interested in Big Picture investing, by that I mean not the nuts and bolts of everyday stock trading, charting, etc. but, say financial planning, etc. I’d like to add former Fed chief Alan Greenspan’s tomb of the 20^th century, The Age of Turbulence, to my recommending reading list. It offers up a wonderful history of America growing wealthy, explains how decisions at the Fed are made and gives forward looking guidance to the world ahead. Also let me add the even newer book, THE POST-AMERICAN WORLD (2008) by Fareed Zakaria, which after I got over my provincial American bias, was wonderful in explaining the world’s likely scenario going forward. a world of shared power with extra kudos to author Zakaria in how he gets into the heads of the Chinese and Indians, explaining how they think, operate and their cultures. Interestingly, India with its long-established democracy, and Indians in their outlook on life, are extremely close to how Americans think. Again these books are for those of you interested in longer range financial planning and the like.

THE ECONOMY

Dell Computer’s report last Friday that the US technology spending slump has spread to Western Europe and some Asian countries just confirms all the other evidence showing up that today’s world, economically and financially is very closely intertwined, not decoupled as the Wall Street argument goes. Of course, this intertwined relationship and what that means isn’t that easy to define, it’s gray, not black or white. But for the near term, negative economic ripples sent streaming outward last year when the US subprime mortgage market imploded are now being sighted and felt in other parts of the globe. How severe these global ripples get, these so-called 3^rd-order effects, as economists like to term them, remains to be seen. Bulls say they will prove minor; bears like me say they will prove more severe; only time will provide the answers.

Still, right now, everywhere one looks negative ripples sent outward from the US tsunami in collateralized asset-backed investments are starting to show up. One major problematic ripple in the US and globally is the effect being felt by banks and their business. It isn’t, can’t be “:business as usual” any more. Banks’ fortunes – with huge paper losses and their opaque, illiquid, very leveraged and still deteriorating loans on the books – are now directly tied to US house prices. As house prices fall, the value of these locked in bank investments keep tumbling as well. Leading to write-offs. It’s all a negative domino effect. The lingering loss of confidence leads to a continuing reluctance to make loans, thus to lower stock prices and thus also to a growing need for banks and other financials to repair their balance sheets by raising more and more capital. Which in turn dilutes earnings and the vicious cycle continues.

Schwartz View: My ongoing view is that this widespread consumer, business and investor loss of confidence, combined with the first bout of problematic inflation and a weakening US and now global economy is not some short term event. That we’re now in a downward spiral that will take much time to bottom out and reverse. We’re, bottom line, in an economic event and economic changes just can’t move along anywhere near as fast as stock market participants would like them to. Thus, we see frustration by strategists, money managers and all the bulls out there to find and call a bear market bottom way too early. I believe investors have to exhibit extreme patience for the foreseeable future.

THE STOCK MARKET

Impatient investors keep fishing for a bottom, thus causing the periodic “flashy-splashy” big rallies we get, like last Thursday’s +2% move up. These big one and two day moves up are actually symptoms and signs of a stock market still on the way down, actually now firmly controlled by the grizzly bear, if you believe a recent report by Merrill Lynch after they studied all the ups and downs of the just completed full stock market cycle, starting with the bear market running from 2000 to 2002 and the following bull market running from 2002 to 2007. Big pops happen in bear markets but then get completely washed away over time. Certainly during these bear markets stocks can also cobble together rallies which last for weeks or even months at a time, such as two-month rally we put in from mid-March to mid-May this year. Or the rally we are now experiencing; so far six weeks long and still alive and kicking although very saw tooth in nature. Obviously, nothing ever goes in just one direction. That’s especially so in the stock market whereby prices normally shoot out to extremes, up or down, and then need to balance themselves off.

Right now that’s where I see us. Stocks balancing off upwards after a downward movement that dropped too far, too fast. Actually that’s normal in any extended, economically-catalyzed bear market, investors losing confidence periodically, then regaining their nerve, then losing it again. Again, deteriorating economic trend(s) causing some major decline in stock prices just can’t cycle through its phases anywhere near fast enough to please myopic, very rapidly moving stock market players. So we get quick moves down, then bounces up or sideways movements to get time & price back in sync. Then it repeats again.

Schwartz View: These bounces are when and where traders try to make their profits during multi-year bear markets. Most traders early on realize it’s a lot easier and more profitable in the long run to always stay bullish, thick or thin, bull or bear market. Thus the extreme bullishness shown by a very experienced NYSE floor trader when interviewed late last week by CNBC. His time frame is so much different than the rest of us, he can be very bullish right now, right in the midst of a firmly entrenched bear market.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Net, net this six-week rally may last for another month or even two but I wouldn’t get too attached to it. In fact today, let’s hope the market goes up a whole heck of a lot. I plan to book some profits. The first trading day after Labor Day is normally a seasonally strong day but then September can go south very fast and has proven to be the worst overall month of the year on average. Plus August was our first monthly advance in four months for many key indices so I’d like to take advantage of this normal “rally in a downtrend” and lighten up on some short term trading positions established back in July or early August. And suggest readers do the same, review everything else you now hold as well to see if any sectors are now timely to get out of. Again, to take advantage of this recent bear market rally. For example, please review the technology sector after Dell’s news last week warning it sees spreading, global tech weakness now.

Schwartz View: With big players coming back to work this week and with oil resuming its steep decline, we may extend this recent rally. Rallies can last upwards of three months in bear markets and since this one started on July 15^th, the best case scenario says it can run through October 15^th. Still, best I can deduce, all we’ve been doing this summer is killing time before the next round of bearish news hits. So I would continue to book trading profits as you go, sort of imitating the always in traders on the NYSE floor.

Have a grand week!

Understanding/Applying "Feedback Loops"

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:51:00 GMT

FEEDBACK LOOPS: A VICIOUS CYCLE. I’m slowly yellow-highlighting passages on every page of the little gem of a book I found at the annual New Paltz library sale: THE RETURN OF DEPRESSION ECONOMICS (1999) by Paul Krugman. For those of you who are students of economic history, ala my Principle of Economic & Stock Market History, I’d strongly recommend this book as the well-known author is insightful, a good writer and provides (and clarifies) some great economic history. One section, appropriate to mention today explains “feedback loops.” Briefly this is a circular process of how a loss of confidence, financial crises and falling currencies/rising interest rates/slumping economies all form a negative loop. And when they get started, how they feed on each other. Schwartz View: Today, we’ve experienced the first two. First, a major loss of confidence as shown by consumer confidence plunging here in America and in Europe too. Which fits into Robert Prechter’s view of how economic slumps get started. Second, we also obviously have massive, massive financial losses caused by a financial crisis, “the worst crisis since the Great Depression.” And third, we’re slowly morphing into slumping global economies (which are going to spread greatly if commodities prices continue downward). My big picture view is that the this current feedback loop or vicious circle will eventually lead to connecting the whole loop, we’ll see falling currencies, especially in the US dollar along with rising long term US interest rates. Bottom line is: Don’t get misled by the trees, go up on the mountain top & see what’s really happening.

Papa Bear Market Downside Target

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:16:00 GMT

THE STOCK MARKET

Hope camouflaging a water torture, drip-by-drip decline is one way of describing today’s stock market. The big problem with all the bottom calling a few months back by Bob Doll, BlackRock’s “Trillion Dollar Man”, by Mad Man Cramer last week and by Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) putting the “bull back in the box” last Tuesday and by the majority of Wall Street guests on CNBC is that they all continue to offer up hope to other investors who don’t really watch or track the stock market and economy closely. This continuous bullishness follows the historic pattern of investors not believing a bear market is even here and thus not noticing or ignoring the financial damage they’re occurring by listening to the experts, until somewhere near the bear market’s ultimate bottom. Finally, when they’re surrounding by negative news and can actually feel the economy turn really sour all around them, they take to not sleeping well at night, sweating profusely under the intensifying pressure and end up selling right at the bear market bottom along with everyone else. I’ve studied economic and stock market history and unfortunately I see that normal historical pattern playing out again today.

To make matters worse for the minority who are now waking up to what’s going on, we’re already morphed into getting only sideways stock market corrections upward, not rallies, which means to most investors that it’s too late to sell. As regular readers know I believe we’re still in line to lose as much or more than we’ve already lost so it’s really not too late to sell. It just takes some courageous decision making, terribly difficult today after investors have seen their double digit losses on their quarterly statements. But down the line sometime decision making time will rear it’s ugly head again. Selling then, at or near the bottom, will finally provide short term relief although long term regrets.

Schwartz View: In terms of a long term Papa Bear market downside target, in the S&P 500, the professional’s benchmark, logic says we should “retest,” or go as low, as the previous Mama Bear market bottom set back in October 2002 of about 770. From 1261 now, that’s about another 35% or more on top of the 20% we’ve lost so far.. That would take us to the bottom end of a multi-year trading range which already has two tops in place. About S&P 500 1550, the early 2000 peak to the grand bull market of the 1990s and the late 2007 peak of about 1575. And put us into a similar multi-year trading range to the one the stock market stalled out into lasting from 1966 to 1982 before it finally broke Dow 1000 to the upside. And confirm a number of theories floating around today. Big picture specialist Jim Rogers’ view that long term bull markets run for about 18 years, www.ComstockFunds view that the 1982 bull market really did top out in 2000, past top dog guru Robert Prechter’s Super Cycle technical peak and super global investor George Soros’s fundamentally-based belief that the 30-year credit expansion which was the engine driving the US economy, as we gave up our manufacturing domination, is indeed over. And most likely prove that Rogers’ recommendation of getting out of the US dollar was correct. Schwartz View: Near term we certainly could rally some, but I wouldn’t bet too much on such. Especially since my previous warning of a weak stock market period surrounding Northeast homeowners getting our winter oil heating bills has arrived. Friday we got the oil bill for our small townhouse. It was at a rate of $4.699 versus last year’s rate of $2.649, an increase of 77%. Meaning the cost of heating is going up from $1181 to $1907.

Potential Rally Remains on Tightrope

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:49:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. Written Friday, August 1st, 2008: 6:30 a.m. EST

With the S&P 500 closing just above it’s week ago Wednesday’s close this past Wednesday and the Nasdaq Composite following suit, we have a series of higher lows and higher highs in both, i.e., an uptrend in place. So I was hoping for some follow through by the Dow and other indices yesterday to confirm such. But no such luck. Turned out the market couldn’t overcome more depressing, recessionary-like economic data and even oil turning down didn’t help that much. Just wonder if Mr. Market has already reached the conclusion that lower oil won’t resolve all our problems. Nah, it’s hard to believe we’ve squeezed all the bullishness and resulting rally out of lower oil just yet. The crude price continuing to drop should continue to help stocks, just looked like a breather to me yesterday. Getting back to the technical view, and Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) putting the “Bull back in the Box” after a bullish “follow-through” day after Tuesday’s big up day on higher volume, IBD always recommends watching closely in the days immediately following. So I pulled out an dog-eared IBD publication because I remember well they have a good explanation of whether a follow-through day is succeeding or not. Yep, here it is, in William O’Neil and Gil Morales’ short 2005 book HOW TO MAKE MONEY SELLING STOCKS SHORT (get yourself a copy): “In a few instances, you may have a strong follow-through day and the market will still fail. When this occurs, it usually happens rather fast and can be figured out in a few days.” [Schwartz: This latest follow through day came very late, past the 4 to 10 day normal limit.] IBD follows with this: “If the market is making very little price progress on decreased volume, or if it abruptly begins to fail badly after a sharp, one-day rally, you are probably at another short selling point, as far as the general market averages are concerned.”

Schwartz View: I was prepared to push a little more money thru the windows yesterday – not too much! -- figuring a rally was started but didn’t when I remembered the first Friday of each month we get the JOBS report. Better to wait one more day. So let’s see what the 8:30 am data brings today (although I don’t trust the data, short term traders do trade it). FLASH! Data not too bad, if one trusts it. And while yesterday wasn’t any bearish “distribution day” because of the reduced trading volume, it still looks like we could get a market failure as IBD warns us to always watch closely for. And in spite of me possibly buying a bit more today, please remember, overall, I believe a recession is here & the market will have to factor that in & move lower over the next year or so.