Principles of the Stock Market : History

The Great Recession Unfolds This Way

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:16:00 GMT

SCHWARTZ RECESSION CONCLUSION. Tuesday, July 28^th, 2009.

Ok, after much consideration, here’s my conclusion as to what unfolds going forward. The economy struggles through but survives the next few years. About 20% of Americans have a very, very difficult time out of work and out of hope but the other 80% make out all right. Similar to the 1930s when those with a job managed. Today the US economy is so deep and varied, meaning there is so much diversification, that there will be areas of growth and even prosperity along with much despair. The stock market, in its infinite wisdom and with its amazing discounting faculty, based on the government having prevented an all out total collapse, sees this and settles down. And this mini bull market lasts and lasts confounding the adamant bears. But somewhere along the line we get a recession within this Great Recession, just like hit America in the 1930s when we got a “depression within the depression” after a five year hiatus and stock market run up, which hit in 1937-1938 when the market crashed big time. This time it will be a recession within a recession because of all the safety nets put in place after and as a result of the Great Depression of the 1930s. What will cause this second down turn will be the other 80% of Americans retrenching. I mean the 80% of Americans who are monitoring today’s troubles but not being directly affected by today’s high and rising unemployment are continuing their current lifestyles, meaning continuing their current over spending habits without (m)any changes today. I see this going on all around me. People still working aren’t cutting back much, it’s only those rich and not so rich alike who have been struck head-on by today’s sudden economic downturn, who have been FORCED to cut back. The other 80% while being a bit more cautious are continuing their too abundant lifestyles. Myself I’m not exactly sure what will cause this second and more all-encompassing retrenchment but I believe it does lie ahead. Likely some “Black Swan” event, some unpredictable sudden shock. But the domino, rippling outward series of cutbacks now working their way through America will be partially to blame, having weakened the foundation. I must say driving through the village of New Paltz, NY this morning, probably the most vivacious and bustling town in the Catskills or mid-Hudson River valley region partially buoyed by its SUNY college, I saw more 'For Sale' and 'For Rent' and 'For Lease' signs than ever before in my ten year history living here. Ironically it’s the old paradox of thrift which may get us over time. Meaning savings is good for the individual but bad for the overall economy. For more, agree or disagree, email me at RichardStk@aol.com for a sample of my daily "learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service."

Big Names Predict Problematic Inflation: What's An Investor To Do?

Richard Schwartz — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:48:00 GMT

ECONOMIC VIEW. Rising Inflation Expected. So predicts a whole slew of big names, everyone seems to be jumping on board this train in the last few days. Now Warren Buffett and Bill Gross have joined Marc Faber and Jim Rogers and more in predicting problematic inflation just out there over the horizon. Yep, as soon as deflation became the consensus buzz word – recessions kill inflation is what I’ve heard repeated from many sources – we’re getting a groundswell of opposite opinion. Well, not quite opposite but close enough, let me explain. Everyone agrees this slump will preclude problematic inflation but all say that’s a temporary phenomenon. No one predicting rising inflation will go so far as to say just WHEN rising inflation is going to emerge but more and more observers are saying it’s definitely coming, arriving when this economic slump is over, whenever that is. Again, rising inflation, no, out of control inflation, no, to put it more accurately, hyperinflation is my biggest worry. That America printing money galore – yes, for bailing out businesses too important to the financial system to allow them to fail, and, yes, for keeping the economy greased and running, and, yes, for stimulating new growth and maintaining existing economic activity, and, yes, for overall deficit spending in this economic downturn – will come back to bite us in a big way. I can handle some inflation, I know how to shop for bargains which will help in food and clothing needs, what I’m worried about is a major currency devaluation which wipes out mine and America’s buffer. America’s savings becoming worthless as has happened time and again across the globe when some country’s finances just go kafluey. When a country can’t pay its bills compounded by a wholesale lack of trust in its currency. Schwartz View: Hasn’t happened in the US yet, but …

So I get more nervous when I hear Warren Buffett, America’s richest man and known as the best value investor of our time, say inflation could go as high as it was in the 1970s, that’s almost double digits! I get even more nervous when Bill Gross, who manages one of the largest bond funds going, says that US government efforts to break this recession will cause “costs for goods and services” to rise. I respect both these guys and their opinions. Now they join long term forecaster Jim Rogers, who is also more worried about rising inflation than deflation, best I can figure. He’s long been predicting an US dollar crisis and really bad inflation ahead and says he’s just waiting for the proper moment to essentially “short US Treasury bonds.” Rogers sees commodity inflation returning with a vengeance since today’s global economic slump in his view is just improving the fundamentals underpinning commodity prices. In other words today’s credit crunch and resulting recession causing miners to delay or even shut down exploration and thus leading to a further drop in supply. He loves to mention that global food inventories are already down to 50 year lows. Finally, Marc Faber, the well regarded international investor and past BARRON’S Roundtable panelist, sees rising inflation from another angle. He figures that the US government is going to have all kinds of problems in raising interest rates down the road or in effect withdrawing all the money it’s pushing into the system now to try to end today’s credit crisis. Schwartz View: This rising inflation camp is growing now, with many others predicting a forthcoming inflation problem as well. I am too.

Schwartz Recommendation. If you also worry about rising inflation, one strategy available today is to buy an inverse ETF or inverse sector fund. One that goes up when long term US interest rates go higher. That’s the natural reaction if inflation rises, yields generally rise forcing bond prices down. For example ProFunds has two such funds, RTPIX and RRPIX while Rydex offers up RYJUX and in the ETF camp there’s TBT which “correspond to twice the inverse” of the US Treasury bond. I recommend such.

Disclaimer! I don’t own any of the above now but can and do change positions without notice.

For a FREE week’s sampling of my complete daily e-letter, please email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

To Stimulate Or Not To Stimulate The US Economy

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:29:00 GMT

ANTI-Stimulus Protest Demonstrations; Say What?

That’s a big global fear surrounding this global economic slump. History shows economic debacles like this breed unrest, anger, frustration among those losing their jobs, etc. and thus protest demonstrations. If one watches www.worldfocus.com or any other news global news show, you’ll see violent protests happening globally. In Eastern Europe as one example. In China too and especially. China’s government’s big fear, knowing it’s own history, is protests which bring down the government there. Making the upturn in global protests there and elsewhere important for all investors to track.

Yesterday’s Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) newspaper had a front page article reporting that anti-stimulus demonstrations have occurred in 35 American cities. Yes, these are small demonstrations so far, 100 or 200 people and organized by interest groups, but maybe they will grow in size after IBD gave them face time, i.e. publicity -- I hadn’t even heard about these protests at all until yesterday -- and also gave them such a nationalistic and catchy name: “Nationwide Tea Parties.” I read where these events are being organized by those groups who sarcastically say we should: “Legalize Capitalism!” Or who believe: “The best government, governs least.” And those who sardonically and exaggeratedly say: “No to socialism!” And are epitomized by one protestor’s sign which read: “Your mortgage is not my problem!”

Obviously US government stimulus spending to try to keep this weakened economy from getting worse is anathema to those who believe in the strict Austrian school of economics. That economic school says things just get screwed up terribly whenever the government gets involved. And who knows, maybe doing nothing, to try to shorten this downturn, was indeed the right move. But as I see it it’s too late now; we’re already committed. I’ve given up opining on what were the right and wrong roads to follow but let me also report there are a lot of other angry people in America today, those that say they are tired of lavish retreats and concerts, tired of private jets, tried of companies paying out huge bonuses with or without government money. Regular readers know I’ve been angry and pounding the table for many years about these excesses. So maybe we do or will have class warfare, that is if these anti-stimulus demonstrations get larger and cause more of a divide among all kinds of angry Americans.

Schwartz View: But as I see it, we’re now committed to this “bail out” path, we got committed a year ago when we bailed out the first company, Bear Stearns or whoever came first. This far along this path I can’t foresee us stopping now. Plus it only makes common sense for any government to try to stimulate the economy when the two other major sources of normal demand, consumer spending and business investment, are in total hunker down mode. The even bigger picture, as I see things from up on the mountaintop looking down at the valley and what’s happening, is that these demonstrations by those who say your problem is not my problem, are the last desperate efforts by those who still believe in the “me first” path America has been on for roughly three decades now. As I see it, the results of the recent US presidential election announced that the majority of Americans want big change in America, a change which returns the America Dream to the average working person once again and returns us to a more level playing field. And that means, even though there is some opposition, that America has now crossed the Rubicon, so to speak. Meaning we’ve just begun a 10-year or so cycle which puts public interest over private interest. History shows we do swing back and forth from longer periods, or about 20 years, of letting capitalism run unchecked and America showing strong economic growth as a result to shorter periods of about 10 years or so where we put the unfortunate and forgotten Americans first, which yes, also means slower economic growth as a result. (Please read Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s THE CYCLES OF AMERICAN HISTORY if you’d like more on this repetitive cycle.) All signs that I can detect today tell me that America is going to level the playing field, get rid of the excesses, the corruption and scamming of the system, in general just the overall greed which always naturally arises from allowing capitalism unchecked to run for too darn long. Again, I’m just observing what I see happening not opining whether it’s right or not. As for investment implications, for now stay hunkered down, practice extreme patience and proper money management while out waiting this Papa Bear market.

To subscribe to my daily letter PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET or to receive a week’s worth of FREE letters, please email me at RichardStk@oaol.com.

Good trading, speculating and investing!

Monday Weekly Strategy

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

1930s Parallels Keep Popping Up

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:49:00 GMT

REVIEWING THE 1930s. The Principle of Knowing History. Let me get down on paper a bit about President Hoover (1928 to 1932) and President Roosevelt and the 1930s after nearly finishing up THE FORGOTTEN MAN (2007) by Amity Shlaes. Again, let me recommend you get yourself a copy as today’s happenings keep looking more & more like a redux. I’m still thinking about taking this book to the beach over the Christmas holidays. It’s entertaining reading. One back cover reviewer compared Shlaes to Frederick Lewis Allen and his wonderful early 1900 histories (which I loved and heartily recommend; ‘Only Yesterday,’ ‘Since Yesterday,’ ‘The Big Change’). Shlaes’ history of the Great Depression starts after President Coolidge, a hands off US president gave way to President Hoover, of the same party, who turned out to be much more hands on. This flies in the face of the old belief that Hoover was hands off.

Late 1920s. President Hoover was elected in 1928 and for his first year the economy and stock market was copasetic. But after the October 1929 terrible market crash, it was up to Hoover to decide how to proceed. To understand Hoover, we can go back to when he was Commerce Secretary and wrote a book entitled American Individualism although the name wasn’t appropriate, according to Shlaes: “Hoover rejected the old brand of absolute individualism and distained laissez-faire economics as ‘theoretical and emotional’.” So, when the crisis hit, President Hoover went right to work. First, he made very clear he was for regulation. Hoover believed in government help and loved standards, efficiency and organization and had done much in the middle 1920s to install such across America. But now, upon President Hoover getting a confidential report from the Fed that the market “readjustment” was going to last, and after asking himself a question he later wrote down: “The primary question at once arose as to whether the President and the federal government should undertake to mitigate and to remedy the evils,” Hoover concluded, yes, action was needed. President Hoover from the crash until President Roosevelt took over in March 1933 pushed for “expanded public buildings programs, requested a national system of cooperation among the states on public works programs, proposed expansion of the merchant marine, regulation of the new inter-State electric power system, consolidation of the railroads, development of public health services and departmental reorganization.”

In general terms, Hoover: (1) intervened in business, starting by calling business leaders to Washington and told them to keep up business as usual and to keep wages up, not allowing any free market cleansing, (2) signed one of the largest tariff bills in US history, which caused less trade and thus further contraction and (3) publicly assailed the stock market. All moves which backfired because they also caused a loss of confidence. Retired President Coolidge, the hands off president, railed against Hoover’s moves, calling them “socialistic notions of government.” Right up until President Roosevelt replaced Hoover in early 1933, Hoover continued using the government to try to make things better. In June 1931, for example, Hoover announced a moratorium on German debt repayment. And then created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to help banks and homeowners. Finally Hoover signed a big tax increase, the Revenue Act of 1932, because of his fear an unbalanced budget would cause a run on the dollar. During the interregnum between Roosevelt’s election in November 1932 and his inauguration in March 1933, Hoover even wrote to Roosevelt trying to get him to sign off on special war powers to handle the emergency, and a bank holiday. Roosevelt said no, even though upon taking office, he followed many of Hoover’s beginnings.

March 1933. Upon entering office, President Roosevelt showed he would try anything. He knew people wanted action and that this was a rare opportunity for change. Plus he just enjoyed activity, of any sort. I can imagine how activity uplifted him, he wore these heavy metal leg things, for his polio. He was inaugurated in March 1933 when their was prevalent despair and unemployment had soared to about 17% Thus from March 1933 on he tried whatever struck his fancy. Plus he had a group of advisors called the “brain trusters.” Whatever they proposed, Roosevelt went with. The Hundred Days this period was called as President Roosevelt legislated galore. People hear that arts flourished during the Depression but now I know why. President Roosevelt (FDR) spent big money on them. He hired artists and had them paint murals--we have some in local post offices here near Roosevelt’s Hudson River home. He hired movie people and had propaganda firms made, burnishing the image of his actions, action which became known as the New Deal. Basically the New Deal was trying to help certain constituencies which Roosevelt chose. Essentially, the middle class or “everyman” or common man. And policies against the rich (even though Roosevelt was one of those). FDR started passing law after law seeing what worked. Lots of his laws were later thrown out, in the latter 1930s by the Supreme Court (which he then attacked by trying to “pack” the court, increasing the number of justices to decrease their vote importance). But the people knew Roosevelt was using government to help them for once. So he kept garnering support in spite of his arbitrary, sort of kingly behavior. Maybe because he was also able to charm his way through most any siutation.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. Out of time this morning, so let me just summarize. Both President Hoover and President Roosevelt put government to work to stimulate the economy after the 1929 stock market crash. We still debate today whether that was the right move or not. Today our US government is following a similar path after a similar crisis. But the law of unintended consequences may again come into play; government may end up making things worse and thus cause a lackluster economy to last and last instead of allowing the natural process of the free market to clean out the old and bad and bring in the new. Still, if you were US president, what would you do? Be an ideologue? Sit back and stay out of the way? Doubtful since you’d be viciously attacked by the media and others to do something. As very interested bystanders, all the individual investor can do is sit back and watch developments and place them in historic perspective. Then plan out strategy. As of now, please just stay hunkered down and out of harm’s way as much as possible.

Studying Similar Sharp Declines & Their Bottoms

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:00 GMT

The Principle of Understanding History & The Principle of Technical Analysis. Written Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

OK, yesterday I heard one analyst, I believe it was Liz Ann Sounders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab say the recent sharp year-over-year (yoy) stock market decline is only rivaled by the year 1974 and two years back in the 1930s. I could make a good guess which years in the 1930s those steep yoy declines came but I went back and checked anyway because those are the years along with their stock market bottoms that I want to start studying, their charts and their economic, financial and psychological backdrops as well. All three years were big bad bear market years as yoy declines of -30% or more would have to be. 1974 was the year our last Papa Bear market ended, and was the second year of that bear market. 1931 was smack in the middle of that big Papa Bear (stocks bottomed May 1932 and in rallied the second half, preventing 1932 from making the list). And 1937 was the year the five year, first bull market after the Papa Bear of 1929-1932 ran out of steam and the economy ran off the cliff and we had a short but very severe Mama Bear market. (I distinguish Papa bear markets from Mama bear markets by their lengths, the 1937-1938 bear market lasting only one year.) A first, brief cursory review of those big down years is as follows:

· 1974. The total decline in the Dow came to -45.1% in just under two years. The stock market’s bear market ending was immediately preceded by a most severe leg down in stock prices, losing -27% in less than two months from early August through October 4^th. The ultimate bottom was characterized by the Dow Transports NOT making one last new low along with the Dow Industrials in early December. Schwartz View: Diverging in other words.

· 1931. The total decline in the Dow came to -89% and took just under three years, September 1929 to July 1932. 1931 came in the middle of that horrific Papa Bear market so that’s dismaying for us today. But, similar to the bottom in 1974, the 1932 bottom came after a grinding last leg down in stock prices. From March through July 1932, we saw an inexorable day-after-day, four-month decline totaling -54%. Whew! Schwartz View: Trading volume was the distinguishing characteristic of that market bottom, shrinking up noticeably.

· 1937. The total decline in the Dow came to -49% and took almost exactly one year. The bulk of the 1937 Mama Bear market occurred primarily during a sudden market collapse from August through December and encompassed another extended, depressing, sharp down leg of -40%. In October of this four-month leg down, trading volume spiked during a mini crash but that wasn’t the final bottom. Schwartz View: The bottom came on much reduced trading volume in March of the following year and prices didn’t really move up until volume again picked up, in about June.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. My first, quick gleanings from reviewing past market bottoms after the three most severe year-over-year declines in stock prices, like one we're in right now, indicate we might look for anultimate market bottom to include: (1) a sharp leg down just preceding the bottom, (2) a divergence between the Dow and the Dow trannies and/or (3) sharply lower trading volume for some weeks before the ultimate bottom. Stay tuned for more to come while hanging tough.

Re-Regulation Begins a Multi-Decade Road

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:39:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Today’s Big Picture view revolves around the probable coming re-regulation of the financial markets. History shows regulation of markets is similar to a grandfather’s clock pendulum swinging back and forth although not as regular. A brief look back to the start of the 20^th century, shows free markets and a first age of globalization, with the introduction of the telegraph and telephone, steamships and railways, at a peak. Millions even migrated without passports while trade flourished meaning free markets were in charge.

· Governments Take Charge. Then, in August 1914, with World War I, that age ended abruptly. WWI left people disillusioned and looking for something better and many turned to socialism and communism. The Russian Revolution in 1917 drew followers and essentially sought to end capitalism for good, making private property illegal. Socialists and other government controlled economic systems were winning the battle of ideas, governments were in charge, free markets were in retreat. In less than 30 years, one third of humanity, including Eastern Europe, China and the Soviet Union, would be living under socialism or communism. Capitalism looked to be doomed except for in America. The 1920s in America was still a boom time, Americans buying cars, buying illegal gin, buying stock. Radio was the Internet of the 1920s. It was a classic bubble. Finally the 1929 stock market crash started Americans on the way to despair, a complete economic collapse "with no ability to earn, repay, spend, consume." Everything spiraled downward while about half the banks in the US closed. America turned toward government for help and thus re-regulation with President Roosevelt’s numerous new government regulatory agencies. Around the globe, governments gained power … over free markets. In Italy, Spain and Germany fascism took charge. World War II then arrived and even afterwards people all around the globe still blamed capitalism for causing the depression. The whole world kept moving towards more regulated economies. England even went socialistic as Winston Churchill, the great war leader, was beaten by the socialists! Most of the world operated under this sort of government planning process for the next 30 years.

· Free Markets Regain Control. But in the 1970s free markets began a resurgence. Margaret Thatcher came to power in England with free market thoughts as did Ronald Regan here in the US. with his Reganomics. Both cut back on government regulations, giving markets more ascendancy and free markets again starting coming to the forefront. England started privatizing its economy while President Regan cut taxes and let free markets regain control as epitomized by breaking the air controllers strike. Thus capitalism got a free hand which lasted for aboutt 30 years, even through the dot.com boom and bust. But after last year’s incredible debacle with investment banks, money center banks, insurance companies, etc. losing billions after irresponsibly leveraging up their investments 20 or 30 times, it’s apparent to most everyone that, just like in the 1930s, we can’t afford to have any similar financial market collapse spawning from totally free markets to happen again any time soon.

Schwartz View: So after reviewing the history of the 20th century and seeing how over long periods, market regulation swings back and forth, I have to figure we’ve just started a long term swing back on the way to re-regulation. For more on this topic, I recommend you watch Commanding Heights, the Battle for the World Economy, by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw which was turned into a DVD and a PBS prouction, a wonderful esplanation of the battle for economic minds in the 20th century. Filled in some missing pieces for me and should for you all as well.

To Risk "Cleaning Out the System" or Not

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:37:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Written Monday, September 29th, 2008: 6:30 a.m..

What happened in Congress last Friday – House Republicans refusing to go along with the government’s rescue plan – was caused by political/economic ideology combined with Americans not wanting to bail out Wall Street. With the men and women on Main Street contacting their representatives en masse to protest any plan at all to bail out Wall Street, some Republicans decided they were willing to test the thesis that not going along with the government’s plan risked Armageddon for the whole American financial system. Conservative capitalistic ideology says the best and only way to handle economic crises is to let the free marketplace work, meaning let those individuals and corporations who’ve made bad decisions fail. Famed investor Jim Rogers, who’s consistently said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulsen have been following the wrong road during this crisis, must have been pleased. Rogers also feels the best path is to let underwater financial concerns go bankrupt. He says bankruptcies have happened before, will again, and serve a purpose. They effectively clean out the distortions and excesses built up in the economic system so in the future we can start over and move ahead on a strong foundation. Not doing so would set up the same situation here in the US that caused Japan’s “lost decade” of the 1990s whereby the Japanese government let failed banks keep operating. Bailing out and keeping zombie-like banks alive here as well would just slow dramatically or even block America’s economic recovery. Bottom line, with terrific public opposition – calls coming in 100 to 1 against bailing out Wall Street -- late last week some conservatives decided to risk taking the whole country down and into the economic abyss and see what happens. They backtracked a bit over the weekend, giving in to the mantra that “we had to have a deal before the Asian markets opened.” Schwartz View: Boy, do I have mixed feelings! Invading Iraq because of itsreported stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, proved that acting out of fear can be wrong. Thus when the government forecasts disaster ahead today unless we follow their rescue plan, it feels like they are crying wolf again. Plus I fervently believe we do need to “clean out the system” and show Wall Street we’ve stopped socializing their losses. On the other hand, common sense tells me at all costs we should avoid any economic meltdown which could morph into another 1930s-style depression. Finally I believe in letting the marketplace operate as freely as possible and I agree with the man on street that rich players who’ve gamed the system for so long should share the economic pain the rest of America has been feeling for many depressing years now. Making matters even worse and even more complicated is the absolute horrendous timing of this crisis. Our politicians wanted to recess and get out of Washington, DC last Friday to go campaign in their districts and certainly didn’t want to have to be forced into voting YES on any detested bailout plan. Now they all will have to explain to voters how “we’ll all sink or swim together.”

Where Now Inflation?

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:39:00 GMT

THE FIRST INFLATION SURGE IN 25 YEARS IS OVER. So, what now?

First, let me give credit when credit is due. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed finally got one right. They’ve been promising us moderating inflation for a year or more and now with -30% lower crude oil prices and a big general commodity collapse we’re finally we’re seeing it happen. Or, at least, starting to (most things economic happen with a lag). And with the US dollar now surging, that’s going to reverse/diminish rising, problematic imported inflation as well. So now the deflationists out there, those who say deflation is our real problem facing us for some time – Gary Shilling, Robert Prechter, Ron Insana to name just three -- can really have their time in the sun.

Still, there remains some debate whether problematic rising inflation is going quiescent. Mac Courtenay of Seeking Alpha, I guess a boutique research firm, offers up seven reasons why inflation isn’t going away:

1. Inflation is already firmly entrenched. Schwartz View: I agree. I’ve been observing the Fed’s incessant jawboning that inflation expectations remain low is wrong and we all know that the government’s inflation data is terrible skewed to the downside from what inflation really is.

2. Inflation is already here. Schwartz View: The Producer Price Index (PPI) is up +9.8% over last year, and that’s only what the government grudgingly admits to.

3. Inflation is now moving its way through the “food chain” showing up in consumer prices as well. After some hope that because of global competition (globalization) producers would eat the higher inflation. Schwartz View: This rippling through is evidenced by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising too, again up the fastest in 17 years.

4. Average weekly earnings fell in July the largest since 1990. Schwartz View: I’d guess Mr. Courtenay’s point is that when earnings drop, we can’t buy as much. ???

5. More and more Federal Reserve governors are talking about raising interest rates next, not lowering them. Especially if we see energy prices stabilize above $100 and bounce. Schwartz View: Of course, these Fed officials, meeting again next Tuesday, can change their views.

6. Global (food?) consumption patterns are heading higher. Schwartz View: I don’t know if author Courtenay is talking about food, metals or just what. But I agree with him on food. As people get a little money, one of the first things they spend it on is more and better food. Thus global food consumption patterns should keep heading higher even if the global economy recesses.

7. The markets will take charge. If the Fed doesn’t raise rates, the marketplace will raise them. Schwartz View: Not sure about this reason he positing for inflation staying problematic. Right now the markets, the long US Treasury market, is still forecasting a slowdown by yields going lower and lower, which to me means more disinflation ahead, not rising inflation.

Schwartz View: He goes on to say part of oil’s recent comeuppance, coming down, is forced hedge fund liquidation because of Congressional pressure (I agree). And that it’s a great time to buy TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and the easiest way is to buy the symbol TIP. And to buy commodities on this correction, recommending also symbols DBC (a basket of commodities) and GDX (gold). Myself, while I believe this commodity pullback is indeed a correction, I think it’s too early to buy them back.

Schwartz BIG PICTURE Inflation View. My belief, garnered from studying stock market history and looking at thousands of charts over the last 20+ years, is that when any new trend begins, many times it begin with a surge in the new direction, then a pullback or at least a pause, sort of to regroup, consolidate gains, make believers out of disbelievers, open the eyes of others who are slow to see and just basically kill enough time to see if the new trend has legs. Then after this pullback correction, which more often than not can be large and long lasting, runs its course, the new trend reasserts itself.

Basically that’s where I see us today with rising inflation, in a pause to refresh. I’ve theorized over the last year than oil and other commodities would stay stronger, longer than most thought this year. I’d say that proved correct with oil going up all the way to about $147 and related sectors like natural gas, energy services, solar, wind and other alternative clean green leading the stock market for the whole first half of 2008. Similar to what happened during the first year of the last severe Papa Bear stock market back in 1973-1874 (oil stayed high the first year). But now, with commodities reversing downward and in major correction, it’s obvious change has occurred, that a pause to refresh is underway. And we can expect this new trend to last longer and correct deeper than many would think I’d venture. Sure, first because commodities are inherently extremely volatile, much more so than stocks and bonds. But also because of the emerging new, macroeconomic backdrop. We seem to be in line for a major, global economic slowdown which will throw a big detour on the road to a new long term trend to rising global inflation. If the global economy really goes blah for the next few years, commodities will take a longer than expected breather. Schwartz View: Still I’m in agreement with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan who predicted in his 2007 book The Age of Turbulence that we live in an inflationary world and that the disinflation trend dominating all during his tenure as Fed chief is coming to an end. And I’m in agreement also with famed, global investor Jim Rogers who says commodities normally correct 50% or more and that’s what we’re seeing now, a correction not the end, to this so far about 9-year commodity bull market.

Monday Weekly Overview Sample Letter

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, July 28^th, 2008: Your New Paltz, NY SUNFLOWER update: A few sunflowers have popped but I noticed the farmer’s market has alternated its plantings so any time you visit you should see some. Just spectacular!

THE BIG PICTURE

Looks like one potential US and global leader gets it. Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama, to shore up his lack of experience on the global stage, embarked on a global tour last week. And was again able to put his finger on the pulse of the world and his audience, exhibiting his knowledge of history and this particular critical point in time speaking at the historic Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. While he didn’t rock star the crowd, fine with me, it was good to see he continues his role as alienate no one, moderator showing again he understands all sides of issues and is committed to leading by example. While not denigrating any political party, say our Republicans, or country, say Old Europe. Thus there is hope that America will soon embark on a new direction, one of getting things done by bringing all parties together and then making logical and effective, not ideological, decisions, forgoing our previous path of fostering divisiveness in the world, between our two political parties and among the American people ourselves.

Schwartz View: Enough said. I always get negative feedback when treading in political waters. I do like presumptive Republican presidential nominee and American hero John McCain quite a lot but just feel we have to drastically change policies going forward, not follow a similar path. America needs to get it’s act together quickly as all long range forecasters have reached consensus, saying we’re on a downward slide, financially, politically, economically, socially. We just need to start cohesively tackling our problems.

THE ECONOMY

Numerous economists last week admitted that the US economy is weakening. Among them Brian Bethune of Global Insight, James O’Sullivan at UBS and Moody’s John Lonski. So, in spite of the US not posting two straight quarters of negative GDP growth, the old and easy definition of a recession, and one not used any longer by the National Bureau of Economic Research which calls and dates recessions but problematically many months late -- remember in today’s new globalized world we need to learn new economic relationships! -- it looks like a recession is here. And in my view is going to stay with us for quite some time. That’s because America has been moneying-over all near term problems for many, many years, thus postponing the always needed recessionary cleansing and efficientizing of the US economy, while we’ve also avoiding developing and implementing solutions to our long term ills, like our increasing oil dependency, our underfunded government pension plans, Social Security and former Fed head Alan Greenspan’s #1 concern, Medicare. America does have a bad habit of avoiding problems until they reach crisis state. Maybe that’s because our representative democracy has become so dysfunctional here in the US. I would suggest we start fixing things right there in Washington by first getting rid of lobbying which skews everything toward those with the money to get their voices heard. Even corporate America, who now realizes it’s entrapped by this self-perpetuating system, would like nothing better than to see lobbying go away as big business now has to carry and fund a large and increasingly onerous lobbying budget.

Schwartz View: All I’ve read recently has been about how there are so many inefficiencies corrupting our inherently great economic and social framework that it’s a wonder anything can get done. Such as the US having 600,000 lawyers while Japan has 15,000 (those figures were about 10 years back but obviously haven’t changed for the better). And all the broken marriages and unwed mothers costing America a fortune as well. It’s almost funny, after encouraging the rest of the world to move to free markets for decades, when the Soviet Union collapsed and showed the economic rot hidden there, the world finally started followed our recommendations. And economic success followed suit but that led to tremendous and widespread global competition, so it’s vital we get our own act together as soon as possible, to just keep up. Thus the silver lining to this current economic slowdown, a slowdown that isn’t responding to our normal response of throwing money at it, is that crisis is when change really does occur in America

THE STOCK MARKET

Stocks have again gotten ahead of themselves on the downside although not as much out of whack as at the first bottom back in mid-March. Figuring the Dow Industrials and S&P 500’s previous bull market tops were set back last October, after nine months of a bear market or at the recent July 15^th lows, we are down on average about 2.5% per month versus the historic average bear market monthly decline of 2%. So we could easily see a backing and filling trading range here and now or even a modest rally, the two normal ways bear markets correct themselves. Much government intervention has come together to force down the price of oil and thus commodities in general, prop up housing and consumer spending, keep the financial system from breaking down completely and holding interest rates way below the rate of inflation. So all this government stimulus has to go somewhere just as previous stimulus found places to bubble up. Plus new government props and controls historically have been able to put a temporary fix in place.

Still, over a period of time the stock market reflects the economy and things aren’t really getting any better there, despite Q2 GDP growth out this Thursday going to again be positive. In point of fact, the economy is continuing to get worse if one looks under the surface at signals like credit spreads, a rough definition being the difference in yield between US government bonds and non-US government guaranteed bonds, which remain wide. Or if we factor in historic trends which show that economic downturns tend to surface hidden problems which end up feeding on themselves. Today’s continuing wide credit spreads mean at some point MBIA & Ambac and Fannie & Freddie, the other 17 big financials which have also been taken off the allowed short selling list & all the other financials who’ve lost billions of dollars aren’t going to be able to hide things any longer and are going to have to really own up. So stocks remain iffy for now. And with the rug pulled out from under the remaining stock leadership in the stock market over the last two weeks, out from under energy, the energy complex and other commodities, any market rallies are going to be just technically based, say from an oversold position or short sellers being forced to cover. Sure, a rally may then feed on itself and last longer than bears think, but should ultimately roll over as data worsens.

Schwartz View: Technically then, we could be embarking on a summer rally and if so sharp traders with the courage to risk their monies in the propped up financials may be able to scalp the stock market. And other pockets of strength should or may show up (hopefully in the health sector as that is now my focus with my few longs) normally searched out and propelled along by momentum players.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

LONG TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY continues to be hunkering down until this big storm passes. I expect that to be longer than most government and Wall Street economists and market strategists believe or at least publicly state. Publicly state because we all know that bearish Wal Street analysts and economists ultimately get fired and that in the aftermath of the dot.com bubble bursting, we got some theretofore hidden insight into what analysts really think. I see widely-followed, economist Nouriel Roubini, formerly holding various high level economic advisory positions in government, believes the US and European economies are now sinking as last Friday he said Wall Street was in spin mode and that financial institutions are “… manipulating at will their earnings, and analysts [are] falling for this supreme baloney.”

NEAR TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY depends more on whether this two-week, fledgling rally proves it has legs or not. I’m using as a key gauge whether the Dow and S&P are able to close above their last Wednesday’s closing highs, Dow 11,632.40 and S&P 1282.19. If these key indices close higher, then we will have the definition of a new up trend in place, a series of higher lows and higher highs. Strategy then will be to favor the long side but with say with no more than 50% at most market exposure. Planning on a modest summer rally for a month or two, with strategy being trying to scalp some short term profits.

AS FOR INCOME INVESTORS, we’ve all gotten used to our income fixes after 25 years of income investing being easy during a bull market in bonds, meaning just riding the trend toward lower and lower long term rates, I know it’s a struggle for you all today. My best suggestion is to watch for weakness in income sectors, say in utilities, royalty trusts and even REITs, then strike. Only move in and in a small manner AFTER a sector has just been blasted. This gives you some profit buffer as primary extended downtrends many times have sharp sell offs after disillusioned investors finally give up hope and sell, right before they rally. This can get you in at unusually good prices, at least for the near and intermediate term.

INCOME IDEAS. Thus I would currently search through the utility sector as the Dow Utility Index has just fallen a sharp -8% over the last two weeks. Or take another look at my previous July 11^th, 2008 two energy income recommendation Cross Timber Royalty Trust (CRT) and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT), both haven tumbled hard with crude. Both go ex-dividend tomorrow, meaning today’s the last day to get in to collect the substantial August dividend (both pay monthly). Or finally, revisit my other income recommendation, back on July 10^th, 2008, of two large European pharmas, GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) paying moderate dividend yields of 4.4% and 5.8% respectively. You need to buy GSK today to be entitled to this quarter’s dividend and buy AZN soon before it goes ex-dividend (not declared yet but last year it went ex on August 8^th). Good income investing!

Have a great week!

Let's Face Our Problems! Americans are Ready.

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:13:00 GMT

HERE’S ANOTHER’S BIG PICTURE VIEW. A longtime regular reader emailed me his opinion of the current US residential housing market yesterday and how the government is handling things, writing:

‘It seems now to me that the "gov" is tweaking things to "hold it off." By that I mean that if you allow phony mortgages for years and pump up the price of homes, when that collapses home values must drop to the "normal" level. Pushing this pain off to the future only makes it more protracted and worse. I see a worse "bear" than you.’

I answered this way, with a couple of tweaks myself for today’s broader readership: .

“I agree. The way our political system and US government is currently put together it's always in the politicians own best interest to put off resolving trouble. Thus they never face trouble head on. Economists see this and note it as it occurs (like in the current housing crisis) but nothing every changes. Re: the current housing debacle, all the effort, like you say, has been to postpone trouble. Which means we can't get through it, it will linger & linger.

“Obama's plan is to put on all Congressional deliberations and votes on public TV so the public can watch what goes on and who votes for what. Hopefully that may change things and we can move from a representative democracy to a participatory democracy whereby the public gets a vote on all large issues. Therefore we get back to more equitable representation for all.

“Even business is fed up with the current lobbying system. It costs business a fortune! They now need to fund a large, extraneous lobbying budget. So business wants to end the whole lobbying system but can't while their competition keeps on lobbying. Just like business wants a cap & trade emissions scheme and other regulations. If our, or all, governments were to just say here's the new rules, no lobbying in Washington, or over in the pollution emission area, here’s the rules on how to operate going forward, these rules would apply to all business so all could see that no one would get an advantage. We do desperately need new, enlightened leadership!"

Schwartz View: It’s just like those suggesting we explore for more oil and open up more protected lands. We’re still heading in totally the wrong direction with wrongheaded thinking completely. We all just need to get a brand new mindset that we’re not using any more oil, let’s have America lead the way in getting off burning oil (and coal). Thanks goodness for one well known investor doing some out-of -the-box thinking, the long time oil man, Boone Pickens! Go Boone! I’m 100% behind The Pickens Plan, unveiled earlier this week. If you haven’t heard of it or you missed my Wednesday review and raves about it in this space, please let me know and I’ll email you some info. Or just google it and read about it yourselves. Briefly it calls for putting up wind turbines in the wind corridor from Canada down to Texas and using that energy to replace natural gas usage and start using that natural gas to power cars. I love it! And I’m all for any other similar plans anyone else comes up as well. America generally wakes up and responds only where there is a crisis. Let’s get America working as a team toward the right goal!

Sample Monday Overview Letter

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:55:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, June 30^th, 2008: Ok, I’m off this afternoon. For a week of revitalizing rest and recreation, I hope. Actually San Jose to Lake Tahoe runs through some of the worst housing bust in America, with one county near there declaring bankruptcy. So I may be back with some first hand knowledge & new insights. Have a great week and a greater 4^th of July. I hope everyone gets to listen to lots of patriotic songs. We all have to believe in this country which has done so many good things, for us, and the rest of the world too.

THE BIG PICTURE

In today’s Big Picture view, let me lay out how big bad bear markets historically have unfolded. Thereby to offer up some guidelines on what to expect over the next year or two. Essentially this model scenario comes from my many years of studying past history and also from my first hand experience of being in this fascinating stock market business for the last 35 years (dating myself). Yep, when I add it up, it’s been that long. Actually that’s also approximately how long its been since we suffered through the last Papa Bear market as I expect this one to prove to be. I had just gotten out of college and started work at “Mother” Merrill Lynch and asked a rep which stock to buy. He said buy Merrill Lynch, which I did and it promptly went down from about $23 to $8. I really didn’t understand what was going on back then.

Bear markets, Papa, Mama or Baby, go through psychological stages or phases. The first psychological phase is when investors deny and thus fight tooth and nail that a bear market has even really begun, after being so locked into bullish expectations for so darn long (in today’s case for five years, longer than normal). The second psychological phase is when the news turns so bad that even firmly entrenched bulls have to admit that something is wrong out there. That maybe the economy is sinking or in recession because the economic data (as inexact and easily manipulated as it is) then coming out is so negative. This phase can go on for quite a long time and is generally the longest of the three phases. Investors still look to find ways to invest and make profits through this phase although that becomes harder and harder as the incoming news goes from bad to worse. And finally the third psychological phase is capitulation.. That’s when even the most adamant bulls lose all hope, give up the ship. And sell. This capitulation phase can be short or long but is epitomized by massive selling all at once, as everyone still invested feels the heat and pressure, can’t sleep and somehow all give in to the pressure at the same time. After this massive selling, the pressure comes off stocks as everyone who wanted to sell has. Still we generally need additional time to heal, thus after a lack-of-sellers bounce, stocks generally retreat once again, but this time on shrinking trading volume, they successfully “retest” their capitulation lows and the stage is set for a new bull market.

Schwartz View: I think we’re in for a similar performance to the above scenario. President Bush probably thinks he did something truly good with his multiple tax cuts following in President Regan’s footsteps but the early 2000 tax cuts just went primarily to the super rich. And Bush’s Iraq invasion and following years of morass just went on our credit card. And our looming long term critical economic and social problems like Medicare & Medicaid, Social Security, energy and health care haven’t been tackled. Thus I see big problems accumulated for the next US president as he is going to have to tackle and come up with some very important solutions. During this period, say the first two years of a new presidential term, most everyone in America is going to have to change our lifestyles, from freewheeling and overspending and living on credit to living a more disciplined, controlled lifestyle. All in all in today’s very competitive global economy and world we live in the sooner America and Americans get our acts together the better. I want to turn bullish on America again asap and thus benefit from America showing the world what we can do when we’re all pull together on the same page and right path. But for now we’ve got a tough period to slug through, so hunker down. Our fortitude, intellect and culture should stand us in good stead.

THE STOCK MARKET

We could see a stock market bounce soon, any time now after stocks have dropped so much, so fast, recently. After the Dow Industrials plunged through its March lows last Thursday and the S&P 500 fast approaching its own March lows now, closing at 1278.38 on Friday, just +0.39% above its March 10^th closing low of 1273.37. Generally institutional, professional investors like to defend old lows and other key prices levels I’ve found. I mean there are sign posts in the stock market and besides low lows another is when a key index drops -20% from its peak, that’s a price level where market observers start calling a decline a bear market and no one wants that. For instance, the Dow hit that -20% point off last October’s high last Friday, CNBC started flashing the news and stocks promptly rallied, a bit. Again, some investors will fight new trends at these key price levels. We’ve seen this play out over the last few years during the bull market, at important correction points, like down -10% whereby mysteriously in came buyers time after time. Maybe it’s a black box phenomenon, some trading strategy hedge funds have and profit by.

Anyway, and on the other hand, we may NOT get such a bounce this time down or at this point. In fact, we’d better not count on it, not with crude oil making new highs every time we turn around, like this morning rising to another record, now about $143 a barrel. Yes, some are calling for oil and commodities to collapse, calling their rise just another bubble. Oil dropping $10 a barrel in a day and $30 in a few days would likely help the stock market but after the knee-jerk upside reaction, investors would probably decide lower commodities also broke the back of any and all remaining stock market strength and leadership. And that resulting sigh-of-despair would then lead to even more selling. Plus, who’s to really know whether the commodity boom isn’t really a sign that all the world wants to lock up vital crude oil, natural gas, foodstuffs and all other needed natural recourses to keep their economics functioning. We do live in a suddenly, very competitive one global marketplace after all. It’s interesting that the two super successful, first mover, hedge fund investors who teamed up way back in the 1970s with the Quantum Fund today have slightly different views of what’s going on in commodities, but pretty much the same. Jim Rogers, the analyst of the pair, says buy commodities, these soaring prices are because the supply-demand equation is way out of whack. Prior to recently soaring global demand there’d been no incentive and thus little search for new supplies in most any commodities going back two decades. And George Soros, the trader of the pair, says yes there is a bubble in place today in oil and commodities but it’s superimposed on an credible long term uptrend. In other words, both can see a big decline in demand during the next global slowdown, a major glitch, but both can see further commodity price rises over time ahead. All combining with past US history, there for anyone to look at, that oil and oil stocks did very well during the first year of the last major market, in 1973-1974, thus supporting my theory that oil will hang in there longer than most expect. And my recommendation to keep one toe in the energy patch; I’m recommending the oil service sector.

Schwartz View: Looks to me like a second leg down in stock prices (as contrasted to a second psychological phase which seems also to have started) in this bear market has begun and thus that this summer could offer up much lower stock prices rather than more sideways, complacent trading of the last three months. I would play your cards close to the vest. Please see PORTFOLIO STRATEGY below.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

With the stock market now down substantially -- and hopefully everyone reading my letter having already following my consistent and persistent advice over the last seven months of cutting back stock market exposure -- I still have to recommend “getting smaller” like well-known trader Dennis Gartman likes to say. I mean it’s so easy to just be complacent here, figuring stocks are already down -20% so most of the risk is over. But history shows the opposite, that stocks drop more like -50% or more during big bad bear markets. Just seems logical to cut back even more as a second leg of price trouble begins. And there’s no guarantee that these bear market legs will just number three, following along with the psychological phases of bear markets, as www.Comstockfunds.com calls them, denial, concern and capitulation. In the 1929 to 1932 bear market, I remember reading there were like seven legs down in stock prices. Thus, as I jet off on a quick vacation, be back writing next Monday, I’m reviewing my own managed portfolios to find the best places to cut back my exposure even while only being 40% exposed in one portfolio, only 30% in another and pretty well hedged with inverse sector funds in the other three more actively traded accounts. Please, yourselves, attempt to take a look out six months or a year ahead, over the horizon yourself, a necessary step when managing other people’s monies, and consider the Big Picture. Just say things unfold poorly. What would you do next summer if the economy is finally post terrible stats and corporate profits have plunged? And if your portfolios are then down -50% or more? Are you going to sell then? No. Today we still have time to sell and looking back selling would have been correct strategy if that likely scenario unfolds, wouldn’t you agree. Bottom line, in big bad bear markets it’s better to be safe than sorry. Wait until the next bull market comes along before you starting going for the gold. Oops, hold a little gold here.

Have a great week and a terrific 4^th of July!

* Please also, go ahead and overdose on America’s heritage this week, listen to a lot of wonderful July 4^th songs and let them infuse you with a renewed sense of patriotism.

One American's View on $4 Gas

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:56:00 GMT

ECONOMIC VIEW. One American’s View. Yep, Mine! With a bear market upon us, and myself and hopefully my readers all with hunkered down investment portfolios which thus don’t need constant care and attention, let me turn the spotlight on one American’s new travails, resulting views & future plans.

Travail. I borrowed Lucy’s car to drive out over the mountain to play golf at the Hudson Valley Resort (VJ Singh recently bought an interest in the resort, for you golfers out there) for the Tuesday night golf league this week. And then borrowed it again to go take my nightly swim at the Ulster County pool last night. My car’s being temperamental, some type of under the dashboard wiring issue which cuts off the engine, I’m taking it in on Saturday. Anyway I like to put gas in her car when I use it. At $4.21 a gallon I figure gas is not cheap anymore and I don’t want to short Lucy.

View. Thus, figuring gas mileage in my head and how much it costs to drive, say 40 miles, I started thinking about what today’s higher gas prices reverberate, they are about double last summer. Means less people driving and everyone taking shorter and fewer trips. The county pool, for example, about three miles out of town, has been quite empty this year. Thus I see much higher gas is going to hurt tourist stops such as Lake Placid, NY and Lake Tahoe, CA/NV. Already we’ve rebooked twice, at lower prices, at the casino/hotel we’re staying at in Lake Tahoe. Must be many fewer people driving there from San Francisco and the rest of California, especially with California having the highest gas prices in the nation, about $4.60 last I heard. I can sure understand why. We’ve driving a SUV from San Jose to Lake Tahoe (between four and five hours) and Lucy’s best friend who we’re visiting in San Jose says the total gas price may cost us $80. I figure double that by the time we take the three hour drive around the lake once or twice, billed as the “most beautiful drive in America,” by the way. And maybe go see Squaw Valley (where the Olympics were once held) and maybe Reno too. Our visit wasn’t going to be cancelled just because gas prices have doubled since we planned this vacation. But today’s gas prices will be factored into our future trips, surely, knowing myself. Yep, Americans plans in general will be wound down or changed slowly. Planning now has to include gas prices as parties and family get-togethers can’t place everyone under big cost pressures.

Future. Thus I see higher gas prices really having long, negative coattails for business. All those convenience stores along major highways, all the tourist towns including New Paltz, all the recreational destinations, like Las Vegas, Disneyland and the various small businesses surrounding, all will see fewer people and thus lower revenues. This winding down of travel and changing of plans will be a major issue.

Schwartz View: Bottom line, as bad as being asked for new financial discipline and sacrifice, this process is exactly what America needs. For our longer term health and global competitiveness. Unhappily this sacrifice is being forced on us but likely America and Americans wouldn’t cut our deeply ingrained, bad overspending habit any other way. Spending less and saving more has been the needed antidote for our economic stresses for many, many years. Thus I can’t wait to turn bullish on us as America gets back on the right track. That’s one reason my first choice of books to take and read on the planes and during the three hour waits in two airport terminals is long range forecasters predicting bullish happenings ahead.

Once a Century Day of Reckoning Starting?

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:44:00 GMT

THE BIG PICTURE

Ok, here’s a Big Picture of where America and we Americans stand today. A fairly downbeat Big Picture so buckle your seatbelts. America has been on the verge of a major comeuppance for many, many years. But its been postponed and postponed. Because the US dollar is the world’s reserve currency we’ve been able to play by different rules than the rest of the world but now we’ve pushed that special benefit to the limit and beyond. But each time we’ve come close to going into a major economic recession, which almost by definition means a near term cleansing out and thus longer term strengthening of the economy, we get “bailed out,” so to speak, by the Federal Reserve or by our much deteriorated if not totally corrupted political system, i.e., by the sitting president and his staff or by Congress. Our economic problems which terribly need to be resolved, just get more and more money thrown at them (which just makes them worse and more deeply entrenched) say by President Bush’s multiple tax cuts upon taking office in 2000 or by the Fed dropping interest rates rapidly or through the floor or both. For example, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan numerous, back to back to back interest rate cuts in 2001 and 2002 and current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s dramatic rate cuts since September. So our economy has been artificially pumped up and stimulated by what I call, financial “steroids.” time and time again for many years now. But now this use of steroids just isn’t working. Now all the money the Fed is pumping into the system to mitigate the credit crunch and crisis is just causing a big bubble in gasoline (and heating fuel prices) in America which at $4.00+ a gallon is now being felt widely. I say $4.00 is the tipping point and things are going to get worse quickly now because of the four following examples over the past weekend. First, Lucy let her Honda get down to a quarter of a tank for the first time in a long time. She called the dollar cost to fill it up

“eye-opening” numerous times as we drove off and away. I could hear the wheels turning in her head. Second, a real estate owner told me he was feeling this recession with a massive increase in real estate taxes, etc. and that he never felt any previous economic downturns in his life. Knowing me I probably blurted out it was just beginning, but I hope not. Third, awhile after my Sunday early morning bird walk, while reading the paper and drinking my coffee I heard the morning manager of Stewart’s, the local all purpose convenience store, tell another customer, a bit desperately, she couldn’t afford to drive to work now. And lastly, when I called to wish my brother-in-law Happy Birthday, my sister, retired but who was a bank trust officer in Buffalo for many years, says she’s never seen anything like this looming downturn. All in all, I expect $4 gas or out of control oil prices in general, is what the stock market discounted roughly six months back, it’s normal advance foresight time frame, when it really collapsed back in January, it’s first leg down in this bear market.

Now, Price Inflation. This commodity inflation, this cost of living inflation or price inflation, is starting to work its way through the economy in food prices as well. Watching the free marketplace work, in effect dramatically weeding out, killing off cattle herds because it costs too much to feed the cattle, that’s going to reverberate into higher hamburger and steak prices down the road. Plus Chinese wage demands will now work their way into much US clothing prices as well during this cycle. And if the US dollar keeps dropping, as it will because the US balance sheet is in such terrible shape, all prices will rise even faster. I’d go so far as to say commodity guru Jim Rogers’ and Peter Schiff’s predictions of hyperinflation are becoming a distinct possibility. All this rising inflation as the economy sinks and US wages stagnate or go lower and jobs shrink. So it’s not a pretty picture. And it’s possibly worse than a normal recession because we’ve put off this day of reckoning for so, so long. For example, in Trader Vic Sperandeo’s two early 1990s books, Trader Vic – Methods of a Wall Street Trader and Trader Vic II – Principles of Professional Speculation, he predicted a day of reckoning right then or very soon. And related to us a little history of how the US government operates, trying to paper over our problems by lowering rates, cutting taxes and whatever else they can think up to throw more money at our problems. This works and works and works … until it doesn’t work anymore. So far no one really has been able to predict when the day of reckoning will arrive. In the late 1980s/early 1990s was a flash point for trouble but we muddled through. Then another flash point around the dot.com bust from 2000 to 2002. But lower taxes and lower interest rates got us through. But now, 2008 -- 10 is the next flash point. Who knows? This time may indeed by the real thing. It sure looks it. Why? Obviously because the extremely important financial sector, the very area which has been driving the stock market higher by soaking up all the Fed and other government liquidity and manipulating it to make things look better and better on paper, has now imploded and gone bust. As Peter Schiff writes in his 2007 book, Crash Proof and Robert Prechter Jr. wrote in his 2002 book Conquer The Crash manipulating financial paper/assets/capital around to make it seem like we’re getting wealthier is a lot different than when America did grow wealthy by actual manufacturing, producing things people need and thus were willing to pay for. In the 1950s and 1960s we were the manufacturing colossus we lived on some of our profit and saved the rest. That’s how you build wealth. This disparity is one of Mr. Schiff’s key theses. Also one of Mr. Prechter’s major theses as well, just illustrated differently. Mr. Prechter, a chartist, says the US economy performed its best in the 2^nd leg up of this long term business cycle, say from the 1950s through the 1970s which shows this 3^rd leg up is nearing a major top. Schwartz View: So it’s all coming together now, seemingly. All the wrong paths we’ve followed for years coming home to roost now. That’s my guesstimate anyway. So, is this latest market decline really the beginning of America’s day of reckoning whereby the rest of the world finally loses confidence in America, waking up to the deception of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, as Mr. Schiff describes it? Does the US dollar really head down as the world unloads our Treasury bonds, thus forcing up long term interest rates, which in turn ratchets up the already gigundo squeeze on America and us individual Americans and make the situation even worse? No one really knows for sure as Mr. Prechter reports these true economic disasters only occur about once a century! Like in the 1930s in the just departed 20^th century and once in the 19^th century as well. Why would this once in a century event be beginning now? As bad as things now look, maybe somehow we’ll get bailed out and the day of reckoning postponed once again. But since I began this stock market letter, 18 years ago in September 1990, I’ve watched things get worse and worse, not on the surface where we had a great stock market run in the 1990s, but under the surface, as democracy got pushed back and back, as labor unions lost power, as corporate statesmen became extinct, as much needed government regulation somehow morphed into a swear word and became despised, as liberalism or helping the unfortunate became obsolete behavior and as capitalism ran away unchecked, benefiting from fiscal and monetary stimulus over and over again whenever the economy lapsed into the normal down wave of a business cycle leaving us today with just a shell of the old wealth producing US economy. Yep, all looming economic crises and recessions have been pushed to the back burner by our dysfunctional political system which now listens only to corporations through their lobbying efforts. A system which even business if fed up with. Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid, pensions, health care, energy, the environment, a big wow! when I write them all down, all these long term vital issues have been avoided because of capitalism gone wild, because doing anything about them would “… hurt the economy and be bad for business … .” The same mantra Congress just used as its reason last week to kill a critical climate bill! Just awful action. Politicians should know there’s more to the economy than keeping the steroid sham going year after year, there’s more than keeping the business lobbyists happy near term and there’s more than their next election result. The US economy needs to be cleansed out from time to time and thus made fundamentally stronger for the longer term and more competitive in today’s new global economy. We still have the strongest, most fundamentally sound economic, financial and social system going from all I can tell. And the country has more than just our economy to worry about and strengthen for the longer run. We also need to re-strengthen our democracy once again after the loss of common man representation that’s taken place over the last 30 to 40 years. Actually, it’s no one’s fault, this push into Supercapitalism as Robert Reich terms it in his latest book of the same name, what has happened in America over the last few decades. But now it’s time to look at and push the flip side of the coin, to reawake democracy which is vital to American life as well. We need to regain representation for little towns and smaller groups, non-profits, etc., etc., all those groups who can’t get their sides of the story heard any more today as corporate lobbyists dominate. Again, I don’t blame anyone for what’s evolved. That’s capitalism, if left “unfettered” as even Republican presumptive presidential nominee Senator John McCain has described today’s economy, it will go to an extreme … as it now has. * For the record, one can get all five books I’ve just mentioned above from www.Amazon.com or elsewhere. And I recommend them all.

Get Back Into Gold!

Richard Schwartz — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:19:00 GMT

GOLD VIEW. It’s Time to Buy Back into GOLD! I must say the gold chart looks ripe for a rally and the background economics are screaming rising inflation here in the US and all around the globe, so I would recommend buying back into gold. Gold pulled back from its big Round Number of $1000 in almost perfect fashion for those of us like myself who believe Round Numbers are meaningful & insightful. If you remember gold traded over $1000 an ounce for just two days, on Friday, March 14^th and again on Monday, March 17^th, found that it didn’t have enough buyers to propel it higher and promptly rolled over, sold off and said sayonara to $1000. So it’s been down for the normal three weeks to three months which normally encompasses counterswing rallies to primary down trends . Since then it’s bottomed at $852.70, then at $864.00 and then $877.90. So it’s made a series of higher lows which is bullish. And, as I mentioned earlier, all I see is rising inflation around the world, from here in the US to Europe to Asia to the developing world to the new “frontier” world. Sensible because food and energy are soaring everywhere.

Schwartz View: Since gold reversed direction around the “fateful weekend” when the Fed showed they were backstopping the whole financial system, it just makes sense that if the stock market rally which began around that same time is over or in its last throes, the other counterswings that began the same time may be over as well. One such counterswing has been in gold. So, I recommend buying gold today.

Like always let me recommend buying the gold bullion tracking stock, now called SPDR Gold Trust (symbol GLD) instead of the gold mining companies. Buying GLD takes the added, now unnecessary risk of buying the gold miners themselves out of the mix. Regular readers know I want to take that geopolitical risk out. The recent risk that developing countries all want to renegotiate their contracts with all the mining companies including the gold miners. (And who can blame them?) They want better deals than which they made back when gold was at $250 an ounce. Renegotiating would hurt gold mining profits, so in spite of us having the right investment idea we could lose; you know being in church but in the wrong pew.

Bottom line, I have to think with global wide inflation rearing its head for the first time in some 25 years, gold will surely benefit over the longer run. And since we just pulled back, it’s a good time to get back in. Thus I would buy a little gold here and buy more on weakness, paying close attention to the correct percentage exposure for your own circumstances and also how much you buy each time in. Overall through your gold exposure starting today should be much larger than the normal 3% to 5% exposure that many advisors normally and historically recommend. It’s gold’s time to shine again after being out of favor for 25 or so years. Be sure to get some as it should prove a great hedge against your long portfolio.

Disclaimer! I own a little GLD and plan to buy more although please remember I can switch my views and thus my positions at any time.