Growth Report : MLP

After the Bailout

Ian Wyatt — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:15:00 GMT

After the Bailout

I can’t help but wonder if Monday’s bailout vote would have been different if the Dow Industrials were down 770+ points before they started the roll call.

Members of Congress that voted against the Paulson Asset Management plan seemed to be responding to political concerns. Apparently Capitol Hill phone lines were clogged with angry voters. And voting with President Bush isn’t the best career move these days.

Most in Congress agree that doing nothing will certainly lead to higher unemployment and foreclosure rates (and more angry voters). They wanted the bill to pass, but didn’t want to be on record as having voted for it.

I suppose that’s understandable. Whether you want to blame the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi for undermining the vote, the fact remains that the American public wasn’t sold on the bill. First of all, the word “bailout” is poor marketing. It gives the impression that Paulson and Bernanke simply want to help their banker buddies. And frankly, the terms of the bill didn’t do a lot to dispel that perception.

Bernanke argued against setting salary caps on CEOs who sold impaired mortgage-related assets to the government. And the plan to buy these impaired assets at above-market prices smells of cronyism.

Marking to Market: Fair Value Accounting

Over the last couple of days, the issue of “marking-to-market” is getting a lot of attention. Financial institutions are required to mark their assets to the market. They have to value their assets according to the price they’d fetch on the open market. Since nobody in their right mind would buy anything that even remotely looks like a mortgage backed security, those assets have to be carried on the books as a huge loss.

Makes sense. I can’t claim my house is still worth what it was 3 years ago. And I sure can’t adjust my brokerage statement to reflect what I think a stock should be worth. To let banks value their assets at anything other than what they can sell them for is utterly ridiculous.

Don’t get me wrong. I see the point. If banks can value their assets at a higher level, they suddenly have enough capitalization to raise their creditworthiness. Then they have the ability to sit on these mortgage-backed assets until the market (hopefully) improves.

The only problem with this is it’s not reality. It’s wishful thinking. And any move to suspend mark-to-market accounting is a sin of the exact nature that got us into this mess. Namely, that there’s no downside risk.

Nothing but Downside

So Congress goes back to vote on some new version of the bailout plan Thursday. And given Monday’s record-setting decline for the Dow, I suspect Congress and their constituents are a bit more amenable to passing the bailout bill. I just hope Congress avoids the real bailout issues, like suspending mark-to-market accounting, and instead focuses on truly helpful measures like increasing FDIC insurance limits and expanding unemployment benefits.

Traders certainly seemed to be hopeful. On Tuesday The Dow took back more than half of its Monday losses. But it’s still going to be interesting to see what happens in the wake of a passed bailout bill.

It seems a pretty good bet that stocks will rally further, at least in the short term. But it’s hard for me to get fundamentally bullish about massive government intervention. The dollar is enjoying a little return to faith rally. But ultimately, $700 billion coupled with the massive amounts of cash being made available by the Fed seem more than a little inflationary.

And while we might stave off disaster, there are still fundamental problems with the US economy that won’t be fixed by helping banks with their mortgage related credit problems.

Where’s the Money Going

Monday was a very interesting day, trading wise. While the total point losses were huge, some sectors did very well. Biotech and alternative energy rallied strongly. Both sectors are about as far from mortgages as you can get. But they do depend on investment, which is a little incongruent.

In any event, Pacific Ethanol (Nasdaq:PEIX) shares shot up from $1.30 to $2.08 in the final 30 minutes of trading. Of course, it gave most of it back on Tuesday.

Beacon Power (Nasdaq:BCON) and Quantum Fuel Systems (Nasdaq:QTWW) made a similar late day jumps only to fall back. Only Ocean Power Technologies (Nasdaq:OPTT) managed to hold its gains.

In the biotechs, Altus Pharmaceutical (Nasdaq:ALTU) and Helicos Biosciences (Nasdaq:HLCS) gave back their Monday afternoon gains.

Gold prices have been extremely volatile. But not much has changed with the miners, which means they aren’t doing well. Oil prices seem to be highly correlated to the bailout plan. Traders appear to believe the bailout will mean stronger economic activity and hence more demand for oil.

Now I hate to keep saying the same thing over and over, but I’m still a big fan of the MLPs. I first mentioned these stocks in my column on September 17. One of the stocks in the free report I offered, Eagle Rock Energy (Nasdaq:EROC) opened at $10.41 that day. 2 days later it closed at $13.75.

Today, Eagle Rock closed at $10.53. Now, I’m not going to predict another 32% run in two days. But I won’t be surprised to see it move higher when the bailout bill passes.

Also, my special report is still available here.

Best regards,

Ian Wyatt

Chief Investment Strategist

Growth Report

Paulson Asset Management, LLC

Ian Wyatt — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:43:00 GMT

Paulson Asset Management, LLC

So now the Treasury has a massive $700 billion bailout plan on the table. The idea is to create a government agency to deal with bad mortgage related debt, sort of like how the Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC) dealt with $394 billion in assets of failed banks during the S&L Crisis in the 80s.

You probably recall how regulators would swoop in on troubled banks, close them down and turn their assets over to the RTC, who would then dispose of them, sometimes for pennies on the dollar.

It was like free money for some savvy investors as they were able to buy assets on the cheap from the RTC. Still, many shareholders in failed banks like Silverado and Lincoln never recovered their money.

That’s got me curious as to how Paulson Asset Management, LLC (PAM) will deal with the mortgage-related assets it takes on. Clearly, some of those assets, like the credit default swap derivatives, are essentially worthless and will remain so.

However, there’s certainly a fair amount of mortgage-backed securities that have been written down to near-zero out of necessity, because no one will buy them now, but will probably regain some value in the future.

After all, why else would PIMCO’s Bill Gross say that he’s expecting to be called by PAM (Paulson Asset Management), to help manage the mortgage-backed assets it buys?

Economic Socialism: Puttin It Mildly

My point here is that we’re seeing much more than economic socialism, or the economic communism that Jim Rogers alluded to recently. This is more akin to Valdimir Putin’s hostile takeover of Yukos Oil.

Politics aside, there’s a profit-motive here. Think about it. The Fed and Treasury lent AIG $85 billion. AIG can either pay up (with 11% interest) or the Fed and Treasury get an 80% stake in the company. And from what I understand, AIG has a matter of days to come up with the loot.

At $5 a share, AIG is worth around $13 billion right now. At the start of the year, it was worth around $130 billion. As of June 30, 2008, AIG had $67 billion in tangible assets, down from $95 billion a year earlier.

Obviously, those tangible assets are worth less than $67 billion now. Nobody will buy them.

But what will they be worth a year from now, after most of the bad debt out there has been exposed and investors can make informed decisions about what’s got value and what doesn’t?

That’s OUR $85 Billion

I suspect that PAM’s stake in AIG could be worth a decent sum in a few years. Same goes with whatever assets PAM’s $700 billion buyout fund targets.

It seems to me, since PAM is using taxpayer money to fund its investments, the American people should be considered shareholders. We should share in the spoils.

Now before you think this suggestion is like investing social security in the stock market, there’s a very important distinction here. For instance, PAM can change the rules anytime it wants to. Stock price going down? No problem. Just make it illegal to short.

The more I think about it this idea, the more I like it. And for the record, I have no problem with Bill Gross as the Chief Investment Officer.

What Will Congress Do?

Now I want to be clear about something. I might sound a little flippant with my suggestions here. But this financial mess is very serious. It’s a massive fraud, and the government’s bailout plan doesn’t mention even the slightest slap on the wrist for the offenders or deal with homeowners problems.

Of course, there will be new regulations. There always are. But they never seem to do what they’re intended to do.

As the panic from last week’s market rout eases a little, and Bernanke and Paulson testify before Congress, Congress seems to be taking a harder line on the bailout plan, which is good.

Because, again, I want to know how PAM intends to dispose of billions in impaired assets.

And what’s more, Bernanke apparently wants to buy impaired assets from banks at a premium to current value, and hasn’t really talked about what he’ll do with them. That’s a problem.

If you remember the S&L Crisis, you’ll recall that there was a lot of criticism as to how the RTC disposed of its assets. Much of it was real estate, and in less than desirable markets, as well. Still, many felt that the RTC sold at prices that were way too low to compensate investors for their risk. (The New York Times reported about a resort with an $8 million book value selling for 695K.)

If Bernanke and PAM buy impaired assets at a premium with no realistic plan of how to monetize them, then they’re simply seeking to recapitalize failing banks at taxpayers expense. If so, this PAM shareholder has to vote no.

So what Should We Do?

I’d tell you to call your Congressmen, but they’re busy. Plus, judging by the tone of yesterday’s Q&A following Bernanke and Paulson’s testimony, I’d say they’ve got the message. Taxpayers are not wild about bailing out banks.

Why not expand the powers of the FHA and let Americans with mortgage problems refinance to a lower rate? At least that would address the “real” problem, which is default and foreclosure.

As far as investing goes, my advice hasn’t changed from last week:

“There’s one asset class I like a lot right now. It’s something of a defensive play, mainly due to the high dividend yield. But there’s also a case to be made for some capital appreciation.

It’s MLPs. Master Limited Partnerships. These companies own and operate pipelines for oil and natural gas, mostly in the Southwestern U.S. These companies have pretty stable revenue streams because they sell capacity in advance. MLPs are required to pay 95%+ of their income in dividends to maintain their tax exempt status. And they rely on credit to expand their operations, and hence, revenue.

Many MLPs are currently trading at 52-week lows. I believe this is because their ability to expand has been impaired by the banking liquidity problems. But these companies have stable revenue and they pay dividends of 6-11%. That alone makes them a good place to park your cash until the markets get better.

Plus, as the lending situation improves over the next few months, you could see as much as 30% gains for the stocks as investors anticipate revenue expansion.”

Here’s the link I posted last week to get my favorite MLPs. Most of these stocks have jumped 10+% since lows last Thursday.

Best Regards

Ian Wyatt

Editor

Big Idea Investor

Panic in the Air

Ian Wyatt — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:43:00 GMT

Dear Investor,

Monday’s 500 point drop on the Dow was the closest thing we’ve seen to an outright panic in years. Stock prices have been extremely volatile, and that’s probably going to continue.

Now, before I go on, I’d like to take a quick minute to thank my loyal readers for sticking with me. In times like these, when so many of Wall Street’s leaders have proved to be so reckless, it’s not easy to trust anyone when it comes to your money and investments. I’m flattered by your support.

And I’ll be straight with you – I can’t tell you how much farther the markets will fall (though I have some ideas I’ll share in a moment). I can, however, continue to do the same type of analysis that’s lead to 12 out of 16 winners for my Growth Report newsletter this year.

I can also tell you that the problems we’re facing now will be resolved. We may get a stronger SEC, or more laws to protect investors. But we won’t learn our lesson. We’re dealing with the human element here. We’re only 10 years removed from the Internet bubble and Henry Blodgett’s $400 Amazon target…

Back in the day, investment banks put out analyst reports with pie in the sky stock price targets to lure investment banking clients. In the aftermath of the bubble, a few political bulldogs made quantum-leap career moves by pushing regulatory reform.

Investment banks were forced to separate their research divisions from their investment divisions. And in some cases, that meant separating research from any real income, too.

So now, good research on small cap companies is hard to come by. And Elliott Spitzer’s naked ambition got the best of him just up the street from my D.C. offices.

Same Old, Same Old

It’s almost a perfect replay. Just insert “condo” for “Amazon” and you can pretty much leave everything else in place. Except the stakes are far higher this time around.

Because, this time, it’s mortgages and not just stock.

It’s hard to blame investors for being worried – bad bets on mortgages have put our entire financial system on thin ice.

Well, I don’t mind saying I’m worried, too.

And I’m also mad as hell about it. As far as I’m concerned, Wall Street’s committed every one of the Seven Deadly Sins. And it’s you and I that will pay the price as the government bails them out.

However, fear and anger won’t help any of us be better investors. In fact, if you let fear or anger inform your investment decisions, you’re all but guaranteed to wind up poorer.

Let the Times Make the Man (or Woman)

I never recommend taunting the gods with questions like “How can it get any worse?” I did that once. It didn’t turn out well. Still, with Bear Stearns, Lehman, Countrywide, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and IndyMac gone, Washington Mutual and Wachovia soon to follow, and AIG not looking good either, it’s hard not to wonder how it can get worse.

It’s fine to wonder. Just don’t say it out loud. That’s what really gets the gods peeved.

After Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae got nationalized, a lot of stock gurus heard the proverbial “bell at the bottom” and stated it was time to buy financials.

Not me. And not because I know anything more about the situation than they do. Only because I’ve learned that it can always get worse. (And by the way, I think the gods like that kind of talk.)

I’ve repeatedly stated that unemployment is now the key to finding a market bottom. Financial companies may be done writing off bad debt (though I doubt it). But we’re not getting a sustainable rally until the employment situation reverses. Or at least stabilizes.

Times like these don’t call for desperate measures. They call for rational actions. And I’ve got a pretty rational investment for you, which I’ll share in a minute. But first, I need to make a brief comment on the Fed’s decision to hold interest rates steady.

The Right and Wrong Answer

The FOMC responded to the Bear Stearns crash with a rate cut. That was the wrong answer. Cheaper money didn’t really help the banks. They just ramped oil prices higher and the dollar lower.

This time, the Fed got it right, but apparently for the wrong reasons. The FOMC voted to hold rates where they are, with the understanding that the Fed and Treasury will make special liquidity provisions where necessary.

Just when you think the Fed is getting a handle on things, it comes out and says it’s concerned about inflation. That statement got big “huh?” from PIMCO’s Bill Gross. Gross says we’re clearly in a deflationary environment. And it’s hard to argue.

If banks won’t or can’t lend, then there’s less money in circulation. That’s deflation.

Now, the investment angle I wanted to discuss plays directly on this situation…

Low Price, High Yield

There’s one asset class I like a lot right now. It’s something of a defensive play, mainly due to the high dividend yield. But there’s also a case to be made for some capital appreciation.

It’s MLPs. Master Limited Partnerships. These companies own and operate pipelines for oil and natural gas, mostly in the Southwestern U.S. These companies have pretty stable revenue streams because they sell capacity in advance. MLPs are required to pay 95%+ of their income in dividends to maintain their tax exempt status. And they rely on credit to expand their operations, and hence, revenue.

Plus, as the lending situation improves over the next few months, you could see as much as 30% gains for the stocks as investors anticipate revenue expansion.

If you’d like to get my Top 5 MLPs, just click here. They’re free, you just need a valid email to access the report.

Best Regards

Ian Wyatt

Chief Investment Strategist

Growth Report