Growth Report : oil prices

After the Bailout

Ian Wyatt — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:15:00 GMT

After the Bailout

I can’t help but wonder if Monday’s bailout vote would have been different if the Dow Industrials were down 770+ points before they started the roll call.

Members of Congress that voted against the Paulson Asset Management plan seemed to be responding to political concerns. Apparently Capitol Hill phone lines were clogged with angry voters. And voting with President Bush isn’t the best career move these days.

Most in Congress agree that doing nothing will certainly lead to higher unemployment and foreclosure rates (and more angry voters). They wanted the bill to pass, but didn’t want to be on record as having voted for it.

I suppose that’s understandable. Whether you want to blame the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi for undermining the vote, the fact remains that the American public wasn’t sold on the bill. First of all, the word “bailout” is poor marketing. It gives the impression that Paulson and Bernanke simply want to help their banker buddies. And frankly, the terms of the bill didn’t do a lot to dispel that perception.

Bernanke argued against setting salary caps on CEOs who sold impaired mortgage-related assets to the government. And the plan to buy these impaired assets at above-market prices smells of cronyism.

Marking to Market: Fair Value Accounting

Over the last couple of days, the issue of “marking-to-market” is getting a lot of attention. Financial institutions are required to mark their assets to the market. They have to value their assets according to the price they’d fetch on the open market. Since nobody in their right mind would buy anything that even remotely looks like a mortgage backed security, those assets have to be carried on the books as a huge loss.

Makes sense. I can’t claim my house is still worth what it was 3 years ago. And I sure can’t adjust my brokerage statement to reflect what I think a stock should be worth. To let banks value their assets at anything other than what they can sell them for is utterly ridiculous.

Don’t get me wrong. I see the point. If banks can value their assets at a higher level, they suddenly have enough capitalization to raise their creditworthiness. Then they have the ability to sit on these mortgage-backed assets until the market (hopefully) improves.

The only problem with this is it’s not reality. It’s wishful thinking. And any move to suspend mark-to-market accounting is a sin of the exact nature that got us into this mess. Namely, that there’s no downside risk.

Nothing but Downside

So Congress goes back to vote on some new version of the bailout plan Thursday. And given Monday’s record-setting decline for the Dow, I suspect Congress and their constituents are a bit more amenable to passing the bailout bill. I just hope Congress avoids the real bailout issues, like suspending mark-to-market accounting, and instead focuses on truly helpful measures like increasing FDIC insurance limits and expanding unemployment benefits.

Traders certainly seemed to be hopeful. On Tuesday The Dow took back more than half of its Monday losses. But it’s still going to be interesting to see what happens in the wake of a passed bailout bill.

It seems a pretty good bet that stocks will rally further, at least in the short term. But it’s hard for me to get fundamentally bullish about massive government intervention. The dollar is enjoying a little return to faith rally. But ultimately, $700 billion coupled with the massive amounts of cash being made available by the Fed seem more than a little inflationary.

And while we might stave off disaster, there are still fundamental problems with the US economy that won’t be fixed by helping banks with their mortgage related credit problems.

Where’s the Money Going

Monday was a very interesting day, trading wise. While the total point losses were huge, some sectors did very well. Biotech and alternative energy rallied strongly. Both sectors are about as far from mortgages as you can get. But they do depend on investment, which is a little incongruent.

In any event, Pacific Ethanol (Nasdaq:PEIX) shares shot up from $1.30 to $2.08 in the final 30 minutes of trading. Of course, it gave most of it back on Tuesday.

Beacon Power (Nasdaq:BCON) and Quantum Fuel Systems (Nasdaq:QTWW) made a similar late day jumps only to fall back. Only Ocean Power Technologies (Nasdaq:OPTT) managed to hold its gains.

In the biotechs, Altus Pharmaceutical (Nasdaq:ALTU) and Helicos Biosciences (Nasdaq:HLCS) gave back their Monday afternoon gains.

Gold prices have been extremely volatile. But not much has changed with the miners, which means they aren’t doing well. Oil prices seem to be highly correlated to the bailout plan. Traders appear to believe the bailout will mean stronger economic activity and hence more demand for oil.

Now I hate to keep saying the same thing over and over, but I’m still a big fan of the MLPs. I first mentioned these stocks in my column on September 17. One of the stocks in the free report I offered, Eagle Rock Energy (Nasdaq:EROC) opened at $10.41 that day. 2 days later it closed at $13.75.

Today, Eagle Rock closed at $10.53. Now, I’m not going to predict another 32% run in two days. But I won’t be surprised to see it move higher when the bailout bill passes.

Also, my special report is still available here.

Best regards,

Ian Wyatt

Chief Investment Strategist

Growth Report

Big Oil and Big Brother Google

Ian Wyatt — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:44:00 GMT

Big Oil and Big Brother Google

I hope everyone enjoyed their long weekend. I know I did. But I’ll also freely admit – I always look forward to getting back in to the office after a holiday.

The financial markets are the most dynamic of beasts. They give you something new and different to chew on every day. It’s a constantly shifting landscape. On a daily basis, you have to be ready to shift gears quick in response to trader’s fickle sentiment.

For instance, on August 19^th we noticed a pronounced shift in sentiment toward one solar stock, Canadian Solar (Nasdaq:CSIQ). That stock was up 17% in the days following. And you’d think the entire solar sector had received an upgrade.

By August 22^nd, a handful of double-digit gains could have been made, based off that one event with Canadian Solar. Canadian Solar is still holding 10% or so of its gains, while other solar stocks have given all their recent gains back.

Think Long-term, Act Short-Term

Of course, over weeks and months, the recent rally for solar stocks will be just a bump on the charts as longer term business and economic trends play out. I’ve been bearish on traditional “Big Oil” stocks for months. I just can’t see how – with virtually no new discoveries and rising costs – a company like Exxon-Mobil (NYSE:XOM) can see its stock price rise. Record-setting profits or no.

And Exxon recently broke below $80 a share for the first time in nearly 2 years. That was well before Hurricane Gustav was even a blip in the radar.

We’ve been having good results with small, dynamic exploration and services companies all year.

Today, oil prices may be responding to Gustav-relief. But there are much bigger issues for oil prices. Commodities are dropping across the board as the OECD has slashed growth estimates for Japan and Europe to 1.2% and 1.3% respectively. England’s 1.2% estimates appears to be a best-case number, as the OECD acknowledges that the UK economy is looking recessionary.

Surprisingly, the US is doing better than expected. Growth estimates here rose to 1.8% from 1.2%. With a strengthening dollar and rising exports, perhaps the rally that began on July 16 hasn’t been complete folly.

This Time, I’m Cheering for Microsoft

One particularly important-sounding headline that greeted me this morning was the latest in the Google vs. Microsoft heavyweight battle. In case you missed it, Google is launching an Internet browser, called Chrome, to compete Microsoft’s 8^th version of Internet Explorer.

Internet Explorer is the dominant browser with 75% market share. With no vested interest, I’ll usually pull for the underdog. It’s always nice to see the little guy win. Of course you can’t really call Google “little” anymore. This is a battle of titans with Google weighing in with a $146 billion market cap to Microsoft’s $248 billion cap.

We all saw Microsoft crush Netscape. And WordPerfect. And any other company it could. But I’m pulling for Microsoft and Explorer 8 to thoroughly pound Google’s Chrome into the cyber-canvas. And I’ll tell you why.

Google is a remarkable company. It pretty much created the paid search industry. And it’s now a major determinant for all Internet traffic. In other words, if you’re not picked up by Google’s search functions, you ain’t sellin’ squat.

Trust me, I’m in the publishing business and we do much of our work on the Internet. And I consider my relationship with Google downright Faustian. On the one hand, with its paid search results, Google has made Internet advertising simple and effective, albeit a little expensive.

But on the other hand, Google is very specific about the free results that it will display when you search for specific information. In fact, if you don’t construct your website with a Google-approved design, you’ll never show up in their search results, no matter how relevant your solution to a query might be.

Free the Internet!

Google’s strict and mysterious search criteria has spawned legions of companies that do nothing other than try to figure out what Google’s search algorithms are looking for. And of course, those algorithms change every few months.

In a nutshell, Google is attempting to take way to much control over Internet commerce. And it seems to me, if it gets a massive share of the Internet browser market, Internet commerce will become Google commerce.

So how’s Microsoft going to help? Mainly, by keeping what websites we visit at least semi-private. Here are a couple quotes I’ve come across today…

“[the new Explorer’s functions include]…privacy changes that could prevent it [Google] from collecting information related to the effectiveness of its ads, quick-linking to Microsoft mapping and other offerings and a more robust search bar that is also more Microsoft-centric.” -- D: All Things Digital

“Microsoft…released a new version of Internet Explorer last week for testing. The software lets users control whether it saves the sites they've visited.” Bloomberg

We all know that many company websites put “cookies” on your computer when you visit. The cookie can then track your steps and report its findings back to the company for marketing purposes.

Maybe I’m being too Orwellian here, but the thought of Google taking sole control of Internet advertising scares me a bit. If I have to align myself with evil Microsoft to maintain Internet commerce freedom, then so be it. I won’t be using Google’s Chrome browser any time soon.

Friday’s Investors Insight Discussion

As you know if you read last week’s entry, the moderators at the fine website Investor’s Insight (www.investorsinsight.com) asked if I’d be willing to host a live forum discussion event on their website. I agreed and it’s happening this Friday, September 5, from 11:30 am to 12:30 pm, ET.

It’s totally free. All you have to do is sign up with a valid email address at the website. Then you can listen in to the discussion and ask questions if you like. I expect we’ll be talking mostly about my stock-picking machine TRIGR and what investment opportunities it’s been turning up lately. But this is an open forum discussion so you’ll be free to bring up any topics for discussion.

Again, I’ll be hosting a live Internet discussion at www.investorsinsight.com on Friday, September 5 between 11:30 am and 12:30 pm, ET. I hope you can make it, it should be fun, informative and profitable!

Best regards,

Ian Wyatt

Publisher

Growth Report

The Hero's Dilemma: Kill the Dragon or Rescue the Princess?

Ian Wyatt — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:47:00 GMT

The Hero's Dilemma: Kill the Dragon or Rescue the Princess?

Our previous experiences with "stagflation," as the double economic whammy of slowing growth and rising inflation is known, occurred in the '70s and early '80s.

Market veterans still recount the Legend of Former Fed Chief Paul Volcker as if it were a cautionary tale for children -

"...and then, Volcker held interest rates aloft (to a now unthinkable 20%) and vanquished the foul worm (inflation rates of 13%)."

Volcker made his heroic choice. He fought the dragon first. Once that threat is no more, living happily ever after with the princess is no problem.

But if we understand the true nature of this Hero's Dilemma, we see that stagflation isn't really a double whammy. In the modern era (the only era that matters), stagflation is caused by one thing: high oil prices.

Sure, one could argue that the condition of stagflation is exacerbated by several factors, like a bombed out housing market, a weak U.S. dollar or a financial crisis. But ultimately, it's rising oil prices that both slows economic growth and causes prices to rise.

Volcker really had no choice at all.

Any attempt to invigorate the economy with lower interest rates would only push oil prices higher. In other words, if you rescue the princess first, then the dragon eats you both.

Memo to Bernanke: The Dragon's Breathing Down Your Neck

So another FOMC meeting has come and gone. And as expected, the Fed did nothing to surprise the financial markets. Most of the time, it's good monetary policy to give the market what it wants.

But we're quickly getting to the point where Fed Chief Ben Bernanke has to make a heroic choice. At least, that's how it seemed a week ago, before oil prices dropped 20%.

It would appear that Bernanke is keeping his sword in its sheath, hoping that falling oil prices will render the necessity of choosing between the princess and the dragon moot.

Stocks rallied strongly today in reaction to Bernanke's non-decision. The average investor can usually be counted on for hope. But ultimately, I don't think many investors are comfortable with a Fed relying on luck to take care of the problem.

The meteoric rise of oil prices could have been a bubble. And we could be seeing that bubble deflating right now. But there's one way Bernanke can be sure: raise interest rates, strengthen the dollar and actively force oil prices lower.

That might put the princess through the ringer for another few quarters, but princesses have a way of coming out of tough situations looking pretty good.

For my money, I'd rather see Bernanke deal the dragon a mortal blow.

Time to Live Happily Ever After?

I'd like to think that the oil "bubble" is popping. I'd like to think that the effects from that main driver of inflation will soon be reversed. But I just don't see the current economic problems having a fairy tale ending without a fight.

That's probably why interest rates rose on T-bills after the Fed's statement. Investors might like the news. But the bond market seems to think that higher rates are coming. And that's probably not good news for stocks.

So what's an investor to do? Well, my stock picking machine (which, by the way, is called TRIGR) is still turning up some great stocks to short. In fact, on July 29, one of its Top Shorts was WCI Communities. Yes, that WCI Communities, the one that filed for bankruptcy on August 4.

Actually, TRIGR's been pulling up WCI Communities regularly since May 8. Of course, it also targeted IndyMac on May 12, 2008, and we all know how that turned out.

We also closed two other short positions yesterday - Western Refining (NYSE:WNR) for 17% since July 31 and Accuride (NYSE:ACW) for 16% since July 30.

Today, TRIGR turned up Hansen Medical (Nasdaq:HNSN) as a Top Short. In light of the decent gains TRIGRs pulled up with its Top Long Biotech stocks, the sight of a medical devices company on the Top Short was worth another look.

I'm not sure how Hansen Medical ever commanded a $1 billion market cap on $16 million in revenues. And I suspect it'll have difficulty holding on to its current $300 million market cap without a massive jump in revenue. Judging by the ever-widening loss estimates from the covering analysts, such a jump in revenue isn't forthcoming.

You might want to give this stock a look as a potential short opportunity while Bernanke tries to figure out what to do about that pesky dragon.

Ian Wyatt

Chief Investment Strategist

Growth Report

TRIGR is an electronic stock-picking machine that selects long and short opportunities for the TradeMaster Daily Stock Alerts service. For more information on how you can have your profits powered by TRIGR, click here.