To elaborate on my Tuesday BNN TV interview and to provide a technical analysis perspective as to why the Financials are a value trap for investors, here are a few thoughts.
As stated in the interview,
from a fundamental perspective any sector that is about to undergo
regulatory change is by itself sufficient reason for longer-term investment pause. And in a highly charged election year, this risk becomes of greater concern. However, it is longer-term consequences of a changed business model that is the greatest risk to investing in the sector. For example, the specific risks to the Financials sector pales in comparison to the likely impact that a changed business model will have on the US and global economies - and then in turn back to the sector.
There is a
larger economic consequence to the changed business model, one that few seem to be focusing on – the effect that a deleveraged, changed business model will have on credit creation. If the global economy was aided and abetted in the recent years by financial innovation, it is logical to assume that a dramatic (radical?) shift away from that business model of easy credit and financial innovation (securitization, for example) will result in
a lessened degree of capital for consumers and businesses. Therefore, economic activity, particularly domestic activity in the US, will ratchet downward, influenced also by the need for US consumers to rebuild their depleted personal balance sheets.
As this relates specifically to financial institutions, the risk of competition (financial institutions in other regions of the world less burdened by regulatory constraints) due to a changed US regulatory environment for US financial institutions will also almost certainly create growth and profitability difficulties in the years ahead.
While all this real economy stuff gets absorbed by fundamentally-oriented investors, the technicals of the market may paint a different picture. It does not, as the two charts** above show.
The
first chart provides a longer-term picture of the sector, which plainly shows a sector that is solidly in a negative mega trend, based on my Moving Averages Principle*. The
second short-term chart provides a few reasons why the near term trend is modestly positive. Specifically, momentum and MACD are both positive. And the slow stochastic is not in high overbought territory (above 80 for both trend lines). Moreover, both MACD and the slow stochastic lines have not crossed, which would indicate the end of the near term uptrend.
Investment Strategy Implications
As stated on Tuesday,
Financials should participate in the current spring rally. However, beyond this point in time, it is hard to conceive of the longer-term investment case for a sector undergoing a change to the core of its business model. As noted above, the technicals also reflect this longer term concern.
*See prior blog entries and reports for definitions and examples
**click images to enlarge
*To learn how to gain access to my weekly research report, "Sectors and Styles Strategy Report",click here
Posted
04-03-2008 10:35 AM
by
Vinny Catalano, CFA